Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Decision-Making Logic of Big Data Algorithmic Analytics

The Decision-Making Logic of Big Data Algorithmic Analytics We inspect the relevant literature on the decision-making logic of big data algorithmic analytics, providing both quantitative evidence on trends and numerous indepth empirical examples. Building our argument by drawing on data collected from Pew Research Center, we performed analyses and made estimates regarding % of users who say they frequently/sometimes see on social media posts that are overly dramatic or exaggerated/ people making accusations or starting arguments without having all the facts/posts that teach you something useful you had not known before/posts that appear to be about one thing but turn out to be about something else and % of users who say, after being directed to view their Facebook “ad preferences” page, that they did not know Facebook maintained this list of their interests and traits/they are not comfortable with Facebook compiling this information/the listings do not very or at all accurately represent them. Data collected from 4,200 respondents are tested against the research model by using structural equation modeling. Keywords: decision-making logic; big data algorithmic analytics; machine learning http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice Addleton Academic Publishers

The Decision-Making Logic of Big Data Algorithmic Analytics

Loading next page...
 
/lp/addleton-academic-publishers/the-decision-making-logic-of-big-data-algorithmic-analytics-WaW4McI1wK

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Addleton Academic Publishers
Copyright
© 2009 Addleton Academic Publishers
ISSN
1948-9137
eISSN
2162-2752
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

We inspect the relevant literature on the decision-making logic of big data algorithmic analytics, providing both quantitative evidence on trends and numerous indepth empirical examples. Building our argument by drawing on data collected from Pew Research Center, we performed analyses and made estimates regarding % of users who say they frequently/sometimes see on social media posts that are overly dramatic or exaggerated/ people making accusations or starting arguments without having all the facts/posts that teach you something useful you had not known before/posts that appear to be about one thing but turn out to be about something else and % of users who say, after being directed to view their Facebook “ad preferences” page, that they did not know Facebook maintained this list of their interests and traits/they are not comfortable with Facebook compiling this information/the listings do not very or at all accurately represent them. Data collected from 4,200 respondents are tested against the research model by using structural equation modeling. Keywords: decision-making logic; big data algorithmic analytics; machine learning

Journal

Contemporary Readings in Law and Social JusticeAddleton Academic Publishers

Published: Jan 1, 2019

There are no references for this article.