Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
This article examines Frida Kahlo’s career in an attempt to offer a refinement to Oana Baddeley’s suggestion that the reception of female artists, more often male artists, tends to be overshadowed by their personal style and life. While this argument appears to be supported by Kahlo’s reception, especially during her resurgence of popularity in the 1980s and 1990s, Kahlo is somewhat unique in that her personal style was so much an extension of her body of art. In addition, the personal style that attracts so many may be considered additive value leading to a greater appreciation of Kahlo’s art but it should also be valued as an art in itself. While Baddeley’s argument admirably attempts to safeguard female creativity in the realm of high art, it minimizes popular art. In so doing, it falls prey to the “ironies” which seem to arise frequently from the “fault-lines within the post-modernist and/ or feminist projects” as discussed by Anne Beer in “Johnny and Bess: Life Writing and Gender.” Keywords: Frida Kahlo, gender issues, popular culture, life writing, fashion
The Journal of Research in Gender Studies – Addleton Academic Publishers
Published: Jan 1, 2013
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.