Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

REFUSING TO SERVE LGBT PEOPLE: AN EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENT OF COMPLAINTS FILED UNDER STATE PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS NON-DISCRIMINATION LAWS

REFUSING TO SERVE LGBT PEOPLE: AN EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENT OF COMPLAINTS FILED UNDER STATE PUBLIC... While there is increasing acceptance of a norm of non-discrimination against LGBT employees, opponents of LGBT rights are asserting a right to refuse services, particularly those related to wedding celebrations and health care, to LGBT people. While the media and court cases have focused on a limited set of known examples, to date, little is known about the overall incidence of public accommodations discrimination against LGBT people. This study is the first to measure how frequently existing state public accommodations non-discrimination laws are used by LGBT people. Analysis of available data from 16 states that prohibit sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination in public accommodations shows that these laws are used by LGBT people at rates similar to the use of race non-discrimination laws by people of color and the use of sex non-discrimination laws by women. Nationally, on average, approximately 4 complaints of sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination in public accommodations are filed for every 100,000 LGBT adults each year, compared to approximately 3 complaints of race discrimination filed for every 100,000 adults of color, and 1 complaint of sex discrimination filed for every 100,000 women. This study shows that public accommodations discrimination is reported far less frequently than employment discrimination by all protected groups – by a factor of ten. Second, while further research is needed to determine how frequently religious grounds are the basis for the discrimination against LGBT people alleged in these complaints, such motivations are not increasing the rates of discrimination to levels significantly higher than public accommodations discrimination against people of color and women. Notably, data analyzed in this study reflect current legal interpretations by courts that have upheld the historic limited religious exemptions to state non-discrimination laws. 11 0 Keywords: public accommodations discrimination; sexual orientation; gender identity http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The Journal of Research in Gender Studies Addleton Academic Publishers

REFUSING TO SERVE LGBT PEOPLE: AN EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENT OF COMPLAINTS FILED UNDER STATE PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS NON-DISCRIMINATION LAWS

The Journal of Research in Gender Studies , Volume 8 (2): 18 – Jan 1, 2018

Loading next page...
 
/lp/addleton-academic-publishers/refusing-to-serve-lgbt-people-an-empirical-assessment-of-complaints-IbH2L6BhhU

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Addleton Academic Publishers
Copyright
© 2009 Addleton Academic Publishers
ISSN
2164-0262
eISSN
2378-3524
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

While there is increasing acceptance of a norm of non-discrimination against LGBT employees, opponents of LGBT rights are asserting a right to refuse services, particularly those related to wedding celebrations and health care, to LGBT people. While the media and court cases have focused on a limited set of known examples, to date, little is known about the overall incidence of public accommodations discrimination against LGBT people. This study is the first to measure how frequently existing state public accommodations non-discrimination laws are used by LGBT people. Analysis of available data from 16 states that prohibit sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination in public accommodations shows that these laws are used by LGBT people at rates similar to the use of race non-discrimination laws by people of color and the use of sex non-discrimination laws by women. Nationally, on average, approximately 4 complaints of sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination in public accommodations are filed for every 100,000 LGBT adults each year, compared to approximately 3 complaints of race discrimination filed for every 100,000 adults of color, and 1 complaint of sex discrimination filed for every 100,000 women. This study shows that public accommodations discrimination is reported far less frequently than employment discrimination by all protected groups – by a factor of ten. Second, while further research is needed to determine how frequently religious grounds are the basis for the discrimination against LGBT people alleged in these complaints, such motivations are not increasing the rates of discrimination to levels significantly higher than public accommodations discrimination against people of color and women. Notably, data analyzed in this study reflect current legal interpretations by courts that have upheld the historic limited religious exemptions to state non-discrimination laws. 11 0 Keywords: public accommodations discrimination; sexual orientation; gender identity

Journal

The Journal of Research in Gender StudiesAddleton Academic Publishers

Published: Jan 1, 2018

There are no references for this article.