Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
In this chapter, the authors present three case studies that highlight the complexities of telepsychology practice when practicing across state lines within the regulatory environment at the time this was written. The risk management and regulatory perspectives for each case study are described and contrasted. Readers can evaluate their own situations and gauge the potential risks and benefits. Not surprisingly, all sides will not necessarily agree on an approach, underscoring why practitioners should give careful consideration to how to proceed if they are thinking about engaging in telepsychology across state lines. It should be noted that specific states identified in any of the case examples are used strictly for illustrative purposes, demonstrating the thought process for considering whether to engage in telepsychology across jurisdictional lines. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)
Published: Aug 28, 2017
Keywords: telepsychology; interjurisdictional practice; regulatory environment; state lines; practitioners
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.