Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
AND OVERVIEW In the aftermath of the 1973 "energy crisis" and the ensuing oil price shocks of 1 979-1 980, there was considerable interest in developing and promoting renewable and alternative power generation technologies (RJAs). This burst of enthusiasm-fueled by concerns about drastically rising foreign oil prices and generously backed by the federal government in the form of R&D funding and tax incentives-resulted in an optimistic euphoria that a wide range of RJAs would be commercially viable by the late 1980s or early 1990s. A key element in the federal government's plan to commercialize RJAs was to guarantee a market for the generated electric power at an attractive price. This was provided by the passage of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978, better known as PURPA. Under PURPA, utilities were required to 1 Disclaimer: The views expressed and the conclusions reached are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Southern California Edison Company. 0362-1626/90/1022-0099$0.200 NOLA & SIOSHANSI buy all that was produced by Qualifying Facilities or QFS2 and were required to pay for QF power based on the utilities' "avoided costS. " 3 Utilities were also required to interconnect with
Annual Review of Environment and Resources – Annual Reviews
Published: Nov 1, 1990
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.