Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
AND SUMMARY A by-product of the energy crisis has been a strong interest in modeling energy demand. Although the crisis has subsided in the last few years, the number of new demand studies has not. At least forty new econometric studies of energy demand have been published since the appearance of three recent and comprehensive surveys of the literature (1-3). It is useful to keep abreast of developments in the literature, as noted by Hartman (2), because the stock of information about demand continues to develop much like any other capital stock, with existing information in varying stages of obsol escence as new techniques and data bases are developed and exploited. Two kinds of information are conveyed in this body of literature: (a) esti mates of how demand behaves, and (b) alternative ways of making the esti mates. The information is sometimes bewildering, however, because of the variety of techniques employed and the disparities among the results. Our primary interest in this survey, like that in Bohi (3), is the sensitivity of statistical results to differences in modeling techniques and sample data. This exercise can serve as a basis for evaluating and choosing among alternative procedures and alternative
Annual Review of Environment and Resources – Annual Reviews
Published: Nov 1, 1984
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.