Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
I draw on a substantial body of theoretical and empirical research on the inherent regulatory capacity of data-driven automated decision-making, and to explore this, I inspected, used, and replicated survey data from Pew Research Center, performing analyses and making estimates regarding % of Facebook users who say they understand not at all/not very/somewhat/very well why certain posts are included in their news feed and others are not, % of U.S. adults who say that it is possible for computer programs to make decisions without human bias/computer programs will always reflect bias of designers (by age group), and % of Facebook users with no assigned category/fewer than 10 categories/10–20 categories/21+ categories listed on their “ad preferences” page. Structural equation modeling was used to analyze the data and test the proposed conceptual model. Keywords: governance; analytical algorithm; data-driven automated decision-making
Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice – Addleton Academic Publishers
Published: Jan 1, 2019
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.