Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
Research evidence (e.g. Cassetta et al., 2017; Ma et al., 2018a,b; Vazifeh et al., 2018) suggests that nearly all sharing mobility business patterns give hope of green and affordable urban transport. Using data from APTA, Dalia Research, McKinsey and Company, The National League of Cities, The Shared-Use Mobility Center, Statista, I performed analyses and made estimates regarding continued growth potential for shared mobility, cities’ regulatory response to the sharing economy, and shared mobility services booked online. Empirical and secondary data are used to support the claim that the swiftly expanded processes of sharing mobility business patterns have frequently brought about considerable disorder and tensions to city governance. Keywords: sustainable urban mobility; sharing economy; innovative transportation
Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice – Addleton Academic Publishers
Published: Jan 1, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.