Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
This article is based on a Foucaultian genealogical approach to a problem of the present. In this case the “problem” is that current official aims for education are inadequate to the needs of students in a rapidly changing world. I discuss briefly the location of educational aims in their historical contexts (to establish that the historical context affects the aims of education), and then focus particularly on the two major theoretical streams of neo-liberalism: “Public Choice Theory” and “Human Capital Theory” and the ways in which they influence contemporary educational aims, in New Zealand as elsewhere in the “Western” world. As recent political developments suggest that neo-liberalism, as a political program, may be losing its popular appeal, I ask what the aims of education might be when both forms of neo-liberal thought have been discredited, and new forms of thought appropriate to a post-neo-liberal world might be developed. Keywords: educational aims; post-neoliberal; public choice theory; human capital theory; New Zealand context
Knowledge Cultures – Addleton Academic Publishers
Published: Jan 1, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.