Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/annual-reviews/evidence-based-management-foundations-development-controversies-and-BsKV9Jn0Jh
References
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2017 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved
- ISSN
- 2327-0608
- eISSN
- 2327-0608
- DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113306
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
We review the recent development of evidence-based management (EBMgt), tracing its origins to longstanding gaps between research and practice, discrepant findings across studies, and the emergence of evidence-based medicine (EBMed). We provide a definition of EBMgt and review four foundational articles advocating its use. We then review categories of articles that comprise the EBMgt canon: advocacy articles, essays or perspectives, teaching-related, empirical, reviews, and critiques and responses. Critiques include political, epistemological, and methodological issues directly pertinent to EBMgt as well as broader concerns about the scholarly research base on which EBMgt depends. Our suggestions for future research emphasize, first and foremost, increasing the production of high-quality empirical studies in EBMgt. Topics of particular interest include research co-creation by academics and practitioners, process and outcome studies of EBMgt implementations, and practitioners’ use of evidence in their working environments. We also call for broader types of systematic reviews (SRs) than have generally been conducted in the organization sciences.
Journal
Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior – Annual Reviews
Published: Mar 21, 2017