Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
Are John Stuart Mill’s feminist ideas espoused in The Subjection of Women very liberal, or very radical? This question has been debated among contemporary scholars. The purpose of this paper is two fold. The first goal is to propose that Mill’s feminist work reveals a conception of power that is analogous to Steven Lukes’s (2005) radical theory of power. This is demonstrated by using Lukes’s theory as a lens through which to systematically analyze Mill’s conception of power as seen in The Subjection of Women. Second, I suggest that from an understanding of Mill’s conception of power as radical in the way that Lukes defines it, four central feminist critiques of Mill’s Subjection of Women are mitigated. Understanding Mill’s feminism in light of a radical view of power reveals that some feminist critiques have overlooked important aspects of Mill’s feminism that show his continued relevancy to the contemporary feminist movement and feminist thought. Keywords: Mill, Lukes, power, feminism, subjection, liberalism, radical
The Journal of Research in Gender Studies – Addleton Academic Publishers
Published: Jan 1, 2013
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.