Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
I inspect the relevant literature on data-driven algorithmic decision-making, providing both quantitative evidence on trends and numerous in-depth empirical examples. Building my argument by drawing on data collected from HubSpot, Pew Research Center, and Statista, I performed analyses and made estimates regarding % of users who say they frequently/sometimes see content on social media that makes them feel amused/angry/ connected/inspired/depressed/lonely, % of users who say they more often see people being mean or bullying/kind or supportive/trying to be deceptive/trying to point out inaccurate info when using social media sites, and % of users who say it would be very/somewhat difficult/easy for social media sites to figure out their race or ethnicity/hobbies and interests/political affiliation/religious beliefs. Data collected from 4,800 respondents are tested against the research model by using structural equation modeling. Keywords: automated digital system; data-driven algorithmic decision-making; society
Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice – Addleton Academic Publishers
Published: Jan 1, 2019
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.