Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/arxiv-cornell-university/tree-species-effects-on-topsoil-carbon-stock-and-concentration-are-1GJOPH2pZB
- ISSN
- 0378-1127
- eISSN
- ARCH-3345
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118510
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
This paper is a postscript-version (Authors Accepted Manuscript) of the paper accepted in Forest Ecology and Management Tree species effects on topsoil carbon stock and concentration are mediated by tree species type, mycorrhizal association, and N-fixing ability at the global scale 1* 1 1 1 2 Yan Peng , Inger Kappel Schmidt , Haifeng Zheng , Petr Heděnec , Luciana Ruggiero Bachega , 3, 4 3 1 Kai Yue , Fuzhong Wu , and Lars Vesterdal 1. Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg 1958, Denmark 2. Department of Environmental Science, Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos, SP 13565- 905, Brazil 3. State Key Laboratory for Subtropical Mountain Ecology, School of Geographical Sciences, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China 4. Center for Biodiversity Dynamics in a Changing World (BIOCHANGE) and Section for Ecoinformatics and Biodiversity, Department of Biology, Aarhus University, NyMunkegade 114, DK-8000, Aarhus C, Denmark *Corresponding author: Yan Peng Email address: yape@ign.ku.dk Full address: Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 23, DK-1958, Frederiksberg C, Denmark Abstract Selection of appropriate tree species is an important forest management decision that may affect sequestration of carbon (C) in soil. However, information about tree species effects on soil C stocks at the global scale remains unclear. Here, we quantitatively synthesized 850 observations from field studies that were conducted in a common garden or monoculture plantations to assess how tree species type (broadleaf vs. conifer), mycorrhizal association (arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) vs. ectomycorrhizal (ECM)), and N-fixing ability (N-fixing vs. non-N-fixing), directly and indirectly, affect topsoil (with a median depth of 10 cm) C concentration and stock, and how such effects were influenced by environmental factors such as geographical location and climate. We found that (1) tree species type, mycorrhizal association, and N-fixing ability were all important factors affecting soil C, with lower forest floor C stocks under broadleaved (44%), AM (39%), or N-fixing (28%) trees respectively, but higher mineral soil C concentration (11%, 22%, and 156 %) and stock (9%, 10%, and 6%) under broadleaved, AM, and N-fixing trees respectively; (2) tree species type, mycorrhizal association, and N-fixing ability affected forest floor C stock and mineral soil C concentration and stock directly or indirectly through impacting soil properties such as microbial biomass C and nitrogen; (3) tree species effects on mineral soil C concentration and stock were mediated by latitude, MAT, MAP, and forest stand age. These results reveal how tree species and their specific traits influence forest floor C stock and mineral soil C concentration and stock at a global scale. Insights into the underlying mechanisms of tree species effects found in our study would be useful to inform tree species selection in forest management or afforestation aiming to sequester more atmospheric C in soil for mitigation of climate change. Keywords: forest floor, mineral soil, climate, soil property, meta-analysis, linear mixed model, global 1. Introduction In the face of global climate change and elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO ) concentrations, forest soils play an important role in global carbon (C) cycling and are potential terrestrial C sinks (Pan et al., 2011). However, the degree to which forest soils can sequester C may vary significantly with forest management, and there is a lack of scientific consensus regarding the feasibility of management strategies aimed at promoting forest soil C sequestration (Vesterdal et al., 2013; Jandl et al., 2014). One important element of forest management strategies is the selection of tree species most conducive to C sequestration in biomass and soil (Mayer et al., 2020). Several studies have assessed tree species effects on both forest floor and mineral soil C stocks (Vesterdal et al., 2008; Mueller et al., 2015; Cepáková et al., 2016), however, our understanding of the quantitative response to tree species change and the drivers and underlying mechanisms of such effects remains limited (Mayer et al., 2020). Therefore, more detailed and quantitative knowledge of tree species effects on soil C stocks is crucial for informing tree species selection strategies in the context of forest management or afforestation. Tree species are known to affect soil C stocks through a variety of traits that are closely correlated with C sequestration and flux processes, such as the input of above- and belowground plant litter and the output of C mainly via heterotrophic respiration fluxes (Prescott and Vesterdal, 2013; Vesterdal et al., 2013). Through differences in litter quality, tree species have the potential to impact the C concentrations, C stocks, and their distribution to forest floor and mineral soil (Wardle et al., 2004; Bardgett and van der Putten, 2014). It is traditionally acknowledged that tree species with leaf litter traits driving slow rates of decomposition have been associated with accumulation of higher C stocks compared with tree species with fast litter decomposition rates (Berg, 2014; Lehmann and Kleber, 2015). This hypothesis has mainly been based on the observation of thick C-rich forest floors under coniferous tree species associated with ectomycorrhizae (ECM) (Keller and Phillips, 2019). However, a more recent hypothesis has suggested that tree species with foliar litter traits conducive to fast decomposition will lead to more pronounced microbial stabilization and transformation of plant litter C through greater production of microbial residues (Cotrufo et al., 2013), ultimately supporting greater mineral soil C stocks. The latter tree species are mainly deciduous and in a temperate climate, some of these are associated with arbuscular mycorrhizae (AM). Deciduous AM tree species have also been suggested to enhance deeper incorporation of C by higher belowground rates of litter input, either via roots or bioturbation by soil fauna (Vesterdal et al., 2013; Lin et al., 2017; Craig et al., 2018). A previous study also suggested that accumulation of forest floor C in conifer stands is mainly attributed to the adverse environmental conditions that retard decomposition, indicating the importance of environmental factors in regulating tree species effects on soil C stocks (Berger and Berger, 2012). Evidence of different nutrient economies in AM and ECM tree species (Phillips et al., 2013) further suggests that soil C dynamics could differ in contrasting soil environments. Despite that these two hypotheses related to driving tree species traits seem rather contrasting because of their different mechanisms and opposite direction of effects, both suggest that tree species type (broadleaf vs. conifer) and their mycorrhizal association (AM vs. ECM) are important traits driving tree species effects on C stocks and their vertical distribution. It remains to be confirmed if one of these hypotheses has general validity or if they are valid within different contexts. Although mycorrhizal association of tree species mainly relates to their phylogeny (Koele et al., 2012), the dominant mycorrhizal association of a forest community can also be influenced by climate and soil conditions (Barceló et al., 2019). In general, AM trees increase in dominance in subtropical and lowland tropical forests where nutrient mineralization processes are fast, nevertheless ECM-associated tree species tend to dominate in cooler environments where the decomposition of organic matter occurs at a slower rate (Read and Perez-Moreno, 2003; Soudzilovskaia et al., 2015), indicating that climate and location may indirectly affect tree species effects on soil C stocks. Climate may control soil C stock through its effect on forests microclimate (Berger and Berger, 2012), such as the more dry and cooler conditions under conifers as a result of greater interception of rain and less sunlight throughout the year. Besides, because geographical location is closely correlated with climate, soil properties such as soil respiration (Chen et al., 2014), nutrient availability, and physicochemical characteristics vary remarkably at different locations and thus may control soil C stock (Yue et al., 2016). Therefore, climate, location, and soil property may also influence the effects of tree species on soil C stocks, directly and/or indirectly. In addition, many AM tree species are also N-fixing, and the suggested effects on soil C may be related to this trait rather than the mycorrhizal association as such (Lin et al., 2017). Soil C stocks in the mineral soil are generally higher under N-fixing trees (Nave et al., 2009; Mayer et al., 2020), but the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. Therefore, quantitative assessments of tree species effects and interactive drivers on soil C stocks are still scarce, especially at a global scale, which limits our understanding of targeted use of tree species to sequester soil C in existing forests and afforestation. To examine tree species effects on soil C stocks, we comprehensively reviewed previously published articles and conducted a quantitative synthesis. Because different tree species in natural forest ecosystems usually follow certain gradients in soil physicochemical characteristics, climate, and forest successional stage that can also influence C stocks, comparing C stocks of natural forests would be a doubtful source of information on the true “tree species effects” (Vesterdal et al., 2013). We thus compiled a database with 850 observations collected from 143 articles that reported forest floor C stock and mineral soil C concentration and stock in common garden and monoculture plantation studies. The objective of this study was to explore the quantitative influence of tree species on soil C concentrations, stocks, and the underlying drivers. We asked (1) whether and how biotic factors e.g. tree species type, mycorrhizal association, and N-fixing ability of different tree species influence soil C stocks; and (2) how abiotic factors such as climate, spatial location, and soil characteristics modulate tree species effects on soil C concentrations and stocks. 2. Materials and methods 2.1. Data collection and compiling Peer-reviewed journal articles published before 20 December 2018 were searched using the Web of Science, and Google Scholar with the search terms of “(tree species OR plant species) AND (soil carbon OR carbon cycling) AND (common garden OR plantation)” in English and Chinese. We extracted studies from our search that met the following criteria: (1) studies were carried out in forest ecosystems (i.e., laboratory mesocosm studies were excluded); (2) at least one response variable of C (i.e., forest floor C stock, mineral soil C stock, or mineral soil C concentration) or litter production was reported; (3) tree species were identified by the Latin name; (4) only common garden or monoculture plantations with replicated plots within the same site were included in our database (i.e., mixed plantations and natural forests were excluded); (5) the means and sample sizes of the selected response variables were available or could be calculated from the related publications. If results from the same study sites and the same sampling year were reported in different articles, only one article was included in our database. After extraction, a total of 143 articles covering 850 observations matched these selection criteria and were thus included in our study (Fig. 1, Table S1, Appendix 1). The number of tree species across tree species type, mycorrhizal association, and N-fixing ability are shown in Table 1. Table 1 The numbers of tree species within species groups included in analysis of forest floor C stock, mineral soil C concentration, and mineral soil C stock. Soil layer Tree species group Species type Mycorrhizal association N-fixing ability Broadleaf Conifer AM ECM N-fixing non-N-fixing Forest floor C stock Broadleaf 30 - 17 13 5 25 Conifer 15 0 15 0 15 AM 17 - 4 13 ECM 28 1 27 N-fixing 5 - non-N-fixing 40 Mineral soil C concentration Broadleaf 127 - 73 54 14 113 Conifer 70 17 53 0 70 AM 90 - 11 79 ECM 107 3 104 N-fixing 14 - non-N-fixing 183 Mineral soil C stock Broadleaf 102 - 57 45 16 86 Conifer 53 11 42 0 53 AM 68 - 12 56 ECM 87 4 83 N-fixing 16 - non-N-fixing 139 From each common garden or monoculture plantation at each study site, we extracted mean values of forest floor and mineral soil C stocks, mineral soil C concentration, and/or litter production for each tree species, if any of them was available. When only C concentrations were reported for mineral soil, we calculated C stocks according to Eqn 1: C = C × bulk density × soil depth (1) stock concentration if the information on soil bulk density and soil depth were available. For studies reporting several sampling depths, we only included the layer(s) from top of the mineral soil (i.e., 0 cm) to a certain depth (e.g., 0-5, 0-10, and 0-15cm, and maximum sampling depth), which was needed as a covariate in our analysis of tree species effects. Across all the data points of our constructed database, soil depths ranged from 1 to 100 cm, with a median of 10 cm. Therefore, we mainly addressed topsoil, but will hereafter use “soil” for conciseness. Meanwhile, if information about - + soil total nitrogen (N) concentration, nitrate (NO ), ammonium (NH ), plant-available 3 4 phosphorus (PAP), C:N ratio, microbial biomass C (MBC), microbial biomass N (MBN), microbial biomass phosphorus (MBP), soil physical characteristics (i.e., the particle size distribution and bulk density), soil pH, and soil basal respiration were reported for a specific soil depth, we also recorded such information along with soil C data. To determine mycorrhizal association type (i.e., AM vs. ECM) of each tree species, we searched the Web of Science for studies that reported such information (Brundrett, 2009; Koele et al., 2012). For tree species that have been reported to associate with both AM and ECM fungi (e.g., Eucalyptus and Salix spp.), we defined these trees as ECM because many ECM roots have very small amounts of AM fungi (Wagg et al., 2008). In addition, we also classified by the N-fixing ability (i.e., N-fixing vs. non- N-fixing) and tree species type (i.e., broadleaf vs. conifer) of different tree species according to the literature, and recorded the stand ages if available. All original data were extracted from the text, tables, figures, and appendices of the publications. When data were presented graphically, the figures were digitized to extract the numerical values using the free software Engauge Digitizer version 5.1 (http://digitizer.sourceforge.net). In addition, mean annual temperature (MAT) and mean annual precipitation (MAP) were obtained directly from the selected articles, or extracted from the WorldClim version 2.0 (http://www.worldclim.org) using the information of latitude and longitude in case these data were not reported. Fig. 1 Map showing the location of the study sites from the compiled 143 articles used in the present study. The sample size (number of observations) from each site is represented by symbol size, and more detailed information are shown in Table S1 in Supporting Information. 2.2. Statistical analysis For the entire dataset including paired (with both broadleaf and conifer, AM and ECM, and/or N- fixing and non-N-fixing) and non-paired plots, we first compared forest floor litter mass, forest floor and mineral soil C stocks, and mineral soil C concentration within each group (i.e., between AM and ECM trees, N-fixing and non-N-fixing trees, and broadleaved and coniferous trees). We used linear mixed models to estimate the mean values for each group by adding tree species type, mycorrhizal association, or N-fixing ability as fixed factors, while soil depth and “study” (the identity of each primary study) as random-effect factors. The difference within each group was assessed using a two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test to account for small and uneven group size and/or non-normal error distribution. All these analyses were performed using R version 3.6.2 (R Core Team, 2019). We then used structural equation models (SEMs) to further assess the relative importance of climate (i.e., MAT and MAP), spatial location (i.e., latitude, longitude, and altitude), tree species type (broadleaf and conifer), mycorrhizal association (i.e., AM and ECM), N-fixing ability, and soil properties (N stock (for forest floor) or N concentration (for mineral soil), C:N ratio, and pH) on soil C stocks and concentrations. We proposed an a priori model of hypothesized relationships among predictor and response variables within a path diagram (Fig. 2) and tested the fit of the a priori model against each sub-grouped dataset. This a priori model also tested whether tree species effects on soil C were direct and/or indirect through changes in other soil properties. The same model was hypothesized for forest floor C stock, mineral soil C stock, and mineral soil C concentration. The overall impacts of “climate” and “location” on C stocks or concentration were modeled as exogenous categorical effects using dummy variables (Grace, 2006). For each predictor variable in the SEM, we conducted principal component analyses (PCA) to extract a reduced number of variables that captured most of the variance to avoid redundancy among correlated variables (Grace, 2006; Yue et al., 2018) and only used the first PCA axes with eigenvalues > 1 in the SEM. Also, a reduced number of predictor variables by using the first PCA axes can facilitate a good model fit (Grace, 2006). Tree species type, mycorrhizal association, and N-fixing ability were coded as binary variables for which “1” indicated the broadleaved, AM, or N-fixing trees, and “0” the coniferous, ECM, or non-N-fixing trees. The factors of study and soil depth were also treated as random-effect factors within each model to account for the potential non-independence among data from the same study and the influences of sampling depth, respectively. We used Fisher’s C to test the overall goodness-of-fit of each model. The SEM analyses were performed in R using the piecewiseSEM package (Lefcheck, 2016). Because of the limited co-occurring data for NH , NO , PAP, MBC, MBN, MBP, and basal respiration along 4 3 with soil C stock or concentration, we did not include these variables in the SEM analysis. Instead, we first assessed how tree species type, mycorrhizal type, and N-fixing ability affected these properties, by considering each of them as fixed factor and study and soil depth as random factors, and then tested the correlations between these soil properties and soil C stock and concentration based on Pearson correlation coefficients. Each soil property variable was assessed separately. To further assess the effects of tree species type, mycorrhizal association, and N-fixing ability on soil C stocks and concentrations based on rigorous common garden or paired plot designs controlling for site effects, we conducted meta-analyses using data from paired plots within a common garden (e.g., one AM species and two ECM species in a common garden, would mean two effect sizes) in the case the initial soil properties were the same. For each paired study, the effect sizes of tree species type, mycorrhizal association, and N-fixing ability were calculated as the normalized effects using the natural log response ratio (lnRR) as: lnRR = ln(broadleaf/conifer) (2) species type lnRR = ln(AM/ECM) (3) mycorrhizal association lnRR = ln(N-fixing/non-N-fixing) (4) N-fixing ability To conduct our meta-analyses, we initially ran intercept-only models to calculate the overall effect sizes (lnRR ). These intercept-only models fitted lnRR as the response variable and included ++ “study” as a random factor given that calculating effect sizes of all possible pairs from a single common garden may be non-independent. Meta-regression models, which included fixed effects, were then run to explore the effects of climate zone (i.e., boreal, temperate, and subtropical/tropical), MAT, MAP, latitude, altitude, stand age, and soil depth on lnRR by fitting ++ these variables as fixed factors. For aiding the interpretation of results, lnRR and its ++ corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were transformed back to percentage change as 𝑙𝑛𝑅𝑅 ( ) 𝑒 −1 ×100%. If the 95% CIs of lnRR did not overlap zero, the effects were considered ++ to be significant at α = 0.05 for tree species type, mycorrhizal association, or N-fixing ability. Soil Location property Soil C Tree Climate species Fig. 2 The proposed a priori structural equation model (SEM) of the causal relationship among tree species (explained by species type, mycorrhizal association, N-fixing ability), soil properties (explained by N concentration, C:N ratio, and pH), location (explained by latitude, longitude, and altitude), climate (explained by MAT and MAP) and soil C stocks or concentrations. The single-headed arrows indicate a hypothesized causal effect of one variable on another. All the predictor variables in the model represent the first principal component analysis (PCA) axes with eigenvalues > 1. 3. Results Globally, litter production, forest floor C stock, and mineral soil C concentration and stock all differed significantly according to tree species type, mycorrhizal association, and N-fixing ability (Fig. 3). Within the three tree species categories, broadleaves had a higher litter production than conifers, but ECM and non-N-fixing trees produced more litter than AM and N-fixing trees, respectively (Fig. 3a). Forest floor C stocks were higher under conifers despite lower litter production, whereas ECM and non-N-fixing trees were significantly highest in forest floor C in line with the higher rates of production (Fig. 3b). In contrast, mineral soil C concentrations and stocks were significantly higher under broadleaved, AM, and N-fixing trees, respectively (Fig. 3c- d). (a) (b) ** (60) ** *** *** *** (107) (49) (71) (89) (70) (33) (125) (55) (15) (23) (5) 0 0 Mycorrhizal association Species type Mycorrhizal association N-fixing ability Species type N-fixing ability Broadleaf Conifer AM non-N-fixing ECM N-fixing (c) (d) 90 90 *** *** *** (30) ** (187) (296) 60 60 ** * (489) (25) (223) (332) (228) (129) (237) (341) (138) 30 30 0 0 Species type Mycorrhizal association N-fixing ability Species type Mycorrhizal association N-fixing ability Fig. 3 Means (± 1 SE) of litter production, forest floor carbon (C) stock, and mineral soil C concentration and stock under different tree species type (broadleaf vs. conifer), mycorrhizal association (AM vs. ECM), and N-fixing ability (N-fixing vs. non-N-fixing) across all data points as estimated from linear mixed models, in which the identity of primary study and soil depth (for mineral soil only) were treated as random -1 -1 -1 Mineral soil C concentration (g·kg ) Litter production (Mg·ha ·yr ) -1 -1 Mineral soil C stock (Mg·ha ) Forest floor C stock (Mg·ha ) * ** *** factors. Statistically significant differences are shown with asterisks ( p< 0.05, p< 0.01, p< 0.001), and the number in parentheses are the number of data points. Tree species type, mycorrhizal association, and N-fixing ability all significantly affected soil properties such as N concentration, MBC, and basal respiration (Table 2). By simultaneously assessing the effects of soil properties in combination with climate, location, and tree species using SEM analysis, we found that climate and tree species, the variances of which were mainly explained by MAP and tree species type, respectively, showed significant direct effects on forest floor C stock (Fig. 4). Specifically, the first PCA axis of climate had a negative effect on forest floor C stock and negatively correlated with MAP, indicating a positive effect of MAP on forest floor C stock (Fig. 4a). The first PCA axis of tree species, which was negatively correlated with tree species type and mycorrhizal association, showed a positive effect on forest floor C stock, suggesting that C stock was higher under coniferous or ECM trees because broadleaved and AM trees were coded as “1” and coniferous and ECM trees as “0” in the SEM analysis. In contrast, no significant effect of tree species or other variables on soil mineral C concentration or stock was found, and the marginal R of SEMs for C concentration and stock were only 0.03 and 0.08, respectively (Fig. 4b, c). Location and soil properties did not affect forest floor C stock or mineral soil C concentration and stock. The indirect effects of tree species were examined by first testing the differences in soil variables between the groups of tree species (Table 2) and next testing their correlations with mineral soil C concentration and stock (Table 3). Mycorrhizal association and N-fixing ability strongly affected MBC, with higher values under AM or non-N-fixing trees (Table 2, 3), and MBC was again significantly positively correlated with soil C concentration and stock. Tree species type significantly affected MBN, with a higher value under broadleaved trees (Table 2, 3), and MBN was again tightly positively correlated with soil C concentration. Fig. 4 Structural equation models (SEMs) for forest floor C stock (a), mineral soil C concentration (b) and mineral soil C stock (c) describing the influence of climate (mean annual temperature (MAT) and mean annual precipitation (MAP)), location (latitude, longitude, and altitude), tree species (tree species type, mycorrhizal association, N-fixing ability), and soil properties (N stock for forest floor, N concentration for mineral soil, C:N ratio and pH) on forest floor carbon (C) stocks and mineral soil C concentration stock for the entire dataset. Positive and negative coefficients indicate positive and negative effects of the first principal component analysis (PCA) axes. Values in brackets are the correlation coefficients between the first PCA axes and each variable. Significant effects are indicated by solid lines and non-signifante effects by dashed lines. Arrow widths are proportional to path coefficient. The goodness-of-fit tests are shown at the bottom of each path diagram. The values of Fisher’s C are very small and all p-values >0.05, indicating * ** *** very good fits of all the three models. p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p < 0.001. Table 2 Effects of tree species type, mycorrhizal association, and N-fixing ability on mineral soil chemical and biotic properties as assessed using linear mixed models in which each of the tested variables was treated as fixed effect and study identity and soil depth were treated as random effects. Values are means ± 1SE, and p-values of tree species effects are also shown. Soil property Species type Mycorrhizal association N-fixing ability Broadleaf Conifer p- AM ECM p- N-fixing non-N- p- value value fixing value -1 N (g kg ) 3.8 ± 0.63 3.4 ± 0.64 0.037 3.9 ± 0.64 3.5 ± 0.63 0.021 4.0 ± 0.70 3.6 ± 0.63 0.026 C:N 15.7 ± 1.4 19.5 ± 1.5 0.009 15.2 ± 1.6 18.5 ± 1.3 0.001 14.9 ± 3.8 17.5 ± 1.3 0.017 pH 5.4 ± 0.14 5.2 ± 0.14 0.417 5.5 ± 0.15 5.2 ± 0.15 0.008 5.3 ± 0.17 5.3 ± 0.14 0.422 + -1 NH4 (mg kg ) 214.8 ± 575.9 ± 0.262 309.1 ± 411.2 ± 0.431 327.5 ± 377.5 ± 0.453 140.1 155.4 189.7 225.9 124.8 164.0 - -1 NO3 (mg kg ) 14.7 ± 5.7 13.2 ± 5.7 0.084 17.2 ± 5.6 11.9 ± 5.5 0.024 17.2 ± 7.8 14.0 ± 5.6 0.065 -1 PAP (mg kg ) 312.1 ± 463.8 ± 0.411 293.9 ± 447.8 ± 0.401 246.3 ± 391.4 ± 0.404 146.1 258.8 208.2 265.2 152.1 191.7 -1 MBC (mg kg ) 599.8 ± 577.7 ± 0.054 684.8 ± 535.9 ± 0.006 560.7 ± 594.8 ± 0.040 211.7 215.2 215.2 208.1 250.8 209.4 -1 MBN (mg kg ) 85.7 ± 31.8 57.2 ± 32.9 0.002 76.4 ± 33.9 73.5 ± 33.7 0.089 70.8 ± 38.9 75.2 ± 33.2 0.053 -1 MBP (mg kg ) 26.4 ± 13.4 15.4 ± 13.5 0.202 19.8 ± 13.6 24.9 ± 13.1 0.375 23.3 ± 13.9 23.4 ± 12.9 0.483 Basal respiration (mg CO g 27.6 ± 12.1 29.4 ± 12.1 0.027 24.2 ± 12.5 29.7 ± 12.3 0.012 27.1 ± 12.4 28.8 ± 12.1 0.030 1 -1 day ) PAP: plant available phosphorus; MBC: microbial biomass carbon; MBN: microbial biomass nitrogen; MBP: microbial biomass phosphorus; Data in bold indicate statistical significance. Table 3 Pearson correlations (ρ) between soil properties and mineral soil C concentration and C stock under different tree species. Soil properties C concentration C stock ρ p-value ρ p-value NH4 0.125 0.601 0.141 0.236 NO3 0.252 0.283 0.118 0.381 PAP -0.011 0.923 0.061 0.453 MBC 0.444 0.001 0.270 0.002 MBN 0.253 0.194 0.282 0.029 MBP 0.949 < 0.001 0.711 0.021 Basal respiration 0.217 0.357 0.093 0.536 PAP: plant available phosphorus; MBC: microbial biomass carbon; MBN: microbial biomass nitrogen; MBP: microbial biomass phosphorus; n: number of data point; Data in bold indicate statistical significance. By conducting a meta-analysis using data from paired plots, we found similar patterns as in results generated from the total dataset (shown in Fig. 3). Forest floor C stock was 43.9% lower under broadleaved trees than under coniferous trees at the global level (Fig. 5a). In contrast, mineral soil concentration and stock were significantly higher under broadleaf than conifer, with averages 12% and 9% higher, respectively, but no difference was found within climate zones. As to mycorrhizal association, forest floor C stock was 39% lower under AM than under ECM trees at the global scale (Fig. 5b). However, mineral soil C stock under AM trees was significantly higher than under ECM trees, with an average of 10% globally. A similar trend was also found for mineral soil C concentrations, which were 22% higher under AM trees at the global scale, and 22% and 23% higher under AM trees compared with ECM trees in temperate and in subtropical/tropical regions, respectively (Fig. 5b). Nitrogen-fixing trees tended to have lower forest floor C stocks at the global scale (p =0.056) and in temperate zones (p = 0.058), but not in tropical zones (Fig. 5c), but both mineral soil C concentration and stock were significantly higher under N-fixing trees than under non-N-fixing trees (Fig. 5c). Meta-regressions revealed that the effects of tree species type and mycorrhizal association on forest floor C stock were negatively affected by latitude and forest stand age, but positively with effects of N-fixing ability (Table 4). Tree species type effects on mineral soil C concentration were positively related to MAT and MAP and negatively to stand age (Table 4). N-fixing ability effects on mineral soil C concentration and stock were positively related to latitude soil depth and stand age. These results suggested greater effects of species type and mycorrhizal association on soil C in younger (lower stand age) forests located in lower latitude and warmer climate, but greater effects of N-fixing ability on soil C in higher latitude mature (higher stand age) forests. Species type Mycorrhizal association N-fixing ability (a) (b) (c) (AM/ECM) (N-fixing/non-N-fixing) (broadleaf/conifer) Overall (169) ** (83) * (21) Boreal (2) Temperate (160) ** (76) * (16) (7) (7) (Sub)tropical (5) Forest floor C stock Forest floor C stock Forest floor C stock -- Overall (375) * (386) ** (82) *** Boreal (12) Temperate (239) * (25) *** (275) (Sub)tropical (88) (147) * (57) ** Mineral soil C concentration Mineral soil C concentration Mineral soil C concentration -- (272) * (77) * Overall (285) * Boreal (2) Temperate (198) * (41) (227) (Sub)tropical (57) (87) (36) Mineral soil C stock Mineral soil C stock Mineral soil C stock -100 0 100 200 300 400 -100 0 100 200 300 400 -100 0 100 200 300 400 Differences among tree spcies in percentage (%) Fig. 5 Effects of (a) tree species type (broadleaf vs. conifer), (b) mycorrhizal association (AM vs. ECM), and (c) N-fixing ability (N-fixing vs. non-N-fixing) of tree species on C stocks of forest floor and mineral soil and C concentration of mineral soil at the global scale and within the different climate zones (boreal, temperate, and subtropical/tropical zones). Results are expressed as the percentage differences (%) between tree species type, mycorrhizal type, or N-fixing ability and based on paired plots. Values indicate the means with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and the numbers of data points are shown. Dots in blue and red indicate significant difference, and dot size represents effect sizes across all variables or within subgroups. p < 0.05, ** *** p < 0.01, p < 0.001. Table 4 The effects of latitude, altitude, mean annual temperature (MAT), mean annual precipitation (MAP), forest stand age, and soil depth on the natural log response ratios (lnRR) of tree species type (broadleaf vs. conifer), mycorrhizal association (AM vs. ECM), and N-fixing ability (N-fixing vs. non-N- fixing) generated from linear mixed models by adding each variable as fixed effect and study as a random effect. Soil depth was treated as a random effect when addressing latitude, altitude, MAT, MAP, and stand age for mineral soil, but as fixed effect when addressing itself. Direction of the estimates (in parentheses) and p-values are shown, and values in bold indicate statistical significance. Tree species type Mycorrhizal association N-fixing ability Forest Mineral C Mineral C Forest Mineral C Mineral C Forest Mineral C Mineral C floor C concentration stock floor C concentration stock floor C concentration stock stock stock stock Latitude (-) 0.006 (+) 0.237 (-) 0.733 (-) 0.016 (+) 0.249 (-) 0.209 (+) 0.004 (+) 0.035 (+) 0.448 Altitude (-) 0.624 (+) 0.090 (+) 0.631 (-) 0.750 (+) 0.217 (+) 0.271 (+) 0.476 (+) 0.787 (-) 0.514 MAT (-) 0.115 (+) 0.009 (+) 0.469 (-) 0.387 (+) 0.310 (-) 0.211 (+) 0.413 (-) 0.466 (-) 0.224 MAP (-) 0.364 (+) 0.025 (+) 0.433 (-) 0.697 (+) 0.295 (-) 0.107 (+) 0.667 (-) 0.538 (-) 0.228 Stand (-) 0.009 (-) 0.844 (-) 0.893 (-) 0.048 (-) 0.695 (-) 0.229 (+) 0.007 (+) 0.170 (+) 0.542 age Soil - (-) 0.076 (+) 0.869 - (-) 0.192 (-) 0.429 - (+) 0.309 (+) 0.006 depth 4. Discussion Forest floor C stock was significantly higher in coniferous forests, but mineral soil C concentration and stock were higher in broadleaved forests. Generally, litter quality of broadleaved trees is higher than that of coniferous trees, resulting in a higher decomposition rate of broadleaf litter than conifer litter (Aerts, 1997; Augusto et al., 2015). For example, compared with conifer litter, broadleaf litter generally has lower C:N ratio, lignin:N ratio, and concentration of phenolics that can lead to rapid decomposition rate and faster and more efficient accumulation of mineral-associated organic matter (Cotrufo et al., 2013), resulting in a higher input of C from forest floor to mineral soil. Therefore, although litter production in broadleaf forests was larger than in conifer forests (Fig. 3a), forest floor C stock was lower whereas mineral soil C concentration and stock were higher in broadleaf forests compared with conifer forests. The difference in forest floor C stock between broadleaved and coniferous trees may also be attributed to the adverse microclimatic conditions, such as soil moisture, that control litter decomposition (Berger and Berger, 2012). However, the lack of data on such microclimatic conditions in our study limited the assessment of its impact in regulating tree species effects on soil C. Our findings were partly in line with a previous meta- analysis suggesting that forest floor C stock was 38% higher under conifers, while mineral soil C stocks were similar between broadleaves and conifers (Boča et al., 2014). The inconsistency regarding mineral soil C may be attributed to different data and analysis methods between our study and that of Boča et al., (2014), in which they had less data points, and the issue of non- independence of collected data points as well as soil depth were not considered when calculating the overall mean effects. Mycorrhizal association has recently been recognized as an important factor regulating forest ecosystem functions such as C and N cycling (Phillips et al., 2013; Lin et al., 2017). Our results showed that AM trees had significantly lower forest floor C stocks compared with ECM forests, which may partly be attributed to the lower litter production and higher litter decomposition rate compared with ECM forests (Keller and Phillips, 2019). Previous studies found that foliar litter from ECM trees usually had lower litter quality (i.e., higher C:N ratio and lignin:N ratios and lower base cation concentrations) than that from AM trees, which contributes to a slower litter decomposition rate (Hobbie et al., 2006; Lin et al., 2017). Previous research has indicated that ECM and AM fungi can have opposite effects on litter decomposition, which can contribute to a higher forest floor C stock under ECM trees than AM trees. Specifically, ECM fungi can indirectly decrease litter decomposition rate by competing with saprotrophic microorganisms for soil water and N (Gadgil and Gadgil, 1971), while AM fungi can promote litter decomposition via their positive effects on the activity of soil bacterial communities (Nuccio et al., 2013). Overall, the higher forest floor C stock in ECM forests supports the traditional hypothesis that tree species with low litter quality driving slow decomposition rates have been associated with accumulation of higher C stocks compared with tree species with fast rates of litter decomposition (Berg, 2014; Lehmann and Kleber, 2015). In contrast to the forest floor pattern, our results showed that mineral soil C concentration and stock were significantly higher under AM trees than ECM trees. Generally, litter from AM trees has higher quality, suggesting a higher content of labile C that would be easier leached into mineral soil (Lin et al., 2017). Our result supports the proposed hypothesis that tree species with foliar litter traits conducive to fast decomposition, such as in AM tree species, will lead to more pronounced microbial stabilization and transformation of plant litter C through greater production of microbial residues (Cotrufo et al., 2013). This hypothesized Microbial Efficiency-Matrix Stabilization framework suggested that labile plant constituents, which are utilized more efficiently by microbes, are the dominant source of microbial products, and these microbial products of decomposition would become the main precursors of stable soil organic C by promoting aggregation and via strong chemical bonding to the mineral soil matrix (Cotrufo et al., 2013; Tamura and Tharayil, 2014). The higher mineral soil C concentration under AM trees compared with ECM trees may also be attributed to a greater proportion of forest floor C incorporation into mineral soil contributed by soil fauna (Schelfhout et al., 2017; Walmsley et al., 2019) because litter C incorporated into soil aggregates by active soil fauna are more protected from decomposition (Frouz et al., 2013; Frouz, 2018). This potential mechanism was supported by studies that reported leaf litter quality was positively correlated with soil fauna abundance (Hobbie et al., 2006; Frouz et al., 2013), and this was particularly the case for AM species such as Acer pseudoplatanus and Fraxinus excelsior (Schelfhout et al., 2017). The N-fixing ability of different tree species also had significant effects on forest floor and mineral soil C. The results of the linear mixed model using the total dataset and the meta-analysis using paired data both revealed that forest floor C stock was higher under non-N-fixing trees (although marginally significant (p = 0.056) in the meta-analysis) while mineral soil C concentration and stock were higher in N-fixing trees. The non-significant results may be attributed to the small sample sizes that limited the statistical power of our analyses (Yue et al., 2017), but similar forest floor C stocks have also been reported in other studies (Bachega et al., 2016). Previous studies found that N-fixing trees are likely to promote mineral soil C accumulation by both retaining old C and accreting new C from plant litter (Resh et al., 2002), indicating higher soil C concentrations and stocks in N-fixing forests. On the other hand, N-fixing is often more likely to form symbiosis with AM fungi while non-N-fixing trees mainly associated with ECM fungi (Pawlowska et al., 1997), indicating that the possible effect of N-fixing species could be confounded with effects attributed to AM association. However, among the 102 AM tree species included in our dataset, only 14 were N-fixing trees, suggesting only limited possible confounding of mycorrhizal association with N-fixing ability effects on soil C. It is noteworthy that the effects of tree species on mineral soil C concentration and stock were non-significant in our SEM analyses (Fig. 4b, c). Three potential mechanisms may explain the inconsistent findings between SEM analyses and meta-analysis: (1) tree species effects on soil C were not confounded with other factors such as microbial biomass and soil respiration in the meta- analysis, but this may be an issue in SEM because MBC and soil respiration, which could not be included in the model because of limited data points, could be confounded with tree species effects; (2) the marginal R in these SEM were only 0.03 and 0.08, indicating very low interpretability of these models; and (3) the heterogeneity among the unpaired data used in the SEM limited the detection of significant results. Nevertheless, the significant effects of tree species on soil C as assessed by linear mixed models using total dataset and by meta-analyses using pairwise datasets were quite similar, indicating that our results are robust across sites on a global scale. In the meta-regressions, location, climate, or soil properties were found to be important moderators of the effects of tree species type, mycorrhizal association, and N-fixing ability on forest floor C stock and mineral soil C concentration and stock. Because spatial location, climate, and soil properties are directly and indirectly linked to plant physiology and ecology, such as plant functional traits, litter quality, and litter decomposition (Wright et al., 2005; García-Palacios et al., 2013), it is not surprising that they significantly moderated tree species effects on soil C. For example, ECM forests usually have much lower soil inorganic N concentrations compared with AM forests (Lin et al., 2017), which may be attributed to the ability of ECM fungi to directly mobilize N from soil organic matter via extracellular enzyme production (Mao et al., 2019). Ectomycorrhizal trees are therefore less dependent on saprotrophic microbes for N uptake (Lindahl and Tunlid, 2015), while AM fungi mainly take up inorganic N produced by saprotrophic microorganisms (Phillips et al., 2013; Lehmann and Kleber, 2015). Thus, the effects of tree species on soil C stocks can be exerted indirectly through the mediation of soil nutrient economies. The greater effects of tree species type and mycorrhizal association on soil C in lower latitude and warmer climate may be attributed to the fact that element cycling processes are faster, and effects may occur faster and be sooner detectable than in cooler environments where the inputs and decomposition of organic matter occur at a slower rate (Zhang et al., 2008). In addition to these tested moderator variables, soil texture may also be an important variable moderating tree species effects on soil C, as previous studies found that clay-rich soils have a greater capacity to accumulate soil C than soils with lower clay content (Laganiere et al., 2010). However, because of limited soil texture data, we could not assess the moderating influence of soil texture on tree species effects on soil C in this study. Microbial biomass C and N, which were significantly correlated with soil C concentration and stock, were significantly affected by tree species (Table 3). Soil microbes play an important role in soil structure and function such as soil organic matter decomposition and biogeochemical cycling (Douterelo et al., 2010). A recent study found that soil C stocks were positively correlated with MBC and MBN (Zhao et al., 2016), and the effects of microbes on soil C dynamics were mainly through controlling C fluxes such as soil organic matter degradation and soilCO emission (Iqbal et al., 2010). In addition, soil fauna has an important role in mediating tree species effects on soil C (Frouz et al., 2013). Among soil fauna, earthworms are one of the most important organisms in forest ecosystems because they can incorporate organic materials into the soil and also affect the activities of other soil organisms (Lee, 1985). Moreover, earthworm communities were found to be significantly affected by tree species (Schelfhout et al., 2017), suggesting that tree species affect soil C stocks indirectly through their influence on earthworm communities. However, owing to the scarcity of such data, we were unable to assess how soil fauna communities under different tree species may modulate soil C dynamics at the global scale. 5. Conclusions Our results from data syntheses and meta-analyses provided further evidence that tree species with specific functional traits have significant effects on forest floor C stock and mineral soil C concentration and stock at the global scale. Broadleaved, AM, and N-fixing trees had lower forest floor C stocks but higher mineral soil C concentrations and stocks than coniferous, ECM, and non- N-fixing trees, respectively. Tree species type, mycorrhizal association, and N-fixing ability affected forest floor C stock and mineral soil C concentration and stock directly or indirectly via impacting soil properties such as MBC and MBN. In addition, tree species effects on soil C concentration and stock were mediated by latitude, MAT, MAP, or forest stand age, with higher effects of species type and mycorrhizal association on soil C in lower latitude, warmer climate, and young forests, but higher effects of N-fixing ability in higher latitude and mature forests. These results show how tree species groups differ in their influence on soil C concentration and stock at the global scale, and the insights into the underlying mechanisms of tree species effects found in our study contribute to informing tree species selection for forest management or afforestation. Future studies should focus more on the potential indirect tree species-mediated effects via soil fauna and belowground litter input on soil C dynamics. Acknowledgments We would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for providing insightful comments and useful suggestions that significantly improved the quality of our study. We are grateful to all the researchers whose published data were used in this study. Yan Peng acknowledges China Scholarship Council for supporting a Ph.D. program grant (201606910045). Kai Yue was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31922052 and 31800373). Petr Heděnec was supported by the Marie Curie European Fellowship (747824- AFOREST-H2020-MSCA-IF-2016/H2020-MSCA-IF-2016). Luciana Ruggiero Bachega was supported by The São Paulo Research Foundation, Brazil (2015/14785-5, and 2017/26019-0). References Aerts, R., 1997. Climate, leaf litter chemistry, and leaf litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: a triangular relationship. Oikos, 439-449. Augusto, L., De Schrijver, A., Vesterdal, L., Smolander, A., Prescott, C., Ranger, J., 2015. Influences of evergreen gymnosperm and deciduous angiosperm tree species on the functioning of temperate and boreal forests. Biological Reviews 90, 444-466. Bachega, L.R., Bouillet, J.-P., de Cássia Piccolo, M., Saint-André, L., Bouvet, J.-M., Nouvellon, Y., de Moraes Gonçalves, J.L., Robin, A., Laclau, J.-P., 2016. Decomposition of Eucalyptus grandis and Acacia mangium leaves and fine roots in tropical conditions did not meet the Home Field Advantage hypothesis. For. Ecol. Manage. 359, 33-43. Barceló, M., van Bodegom, P.M., Soudzilovskaia, N.A., 2019. Climate drives the spatial distribution of mycorrhizal host plants in terrestrial ecosystems. J. Ecol. 107, 2564-2573. Bardgett, R.D., van der Putten, W.H., 2014. Belowground biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Nature 515, 505-511. Berg, B., 2014. Decomposition patterns for foliar litter–a theory for influencing factors. Soil Biol. Biochem. 78, 222-232. Berger, T.W., Berger, P., 2012. Greater accumulation of litter in spruce (Picea abies) compared to beech (Fagus sylvatica) stands is not a consequence of the inherent recalcitrance of needles. Plant Soil 358, 349- Boča, A., Van Miegroet, H., Gruselle, M.-C., 2014. Forest overstory effect on soil organic carbon storage: a meta-analysis. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 78, S35-S47. Brundrett, M.C., 2009. Mycorrhizal associations and other means of nutrition of vascular plants: understanding the global diversity of host plants by resolving conflicting information and developing reliable means of diagnosis. Plant and Soil 320, 37-77. Cepáková, Š., Tošner, Z., Frouz, J., 2016. The effect of tree species on seasonal fluctuations in water-soluble and hot water-extractable organic matter at post-mining sites. Geoderma 275, 19-27. Chen, S., Zou, J., Hu, Z., Chen, H., Lu, Y., 2014. Global annual soil respiration in relation to climate, soil properties and vegetation characteristics: Summary of available data. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 198, 335-346. Cotrufo, M.F., Wallenstein, M.D., Boot, C.M., Denef, K., Paul, E., 2013. The M icrobial E fficiency‐M atrix S tabilization (MEMS) framework integrates plant litter decomposition with soil organic matter stabilization: do labile plant inputs form stable soil organic matter? Global Change Biology 19, 988-995. Craig, M.E., Turner, B.L., Liang, C., Clay, K., Johnson, D.J., Phillips, R.P., 2018. Tree mycorrhizal type predicts within‐site variability in the storage and distribution of soil organic matter. Global Change Biology 24, 3317-3330. Douterelo, I., Goulder, R., Lillie, M., 2010. Soil microbial community response to land-management and depth, related to the degradation of organic matter in English wetlands: Implications for the in situ preservation of archaeological remains. Applied Soil Ecology 44, 219-227. Frouz, J., 2018. Effects of soil macro-and mesofauna on litter decomposition and soil organic matter stabilization. Geoderma 332, 161-172. Frouz, J., Livečková, M., Albrechtová, J., Chroňáková, A., Cajthaml, T., Pižl, V., Háněl, L., Starý, J., Baldrian, P., Lhotáková, Z., 2013. Is the effect of trees on soil properties mediated by soil fauna? A case study from post-mining sites. Forest Ecology and Management 309, 87-95. Gadgil, R.L., Gadgil, P., 1971. Mycorrhiza and litter decomposition. Nature 233, 133-133. García-Palacios, P., Maestre, F.T., Kattge, J., Wall, D.H., 2013. Climate and litter quality differently modulate the effects of soil fauna on litter decomposition across biomes. Ecology letters 16, 1045-1053. Grace, J., 2006. Structural equation modeling and natural systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Hobbie, S.E., Reich, P.B., Oleksyn, J., Ogdahl, M., Zytkowiak, R., Hale, C., Karolewski, P., 2006. Tree species effects on decomposition and forest floor dynamics in a common garden. Ecology 87, 2288-2297. Iqbal, J., Hu, R., Feng, M., Lin, S., Malghani, S., Ali, I.M., 2010. Microbial biomass, and dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen strongly affect soil respiration in different land uses: A case study at Three Gorges Reservoir Area, South China. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 137, 294-307. Jandl, R., Rodeghiero, M., Martinez, C., Cotrufo, M.F., Bampa, F., van Wesemael, B., Harrison, R.B., Guerrini, I.A., deB Richter Jr, D., Rustad, L., 2014. Current status, uncertainty and future needs in soil organic carbon monitoring. Science of the total environment 468, 376-383. Keller, A.B., Phillips, R.P., 2019. Leaf litter decay rates differ between mycorrhizal groups in temperate, but not tropical, forests. New Phytol. 222, 556-564. Koele, N., Dickie, I.A., Oleksyn, J., Richardson, S.J., Reich, P.B., 2012. No globally consistent effect of ectomycorrhizal status on foliar traits. New Phytologist 196, 845-852. Laganiere, J., Angers, D.A., Pare, D., 2010. Carbon accumulation in agricultural soils after afforestation: a meta‐analysis. Global Change Biology 16, 439-453. Lee, K.E., 1985. Earthworms: their ecology and relationships with soils and land use. Academic Press Inc., London, UK. Lefcheck, J.S., 2016. piecewiseSEM: Piecewise structural equation modelling in r for ecology, evolution, and systematics. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 7, 573-579. Lehmann, J., Kleber, M., 2015. The contentious nature of soil organic matter. Nature 528, 60-68. Lin, G., McCormack, M.L., Ma, C., Guo, D., 2017. Similar below‐ground carbon cycling dynamics but contrasting modes of nitrogen cycling between arbuscular mycorrhizal and ectomycorrhizal forests. New Phytol. 213, 1440-1451. Lindahl, B.D., Tunlid, A., 2015. Ectomycorrhizal fungi–potential organic matter decomposers, yet not saprotrophs. New Phytologist 205, 1443-1447. Mao, Z., Corrales, A., Zhu, K., Yuan, Z., Lin, F., Ye, J., Hao, Z., Wang, X., 2019. Tree mycorrhizal associations mediate soil fertility effects on forest community structure in a temperate forest. New Phytol. 223, 475-486. Mayer, M., Prescott, C.E., Abaker, W.E., Augusto, L., Cécillon, L., Ferreira, G.W., James, J., Jandl, R., Katzensteiner, K., Laclau, J.-P., 2020. Influence of forest management activities on soil organic carbon stocks: a knowledge synthesis. For. Ecol. Manage. 466, 118127. Mueller, K.E., Hobbie, S.E., Chorover, J., Reich, P.B., Eisenhauer, N., Castellano, M.J., Chadwick, O.A., Dobies, T., Hale, C.M., Jagodziński, A.M., 2015. Effects of litter traits, soil biota, and soil chemistry on soil carbon stocks at a common garden with 14 tree species. Biogeochemistry 123, 313-327. Nave, L.E., Vance, E.D., Swanston, C.W., Curtis, P.S., 2009. Impacts of elevated N inputs on north temperate forest soil C storage, C/N, and net N-mineralization. Geoderma 153, 231-240. Nuccio, E.E., Hodge, A., Pett-Ridge, J., Herman, D.J., Weber, P.K., Firestone, M.K., 2013. An arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus significantly modifies the soil bacterial community and nitrogen cycling during litter decomposition. Environmental microbiology 15, 1870-1881. Pan, Y., Birdsey, R.A., Fang, J., Houghton, R., Kauppi, P.E., Kurz, W.A., Phillips, O.L., Shvidenko, A., Lewis, S.L., Canadell, J.G., 2011. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science 333, 988-993. Pawlowska, T.E., Błaszkowski, J., Rühling, Å., 1997. The mycorrhizal status of plants colonizing a calamine spoil mound in southern Poland. Mycorrhiza 6, 499-505. Phillips, R.P., Brzostek, E., Midgley, M.G., 2013. The mycorrhizal-associated nutrient economy: a new framework for predicting carbon–nutrient couplings in temperate forests. New Phytol. 199, 41-51. Prescott, C.E., Vesterdal, L., 2013. Tree species effects on soils in temperate and boreal forests: emerging themes and research needs. Forest Ecology and Management 309, 1-3. R Core Team, 2019. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Read, D., Perez-Moreno, J., 2003. Mycorrhizas and nutrient cycling in ecosystems–a journey towards relevance? New Phytol. 157, 475-492. Resh, S.C., Binkley, D., Parrotta, J.A., 2002. Greater soil carbon sequestration under nitrogen-fixing trees compared with Eucalyptus species. Ecosystems 5, 217-231. Schelfhout, S., Mertens, J., Verheyen, K., Vesterdal, L., Baeten, L., Muys, B., De Schrijver, A., 2017. Tree species identity shapes earthworm communities. Forests 8, 85. Soudzilovskaia, N.A., van der Heijden, M.G., Cornelissen, J.H., Makarov, M.I., Onipchenko, V.G., Maslov, M.N., Akhmetzhanova, A.A., van Bodegom, P.M., 2015. Quantitative assessment of the differential impacts of arbuscular and ectomycorrhiza on soil carbon cycling. New Phytol. 208, 280-293. Tamura, M., Tharayil, N., 2014. Plant litter chemistry and microbial priming regulate the accrual, composition and stability of soil carbon in invaded ecosystems. New phytologist 203, 110-124. Vesterdal, L., Clarke, N., Sigurdsson, B.D., Gundersen, P., 2013. Do tree species influence soil carbon stocks in temperate and boreal forests? Forest Ecology and Management 309, 4-18. Vesterdal, L., Schmidt, I.K., Callesen, I., Nilsson, L.O., Gundersen, P., 2008. Carbon and nitrogen in forest floor and mineral soil under six common European tree species. Forest Ecology and Management 255, 35- Wagg, C., Pautler, M., Massicotte, H.B., Peterson, R.L., 2008. The co-occurrence of ectomycorrhizal, arbuscular mycorrhizal, and dark septate fungi in seedlings of four members of the Pinaceae. Mycorrhiza 18, 103-110. Walmsley, A., Vachová, P., Hlava, J., 2019. Tree species identity governs the soil macrofauna community composition and soil development at reclaimed post-mining sites on calcium-rich clays. European Journal of Forest Research 138, 753-761. Wardle, D.A., Bardgett, R.D., Klironomos, J.N., Setälä, H., Van Der Putten, W.H., Wall, D.H., 2004. Ecological linkages between aboveground and belowground biota. Science 304, 1629-1633. Wright, I.J., Reich, P.B., Cornelissen, J.H., Falster, D.S., Groom, P.K., Hikosaka, K., Lee, W., Lusk, C.H., Niinemets, Ü., Oleksyn, J., 2005. Modulation of leaf economic traits and trait relationships by climate. Global Ecology and Biogeography 14, 411-421. Yue, K., Fornara, D.A., Yang, W., Peng, Y., Li, Z., Wu, F., Peng, C., 2017. Effects of three global change drivers on terrestrial C: N: P stoichiometry: a global synthesis. Global Change Biology 23, 2450-2463. Yue, K., García-Palacios, P., Parsons, S.A., Yang, W., Peng, Y., Tan, B., Huang, C., Wu, F., 2018. Assessing the temporal dynamics of aquatic and terrestrial litter decomposition in an alpine forest. Functional Ecology 32, 2464-2475. Yue, K., Peng, Y., Peng, C., Yang, W., Peng, X., Wu, F., 2016. Stimulation of terrestrial ecosystem carbon storage by nitrogen addition: a meta-analysis. Scientific Reports 6, 1-10. Zhang, D., Hui, D., Luo, Y., Zhou, G., 2008. Rates of litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: global patterns and controlling factors. Journal of Plant Ecology 1, 85-93. Zhao, F., Zhang, L., Ren, C., Sun, J., Han, X., Yang, G., Wang, J., 2016. Effect of microbial carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus stoichiometry on soil carbon fractions under a black locust Forest within the central loess plateau of China. Soil Science Society of America Journal 80, 1520-1530. SUPPORTING INFORMATION FOR Tree species effects on soil carbon stock and concentration are mediated by tree species type, mycorrhizal association, and N-fixing ability Table S1 Raw data used in this study that were extracted from the 143 primary studies Longitud Species Mycorrhizal N-fixing respiratio Reference Latitude Altitude MAT MAP layer Litter Cs Ns CN Cc Nc NH4 NO3 PAP MBC MBN MBP pH e type association ability n boradlea non-N- forest Son & Gower 1992 43.867 -91.85 240 7 819 ECM NA NA 0.079 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor non-N- forest Son & Gower 1992 43.867 -91.85 240 7 819 conifer ECM NA NA 0.26 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing floor non-N- forest Son & Gower 1992 43.867 -91.85 240 7 819 conifer ECM NA NA 0.239 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing floor non-N- forest Son & Gower 1992 43.867 -91.85 240 7 819 conifer ECM NA NA 0.306 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing floor non-N- forest Son & Gower 1992 43.867 -91.85 240 7 819 conifer ECM NA NA 0.225 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing floor boradlea non-N- Son & Gower 1992 43.867 -91.85 240 7 819 ECM mineral NA 29.38 3.19 9.2 8.3 0.9 NA NA 20.6 NA NA NA NA 5.4 f fixing non-N- Son & Gower 1992 43.867 -91.85 240 7 819 conifer ECM mineral NA 31.48 3.29 9.6 8.6 0.9 NA NA 35.7 NA NA NA NA 5.3 fixing non-N- Son & Gower 1992 43.867 -91.85 240 7 819 conifer ECM mineral NA 28.18 2.93 9.6 7.7 0.8 NA NA 41.4 NA NA NA NA 5.4 fixing non-N- Son & Gower 1992 43.867 -91.85 240 7 819 conifer ECM mineral NA 36.97 3.66 10.1 10.1 1 NA NA 28.2 NA NA NA NA 5.5 fixing non-N- Son & Gower 1992 43.867 -91.85 240 7 819 conifer ECM mineral NA 43.73 3.73 11.7 12.9 1.1 NA NA 21.2 NA NA NA NA 5.2 fixing boradlea non-N- Kooch et al. 2018 36.617 51.433 215 15.7 1035 ECM mineral NA 55.97 5.48 10.3 40 3.9 30.67 29.13 22.61 667.37 55.18 68.18 0.42 6.16 f fixing boradlea non-N- Kooch et al. 2018 36.617 51.433 215 15.7 1035 ECM mineral NA 49.13 2.62 19.1 45.9 2.4 24.37 20.39 13.48 546 43.55 54.12 0.41 6.48 f fixing non-N- Kooch et al. 2018 36.617 51.433 215 15.7 1035 conifer AM mineral NA 59.17 3.38 17.2 41.2 2.4 22.85 18.18 15.73 501.68 43.24 44.75 0.4 6.45 fixing boradlea non-N- Rachid et al. 2013 -22.767 -43.683 13 23.4 1250 ECM mineral NA NA NA 12.85 4.49 0.35 1.4815 0.0287 NA NA NA NA NA 5.45 f fixing boradlea Rachid et al. 2013 -22.767 -43.683 13 23.4 1250 ECM N-fixing mineral NA NA NA 12.92 4.15 0.32 2.0201 0.459 NA NA NA NA NA 5.38 boradlea non-N- Rachid et al. 2013 -22.767 -43.683 13 23.4 1250 ECM mineral NA NA NA 12.72 6.43 0.51 1.6816 0.3443 NA NA NA NA NA 5.73 f fixing boradlea Rachid et al. 2013 -22.767 -43.683 13 23.4 1250 ECM N-fixing mineral NA NA NA 12.92 7.38 0.58 1.2688 2.7684 NA NA NA NA NA 5.88 non-N- Xu et al. 2006 36.6 139 1014 9.8 1536 conifer AM mineral NA NA NA 14 118.5 8.4 10.2 11.5 NA 8005.61 NA NA 31.9902 5.1 fixing non-N- Xu et al. 2006 36.6 139 1014 9.8 1536 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 18.1 169.8 9.4 13.9 4.6 NA 3487.67 NA NA 65.4322 4.8 fixing non-N- forest Chodak et al. 2015 66.433 29.45 274 -0.8 554 conifer ECM NA NA NA 46.7 345 7.5 NA NA NA 3575 NA NA NA 3.6 fixing floor non-N- forest Chodak et al. 2015 66.433 29.45 274 -0.8 554 conifer ECM NA NA NA 44.6 362 8.6 NA NA NA 3518 NA NA NA 3.7 fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Chodak et al. 2015 66.433 29.45 274 -0.8 554 ECM NA NA NA 26.3 360 14.1 NA NA NA 3391 NA NA NA 4.6 f fixing floor non-N- Chodak et al. 2015 66.433 29.45 274 -0.8 554 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 23.5 12.5 0.48 NA NA NA 237 NA NA NA 4.3 fixing non-N- Chodak et al. 2015 66.433 29.45 274 -0.8 554 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 22.6 22.3 0.82 NA NA NA 199 NA NA NA 4.4 fixing boradlea non-N- Chodak et al. 2015 66.433 29.45 274 -0.8 554 ECM mineral NA NA NA 26.2 31.9 1.21 NA NA NA 208 NA NA NA 4.8 f fixing boradlea non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 2008 55.134 12.036 11 7.5 703 AM 2.7 1.48 0.027 53.9 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 2008 55.134 12.036 11 7.5 703 ECM 3.08 4.7 0.15 31.2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 2008 55.134 12.036 11 7.5 703 ECM 3.12 1.473 0.041 34.93 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest 0.0432 Vesterdal et al. 2008 55.134 12.036 11 7.5 703 ECM 3.6 1.472 34.01 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor 7 boradlea non-N- forest 0.1230 Vesterdal et al. 2008 55.134 12.036 11 7.5 703 AM 3.54 3.192 25.94 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor 6 non-N- forest 0.5635 Vesterdal et al. 2008 55.134 12.036 11 7.5 703 conifer ECM 4.2 15.12 26.83 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing floor 2 boradlea non-N- Vesterdal et al. 2008 55.134 12.036 11 7.5 703 AM mineral NA 14.1 1.1 12.8 36.7 2.87 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Vesterdal et al. 2008 55.134 12.036 11 7.5 703 ECM mineral NA 15.3 1.04 14.9 36.3 2.44 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Vesterdal et al. 2008 55.134 12.036 11 7.5 703 ECM mineral NA 14.9 1.04 14.5 39.6 2.73 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Vesterdal et al. 2008 55.134 12.036 11 7.5 703 ECM mineral NA 14.2 1.05 13.6 33.7 2.48 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Vesterdal et al. 2008 55.134 12.036 11 7.5 703 AM mineral NA 15.5 1.04 15 43 2.86 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing non-N- Vesterdal et al. 2008 55.134 12.036 11 7.5 703 conifer ECM mineral NA 17 1.01 16.9 43.7 2.58 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing boradlea non-N- Baum et al. 2009 51.083 10.45 439 7.7 870 ECM mineral NA NA NA 12 48 4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.1 f fixing boradlea non-N- forest 0.4657 Olsson et al. 2012 56.667 13.05 63 6.9 952 ECM NA 9.671 20.8 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.58 f fixing floor 6 boradlea non-N- 1.0958 Olsson et al. 2012 56.667 13.05 63 6.9 952 ECM mineral NA 20.7 18.9 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.41 f fixing 9 non-N- forest 1.2054 Olsson et al. 2012 56.667 13.05 63 6.9 952 conifer ECM NA 29.67 24.6 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.13 fixing floor 8 non-N- 1.2054 Olsson et al. 2012 56.667 13.05 63 6.9 952 conifer ECM mineral NA 24.85 20.6 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.12 fixing 8 non-N- forest 2.1643 Olsson et al. 2012 56.667 13.05 63 6.9 952 conifer ECM NA 59.33 27.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.7 fixing floor 8 non-N- 1.2602 Olsson et al. 2012 56.667 13.05 63 6.9 952 conifer ECM mineral NA 30.37 24.1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.01 fixing 7 boradlea non-N- forest 0.4657 Olsson et al. 2012 66.333 26.667 63 0.1 580 ECM NA 15.19 32.6 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.21 f fixing floor 6 boradlea non-N- 0.2191 Olsson et al. 2012 66.333 26.667 63 0.1 580 ECM mineral NA 5.543 25.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.77 f fixing 8 non-N- forest 0.4657 Olsson et al. 2012 66.333 26.667 63 0.1 580 conifer ECM NA 17.26 37.1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.07 fixing floor 6 non-N- 0.1643 Olsson et al. 2012 66.333 26.667 63 0.1 580 conifer ECM mineral NA 5.539 33.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.51 fixing 8 non-N- forest 0.5479 Olsson et al. 2012 66.333 26.667 63 0.1 580 conifer ECM NA 19.33 35.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4 fixing floor 4 non-N- 0.1369 Olsson et al. 2012 66.333 26.667 63 0.1 580 conifer ECM mineral NA 4.168 30.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.59 fixing 9 Smolander & Kitunen boradlea non-N- forest 194.67 66.333 26.667 63 0.1 580 ECM NA NA NA 30 600 20 NA NA 14.7718 1.5627 NA NA 2.8 2002 f fixing floor 4 Smolander & Kitunen non-N- forest 58.447 66.333 26.667 63 0.1 580 conifer ECM NA NA NA 32 559 17 NA NA 11.1852 1.2283 NA NA 2.7 2002 fixing floor 6 Smolander & Kitunen non-N- forest 6.7023 66.333 26.667 63 0.1 580 conifer ECM NA NA NA 37 570 15 NA NA 9.84338 0.9839 NA NA 2.3 2002 fixing floor 5 boradlea non-N- Selmants et al. 2005 45.05 -124 69 15 2400 ECM mineral NA NA NA 16.4 160 9.74 NA NA NA 2172 419 NA NA 3.9 f fixing non-N- Chatterjee et al. 2008 44 -104 2060 4 509 conifer ECM mineral NA 18.2 0.73 24.9 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing non-N- Chatterjee et al. 2008 44 -104 2060 4 509 conifer ECM mineral NA 20.9 1.21 17.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing non-N- Chatterjee et al. 2008 40 -106 2060 2 501 conifer ECM mineral NA 18.3 0.66 27.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing non-N- Chatterjee et al. 2008 40 -106 2060 2 501 conifer ECM mineral NA 22.2 0.85 26.1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing boradlea non-N- Malchair & Carnol 2009 50.017 4.4 333 8.8 881 ECM mineral NA NA NA 26.3 120.98 4.6 190 NA NA 2374.19 166.67 NA 1.47241 4.1 f fixing boradlea non-N- Malchair & Carnol 2009 50.017 4.4 333 8.8 881 ECM mineral NA NA NA 23.2 129.92 5.6 500 NA NA 2219.35 222.22 NA 1.68004 4 f fixing boradlea non-N- Malchair & Carnol 2009 50.567 6.016 350 8.8 1043 ECM mineral NA NA NA 24.6 228.78 9.3 900 NA NA 2529.03 225.69 NA 2.0257 3.9 f fixing boradlea non-N- Malchair & Carnol 2009 50.567 6.016 350 8.8 1043 ECM mineral NA NA NA 24 230.4 9.6 2100 NA NA 3174.19 350.69 NA 2.60432 4.1 f fixing non-N- Malchair & Carnol 2009 50.567 6.016 350 8.8 1043 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 29.2 230.68 7.9 0 NA NA 2812.9 208.33 NA 2.2788 3.8 fixing boradlea non-N- Malchair & Carnol 2009 50.3 5.967 400 8 1072 ECM mineral NA NA NA 22 129.8 5.9 100 NA NA 1987.1 180.56 NA 1.88333 4 f fixing boradlea non-N- Malchair & Carnol 2009 50.3 5.967 400 8 1072 ECM mineral NA NA NA 23.4 154.44 6.6 3000 NA NA 2141.94 187.5 NA 1.92874 4 f fixing non-N- Malchair & Carnol 2009 50.3 5.967 400 8 1072 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 30.2 199.32 6.6 11400 NA NA 1935.48 166.67 NA 2.18335 3.9 fixing non-N- Malchair & Carnol 2009 50.3 5.967 400 8 1072 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 27.7 182.82 6.6 0 NA NA 1806.45 159.72 NA 1.9274 3.8 fixing boradlea non-N- Malchair & Carnol 2009 49.817 5.713 503 7.9 1042 ECM mineral NA NA NA 22.4 161.28 7.2 0 NA NA 1858.06 163.19 NA 1.20775 3.9 f fixing boradlea non-N- Malchair & Carnol 2009 49.817 5.713 503 7.9 1042 ECM mineral NA NA NA 24.5 198.45 8.1 700 NA NA 1832.26 180.56 NA 1.55478 3.7 f fixing non-N- Malchair & Carnol 2009 49.817 5.713 503 7.9 1042 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 29.4 267.54 9.1 1600 NA NA 2993.55 208.33 NA 2.89823 3.7 fixing non-N- Malchair & Carnol 2009 49.817 5.713 503 7.9 1042 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 284 198.8 0.7 2400 NA NA 2296.77 121.53 NA 1.22867 3.7 fixing non-N- Huang et al. 2011 -43.65 172.7 50 11.8 724 conifer ECM mineral NA 18.5 1.7 1.1 42 39 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.2 fixing non-N- Huang et al. 2011 -43.65 172.7 50 11.8 724 conifer ECM mineral NA 21.5 1.7 1.3 50 39 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.2 fixing boradlea non-N- Huang et al. 2011 -43.65 172.7 50 11.8 724 ECM mineral NA 19.1 1.8 1.1 44 41 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.2 f fixing boradlea non-N- Huang et al. 2011 -43.65 172.7 50 11.8 724 ECM mineral NA 23.3 1.9 1.3 54 43 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.4 f fixing non-N- Huang et al. 2011 -43.65 172.7 50 11.8 724 conifer AM mineral NA 19.1 1.7 1.2 46 40 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.3 fixing non-N- Huang et al. 2011 -43.65 172.7 50 11.8 724 conifer AM mineral NA 21.9 1.7 1.3 52 41 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.5 fixing non-N- Huang et al. 2011 -43.65 172.7 50 11.8 724 conifer ECM mineral NA 70.1 6.4 11 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.2 fixing non-N- Huang et al. 2011 -43.65 172.7 50 11.8 724 conifer ECM mineral NA 74.3 6.4 11.6 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.2 fixing boradlea non-N- Huang et al. 2011 -43.65 172.7 50 11.8 724 ECM mineral NA 71.6 6.6 10.8 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.2 f fixing boradlea non-N- Huang et al. 2011 -43.65 172.7 50 11.8 724 ECM mineral NA 77.6 6.8 11.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.4 f fixing non-N- Huang et al. 2011 -43.65 172.7 50 11.8 724 conifer AM mineral NA 71.6 6.5 11 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.3 fixing non-N- Huang et al. 2011 -43.65 172.7 50 11.8 724 conifer AM mineral NA 70.6 6.2 11.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.5 fixing boradlea non-N- Huang et al. 2013 26.8 117.967 267 19.1 1673 AM mineral 9.5 18.57 1.03 18 39.5 2.2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.3 f fixing non-N- Huang et al. 2013 26.8 117.967 267 19.1 1673 conifer AM mineral 4.3 14.5 0.91 15.9 30.2 1.9 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.6 fixing boradlea non-N- Huang et al. 2014 22.167 106.833 360 21.3 1344 ECM mineral NA NA NA 2.3 16.9 7.2 2.03 0.39 NA 348.05 NA NA NA NA f fixing non-N- Fu et al. 2015 26.733 115.05 139 17.9 1489 conifer ECM mineral 4.94 NA NA 12.6 14.833 1.179 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.47 fixing non-N- Fu et al. 2015 26.733 115.05 139 17.9 1489 conifer ECM mineral 3.25 NA NA 11.6 12.791 1.105 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.49 fixing non-N- Fu et al. 2015 26.733 115.05 139 17.9 1489 conifer AM mineral 2.86 NA NA 14.2 21.145 1.486 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.07 fixing boradlea non-N- Kang et al. 2018 31.683 121.467 6 15.5 1039 AM mineral NA NA NA 1.2 23.8 20 1.5 11.7 NA NA NA NA NA 7.78 f fixing non-N- Kang et al. 2018 31.683 121.467 6 15.5 1039 conifer AM mineral NA NA NA 1.4 13.8 10 1.89 6.7 NA NA NA NA NA 7.8 fixing non-N- Kang et al. 2018 31.683 121.467 6 15.5 1039 conifer AM mineral NA NA NA 1.3 21.4 16 2.73 13.7 NA NA NA NA NA 7.77 fixing non-N- Kang et al. 2018 31.683 121.467 6 15.5 1039 conifer AM mineral NA NA NA 1.2 20.7 17 3.48 15.3 NA NA NA NA NA 7.81 fixing non-N- Jozefowska et al. 2017 50.336 21.345 155 7 650 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 13.4 13.4 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.2 fixing boradlea non-N- Jozefowska et al. 2017 50.336 21.345 155 7 650 ECM mineral NA NA NA 18.7 13.1 0.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 7.2 f fixing boradlea non-N- Jozefowska et al. 2017 50.336 21.345 155 7 650 ECM mineral NA NA NA 10.4 19.7 1.9 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.8 f fixing non-N- Jozefowska et al. 2017 50.144 19.251 238 8 700 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 35 7 0.2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6 fixing boradlea non-N- Jozefowska et al. 2017 50.144 19.251 238 8 700 ECM mineral NA NA NA 40.5 8.1 0.2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.5 f fixing boradlea non-N- Jozefowska et al. 2017 50.144 19.251 238 8 700 ECM mineral NA NA NA 68 6.8 0.1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.1 f fixing non-N- Jozefowska et al. 2017 51.132 19.257 240 7.6 580 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 37 7.4 0.2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.5 fixing boradlea non-N- Jozefowska et al. 2017 51.132 19.257 240 7.6 580 ECM mineral NA NA NA 49 4.9 0.1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.4 f fixing boradlea non-N- Jozefowska et al. 2017 51.132 19.257 240 7.6 580 ECM mineral NA NA NA 20.9 20.9 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.9 f fixing boradlea non-N- Hagen-Thorn et al. 2004 54.75 24.067 90 6.3 622.7 AM mineral NA 28.62 1.854 15.5 26.2 1.691 NA NA 18.5 NA NA NA NA 5.1 f fixing boradlea non-N- Hagen-Thorn et al. 2004 54.75 24.067 90 6.3 622.7 ECM mineral NA 27.82 1.605 17.3 25.9 1.497 NA NA 27.5 NA NA NA NA 4.7 f fixing boradlea non-N- Hagen-Thorn et al. 2004 54.75 24.067 90 6.3 622.7 ECM mineral NA 24.79 1.452 17.3 21.7 1.253 NA NA 23.8 NA NA NA NA 5 f fixing boradlea non-N- Hagen-Thorn et al. 2004 54.75 24.067 90 6.3 622.7 ECM mineral NA 27.38 1.69 16.2 23.2 1.43 NA NA 20.4 NA NA NA NA 5.5 f fixing boradlea non-N- Hagen-Thorn et al. 2004 54.75 24.067 90 6.3 622.7 ECM mineral NA 26.44 1.543 16.4 25.1 1.533 NA NA 23.8 NA NA NA NA 5.1 f fixing non-N- Hagen-Thorn et al. 2004 54.75 24.067 90 6.3 622.7 conifer ECM mineral NA 31.39 1.543 20.2 24.8 1.23 NA NA 41.2 NA NA NA NA 4.3 fixing boradlea non-N- forest Schulp et al. 2008 52.25 5.683 64 9.4 860 ECM NA 48.5 NA NA 245 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Schulp et al. 2008 52.25 5.683 64 9.4 860 ECM NA 11.06 NA NA 149 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Schulp et al. 2008 52.25 5.683 64 9.4 860 ECM NA 24.62 NA NA 193 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor non-N- forest Schulp et al. 2008 52.25 5.683 64 9.4 860 conifer ECM NA 29.64 NA NA 326 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing floor non-N- forest Schulp et al. 2008 52.25 5.683 64 9.4 860 conifer ECM NA 26.33 NA NA 240 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing floor non-N- forest Schulp et al. 2008 52.25 5.683 64 9.4 860 conifer ECM NA 26.65 NA NA 240 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing floor boradlea non-N- Schulp et al. 2008 52.25 5.683 64 9.4 860 ECM mineral NA 43.89 NA NA 34 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Schulp et al. 2008 52.25 5.683 64 9.4 860 ECM mineral NA 39.51 NA NA 37 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Schulp et al. 2008 52.25 5.683 64 9.4 860 ECM mineral NA 59.69 NA NA 43 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing non-N- Schulp et al. 2008 52.25 5.683 64 9.4 860 conifer ECM mineral NA 66.42 NA NA 52 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing non-N- Schulp et al. 2008 52.25 5.683 64 9.4 860 conifer ECM mineral NA 45.36 NA NA 36 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing non-N- Schulp et al. 2008 52.25 5.683 64 9.4 860 conifer ECM mineral NA 47.4 NA NA 35 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing boradlea non-N- Schulp et al. 2008 52.25 5.683 64 9.4 860 ECM mineral NA 68.27 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Schulp et al. 2008 52.25 5.683 64 9.4 860 ECM mineral NA 53.28 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Schulp et al. 2008 52.25 5.683 64 9.4 860 ECM mineral NA 81.61 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing non-N- Schulp et al. 2008 52.25 5.683 64 9.4 860 conifer ECM mineral NA 97.08 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing non-N- Schulp et al. 2008 52.25 5.683 64 9.4 860 conifer ECM mineral NA 62.51 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing non-N- Schulp et al. 2008 52.25 5.683 64 9.4 860 conifer ECM mineral NA 69.74 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing boradlea non-N- Diaz-Pines et al. 2011 40.4 -4.967 1380 10.2 1068 ECM mineral NA 26.13 0.84 18.1 55.6 3.1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.3 f fixing non-N- Diaz-Pines et al. 2011 40.4 -4.967 1380 9.9 1071 conifer ECM mineral NA 48.81 1.33 23 184.2 7.8 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.4 fixing boradlea non-N- Diaz-Pines et al. 2011 40.9 -3.867 1129 9.7 889 ECM mineral NA 38.14 0.89 17.7 104.5 5.8 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.7 f fixing non-N- Diaz-Pines et al. 2011 40.9 -3.867 1129 9.1 948 conifer ECM mineral NA 54.23 1.48 24.2 159.5 6.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.4 fixing boradlea non-N- Diaz-Pines et al. 2011 40.867 -4.017 1239 8.6 855 ECM mineral NA 22.6 1.08 13.1 39.3 3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.1 f fixing non-N- Diaz-Pines et al. 2011 40.867 -4.017 1239 8.9 806 conifer ECM mineral NA 43.49 1.12 24.5 127.9 5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.2 fixing boradlea non-N- forest 1.3675 23.763 Hansson et al. 2011 56.667 13.05 60 6.9 952 ECM 1.2 32.63 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor 8 4 non-N- forest 0.8373 Hansson et al. 2011 56.667 13.05 60 6.9 952 conifer ECM 2.3 16.65 20 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing floor 6 non-N- forest 0.3652 15.376 Hansson et al. 2011 56.667 13.05 60 6.9 952 conifer ECM 2 5.942 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing floor 8 3 boradlea non-N- 0.8894 17.634 Hansson et al. 2011 56.667 13.05 60 6.9 952 ECM mineral NA 15.94 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing 2 4 non-N- 0.7299 18.064 Hansson et al. 2011 56.667 13.05 60 6.9 952 conifer ECM mineral NA 13.01 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing 1 5 non-N- 0.8687 16.666 Hansson et al. 2011 56.667 13.05 60 6.9 952 conifer ECM mineral NA 14.1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing 5 7 non-N- 2.5824 Wang et al. 2013 22.167 106.833 350 21 1400 conifer ECM mineral NA 46.94 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing 6 boradlea non-N- 3.2701 Wang et al. 2013 22.167 106.833 350 21 1400 ECM mineral NA 49.49 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing 8 boradlea non-N- He et al. 2013 22.067 106.85 267 21.8 1259 ECM mineral NA 124.6 NA NA 39.72 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing non-N- He et al. 2013 22.067 106.85 267 21.8 1259 conifer ECM mineral NA 73.23 NA NA 24.93 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing boradlea Frouz et al. 2013 50.233 12.683 473 6.8 650 AM N-fixing mineral NA 36.9 NA NA 71 NA NA NA 15.3 402 NA NA 79.2 6.6 boradlea non-N- Frouz et al. 2013 50.233 12.683 473 6.8 650 ECM mineral NA 38 NA NA 95 NA NA NA 19 562 NA NA 76.8 6.5 f fixing boradlea non-N- Frouz et al. 2013 50.233 12.683 473 6.8 650 ECM mineral NA 16.5 NA NA 59 NA NA NA 11 240 NA NA 88.8 6.9 f fixing non-N- Frouz et al. 2013 50.233 12.683 473 6.8 650 conifer ECM mineral NA 23.1 NA NA 65 NA NA NA 14.8 237 NA NA 86.4 6.9 fixing non-N- Wen et al. 2014 28.1 113.033 50 17.2 1422 conifer ECM mineral NA 13.67 1.5 9.18 13.95 1.53 NA NA NA 270.103 30.103 NA NA 4.4 fixing boradlea non-N- Wen et al. 2014 28.1 113.033 50 17.2 1422 AM mineral NA 16.15 1.47 11.08 17 1.55 NA NA NA 340.206 65.567 NA NA 4.37 f fixing non-N- Wen et al. 2014 28.1 113.033 50 17.2 1422 conifer ECM mineral NA 21.02 1.42 15.1 13.92 0.94 NA NA NA 140.206 23.918 NA NA 4.14 fixing boradlea non-N- Wen et al. 2014 28.1 113.033 50 17.2 1422 AM mineral NA 24.38 1.94 13.25 17.93 1.43 NA NA NA 204.124 40.825 NA NA 4.51 f fixing non-N- Wen et al. 2014 28.1 113.033 50 17.2 1422 conifer ECM mineral NA 18.29 1.48 12.41 12.36 1 NA NA NA 113.402 18.969 NA NA 4.21 fixing boradlea non-N- Wen et al. 2014 28.1 113.033 50 17.2 1422 AM mineral NA 26.34 1.66 17.19 19.37 1.22 NA NA NA 195.876 39.588 NA NA 4.27 f fixing non-N- Song et al. 2017 41.55 118.617 886 6.5 462 conifer ECM mineral NA 54 6.3 8.7 12 1.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing boradlea non-N- Song et al. 2017 41.55 118.617 886 6.5 462 ECM mineral NA 52.27 5.62 8.88 12.1 1.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Song et al. 2017 41.55 118.617 886 6.5 462 AM mineral NA 45.99 6.13 7.99 10.5 1.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Wang et al. 2017 45.717 126.617 145 3.6 600 ECM mineral NA 35.6 1.2 30.2 13.3 0.44 NA NA 5.84 NA NA NA NA 6.27 f fixing non-N- Wang et al. 2017 45.717 126.617 145 3.6 600 conifer ECM mineral NA 21.2 0.74 28.5 7.4 0.26 NA NA 5.79 NA NA NA NA 6.37 fixing non-N- Wang et al. 2017 45.717 126.617 145 3.6 600 conifer ECM mineral NA 44.7 1.52 29.5 16.5 0.56 NA NA 10.95 NA NA NA NA 7.11 fixing non-N- Wang et al. 2017 45.717 126.617 145 3.6 600 conifer ECM mineral NA 37.4 1.48 25.4 13.7 0.54 NA NA 8.38 NA NA NA NA 6.6 fixing boradlea non-N- Wang et al. 2017 45.717 126.617 145 3.6 600 AM mineral NA 44.2 1.5 29.5 16.8 0.57 NA NA 6.18 NA NA NA NA 7.01 f fixing boradlea non-N- Wang et al. 2017 45.717 126.617 145 3.6 600 AM mineral NA 34.5 1.39 24.5 12.5 0.51 NA NA 2.7 NA NA NA NA 6.32 f fixing non-N- Wang et al. 2017 45.717 126.617 145 3.6 600 conifer ECM mineral NA 35.9 1.24 29.1 13.1 0.45 NA NA 6.33 NA NA NA NA 6.36 fixing boradlea non-N- Wang et al. 2017 45.717 126.617 145 3.6 600 ECM mineral NA 28 0.92 30.5 9.76 0.32 NA NA 6.1 NA NA NA NA 6.6 f fixing boradlea non-N- Wang et al. 2017 45.717 126.617 145 3.6 600 AM mineral NA 41.4 1.54 27 15.4 0.57 NA NA 8.27 NA NA NA NA 6.93 f fixing boradlea non-N- Wang et al. 2017 45.717 126.617 145 3.6 600 ECM mineral NA 31.9 1.19 27.1 11.1 0.41 NA NA 5.86 NA NA NA NA 6.8 f fixing non-N- Wang et al. 2017 45.717 126.617 145 3.6 600 conifer ECM mineral NA 38.7 1.42 27.3 15 0.55 NA NA 4.86 NA NA NA NA 6.39 fixing boradlea non-N- Wang et al. 2017 45.717 126.617 145 3.6 600 AM mineral NA 44.4 1.67 26.6 16.2 0.61 NA NA 8.79 NA NA NA NA 6.58 f fixing non-N- Wang et al. 2017 45.717 126.617 145 3.6 600 conifer ECM mineral NA 37.2 1.26 29.8 13.7 0.46 NA NA 7.67 NA NA NA NA 6.48 fixing non-N- forest Alriksson & Eriksson 1998 63.9 20.5 35 2.9 662 conifer ECM NA NA NA 26.7 320 12 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5 fixing floor non-N- forest Alriksson & Eriksson 1998 63.9 20.5 35 2.9 662 conifer ECM NA NA NA 29.2 350 12 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.9 fixing floor non-N- forest Alriksson & Eriksson 1998 63.9 20.5 35 2.9 662 conifer ECM NA NA NA 30.7 430 14 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.4 fixing floor non-N- forest Alriksson & Eriksson 1998 63.9 20.5 35 2.9 662 conifer ECM NA NA NA 25.3 380 15 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.5 fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Alriksson & Eriksson 1998 63.9 20.5 35 2.9 662 ECM NA NA NA 30.7 430 14 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.2 f fixing floor non-N- Alriksson & Eriksson 1998 63.9 20.5 35 2.9 662 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 15.9 59 3.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.6 fixing non-N- Alriksson & Eriksson 1998 63.9 20.5 35 2.9 662 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 15.1 53 3.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5 fixing non-N- Alriksson & Eriksson 1998 63.9 20.5 35 2.9 662 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 16.5 61 3.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.6 fixing non-N- Alriksson & Eriksson 1998 63.9 20.5 35 2.9 662 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 15.6 53 3.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.7 fixing boradlea non-N- Alriksson & Eriksson 1998 63.9 20.5 35 2.9 662 ECM mineral NA NA NA 17.6 65 3.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.8 f fixing non-N- Alriksson & Eriksson 1998 63.9 20.5 35 2.9 662 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 16.9 9.3 0.55 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.4 fixing non-N- Alriksson & Eriksson 1998 63.9 20.5 35 2.9 662 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 17.2 11 0.64 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.4 fixing non-N- Alriksson & Eriksson 1998 63.9 20.5 35 2.9 662 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 15.9 14 0.88 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.3 fixing non-N- Alriksson & Eriksson 1998 63.9 20.5 35 2.9 662 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 15.1 13 0.86 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.4 fixing boradlea non-N- Alriksson & Eriksson 1998 63.9 20.5 35 2.9 662 ECM mineral NA NA NA 15.4 6.3 0.41 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.5 f fixing boradlea non-N- Neirynck et al. 2000 50.7 4.3 149 9.9 780 ECM mineral NA 16.57 1.29 12.7 41 3.19 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.45 f fixing boradlea non-N- Neirynck et al. 2000 50.7 4.3 149 9.9 780 ECM mineral NA 19.51 1.56 13.5 43 3.43 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.63 f fixing boradlea non-N- Neirynck et al. 2000 50.7 4.3 149 9.9 780 ECM mineral NA 22.35 1.71 13.5 56 4.28 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.9 f fixing boradlea non-N- Neirynck et al. 2000 50.7 4.283 149 9.9 780 AM mineral NA 12.89 1.34 11.5 44 4.59 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.85 f fixing boradlea non-N- Neirynck et al. 2000 50.7 4.283 149 9.9 780 ECM mineral NA 20.33 1.48 14.1 53 3.87 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.65 f fixing boradlea non-N- Neirynck et al. 2000 50.7 4.267 149 9.9 780 AM mineral NA 21.17 2.04 11.7 52 5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.95 f fixing boradlea non-N- Neirynck et al. 2000 50.7 4.267 149 9.9 780 ECM mineral NA 19.32 1.28 16.6 47 3.11 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.82 f fixing boradlea forest Chodak et al. 2015 50.267 19.433 290 8 700 AM N-fixing NA NA NA 18 384 21.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.8 f floor boradlea non-N- forest Chodak et al. 2015 50.267 19.433 290 8 700 ECM NA NA NA 26 381 14.8 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.6 f fixing floor non-N- forest Chodak et al. 2015 50.267 19.433 290 8 700 conifer ECM NA NA NA 36 338 9.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.2 fixing floor non-N- forest Chodak et al. 2015 50.267 19.433 290 8 700 conifer ECM NA NA NA 38 359 9.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.3 fixing floor boradlea Chodak et al. 2015 50.267 19.433 290 8 700 AM N-fixing mineral NA NA NA 15 16.1 1.07 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.5 boradlea non-N- Chodak et al. 2015 50.267 19.433 290 8 700 ECM mineral NA NA NA 24 7.9 0.33 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.1 f fixing non-N- Chodak et al. 2015 50.267 19.433 290 8 700 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 33 5.4 0.17 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.8 fixing non-N- Chodak et al. 2015 50.267 19.433 290 8 700 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 34 6.1 0.18 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.1 fixing boradlea non-N- Kaur et al. 2000 29.983 76.85 256 23.9 700 AM mineral NA NA NA 8.2 6.8 0.83 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Kaur et al. 2000 29.983 76.85 256 23.9 700 ECM mineral NA NA NA 8.3 4.8 0.58 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Kaur et al. 2000 29.983 76.85 256 23.9 700 ECM mineral NA NA NA 8.3 5 0.6 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Kaur et al. 2000 29.983 76.85 256 23.9 700 AM mineral NA NA NA 8.8 5.7 0.65 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Kaur et al. 2000 29.983 76.85 256 23.9 700 ECM mineral NA NA NA 10.9 3.8 0.35 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Kaur et al. 2000 29.983 76.85 256 23.9 700 ECM mineral NA NA NA 7.1 4.2 0.59 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Kaur et al. 2000 29.983 76.85 256 23.9 700 AM mineral NA NA NA 8.4 4.8 0.57 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Kaur et al. 2000 29.983 76.85 256 23.9 700 ECM mineral NA NA NA 11.2 2.9 0.26 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Kaur et al. 2000 29.983 76.85 256 23.9 700 ECM mineral NA NA NA 10 3.2 0.32 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing Galicia & Garcia-Oliva boradlea non-N- 19.5 -105.083 106 24 746 AM mineral NA NA NA 8.6 31.74 3.67 NA NA 740 830 86 NA NA NA 2004 f fixing Galicia & Garcia-Oliva boradlea non-N- 19.5 -105.083 106 24 746 AM mineral NA NA NA 11.3 35.42 3.14 NA NA 530 330 87 NA NA NA 2004 f fixing Gartzia-Bengoetxea et al. boradlea non-N- forest 43.167 -2.85 410 14 1200 ECM NA NA NA 38.79 490.2 12.9 NA NA 650 NA NA NA NA NA 2016 f fixing floor Gartzia-Bengoetxea et al. boradlea non-N- forest 43.167 -2.85 410 14 1200 ECM NA NA NA 35.31 494.4 14.4 NA NA 690 NA NA NA NA NA 2016 f fixing floor Gartzia-Bengoetxea et al. non-N- forest 43.167 -2.85 410 14 1200 conifer ECM NA NA NA 40.81 493.4 12.3 NA NA 660 NA NA NA NA NA 2016 fixing floor Gartzia-Bengoetxea et al. boradlea non-N- forest 43.167 -2.85 410 14 1200 ECM NA NA NA 38.4 512.6 13.6 NA NA 560 NA NA NA NA NA 2016 f fixing floor Gartzia-Bengoetxea et al. boradlea non-N- 43.167 -2.85 410 14 1200 ECM mineral NA NA NA 8.6 17.2 2 NA NA 1.2 NA NA NA NA 5.4 2016 f fixing Gartzia-Bengoetxea et al. boradlea non-N- 43.167 -2.85 410 14 1200 ECM mineral NA NA NA 10.3 41.2 4 NA NA 1.7 NA NA NA NA 4.6 2016 f fixing Gartzia-Bengoetxea et al. non-N- 43.167 -2.85 410 14 1200 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 10.5 21 2 NA NA 0.6 NA NA NA NA 4.5 2016 fixing Gartzia-Bengoetxea et al. boradlea non-N- 43.167 -2.85 410 14 1200 ECM mineral NA NA NA 11.4 68.4 6 NA NA 3.9 NA NA NA NA 6.2 2016 f fixing non-N- Yu et al. 2008 42.717 122.367 246 6.2 450 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 1.62 3.9 0.395 0.51 0.74 101 82.09 10.59 NA NA 6.37 fixing non-N- Yu et al. 2008 42.717 122.367 246 6.2 450 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 1.65 3.97 0.415 0.61 0.93 111 82.04 9.86 NA NA 6.67 fixing non-N- Yu et al. 2008 42.717 122.367 246 6.2 450 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 1.68 4.73 0.327 0.57 0.47 82 73.77 8.94 NA NA 6.62 fixing non-N- 5.3812 170.52 Yang et al. 2018 46.267 131.35 283 3.4 620 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 16.267 2.983 NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.37 fixing 5 3 non-N- 11.287 291.77 Yang et al. 2018 46.267 131.35 283 3.4 620 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 37.158 3.311 NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.2 fixing 5 9 non-N- 6.1687 Yang et al. 2018 46.267 131.35 283 3.4 620 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 18.664 3.033 NA NA 290.37 NA NA NA NA 5.57 fixing 5 non-N- 9.2312 189.13 Yang et al. 2018 46.267 131.35 283 3.4 620 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 20.206 2.194 NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.66 fixing 5 2 non-N- Wang et al. 2016 25.05 102.767 1995 15 979 conifer ECM mineral NA 10.67 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing boradlea non-N- Wang et al. 2016 25.05 102.767 1995 15 979 ECM mineral NA 12.46 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Wotherspoon et al. 2014 43.533 -80.2 332 7.2 833 ECM mineral NA NA NA NA 19.1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing non-N- Wotherspoon et al. 2014 43.533 -80.2 332 7.2 833 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA NA 19 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing boradlea non-N- Wotherspoon et al. 2014 43.533 -80.2 332 7.2 833 ECM mineral NA NA NA NA 18.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Wotherspoon et al. 2014 43.533 -80.2 332 7.2 833 AM mineral NA NA NA NA 17.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing non-N- Wotherspoon et al. 2014 43.533 -80.2 332 7.2 833 conifer AM mineral NA NA NA NA 20.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing boradlea forest Frouz et al. 2009 50.233 12.683 469 6.8 650 AM N-fixing NA NA NA NA 290 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f floor boradlea non-N- forest Frouz et al. 2009 50.233 12.683 469 6.8 650 ECM NA NA NA NA 236 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Frouz et al. 2009 50.233 12.683 469 6.8 650 ECM NA NA NA NA 211 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor non-N- forest Frouz et al. 2009 50.233 12.683 469 6.8 650 conifer ECM NA NA NA NA 308 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing floor boradlea Frouz et al. 2009 50.233 12.683 469 6.8 650 AM N-fixing mineral NA 27.69 NA NA 71 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA boradlea non-N- Frouz et al. 2009 50.233 12.683 469 6.8 650 ECM mineral NA 34.58 NA NA 95 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Frouz et al. 2009 50.233 12.683 469 6.8 650 ECM mineral NA 25.66 NA NA 67 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing non-N- Frouz et al. 2009 50.233 12.683 469 6.8 650 conifer ECM mineral NA 15.08 NA NA 42 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing non-N- forest Mueller et al. 2012 51.233 18.1 179 8.2 573 conifer ECM NA 10.24 NA NA 8.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Mueller et al. 2012 51.233 18.1 179 8.2 573 AM NA 1.429 NA NA 8.8 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Mueller et al. 2012 51.233 18.1 179 8.2 573 AM NA 2.381 NA NA 11.9 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Mueller et al. 2012 51.233 18.1 179 8.2 573 ECM NA 8.81 NA NA 10.9 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Mueller et al. 2012 51.233 18.1 179 8.2 573 ECM NA 20.24 NA NA 12.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Mueller et al. 2012 51.233 18.1 179 8.2 573 ECM NA 8.571 NA NA 10.9 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor non-N- forest Mueller et al. 2012 51.233 18.1 179 8.2 573 conifer ECM NA 13.33 NA NA 8.2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing floor non-N- forest Mueller et al. 2012 51.233 18.1 179 8.2 573 conifer ECM NA 17.62 NA NA 16.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing floor non-N- forest Mueller et al. 2012 51.233 18.1 179 8.2 573 conifer ECM NA 24.52 NA NA 7.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing floor non-N- forest Mueller et al. 2012 51.233 18.1 179 8.2 573 conifer ECM NA 20.48 NA NA 10.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing floor non-N- forest Mueller et al. 2012 51.233 18.1 179 8.2 573 conifer ECM NA 11.19 NA NA 13.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Mueller et al. 2012 51.233 18.1 179 8.2 573 ECM NA 7.857 NA NA 11 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Mueller et al. 2012 51.233 18.1 179 8.2 573 ECM NA 22.62 NA NA 8.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Mueller et al. 2012 51.233 18.1 179 8.2 573 ECM NA 2.381 NA NA 7.8 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor non-N- Mueller et al. 2012 51.233 18.1 179 8.2 573 conifer ECM mineral NA 19.9 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing boradlea non-N- Mueller et al. 2012 51.233 18.1 179 8.2 573 AM mineral NA 14.2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Mueller et al. 2012 51.233 18.1 179 8.2 573 AM mineral NA 27 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Mueller et al. 2012 51.233 18.1 179 8.2 573 ECM mineral NA 23.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Mueller et al. 2012 51.233 18.1 179 8.2 573 ECM mineral NA 25.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Mueller et al. 2012 51.233 18.1 179 8.2 573 ECM mineral NA 25.1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing non-N- Mueller et al. 2012 51.233 18.1 179 8.2 573 conifer ECM mineral NA 19.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing non-N- Mueller et al. 2012 51.233 18.1 179 8.2 573 conifer ECM mineral NA 28.8 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing non-N- Mueller et al. 2012 51.233 18.1 179 8.2 573 conifer ECM mineral NA 18.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing non-N- Mueller et al. 2012 51.233 18.1 179 8.2 573 conifer ECM mineral NA 24.6 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing non-N- Mueller et al. 2012 51.233 18.1 179 8.2 573 conifer ECM mineral NA 25.1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing boradlea non-N- Mueller et al. 2012 51.233 18.1 179 8.2 573 ECM mineral NA 24.8 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Mueller et al. 2012 51.233 18.1 179 8.2 573 ECM mineral NA 20.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Mueller et al. 2012 51.233 18.1 179 8.2 573 ECM mineral NA 16.8 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing non-N- 0.4695 Wei et al. 2010 38.817 110.383 1120 8.4 437 conifer ECM mineral NA 2.826 6 2.03 0.34 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing 5 boradlea non-N- 0.6986 Wei et al. 2010 38.817 110.383 1120 8.4 437 ECM mineral NA 3.547 5.1 2.58 0.51 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing 2 non-N- 0.3315 Wei et al. 2010 38.817 110.383 1120 8.4 437 conifer ECM mineral NA 1.878 5.7 1.32 0.24 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing 9 boradlea non-N- 0.4391 Wei et al. 2010 38.817 110.383 1120 8.4 437 ECM mineral NA 2.386 5.4 1.77 0.33 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing 2 non-N- 0.4653 Wei et al. 2010 38.817 110.383 1120 8.4 437 conifer ECM mineral NA 2.172 4.7 0.75 0.17 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing 1 boradlea non-N- 0.5897 Wei et al. 2010 38.817 110.383 1120 8.4 437 ECM mineral NA 2.511 4.3 0.93 0.22 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing 9 non-N- 0.4127 Wei et al. 2010 38.817 110.383 1120 8.4 437 conifer ECM mineral NA 1.59 3.9 0.56 0.15 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing 4 boradlea non-N- 0.3902 Wei et al. 2010 38.817 110.383 1120 8.4 437 ECM mineral NA 1.364 3.5 0.5 0.15 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing 5 boradlea non-N- forest Langenbruch et al. 2012 51.1 10.517 288 7.5 670 ECM NA 0.42 0.016 26.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Langenbruch et al. 2012 51.1 10.517 288 7.5 670 AM NA 0.16 0.007 24.1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Langenbruch et al. 2012 51.1 10.517 288 7.5 670 ECM NA 0.2 0.009 21.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor boradlea non-N- Langenbruch et al. 2012 51.1 10.517 288 7.5 670 ECM mineral NA 30.7 2.2 13.9 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Langenbruch et al. 2012 51.1 10.517 288 7.5 670 AM mineral NA 37.1 2.7 13.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Langenbruch et al. 2012 51.1 10.517 288 7.5 670 ECM mineral NA 27.1 2.1 13.1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Wang & Zhong 2016 26.833 109.6 392 16.5 1200 AM mineral NA NA NA 12.3 24.7 2.01 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Wang & Zhong 2016 26.833 109.6 392 16.5 1200 AM mineral NA NA NA 11.8 22 1.87 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing non-N- Wang & Zhong 2016 26.833 109.6 392 16.5 1200 conifer AM mineral NA NA NA 13.2 23.3 1.77 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing non-N- Wang & Zhong 2016 26.833 109.6 392 16.5 1200 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 12.8 20.4 1.59 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing boradlea non-N- forest Andivia et al. 2016 49.317 16.717 505 7.2 592 ECM NA 6.79 NA 22.29 329.8 16.6 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor non-N- forest Andivia et al. 2016 49.317 16.717 505 7.2 592 conifer ECM NA 26.25 NA 23.65 354.8 14.2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing floor boradlea non-N- Andivia et al. 2016 49.317 16.717 505 7.2 592 ECM mineral NA 41.73 1.43 21.94 27.9 1.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing non-N- Andivia et al. 2016 49.317 16.717 505 7.2 592 conifer ECM mineral NA 41.93 1.32 21.73 26.1 1.2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing boradlea non-N- Wang et al. 2015 45.4 127.47 486 2.8 629 ECM mineral NA 93.06 15.77 NA 19.885 3.37 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.64 f fixing boradlea non-N- Wang et al. 2015 45.4 127.47 486 2.8 629 AM mineral NA 87.76 14.73 NA 21.096 3.54 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.77 f fixing boradlea non-N- Wang et al. 2015 45.4 127.47 486 2.8 629 AM mineral NA 94.46 16.12 NA 21.274 3.63 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.75 f fixing non-N- Wang et al. 2015 45.4 127.47 486 2.8 629 conifer ECM mineral NA 79.08 14.16 NA 17.651 3.16 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.69 fixing non-N- Wang et al. 2015 45.4 127.47 486 2.8 629 conifer ECM mineral NA 84.76 14.69 NA 19.62 3.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.79 fixing boradlea non-N- Wang et al. 2015 45.4 127.47 486 2.8 629 ECM mineral NA 23.88 NA NA 25.402 NA NA NA NA 281.984 NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Wang et al. 2015 45.4 127.47 486 2.8 629 AM mineral NA 26.48 NA NA 27.586 NA NA NA NA 484.073 NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Wang et al. 2015 45.4 127.47 486 2.8 629 AM mineral NA 26.15 NA NA 27.241 NA NA NA NA 476.24 NA NA NA NA f fixing non-N- Wang et al. 2015 45.4 127.47 486 2.8 629 conifer ECM mineral NA 23.38 NA NA 25.977 NA NA NA NA 283.551 NA NA NA NA fixing non-N- Wang et al. 2015 45.4 127.47 486 2.8 629 conifer ECM mineral NA 24.47 NA NA 24.713 NA NA NA NA 338.381 NA NA NA NA fixing boradlea non-N- forest Finzi et al. 1998 42 -73.25 277 7.3 1218 AM NA 81 5.55 15 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Finzi et al. 1998 42 -73.25 277 7.3 1218 AM NA 81 5.632 14.8 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Finzi et al. 1998 42 -73.25 277 7.3 1218 AM NA 87 5.896 15.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Finzi et al. 1998 42 -73.25 277 7.3 1218 ECM NA 82 4.629 18.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Finzi et al. 1998 42 -73.25 277 7.3 1218 ECM NA 94 5.077 19.2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor non-N- forest Finzi et al. 1998 42 -73.25 277 7.3 1218 conifer ECM NA 108 5.776 19.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing floor boradlea non-N- Finzi et al. 1998 42 -73.25 277 7.3 1218 AM mineral NA 37.31 NA 14.1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Finzi et al. 1998 42 -73.25 277 7.3 1218 AM mineral NA 36.43 NA 13.9 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Finzi et al. 1998 42 -73.25 277 7.3 1218 AM mineral NA 39 NA 17.1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Finzi et al. 1998 42 -73.25 277 7.3 1218 ECM mineral NA 35.51 NA 17.2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Finzi et al. 1998 42 -73.25 277 7.3 1218 ECM mineral NA 37.58 NA 19.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing non-N- Finzi et al. 1998 42 -73.25 277 7.3 1218 conifer ECM mineral NA 39.48 NA 19.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing non-N- Lu et al. 2017 -25.933 153.083 25 21.1 1445 conifer ECM mineral NA 19.9 0.55 36.1 19.7 0.54 NA NA 25.72 116.29 15.07 NA NA 4.51 fixing non-N- Lu et al. 2017 -25.933 153.083 25 21.1 1445 conifer AM mineral NA 12.97 0.6 21.68 10.9 0.5 NA NA 28.94 62.5 8.49 NA NA 6.03 fixing non-N- Lu et al. 2017 -25.933 153.083 25 21.1 1445 conifer AM mineral NA 11.48 0.6 18.92 9.9 0.52 NA NA 31.35 147.63 24.59 NA NA 6.45 fixing boradlea non-N- Ndlovu et al. 2013 0 38 684 23.3 658 AM mineral NA NA NA NA 2.034 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.99 f fixing boradlea non-N- Ndlovu et al. 2013 0 38 684 23.3 658 AM mineral NA NA NA NA 2.6827 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.41 f fixing boradlea non-N- Ndlovu et al. 2013 0 38 684 23.3 658 AM mineral NA NA NA NA 2.8527 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.43 f fixing boradlea non-N- Ndlovu et al. 2013 -0.07 37.18 2470 14 1176 AM mineral NA NA NA NA 2.4533 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.1 f fixing boradlea non-N- Ndlovu et al. 2013 -0.07 37.18 2470 14 1176 AM mineral NA NA NA NA 2.9077 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.38 f fixing boradlea non-N- Ndlovu et al. 2013 -0.07 37.18 2470 14 1176 AM mineral NA NA NA NA 2.561 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.31 f fixing boradlea non-N- Ndlovu et al. 2013 0.05 37.65 1595 18.7 1709 AM mineral NA NA NA NA 2.5258 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.65 f fixing boradlea non-N- Ndlovu et al. 2013 0.05 37.65 1595 18.7 1709 AM mineral NA NA NA NA 2.9697 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.18 f fixing boradlea Ndlovu et al. 2013 0.05 37.65 1595 18.7 1709 AM N-fixing mineral NA NA NA NA 2.9204 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.16 boradlea non-N- Ndlovu et al. 2013 -0.26 37.28 3466 8.1 1734 AM mineral NA NA NA NA 2.3149 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.69 f fixing boradlea non-N- Ndlovu et al. 2013 -0.26 37.28 3466 8.1 1734 AM mineral NA NA NA NA 2.1419 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.73 f fixing boradlea non-N- Ndlovu et al. 2013 -0.26 37.28 3466 8.1 1734 AM mineral NA NA NA NA 2.0417 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.67 f fixing boradlea non-N- Aponte et al. 2014 36.517 37.083 478 15.5 1117 ECM mineral NA NA NA NA 39 2.8 8.1 2.5 NA 378 46 7.9 NA NA f fixing non-N- Aponte et al. 2014 36.517 37.083 478 15.5 1117 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA NA 30 2.2 19 7.9 NA 63 6.9 4 NA NA fixing non-N- Zhou et al. 2017 -25.933 153.083 26 21.1 1287 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 31.8 13.81 0.44 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.58 fixing non-N- Zhou et al. 2017 -25.933 153.083 26 21.1 1287 conifer AM mineral NA NA NA 23.1 10.13 0.43 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.64 fixing non-N- Zhou et al. 2017 -25.933 153.083 26 21.1 1287 conifer AM mineral NA NA NA 21.2 8.92 0.42 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.01 fixing boradlea non-N- Zhou et al. 2017 -25.933 153.083 26 21.1 1287 ECM mineral NA NA NA 29.8 26.11 0.87 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.49 f fixing boradlea non-N- Chaiyasen et al. 2017 16.033 100.783 82 27.8 1213 AM mineral NA NA NA NA 29.6 NA NA NA 100.33 NA NA NA NA 5.56 f fixing boradlea non-N- Chaiyasen et al. 2017 16.2 100.967 199 26.9 1226 AM mineral NA NA NA NA 28.2 NA NA NA 57 NA NA NA NA 6.36 f fixing boradlea non-N- Chaiyasen et al. 2017 14.267 101.117 9 27.7 1342 AM mineral NA NA NA NA 36.3 NA NA NA 368.67 NA NA NA NA 6.68 f fixing boradlea non-N- Chaiyasen et al. 2017 18.967 99.25 567 25.1 1120 AM mineral NA NA NA NA 39.6 NA NA NA 128.67 NA NA NA NA 5.7 f fixing boradlea non-N- Chaiyasen et al. 2017 19.233 99.483 656 24.7 1158 AM mineral NA NA NA NA 29.8 NA NA NA 49 NA NA NA NA 5.23 f fixing non-N- forest Chodak & Niklinska 2010 50.267 19.433 300 8 700 conifer ECM NA NA NA 35.45 339.78 9.459 NA NA NA 4.68184 NA NA 32.9721 NA fixing floor boradlea forest Chodak & Niklinska 2010 50.267 19.433 300 8 700 AM N-fixing NA NA NA 17.6 385.62 21.79 NA NA NA 6.01856 NA NA 36.2454 NA f floor boradlea non-N- forest Chodak & Niklinska 2010 50.267 19.433 300 8 700 ECM NA NA NA 25.64 382.92 14.91 NA NA NA 9.81824 NA NA 60.5847 NA f fixing floor non-N- forest Chodak & Niklinska 2010 50.267 19.433 300 8 700 conifer ECM NA NA NA 37.46 358.65 9.573 NA NA NA 6.05014 NA NA 46.5425 NA fixing floor non-N- 0.10020 Chodak & Niklinska 2010 50.267 19.433 300 8 700 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 32.55 5.3933 0.168 NA NA NA NA NA 0.585561 NA fixing 1 boradlea 0.14807 Chodak & Niklinska 2010 50.267 19.433 300 8 700 AM N-fixing mineral NA NA NA 14.93 16.18 1.064 NA NA NA NA NA 0.818182 NA f 2 boradlea non-N- 0.21342 Chodak & Niklinska 2010 50.267 19.433 300 8 700 ECM mineral NA NA NA 23.67 7.8202 0.318 NA NA NA NA NA 1.17914 NA f fixing 6 non-N- 0.12189 Chodak & Niklinska 2010 50.267 19.433 300 8 700 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 34.06 6.2023 0.176 NA NA NA NA NA 0.57754 NA fixing 6 boradlea non-N- Liang et al. 2006 46.217 -88.3 420 18 578 ECM mineral NA 41.43 3.08 13.46 31.03 2.31 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Liang et al. 2006 46.217 -88.3 420 18 578 AM mineral NA 37.33 2.52 14.7 27.96 1.89 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing non-N- Liang et al. 2006 46.217 -88.3 420 18 1200 conifer ECM mineral NA 53.76 3.23 16.71 29.14 1.75 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing non-N- Wang et al. 2013 26.875 109.668 318 16.5 1200 conifer ECM mineral NA 45.88 3.41 NA 20.3 1.51 NA NA 0.24 550 NA NA 75.9322 4.27 fixing boradlea non-N- Wang et al. 2013 26.875 109.668 318 16.5 1200 AM mineral NA 66.24 5.14 NA 27.6 2.14 NA NA 0.32 415.385 NA NA 67.7966 4.46 f fixing boradlea non-N- Wang et al. 2013 26.875 109.668 318 16.5 1785 AM mineral NA 55.93 3.95 NA 23.9 1.69 NA NA 0.21 484.615 NA NA 67.3446 4.38 f fixing non-N- forest Deng et al. 2010 28.25 116.917 46 17.8 1785 conifer ECM NA NA NA NA 35.83 2.11 NA NA 390 740 NA NA NA 4.16 fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Deng et al. 2010 28.25 116.917 46 17.8 1785 AM NA NA NA NA 31.2 2.07 NA NA 510 500 NA NA NA 4.75 f fixing floor boradlea forest Deng et al. 2010 28.25 116.917 46 17.8 1785 AM N-fixing NA NA NA NA 45.46 3.05 NA NA 380 830 NA NA NA 4.07 f floor non-N- Deng et al. 2010 28.25 116.917 46 17.8 1785 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA NA 11.6 1.11 NA NA 340 230 NA NA NA 4.19 fixing boradlea non-N- Deng et al. 2010 28.25 116.917 46 17.8 1785 AM mineral NA NA NA NA 11.94 1.04 NA NA 430 200 NA NA NA 4.65 f fixing boradlea Deng et al. 2010 28.25 116.917 46 17.8 1785 AM N-fixing mineral NA NA NA NA 17.26 1.25 NA NA 350 260 NA NA NA 4.3 non-N- Kara et al. 2016 40.567 39.283 1120 9.4 461 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA NA 14.9 NA NA NA NA 165.865 NA NA 20.2314 7.65 fixing boradlea Kara et al. 2016 40.567 39.283 1120 9.4 461 ECM N-fixing mineral NA NA NA NA 18.5 NA NA NA NA 211.158 NA NA 18.644 7.68 non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 54.783 11.367 18 8.7 590 conifer ECM NA 2.85 0.072 39.6 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.88 fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 54.783 11.367 18 8.7 590 ECM NA 2.57 0.093 27.6 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.02 f fixing floor non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 54.783 11.367 18 8.7 590 conifer ECM NA 16.11 0.431 37.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.58 fixing floor non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 54.783 11.367 18 8.7 590 conifer ECM NA 4.02 0.155 25.9 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4 fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 54.783 11.367 18 8.7 590 ECM NA 0.72 0.026 27.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.13 f fixing floor non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 54.783 11.367 18 8.7 590 conifer ECM NA 6.33 0.249 25.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.42 fixing floor non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 54.783 11.367 18 8.7 590 conifer ECM NA 12.76 0.422 30.2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.87 fixing floor non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 54.233 11.483 18 8.9 582 conifer ECM NA 1.88 0.048 39.2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5 fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 54.233 11.483 18 8.9 582 ECM NA 2.92 0.101 28.9 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.05 f fixing floor non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 54.233 11.483 18 8.9 582 conifer ECM NA 16.67 0.434 38.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.46 fixing floor non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 54.233 11.483 18 8.9 582 conifer ECM NA 2.34 0.085 27.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.39 fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 54.233 11.483 18 8.9 582 ECM NA 1.51 0.055 27.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.27 f fixing floor non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 54.233 11.483 18 8.9 582 conifer ECM NA 4.54 0.166 27.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.02 fixing floor non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 54.233 11.483 18 8.9 582 conifer ECM NA 7.21 0.263 27.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.1 fixing floor non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 55.967 12.35 10 8.1 595 conifer ECM NA 3.26 0.102 32 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.62 fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 55.967 12.35 10 8.1 595 ECM NA 3.43 0.135 25.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.62 f fixing floor non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 55.967 12.35 10 8.1 595 conifer ECM NA 20.88 0.595 35.1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.51 fixing floor non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 55.967 12.35 10 8.1 595 conifer ECM NA 7.46 0.288 25.9 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.89 fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 55.967 12.35 10 8.1 595 ECM NA 2.25 0.072 31.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.2 f fixing floor non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 55.967 12.35 10 8.1 595 conifer ECM NA 11.09 0.394 28.1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.27 fixing floor non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 55.967 12.35 10 8.1 595 conifer ECM NA 7.44 0.238 31.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.08 fixing floor non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 56.467 10.533 36 7.8 659 conifer ECM NA 12.68 0.585 21.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.46 fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 56.467 10.533 36 7.8 659 ECM NA 15.2 0.672 22.6 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.73 f fixing floor non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 56.467 10.533 36 7.8 659 conifer ECM NA 18.25 0.517 35.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.36 fixing floor non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 56.467 10.533 36 7.8 659 conifer ECM NA 11.43 0.54 21.2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.54 fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 56.467 10.533 36 7.8 659 ECM NA 8.19 0.401 20.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.04 f fixing floor non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 56.467 10.533 36 7.8 659 conifer ECM NA 20.79 0.887 23.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.34 fixing floor non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 56.467 10.533 36 7.8 659 conifer ECM NA 16.56 0.716 23.1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.71 fixing floor non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 56.713 10.017 33 7.7 648 conifer ECM NA 2.38 0.072 33.1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.92 fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 56.713 10.017 33 7.7 648 ECM NA 3.5 0.131 26.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.28 f fixing floor non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 56.713 10.017 33 7.7 648 conifer ECM NA 14.9 0.446 33.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.57 fixing floor non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 56.713 10.017 33 7.7 648 conifer ECM NA 5.85 0.214 27.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.41 fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 56.713 10.017 33 7.7 648 ECM NA 1.08 0.037 29.2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.36 f fixing floor non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 56.713 10.017 33 7.7 648 conifer ECM NA 5.97 0.23 26 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.85 fixing floor non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 56.713 10.017 33 7.7 648 conifer ECM NA 6.68 0.194 34.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.5 fixing floor non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 55.133 8.833 9 8.3 839 conifer ECM NA 2.69 0.1 26.9 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.75 fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 55.133 8.833 9 8.3 839 ECM NA 3.86 0.115 33.6 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.89 f fixing floor non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 55.133 8.833 9 8.3 839 conifer ECM NA 18.19 0.504 36.1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.51 fixing floor non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 55.133 8.833 9 8.3 839 conifer ECM NA 9.48 0.342 27.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.93 fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 55.133 8.833 9 8.3 839 ECM NA 0.73 0.02 36.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.98 f fixing floor non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 55.133 8.833 9 8.3 839 conifer ECM NA 9.14 0.311 29.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.38 fixing floor non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 55.133 8.833 9 8.3 839 conifer ECM NA 7.43 0.257 28.9 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.15 fixing floor non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 56.283 8.433 9 8.7 862 conifer ECM NA 14.95 0.54 27.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.61 fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 56.283 8.433 9 8.7 862 ECM NA 19.26 0.866 22.2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.82 f fixing floor non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 56.283 8.433 9 8.7 862 conifer ECM NA 16.16 0.533 30.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.36 fixing floor non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 56.283 8.433 9 8.7 862 conifer ECM NA 15.92 0.685 23.2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.7 fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 56.283 8.433 9 8.7 862 ECM NA 6.1 0.301 20.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.79 f fixing floor non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 56.283 8.433 9 8.7 862 conifer ECM NA 19.78 0.797 24.8 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.53 fixing floor non-N- forest Vesterdal et al. 1998 56.283 8.433 9 8.7 862 conifer ECM NA 20.69 0.818 25.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.52 fixing floor non-N- Bell et al. 2017 37.4285 -83.1709 368 12.1 1385 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 0.21 0.22 1.04 NA NA 6.79 NA NA NA NA 6.2 fixing non-N- Bell et al. 2017 37.4285 -83.1709 368 12.1 1385 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 0.17 0.34 1.96 NA NA 7.79 NA NA NA NA 5.72 fixing boradlea Bolat et al. 2015 41.617 32.75 602 9.1 490 ECM N-fixing mineral NA 7.11 1.89 3.92 6.4 1.7 NA NA NA 314.943 43.848 NA 7.263 8.26 non-N- Sariyildiz et al. 2015 41.383 33.767 870 9.5 490 conifer ECM mineral NA 48.3 2.37 21 41.3 2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.4 fixing non-N- Sariyildiz et al. 2015 41.383 33.767 870 9.5 490 conifer ECM mineral NA 78.8 4.2 19 32.3 1.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.4 fixing boradlea non-N- Sariyildiz et al. 2015 41.383 33.767 870 9 490 ECM mineral NA 44.5 4.98 15 36.7 2.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.7 f fixing boradlea non-N- Sariyildiz et al. 2015 41.383 33.767 870 9 490 ECM mineral NA 72.9 5.77 13 28.4 2.2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.7 f fixing non-N- Sariyildiz et al. 2015 41.383 33.767 870 8.5 490 conifer ECM mineral NA 41.1 5.19 8 31.8 4.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.5 fixing non-N- Sariyildiz et al. 2015 41.383 33.767 870 8.5 550 conifer ECM mineral NA 67 9.57 7 25.1 3.9 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.5 fixing non-N- Sariyildiz et al. 2015 41.383 33.767 870 11.5 550 conifer ECM mineral NA 43 3.32 13 35.4 2.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.9 fixing non-N- Sariyildiz et al. 2015 41.383 33.767 870 11.5 550 conifer ECM mineral NA 70.9 5.93 12 28 2.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.9 fixing non-N- Sariyildiz et al. 2015 41.383 33.767 870 11.5 550 conifer ECM mineral NA 38.1 3.8 9 31.4 3.1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing non-N- Sariyildiz et al. 2015 41.383 33.767 870 11.5 568 conifer ECM mineral NA 61.3 6.82 10 24.2 2.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing boradlea non-N- forest Oostra et al. 2006 56.033 12.683 40 8.2 568 AM NA NA NA 19.1 158 8.2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.77 f fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Oostra et al. 2006 56.033 12.683 40 8.2 568 ECM NA NA NA 21.8 171 7.8 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.97 f fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Oostra et al. 2006 56.033 12.683 40 8.2 568 AM NA NA NA 20 118 5.9 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.87 f fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Oostra et al. 2006 56.033 12.683 40 8.2 568 ECM NA NA NA 21.7 241 11 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.13 f fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Oostra et al. 2006 56.033 12.683 40 8.2 568 ECM NA NA NA 22.6 234 10.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.96 f fixing floor non-N- forest Oostra et al. 2006 56.033 12.683 40 8.2 568 conifer ECM NA NA NA 22.4 287 12.8 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.23 fixing floor boradlea non-N- Oostra et al. 2006 56.033 12.683 40 8.2 568 AM mineral NA NA NA 15.2 49 3.2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.88 f fixing boradlea non-N- Oostra et al. 2006 56.033 12.683 40 8.2 568 ECM mineral NA NA NA 15.5 43 2.8 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.23 f fixing boradlea non-N- Oostra et al. 2006 56.033 12.683 40 8.2 568 AM mineral NA NA NA 14.6 51 3.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.87 f fixing boradlea non-N- Oostra et al. 2006 56.033 12.683 40 8.2 568 ECM mineral NA NA NA 15.7 45 2.8 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.48 f fixing boradlea non-N- Oostra et al. 2006 56.033 12.683 40 8.2 568 ECM mineral NA NA NA 17.1 64 3.8 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.53 f fixing non-N- Oostra et al. 2006 56.033 12.683 40 8.2 568 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 20.6 54 2.6 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.76 fixing non-N- Cheng et al. 2013 33.433 108.433 1746 8.3 830 conifer ECM mineral NA 40.05 2.07 19.32 37.08 1.92 14.01 3.02 400 772.355 97.674 NA 13.1969 6.06 fixing boradlea non-N- Cheng et al. 2013 33.433 108.433 1746 8.3 830 ECM mineral NA 23.53 1.5 15.71 26.44 1.69 20.87 2.65 340 845.531 123.01 NA 9.897672 3.95 f fixing non-N- Cheng et al. 2013 22.45 108.467 1746 21.6 1576 conifer ECM mineral NA 20.08 1.44 13.98 18.09 1.3 18.86 3.13 320 505.695 61.884 NA 6.59844 5.93 fixing non-N- Cheng et al. 2013 22.45 108.467 1746 21.6 1576 conifer ECM mineral NA 51.82 4.08 12.74 48.89 3.85 20.1 2.57 1140 914.721 80.648 NA 15.45427 5.86 fixing boradlea non-N- Yu et al. 2015 34.483 107.983 699 10.8 601.6 AM mineral NA NA NA 10.55 11.93 1.13 4.77 1.03 380 NA NA NA NA 7.72 f fixing boradlea non-N- 574.91 58.923 Kooch et al. 2018 36.35 53 559 15.5 808 AM mineral NA 31.3 5.38 5.79 16.3 2.8 NA 35.3431 18.634 NA NA 6.86 f fixing 7 2 boradlea non-N- 584.25 56.792 Kooch et al. 2018 36.35 53 559 15.5 808 AM mineral NA 31.37 4.35 7.3 16.6 2.3 NA 29.2209 17.398 NA NA 6.67 f fixing 7 4 non-N- 620.40 53.017 Kooch et al. 2018 36.35 53 559 15.5 808 conifer AM mineral NA 57.3 4.58 12.69 20 1.6 NA 17.6471 11.338 NA NA 6.16 fixing 6 8 non-N- 623.68 52.525 Kooch et al. 2018 36.35 53 559 15.5 808 conifer ECM mineral NA 44.89 2.09 20.28 25.8 1.2 NA 16.0684 10.253 NA NA 5.84 fixing 4 2 boradlea non-N- Lejon et al. 2005 47.3 4.067 618 9 1300 ECM mineral NA NA NA 18.2 67 3.7 NA NA NA 904 NA NA NA 3.6 f fixing non-N- Lejon et al. 2005 47.3 4.067 618 9 1300 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 19.5 72 3.6 NA NA NA 773 NA NA NA 3.6 fixing non-N- Lejon et al. 2005 47.3 4.067 618 9 1300 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 19.1 77 4 NA NA NA 699 NA NA NA 3.6 fixing boradlea non-N- 9182.2 Li et al. 2015 24.717 102.567 1974 14.7 918 ECM mineral NA NA NA 40.58 22.72 0.56 NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.9 f fixing 4 non-N- 7945.0 Li et al. 2015 24.717 102.567 1974 14.7 918 conifer AM mineral NA NA NA 22.3 16.28 0.73 NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.2 fixing 4 non-N- 3914.2 Li et al. 2015 24.717 102.567 1974 14.7 918 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 23.39 18.01 0.77 NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.7 fixing 2 boradlea non-N- 1746.7 Li et al. 2015 24.717 102.567 1974 14.7 918 ECM mineral NA NA NA 33.14 24.86 0.75 NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.2 f fixing 1 non-N- Li et al. 2015 24.717 102.567 1974 14.7 918 conifer AM mineral NA NA NA 24.31 33.79 1.39 NA NA 1829 NA NA NA NA 6.2 fixing non-N- 21234. Li et al. 2015 24.717 102.567 1974 14.7 918 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 21.06 20.85 0.99 NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.2 fixing 7 boradlea non-N- 7892.9 Li et al. 2015 24.717 102.567 1974 14.7 918 ECM mineral NA NA NA 33.45 47.5 1.42 NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.5 f fixing 7 non-N- 9139.1 Li et al. 2015 24.717 102.567 1974 14.7 918 conifer AM mineral NA NA NA 36.39 56.04 1.54 NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.9 fixing 5 non-N- 2158.3 Li et al. 2015 24.717 102.567 1974 14.7 918 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 30.04 27.04 0.9 NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.7 fixing 4 Galicia & Garcia-Oliva boradlea non-N- forest 19.5 -105.083 62 24 746 AM NA NA NA 22 317 16.4 NA NA 2650 NA NA NA NA NA 2011 f fixing floor Galicia & Garcia-Oliva boradlea non-N- forest 19.5 -105.083 62 24 746 AM NA NA NA 23 301 13.4 NA NA 1770 NA NA NA NA NA 2011 f fixing floor Galicia & Garcia-Oliva boradlea non-N- 19.5 -105.083 62 24 746 AM mineral NA NA NA 14.3 40.1 2.8 NA NA 590 774 115 NA NA NA 2011 f fixing Galicia & Garcia-Oliva boradlea non-N- 19.5 -105.083 62 24 746 AM mineral NA NA NA 10.4 30.3 2.9 NA NA 470 662 66 NA NA NA 2011 f fixing non-N- Lucas-Borja et al. 2012 40.017 -1.983 1199 11.9 595 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 28.61 102.3 4.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA 48.59 6.82 fixing non-N- Lucas-Borja et al. 2012 40.017 -1.983 1199 11.9 595 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 31.23 153 5.2 NA NA NA NA NA NA 82.93 5.71 fixing boradlea non-N- Luo et al. 2016 22.167 106.7 231 21 1400 AM mineral NA NA NA 13.1 18.8 1.43 8.08 2.32 NA NA NA NA NA 4.51 f fixing non-N- Luo et al. 2016 22.167 106.7 231 21 1400 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 16.94 17.07 1.01 5.1 1.65 NA NA NA NA NA 4.67 fixing boradlea non-N- forest Luo et al. 2016 22.167 106.7 231 21 1400 AM 3.895 NA NA 14.13 483.6 34.2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor non-N- forest Luo et al. 2016 22.167 106.7 231 21 1400 conifer ECM 3.367 NA NA 36.67 509.7 13.9 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing floor non-N- Mareschal et al. 2010 47.3 4.083 657 9 638 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA NA 66.54 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.15 fixing non-N- Mareschal et al. 2010 47.3 4.083 657 9 638 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA NA 67.22 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.04 fixing non-N- Mareschal et al. 2010 47.3 4.083 657 9 638 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA NA 69.27 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.03 fixing boradlea non-N- Mareschal et al. 2010 47.3 4.083 657 9 638 ECM mineral NA NA NA NA 79.51 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.77 f fixing non-N- forest Melvin & Goodale 2013 42.45 -76.417 448 7.8 430 conifer ECM 4.55 12.63 0.32 28.9 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Melvin & Goodale 2013 42.45 -76.417 448 7.8 430 ECM 4.4 4.63 0.09 30.2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Melvin & Goodale 2013 42.45 -76.417 448 7.8 430 AM 4.51 5.19 0.13 26.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor non-N- Melvin & Goodale 2013 42.45 -76.417 448 7.8 430 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 19.46 97.7 4.96 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.77 fixing boradlea non-N- Melvin & Goodale 2013 42.45 -76.417 448 7.8 430 ECM mineral NA NA NA 14.76 45.95 3.04 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.15 f fixing boradlea non-N- Melvin & Goodale 2013 42.45 -76.417 448 7.8 483 AM mineral NA NA NA 13.37 44.38 3.33 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.24 f fixing boradlea non-N- forest Thomas & Prescott 2000 50.8 -119.433 981 5.9 483 ECM 2.148 NA NA 24.37 449.5 18.5 NA NA 1400 NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor non-N- forest Thomas & Prescott 2000 50.8 -119.433 981 5.9 483 conifer ECM 2.376 NA NA 21.88 455.1 20.9 NA NA 1400 NA NA NA NA NA fixing floor non-N- forest Thomas & Prescott 2000 50.8 -119.433 981 5.9 483 conifer ECM 3.773 NA NA 28.51 464.6 16.5 NA NA 1200 NA NA NA NA NA fixing floor boradlea Laik et al. 2009 25.983 85.8 70 24.8 1300 AM N-fixing mineral 5.15 10.95 NA NA 5.33 NA NA NA NA 134.42 NA NA NA 8.58 boradlea Laik et al. 2009 25.983 85.8 70 24.8 1300 AM N-fixing mineral 8.32 16.48 NA NA 8.08 NA NA NA NA 110.39 NA NA NA 8.38 boradlea Laik et al. 2009 25.983 85.8 70 24.8 1300 AM N-fixing mineral 6.25 13.04 NA NA 6.21 NA NA NA NA 113.27 NA NA NA 8.47 boradlea non-N- Laik et al. 2009 25.983 85.8 70 24.8 1300 ECM mineral 8.46 17.09 NA NA 8.26 NA NA NA NA 180.86 NA NA NA 8.37 f fixing boradlea non-N- Laik et al. 2009 25.983 85.8 70 24.8 1300 AM mineral 5.85 12.26 NA NA 5.8 NA NA NA NA 127.83 NA NA NA 8.56 f fixing boradlea non-N- Laik et al. 2009 25.983 85.8 70 24.8 1300 AM mineral 8.2 17.34 NA NA 8.5 NA NA NA NA 194.4 NA NA NA 8.37 f fixing boradlea non-N- Giardina et al. 2001 39.64 -104.33 1705 9.2 382 ECM mineral NA NA NA 18 63 3.5 NA NA 650 NA NA NA NA 6.03 f fixing boradlea non-N- Giardina et al. 2001 39.64 -104.33 1705 9.2 382 ECM mineral NA NA NA 20.4 94 4.6 NA NA 858 NA NA NA NA 5.97 f fixing boradlea non-N- Giardina et al. 2001 39.64 -104.33 1705 9.2 382 ECM mineral NA NA NA 12 53 4.4 NA NA 760 NA NA NA NA 6.2 f fixing boradlea non-N- Giardina et al. 2001 39.64 -104.33 1705 9.2 382 ECM mineral NA NA NA 18.3 77 4.2 NA NA 769 NA NA NA NA 5.97 f fixing boradlea non-N- Giardina et al. 2001 39.64 -104.33 1705 9.2 382 ECM mineral NA NA NA 18.8 47 2.5 NA NA 670 NA NA NA NA 6.53 f fixing boradlea non-N- Giardina et al. 2001 39.64 -104.33 1705 9.2 382 ECM mineral NA NA NA 16.8 32 1.9 NA NA 577 NA NA NA NA 5.87 f fixing non-N- Giardina et al. 2001 39.64 -104.33 1705 9.2 382 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 20.4 47 2.3 NA NA 500 NA NA NA NA 4.97 fixing non-N- Giardina et al. 2001 39.64 -104.33 1705 9.2 382 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 20.8 27 1.3 NA NA 350 NA NA NA NA 5.2 fixing non-N- Giardina et al. 2001 39.64 -104.33 1705 9.2 382 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 12.2 11 0.9 NA NA 135 NA NA NA NA 4.87 fixing non-N- Giardina et al. 2001 39.64 -104.33 1705 9.2 382 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 22.5 18 0.8 NA NA 343 NA NA NA NA 5.37 fixing non-N- Giardina et al. 2001 39.64 -104.33 1705 9.2 382 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 12.7 14 1.1 NA NA 443 NA NA NA NA 5.53 fixing non-N- Giardina et al. 2001 39.64 -104.33 1705 9.2 382 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 18.9 17 0.9 NA NA 226 NA NA NA NA 5.57 fixing non-N- forest Sevgi et al. 2011 41.15 28.91 31 12.8 1074 conifer ECM NA NA NA NA 349 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Sevgi et al. 2011 41.15 28.91 31 12.8 1074 ECM NA NA NA NA 310 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor non-N- forest Sevgi et al. 2011 41.15 28.91 31 12.8 1074 conifer ECM NA NA NA NA 293 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing floor non-N- forest Sevgi et al. 2011 41.15 28.91 31 12.8 1074 conifer ECM NA NA NA NA 255 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing floor non-N- forest Sevgi et al. 2011 41.15 28.91 31 12.8 1074 conifer ECM NA NA NA NA 208 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing floor non-N- forest Sevgi et al. 2011 41.15 28.91 31 12.8 1074 conifer ECM NA NA NA NA 341 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing floor non-N- Sevgi et al. 2011 41.15 28.91 31 12.8 1074 conifer ECM mineral NA 23.77 NA NA 44.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.63 fixing boradlea non-N- Sevgi et al. 2011 41.15 28.91 31 12.8 1074 ECM mineral NA 20.83 NA NA 43.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.29 f fixing non-N- Sevgi et al. 2011 41.15 28.91 31 12.8 1074 conifer ECM mineral NA 19.89 NA NA 34.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.72 fixing non-N- Sevgi et al. 2011 41.15 28.91 31 12.8 1074 conifer ECM mineral NA 29.31 NA NA 54.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.04 fixing non-N- Sevgi et al. 2011 41.15 28.91 31 12.8 1074 conifer ECM mineral NA 21.96 NA NA 38.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.84 fixing non-N- Sevgi et al. 2011 41.15 28.91 31 12.8 1074 conifer ECM mineral NA 28.31 NA NA 50.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.63 fixing non-N- Laganiere et al. 2011 49.133 -78.767 305 0.7 890 conifer ECM mineral NA 46.3 2.5 18.8 37.5 2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.3 fixing boradlea non-N- Laganiere et al. 2011 49.133 -78.767 305 0.7 890 ECM mineral NA 34.7 2.4 14.6 26.6 1.8 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.7 f fixing boradlea non-N- 0.0424 Taylor et al. 2016 33.883 -83.35 170 16.5 1270 AM mineral NA NA NA 15.08 28.652 1.9 1.42 NA NA NA NA NA 6.1 f fixing 4 boradlea non-N- 0.0220 Taylor et al. 2016 33.883 -83.35 170 16.5 1270 AM mineral NA NA NA 16.09 30.571 1.9 0.85 NA NA NA NA NA 6.52 f fixing 8 boradlea non-N- 0.0284 Taylor et al. 2016 33.883 -83.35 170 16.5 1270 AM mineral NA NA NA 18.64 26.096 1.4 0.52 NA NA NA NA NA 5.84 f fixing 8 non-N- 0.0172 Taylor et al. 2016 33.883 -83.35 170 16.5 1270 conifer AM mineral NA NA NA 20.93 39.767 1.9 1.61 NA NA NA NA NA 5.73 fixing 7 boradlea non-N- 0.0170 Taylor et al. 2016 33.883 -83.35 170 16.5 1270 ECM mineral NA NA NA 15.8 31.6 2 1.22 NA NA NA NA NA 6.02 f fixing 9 boradlea non-N- 0.0140 Taylor et al. 2016 33.883 -83.35 170 16.5 1270 ECM mineral NA NA NA 19.35 40.635 2.1 0.59 NA NA NA NA NA 5.33 f fixing 3 boradlea non-N- 0.0142 Taylor et al. 2016 33.883 -83.35 170 16.5 1270 ECM mineral NA NA NA 17.92 26.88 1.5 1.06 NA NA NA NA NA 5.83 f fixing 3 non-N- 0.0091 Taylor et al. 2016 33.883 -83.35 170 16.5 1270 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 23.06 34.59 1.5 1.42 NA NA NA NA NA 5.36 fixing 8 boradlea non-N- forest Wan et al. 2015 26.8 117.967 277 19.3 1669 AM 9.5 NA NA 24.4 469.3 19.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor non-N- forest Wan et al. 2015 26.8 117.967 277 19.3 1669 conifer AM 4.3 NA NA 57.7 513.6 8.9 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing floor boradlea non-N- Wan et al. 2015 26.8 117.967 277 19.3 1669 AM mineral NA NA NA 17.9 39.5 2.2 13 0.49 NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing non-N- Wan et al. 2015 26.8 117.967 277 19.3 1669 conifer AM mineral NA NA NA 16.2 30.2 1.9 12.2 3.86 NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing boradlea non-N- Ulery et al. 1995 34.2 -118.15 428 14.4 678 ECM mineral NA 22.41 1.09 NA 34.8 1.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.8 f fixing non-N- Ulery et al. 1995 34.2 -118.15 428 14.4 678 conifer ECM mineral NA 1.39 0.12 NA 12.9 1.1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.9 fixing boradlea non-N- Ulery et al. 1995 34.2 -118.15 428 14.4 678 ECM mineral NA 6.03 0.23 NA 43.7 1.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.7 f fixing boradlea non-N- Ulery et al. 1995 34.2 -118.15 428 14.4 678 AM mineral NA 10.06 0.74 NA 54.7 4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.4 f fixing non-N- Michelsen et al. 1993 8.867 38.533 2380 18.2 1019 conifer AM mineral 5.01 171.4 12.74 NA 36.06 2.68 NA NA 2.6 NA NA NA NA 4.91 fixing boradlea non-N- Michelsen et al. 1993 8.867 38.533 2380 18.2 1019 ECM mineral 5.83 164.4 13.44 NA 33.53 2.74 NA NA 4.2 NA NA NA NA 5 f fixing non-N- Michelsen et al. 1993 8.867 38.533 2380 18.2 1019 conifer AM mineral 6.53 153 12.97 NA 39.76 3.37 NA NA 17.6 NA NA NA NA 5.47 fixing non-N- Lemma et al. 2006 7.55 36.583 2200 19.4 1517 conifer AM mineral NA 26.2 NA NA 101.1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.5 fixing non-N- Lemma et al. 2006 7.55 36.583 2200 19.4 1517 conifer ECM mineral NA 14.5 NA NA 56.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.6 fixing boradlea non-N- Lemma et al. 2006 7.55 36.583 2200 19.4 1517 ECM mineral NA 23.6 NA NA 91.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.9 f fixing boradlea non-N- Kasel et al. 2011 -36.833 143.016 275 14 434 AM mineral NA 27.78 NA NA 49.15 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Kasel et al. 2011 -36.833 143.016 275 14 434 AM mineral NA 40.91 NA NA 78.92 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing non-N- Kasel et al. 2011 -36.833 143.016 275 14 434 conifer ECM mineral NA 32.16 NA NA 49.85 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing boradlea non-N- Kasel et al. 2011 -36.833 143.016 275 14 434 ECM mineral NA 26.91 NA NA 52.62 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Kasel et al. 2011 -37.117 144.117 268 13.5 463 AM mineral NA 30.63 NA NA 43.62 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Kasel et al. 2011 -37.117 144.117 268 13.5 463 AM mineral NA 44.84 NA NA 64.38 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing non-N- Kasel et al. 2011 -37.117 144.117 268 13.5 463 conifer ECM mineral NA 29.97 NA NA 40.15 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing boradlea non-N- Kasel et al. 2011 -37.117 144.117 268 13.5 463 ECM mineral NA 35.66 NA NA 51.23 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Kasel et al. 2011 -36.933 144.283 551 12.9 487 AM mineral NA 45.5 NA NA 114.09 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Kasel et al. 2011 -36.933 144.283 551 12.9 487 AM mineral NA 51.84 NA NA 130.78 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing non-N- Kasel et al. 2011 -36.933 144.283 551 12.9 487 conifer ECM mineral NA 46.81 NA NA 86.26 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing boradlea non-N- Kasel et al. 2011 -36.933 144.283 551 12.9 487 ECM mineral NA 35.66 NA NA 77.22 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Kasel et al. 2011 -37.033 144.75 383 13.4 482 AM mineral NA 30.63 NA NA 54.26 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Kasel et al. 2011 -37.033 144.75 383 13.4 482 AM mineral NA 43.09 NA NA 84.17 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing non-N- Kasel et al. 2011 -37.033 144.75 383 13.4 482 conifer ECM mineral NA 35.22 NA NA 59.13 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing boradlea non-N- Kasel et al. 2011 -37.033 144.75 383 13.4 482 ECM mineral NA 36.09 NA NA 72.35 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing non-N- Lu et al. 2012 -25.933 153.083 1287 21.3 1287 conifer ECM mineral NA 20.18 0.56 35.9 19.4 0.54 22.4 0.03 NA NA NA NA NA 4.5 fixing non-N- Lu et al. 2012 -25.933 153.083 1287 21.3 1287 conifer AM mineral NA 14.5 0.66 21.9 12.5 0.57 22.9 2.38 NA NA NA NA NA 6 fixing non-N- Lu et al. 2012 -25.933 153.083 1287 21.3 1287 conifer AM mineral NA 12.53 0.6 20.8 10.8 0.52 21.4 8.02 NA NA NA NA NA 6.2 fixing non-N- forest Quideau et al. 1998 34.283 -117.633 678 14.4 678 conifer ECM 5.18 5.18 0.14 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Quideau et al. 1998 34.283 -117.633 678 14.4 678 ECM 4.9 4.9 0.11 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Quideau et al. 1998 34.283 -117.633 678 14.4 678 AM 4.08 4.08 0.08 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Quideau et al. 1998 34.283 -117.633 678 14.4 678 ECM 3.22 3.22 0.1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor non-N- Quideau et al. 1998 34.283 -117.633 678 14.4 678 conifer ECM mineral NA 20.3 0.44 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing boradlea non-N- Quideau et al. 1998 34.283 -117.633 678 14.4 678 ECM mineral NA 37.6 1.12 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Quideau et al. 1998 34.283 -117.633 678 14.4 678 AM mineral NA 13.98 1.19 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Quideau et al. 1998 34.283 -117.633 678 14.4 678 ECM mineral NA 9.02 0.59 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Templer et al. 2003 41.983 -74.383 842 4.3 1530 ECM mineral NA NA NA 18.36 343.1 18.8 69.4 11 NA 236.082 NA NA NA NA f fixing non-N- Templer et al. 2003 41.983 -74.383 842 4.3 1530 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 20.04 465.5 23.3 61.5 6.3 NA 186.566 NA NA NA NA fixing boradlea non-N- Templer et al. 2003 41.983 -74.383 842 4.3 1530 ECM mineral NA NA NA 20.74 358.6 17.4 56.4 1.3 NA 141.813 NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Templer et al. 2003 41.983 -74.383 842 4.3 1530 AM mineral NA NA NA 17.29 427.1 24.9 51.2 53.6 NA 128.013 NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Templer et al. 2003 41.983 -74.383 842 4.3 1530 ECM mineral NA NA NA 19.54 434.7 22.3 81 8 NA 233.248 NA NA NA NA f fixing non-N- Grayston & Prescott 2005 48.817 -124.783 853 8.8 3943 conifer AM mineral NA NA NA 37 483 13.6 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing non-N- Grayston & Prescott 2005 48.817 -124.783 853 8.8 3943 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 47 484 11.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing non-N- Grayston & Prescott 2005 48.817 -124.783 853 8.8 3943 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 34 474 14.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing non-N- Grayston & Prescott 2005 48.817 -124.783 853 8.8 3943 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 35.6 454 13.2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing boradlea non-N- Nsabimana et al. 2009 -2.6 29.733 1743 19.1 1246.4 AM mineral NA 81.9 5.4 15.17 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.3 f fixing boradlea non-N- Nsabimana et al. 2009 -2.6 29.733 1743 19.1 1246.4 AM mineral NA 92.7 5.9 15.71 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.2 f fixing boradlea non-N- Nsabimana et al. 2009 -2.6 29.733 1743 19.1 1246.4 AM mineral NA 83.9 5.5 15.25 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.4 f fixing boradlea non-N- Nsabimana et al. 2009 -2.6 29.733 1743 19.1 1246.4 AM mineral NA 85.4 5.6 15.25 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.2 f fixing boradlea non-N- Nsabimana et al. 2009 -2.6 29.733 1743 19.1 1246.4 ECM mineral NA 98.4 4.9 20.08 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.2 f fixing boradlea non-N- Nsabimana et al. 2009 -2.6 29.733 1743 19.1 1246.4 ECM mineral NA 64.5 3.1 20.81 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.9 f fixing boradlea non-N- Nsabimana et al. 2009 -2.6 29.733 1743 19.1 1246.4 ECM mineral NA 83.5 5 16.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.2 f fixing boradlea non-N- Nsabimana et al. 2009 -2.6 29.733 1743 19.1 1246.4 ECM mineral NA 67.7 3.1 21.84 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.5 f fixing boradlea non-N- Nsabimana et al. 2009 -2.6 29.733 1743 19.1 1246.4 ECM mineral NA 88.7 5.7 15.56 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.2 f fixing boradlea non-N- Nsabimana et al. 2009 -2.6 29.733 1743 19.1 1246.4 ECM mineral NA 57.3 3 19.1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.2 f fixing boradlea non-N- Nsabimana et al. 2009 -2.6 29.733 1743 19.1 1246.4 ECM mineral NA 109.3 5.7 19.18 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.7 f fixing boradlea non-N- Nsabimana et al. 2009 -2.6 29.733 1743 19.1 1246.4 ECM mineral NA 85.7 4.4 19.48 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.6 f fixing boradlea non-N- forest Hoogmoed et al. 2014 -36.86 145.58 243 14.1 650 AM 2.28 NA NA 32.1 439 14.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor boradlea forest Hoogmoed et al. 2014 -36.86 145.58 243 14.1 650 AM N-fixing 1.86 NA NA 35.4 446 13.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f floor boradlea non-N- forest Hoogmoed et al. 2014 -36.86 145.58 243 14.1 650 ECM 1.88 NA NA 45.6 443 10.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Hoogmoed et al. 2014 -36.86 145.58 243 14.1 650 ECM 2.75 NA NA 47.9 445 9.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor boradlea non-N- Hoogmoed et al. 2014 -36.86 145.58 243 14.1 650 AM mineral NA 7.58 0.647 11.8 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea Hoogmoed et al. 2014 -36.86 145.58 243 14.1 650 AM N-fixing mineral NA 4.39 0.336 13.1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA boradlea non-N- Hoogmoed et al. 2014 -36.86 145.58 243 14.1 650 ECM mineral NA 3.83 0.301 12.6 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Hoogmoed et al. 2014 -36.86 145.58 243 14.1 650 ECM mineral NA 4.84 0.358 13.6 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Mertens et al. 2007 51.917 4.5 25 9.6 785 ECM mineral 2.8 2.35 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.6 f fixing boradlea non-N- Mertens et al. 2007 51.917 4.5 25 9.6 785 AM mineral 3.1 1.71 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 7.1 f fixing boradlea non-N- Mertens et al. 2007 51.917 4.5 25 9.6 785 AM mineral 3.8 1.9 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.8 f fixing boradlea non-N- Mertens et al. 2007 51.917 4.5 25 9.6 785 ECM mineral 2.2 2.32 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.5 f fixing non-N- forest Yin et al. 2014 25.25 116.917 1056 17.8 1785 conifer ECM NA NA NA 18.1 34.12 1.88 NA NA NA 490 NA NA NA 4.05 fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Yin et al. 2014 25.25 116.917 1056 17.8 1785 AM NA NA NA 19.7 32.25 1.64 NA NA NA 420 NA NA NA 4.55 f fixing floor boradlea forest Yin et al. 2014 25.25 116.917 1056 17.8 1785 AM N-fixing NA NA NA 15.4 41.68 2.71 NA NA NA 440 NA NA NA 3.86 f floor non-N- Yin et al. 2014 25.25 116.917 1056 17.8 1785 conifer ECM mineral NA 8.03 0.55 14.7 13.05 0.89 NA NA NA 200 NA NA NA 4.38 fixing boradlea non-N- Yin et al. 2014 25.25 116.917 1056 17.8 1785 AM mineral NA 8.11 0.57 14.2 12.77 0.9 NA NA NA 200 NA NA NA 4.38 f fixing boradlea Yin et al. 2014 25.25 116.917 1056 17.8 1785 AM N-fixing mineral NA 9.96 0.61 16.3 17.79 1.09 NA NA NA 190 NA NA NA 4.17 non-N- forest Smith et al. 2002 -2 -54 2 26 1900 conifer ECM 5.135 5.42 0.062 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Smith et al. 2002 -2 -54 2 26 1900 AM 4.27 4.92 0.149 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Smith et al. 2002 -2 -54 2 26 1900 ECM 3.804 3.595 0.051 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor non-N- Smith et al. 2002 -2 -54 2 26 1900 conifer ECM mineral NA 92 4.957 18.66 50 2.68 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing boradlea non-N- Smith et al. 2002 -2 -54 2 26 1900 AM mineral NA 91 5.804 15.85 49.6 3.13 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Smith et al. 2002 -2 -54 2 26 1900 ECM mineral NA 116 7.586 15.34 62.9 4.1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing non-N- Lemenih et al. 2004 7.333 38.75 2106 20 1200 conifer AM mineral NA 53.72 5.02 10.71 63.2 5.9 NA NA 7.9 NA NA NA NA 6.2 fixing boradlea non-N- Lemenih et al. 2004 7.333 38.75 2106 20 1200 ECM mineral NA 37.54 3.65 10.29 39.1 3.8 NA NA 5.7 NA NA NA NA 5.4 f fixing non-N- Zheng et al. 2005 27.083 112.3 114 17.9 1237 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 14.83 8.01 0.54 NA NA 0.53 119.913 NA NA NA 4.22 fixing non-N- Zheng et al. 2005 27.083 112.3 114 17.9 1237 conifer AM mineral NA NA NA 14.62 10.67 0.73 NA NA 0.95 129.22 NA NA NA 4.37 fixing boradlea non-N- Zheng et al. 2005 27.083 112.3 114 17.9 1237 AM mineral NA NA NA 14.3 10.58 0.74 NA NA 1.22 141.224 NA NA NA 4.54 f fixing boradlea non-N- forest Raich et al. 2007 10.083 -84.083 1993 25.8 4000 AM 11.7 5.9 0.169 34.91 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor boradlea forest Raich et al. 2007 10.083 -84.083 1993 25.8 4000 AM N-fixing 10.3 5.3 0.208 25.48 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f floor non-N- forest Raich et al. 2007 10.083 -84.083 1993 25.8 4000 conifer ECM 10 5 0.137 36.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Raich et al. 2007 10.083 -84.083 1993 25.8 4000 AM 7.4 3.8 0.122 31.15 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Raich et al. 2007 10.083 -84.083 1993 25.8 4000 AM 11.4 5.6 0.147 38.1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Raich et al. 2007 10.083 -84.083 1993 25.8 4000 AM 10.1 4.5 0.162 27.78 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor non-N- forest Zheng et al. 2008 27.083 112.3 143 17.9 1237 conifer ECM NA NA NA NA 576.61 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing floor non-N- forest Zheng et al. 2008 27.083 112.3 143 17.9 1237 conifer AM NA NA NA NA 438.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Zheng et al. 2008 27.083 112.3 143 17.9 1237 AM NA NA NA NA 492.8 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor boradlea non-N- Johnsen et al. 2013 30.82 -84.76 34 18.9 1257 AM mineral NA 62.2 2.82 24 79.4 3.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing non-N- Johnsen et al. 2013 30.82 -84.76 34 18.9 1257 conifer ECM mineral NA 59.3 2.02 141 72.5 2.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing boradlea Tang & Li 2014 25.667 101.857 1181 21.6 634.3 AM N-fixing mineral 3.22 18.29 1.74 10.51 7.67 0.73 NA NA 14.74 184.69 18.28 9.14 4.08 6.2 boradlea non-N- Tang & Li 2014 25.667 101.857 1181 21.6 634.3 AM mineral 2.9 16.66 1.64 10.19 7.03 0.69 NA NA 14.6 180.46 18.51 9.32 4.08 6.22 f fixing boradlea Tang & Li 2014 25.667 101.857 1181 21.6 634.3 ECM N-fixing mineral 0.95 10.99 0.94 11.67 4.55 0.39 NA NA 13.25 170.83 17.44 7.98 3.84 6.3 boradlea non-N- Tang & Li 2014 25.667 101.857 1181 21.6 634.3 AM mineral 1.91 13.88 1.02 13.6 5.71 0.42 NA NA 13.54 168.59 17.08 7.94 3.84 6.24 f fixing boradlea non-N- Tang & Li 2014 25.667 101.857 1181 21.6 634.3 ECM mineral 1.41 12.32 0.92 13.34 5.07 0.38 NA NA 13.88 166.89 16.68 7.68 3.84 6.3 f fixing non-N- Jiang & Xu 2006 30.233 119.7 114 15.9 1424 conifer ECM mineral 2.05 NA NA NA 15.97 NA NA NA NA 260 NA NA NA NA fixing non-N- Jiang & Xu 2006 30.233 119.7 114 15.9 1424 conifer AM mineral NA NA NA NA 16 NA NA NA NA 257 NA NA NA NA fixing boradlea non-N- Yan et al. 2014 28.117 113.033 59 17.2 1422 AM mineral 3.26 NA NA 9.1 0.92 0.101 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.1 f fixing non-N- Yan et al. 2014 28.117 113.033 59 17.2 1422 conifer AM mineral 3.66 NA NA 18.2 2.31 0.127 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4 fixing non-N- Yan et al. 2014 28.117 113.033 59 17.2 1422 conifer ECM mineral 3.41 NA NA 9.9 0.95 0.096 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.1 fixing non-N- Yan et al. 2014 28.117 113.033 59 17.2 1422 conifer ECM mineral 3.79 NA NA 8.7 1.43 0.164 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4 fixing boradlea non-N- forest Devi et al. 2013 30.833 77.133 1179 19 1100 ECM 3.098 5.86 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor non-N- forest Devi et al. 2013 30.833 77.133 1179 19 1100 conifer ECM 6.79 7.19 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing floor boradlea forest Devi et al. 2013 30.833 77.133 1179 19 1100 AM N-fixing 4.52 12.69 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f floor boradlea forest Devi et al. 2013 30.833 77.133 1179 19 1100 AM N-fixing 3.33 5.66 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f floor boradlea forest Devi et al. 2013 30.833 77.133 1179 19 1100 AM N-fixing 2.99 8.34 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f floor boradlea forest Devi et al. 2013 30.833 77.133 1179 19 1100 ECM N-fixing 2.88 6.6 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f floor boradlea non-N- forest Devi et al. 2013 30.833 77.133 1179 19 1100 ECM 3.6 7.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Devi et al. 2013 30.833 77.133 1179 19 1100 AM 4.03 3.01 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor boradlea non-N- Devi et al. 2013 30.833 77.133 1179 19 1100 ECM mineral NA 60.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing non-N- Devi et al. 2013 30.833 77.133 1179 19 1100 conifer ECM mineral NA 53.41 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing boradlea Devi et al. 2013 30.833 77.133 1179 19 1100 AM N-fixing mineral NA 64.06 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA boradlea Devi et al. 2013 30.833 77.133 1179 19 1100 AM N-fixing mineral NA 50.12 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA boradlea Devi et al. 2013 30.833 77.133 1179 19 1100 AM N-fixing mineral NA 49.16 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA boradlea Devi et al. 2013 30.833 77.133 1179 19 1100 ECM N-fixing mineral NA 49.8 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA boradlea non-N- Devi et al. 2013 30.833 77.133 1179 19 1100 ECM mineral NA 40.03 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Devi et al. 2013 30.833 77.133 1179 19 1100 AM mineral NA 49.8 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Devi et al. 2013 30.833 77.133 1179 19 1100 ECM mineral NA 165 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing non-N- Devi et al. 2013 30.833 77.133 1179 19 1100 conifer ECM mineral NA 165 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing boradlea Devi et al. 2013 30.833 77.133 1179 19 1100 AM N-fixing mineral NA 18 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA boradlea Devi et al. 2013 30.833 77.133 1179 19 1100 AM N-fixing mineral NA 195 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA boradlea Devi et al. 2013 30.833 77.133 1179 19 1100 AM N-fixing mineral NA 163 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA boradlea Devi et al. 2013 30.833 77.133 1179 19 1100 ECM N-fixing mineral NA 213 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA boradlea non-N- Devi et al. 2013 30.833 77.133 1179 19 1100 ECM mineral NA 164 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Devi et al. 2013 30.833 77.133 1179 19 1100 AM mineral NA 207 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Jahed et al. 2014 36.317 51.85 1827 16.4 997 AM mineral NA NA NA 10.18 26.26 2.58 NA NA 20.83 NA NA NA NA 6.64 f fixing non-N- Jahed et al. 2014 36.317 51.85 1827 16.4 997 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 12.12 34.67 2.86 NA NA 14.08 NA NA NA NA 6.28 fixing non-N- Riestra et al. 2012 -36.6 -64.17 169 18.9 1257 conifer ECM mineral NA 13.41 NA NA 24.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing boradlea non-N- Riestra et al. 2012 -36.6 -64.17 169 18.9 1257 ECM mineral NA 10.31 NA NA 17.9 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing non-N- Riestra et al. 2012 -36.6 -64.17 169 18.9 1257 conifer ECM mineral NA 8.26 NA NA 13.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing boradlea non-N- Riestra et al. 2012 -36.6 -64.17 169 18.9 1257 AM mineral NA 15.5 NA NA 32.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing non-N- forest Ovington 1954 51.075 0.45 25 9.9 705 conifer ECM NA NA NA 37.8 540.2 14.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.1 fixing floor non-N- forest Ovington 1954 51.075 0.45 25 9.9 705 conifer ECM NA NA NA 30.5 514.7 16.9 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.6 fixing floor non-N- forest Ovington 1954 51.075 0.45 25 9.9 705 conifer ECM NA NA NA 24.3 418.5 17.2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.7 fixing floor non-N- forest Ovington 1954 51.075 0.45 25 9.9 705 conifer ECM NA NA NA 25.9 455.5 17.6 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.6 fixing floor non-N- forest Ovington 1954 51.075 0.45 25 9.9 705 conifer AM NA NA NA 32 486.8 15.2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.8 fixing floor non-N- forest Ovington 1954 51.075 0.45 25 9.9 705 conifer ECM NA NA NA 27.3 398.6 14.6 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.9 fixing floor non-N- forest Ovington 1954 51.075 0.45 25 9.9 705 conifer ECM NA NA NA 26.9 493.1 18.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.7 fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Ovington 1954 51.075 0.45 25 9.9 705 ECM NA NA NA 22.8 462.7 20.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.8 f fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Ovington 1954 51.075 0.45 25 9.9 705 ECM NA NA NA 26.3 476.4 18.1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.8 f fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Ovington 1954 51.075 0.45 25 9.9 705 ECM NA NA NA 25.8 482.3 18.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.1 f fixing floor non-N- Ovington 1956 51.075 0.45 25 9.9 705 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 18.04 36.8 2.04 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing non-N- Ovington 1956 51.075 0.45 25 9.9 705 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 16.01 40.5 2.53 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing non-N- Ovington 1956 51.075 0.45 25 9.9 705 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 23.48 42.5 1.81 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing non-N- Ovington 1956 51.075 0.45 25 9.9 705 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 22.98 57 2.48 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing non-N- Ovington 1956 51.075 0.45 25 9.9 705 conifer AM mineral NA NA NA 17.37 42.2 2.43 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing non-N- Ovington 1956 51.075 0.45 25 9.9 705 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 19.31 42.1 2.18 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing non-N- Ovington 1956 51.075 0.45 25 9.9 705 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 17.93 33 1.84 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing boradlea non-N- Ovington 1956 51.075 0.45 25 9.9 705 ECM mineral NA NA NA 15.45 47.9 3.1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Ovington 1956 51.075 0.45 25 9.9 705 ECM mineral NA NA NA 16.75 45.4 2.71 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Ovington 1956 51.075 0.45 25 9.9 705 ECM mineral NA NA NA 19.22 39.4 2.05 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing non-N- Defrieri et al. 2011 43 -71.517 19 8.2 942 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 6.97 23 3.3 NA NA 24 NA NA NA NA NA fixing boradlea non-N- Defrieri et al. 2011 43 -71.517 19 8.2 942 AM mineral NA NA NA 11.67 35 3 NA NA 26 NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Asadiyan et al. 2013 36.217 36.167 85 11.9 858 ECM mineral NA NA NA 9.95 54.5 5.7 22 17.43 NA NA NA NA NA 6.54 f fixing non-N- Asadiyan et al. 2013 36.217 36.167 85 11.9 858 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 10.02 30.1 3.2 24.19 17.72 NA NA NA NA NA 6.95 fixing boradlea non-N- Asadiyan et al. 2013 36.217 36.167 85 11.9 858 AM mineral NA NA NA 7.86 61.4 8.5 45.4 21.09 NA NA NA NA NA 7.4 f fixing boradlea non-N- Kooch et al. 2012 36.467 52.233 58 16.8 733 AM mineral NA 103.2 9.96 11.35 19.7 1.9 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Kooch et al. 2012 36.467 52.233 58 16.8 733 ECM mineral NA 121.4 7.71 15.07 24.08 1.53 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing non-N- Kooch et al. 2012 36.467 52.233 58 16.8 733 conifer ECM mineral NA 168.2 7.95 19.53 33.63 1.59 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing boradlea non-N- forest Christiansen et al. 2010 55.95 9.617 75 7.3 825 AM NA 2 0.03 64 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.4 f fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Christiansen et al. 2010 55.95 9.617 75 7.3 825 ECM NA 5.3 0.2 33 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.5 f fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Christiansen et al. 2010 55.95 9.617 75 7.3 825 ECM NA 1.3 0.03 44 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.9 f fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Christiansen et al. 2010 55.95 9.617 75 7.3 825 AM NA 1.7 0.03 55 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.8 f fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Christiansen et al. 2010 55.95 9.617 75 7.3 825 ECM NA 4 0.2 27 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.3 f fixing floor non-N- forest Christiansen et al. 2010 55.95 9.617 75 7.3 825 conifer ECM NA 8.9 0.3 29 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.4 fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Christiansen et al. 2010 55.417 12.05 47 7.8 631 ECM NA 5.9 0.2 27 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.3 f fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Christiansen et al. 2010 55.417 12.05 47 7.8 631 ECM NA 1.5 0.04 34 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5 f fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Christiansen et al. 2010 55.417 12.05 47 7.8 631 AM NA 1 0.03 38 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.9 f fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Christiansen et al. 2010 55.417 12.05 47 7.8 631 ECM NA 3.5 0.1 24 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.6 f fixing floor non-N- forest Christiansen et al. 2010 55.417 12.05 47 7.8 631 conifer ECM NA 19.8 0.8 25 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.5 fixing floor boradlea non-N- Christiansen et al. 2010 55.95 9.617 77 7.3 825 AM mineral NA 68 5.6 12 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.8 f fixing boradlea non-N- Christiansen et al. 2010 55.95 9.617 77 7.3 825 ECM mineral NA 52 4.2 12 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.3 f fixing boradlea non-N- Christiansen et al. 2010 55.95 9.617 77 7.3 825 ECM mineral NA 67 5.6 12 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.7 f fixing boradlea non-N- Christiansen et al. 2010 55.95 9.617 77 7.3 825 AM mineral NA 59 5 12 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.7 f fixing boradlea non-N- Christiansen et al. 2010 55.95 9.617 77 7.3 825 ECM mineral NA 72 5.7 13 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.5 f fixing non-N- Christiansen et al. 2010 55.95 9.617 77 7.3 825 conifer ECM mineral NA 67 5.1 13 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.5 fixing boradlea non-N- Christiansen et al. 2010 55.417 12.05 47 7.8 631 ECM mineral NA 61 3.4 18 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.8 f fixing boradlea non-N- Christiansen et al. 2010 55.417 12.05 47 7.8 631 ECM mineral NA 70 3.8 18 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.9 f fixing boradlea non-N- Christiansen et al. 2010 55.417 12.05 47 7.8 631 AM mineral NA 57 3.9 14 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.4 f fixing boradlea non-N- Christiansen et al. 2010 55.417 12.05 47 7.8 631 ECM mineral NA 75 4.1 18 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.8 f fixing non-N- Christiansen et al. 2010 55.417 12.05 47 7.8 631 conifer ECM mineral NA 63 3.4 18 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.7 fixing boradlea Wang et al. 2010 22.567 112.833 40 21.7 1700 ECM N-fixing mineral NA 34.72 0.61 33.2 78.9 1.39 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.81 boradlea Wang et al. 2010 22.567 112.833 40 21.7 1700 ECM N-fixing mineral NA 38.17 0.59 37.4 73.4 1.13 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.85 boradlea non-N- Wang et al. 2010 22.567 112.833 40 21.7 1700 ECM mineral NA 22.84 0.41 32.1 50.2 0.91 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.88 f fixing boradlea non-N- Wang et al. 2010 22.567 112.833 40 21.7 1700 AM mineral NA 24.95 0.42 33.8 49.4 0.84 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.87 f fixing boradlea Peng et al. 2013 25.383 101.583 40 21.5 700 AM N-fixing mineral NA 38.34 2.38 16.14 14.2 0.88 NA NA 23.2 NA NA NA NA 6.85 boradlea non-N- Peng et al. 2013 25.383 101.583 40 21.5 700 ECM mineral NA 27.4 1.42 19.23 10 0.52 NA NA 21.8 NA NA NA NA 5.41 f fixing non-N- Wei et al. 2009 18.383 108.733 452 19.7 3000 conifer AM mineral NA 44.54 2.18 20.47 17.4 0.85 NA NA 0.77 109.8 NA NA NA 4.94 fixing non-N- Wei et al. 2009 18.383 108.733 452 19.7 3000 conifer ECM mineral NA 41.18 2.09 19.73 14.4 0.73 NA NA 0.83 86.8 NA NA NA 4.43 fixing non-N- Yang et al. 2004 26.183 117.433 204 19.1 1749 conifer AM mineral 5.468 40.56 2.69 15.1 16.9 1.12 NA NA 4.7 NA NA NA NA 4.8 fixing non-N- Yang et al. 2004 26.183 117.433 204 19.1 1749 conifer AM mineral 7.291 40 3.1 12.9 17.7 1.37 NA NA 5.6 NA NA NA NA 5.1 fixing boradlea Yang et al. 2004 26.183 117.433 204 19.1 1749 AM N-fixing mineral 5.6895 40.25 2.97 13.6 17.5 1.29 NA NA 6.8 NA NA NA NA 5.1 boradlea non-N- Yang et al. 2004 26.183 117.433 204 19.1 1749 ECM mineral 9.538 37.62 2.46 15.3 17.1 1.12 NA NA 5.9 NA NA NA NA 5.3 f fixing Garcia-Montiel & Binkley boradlea 19.5 -155.25 1224 21 4000 AM N-fixing mineral NA NA NA 12.08 125.07 10.27 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1998 f Garcia-Montiel & Binkley boradlea non-N- 19.5 -155.25 1224 21 4000 ECM mineral NA NA NA 15.22 112.68 7.39 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1998 f fixing Garcia-Montiel & Binkley boradlea 19.5 -155.25 1224 21 4000 AM N-fixing mineral NA NA NA 11.82 135.21 11.31 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1998 f Garcia-Montiel & Binkley boradlea non-N- 19.5 -155.25 1224 21 4000 ECM mineral NA NA NA 13.33 134.09 10.12 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1998 f fixing Garcia-Montiel & Binkley boradlea 19.5 -155.25 1224 21 4000 AM N-fixing mineral NA NA NA 11.95 125.07 10.41 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1998 f Garcia-Montiel & Binkley boradlea non-N- 19.5 -155.25 1224 21 4000 ECM mineral NA NA NA 13.71 120.56 8.93 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1998 f fixing non-N- Jiang et al. 2010 26.733 115.067 82 18.6 1726 conifer ECM mineral NA 13.77 0.81 16 8.5 0.5 8.9 1.4 NA 143.68 20.63 NA NA 4.3 fixing non-N- Jiang et al. 2010 26.733 115.067 82 18.6 1726 conifer ECM mineral NA 19.93 1.28 16 12.3 0.79 12.4 0.6 NA 74.21 9.76 NA NA 4.4 fixing boradlea non-N- Kulakova 2012 49.417 46.767 24 7.6 298 ECM mineral 3.55 45.4 3.48 13.1 103.2 7.9 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing non-N- Kulakova 2012 49.417 46.767 24 7.6 298 conifer ECM mineral NA 92 4.82 19.1 172 9 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing boradlea non-N- Kulakova 2012 49.417 46.767 24 7.6 298 AM mineral NA 91.4 5.93 15.4 160.5 10.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Kulakova 2012 49.417 46.767 24 7.6 298 AM mineral 4.1 20.1 1.35 14.8 34.1 2.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Laudicina et al. 2012 37.55 13.917 471 17.8 460 ECM mineral NA NA NA 12.1 23 1.9 NA NA 77 779 60 NA NA 7.8 f fixing boradlea non-N- Laudicina et al. 2012 37.55 13.917 471 17.8 460 ECM mineral NA NA NA 8.8 14.1 1.6 NA NA 68 671 53 NA NA 7.6 f fixing non-N- Laudicina et al. 2012 37.55 13.917 471 17.8 460 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 10.3 12.3 1.2 NA NA 54 586 44 NA NA 7.9 fixing non-N- Laudicina et al. 2012 37.55 13.917 471 17.8 460 conifer AM mineral NA NA NA 8.8 13.2 1.5 NA NA 53 459 41 NA NA 7.9 fixing boradlea non-N- forest Demessie et al. 2012 7.283 38.8 2284 15.5 973 ECM 11.94 NA NA 68 493 70 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Demessie et al. 2012 7.283 38.8 2284 15.5 973 ECM 11.94 NA NA 49.5 467 9 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Demessie et al. 2012 7.283 38.8 2284 15.5 973 ECM 9.68 NA NA 49.3 473 10 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing floor non-N- forest Demessie et al. 2012 7.283 38.8 2284 15.5 973 conifer ECM 6.43 NA NA 28.1 462 7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing floor non-N- forest Demessie et al. 2012 7.283 38.8 2284 15.5 973 conifer AM 6.07 NA NA 64.8 390 14 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing floor non-N- forest Demessie et al. 2012 7.283 38.8 2284 15.5 973 conifer AM 4.94 NA NA 37.3 458 18 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing floor non-N- Lemma 2012 7.1 38.617 1745 19.5 1240 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 12.5 57.5 4.6 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.2 fixing non-N- Lemma 2012 7.1 38.617 1745 19.5 1240 conifer AM mineral NA NA NA 10.4 58.3 5.6 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.4 fixing non-N- Li et al. 2014 30.3 119.4 285 14.8 1630 conifer AM mineral NA NA NA 13.71 26.59 1.94 61.22 17.65 3.56 NA NA NA NA 4.45 fixing non-N- Li et al. 2014 30.3 119.4 285 14.8 1630 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 12.64 27.43 2.17 67.38 22.84 2.48 NA NA NA NA 4.7 fixing non-N- Lugo et al. 1990 18.275 -65.85 750 23 3800 conifer ECM mineral NA 27.06 1.9 14.3 32.9 2.3 NA NA 11 NA NA NA NA 4.7 fixing non-N- Lugo et al. 1990 18.275 -65.85 750 23 3800 conifer ECM mineral NA 32.94 1.9 17 44.1 2.6 NA NA 21 NA NA NA NA 4.6 fixing boradlea non-N- Lugo et al. 1990 18.275 -65.85 750 23 3800 ECM mineral NA 41.18 3.1 13.6 57.1 4.2 NA NA 15 NA NA NA NA 4.8 f fixing boradlea non-N- Lugo et al. 1990 18.275 -65.85 750 23 3800 AM mineral NA 36.47 3.2 12.5 52.4 4.2 NA NA 36 NA NA NA NA 4.5 f fixing boradlea non-N- Lugo et al. 1990 18.275 -65.85 750 23 3800 AM mineral NA 28.24 2.4 11.9 51.2 4.3 NA NA 25 NA NA NA NA 4.7 f fixing boradlea non-N- Lugo et al. 1990 18.275 -65.85 750 23 3800 ECM mineral NA 32.94 2.1 15.2 57.6 3.8 NA NA 26 NA NA NA NA 4.7 f fixing boradlea non-N- Lugo et al. 1990 18.275 -65.85 750 23 3800 AM mineral NA 30 2.9 10.4 51.8 5 NA NA 28 NA NA NA NA 4.4 f fixing boradlea non-N- Lugo et al. 1990 18.275 -65.85 750 23 3800 AM mineral NA 35.88 2.7 13.4 49.4 3.7 NA NA 25 NA NA NA NA 4.7 f fixing boradlea non-N- Lugo et al. 1990 18.275 -65.85 750 23 3800 AM mineral NA 23.53 2.2 11.5 58.8 5.1 NA NA 31 NA NA NA NA 4.6 f fixing boradlea non-N- Lugo et al. 1990 18.275 -65.85 750 23 3800 AM mineral NA 27.65 2.3 12.3 57.6 4.7 NA NA 36 NA NA NA NA 4.8 f fixing non-N- Abiyu et al. 2011 11.2 39.667 2686 21 2350 conifer AM mineral NA 22.95 2.61 32.8 25.5 2.9 NA NA 7.8 NA NA NA NA 5.8 fixing boradlea non-N- Abiyu et al. 2011 11.2 39.667 2686 21 2350 ECM mineral NA 21.33 2.43 32.8 23.7 2.7 NA NA 8.2 NA NA NA NA 5.6 f fixing boradlea Phillips & Fahey 2006 42.45 -76.417 450 7.8 874 ECM N-fixing mineral NA NA NA NA 211.8 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.94 boradlea non-N- Phillips & Fahey 2006 42.45 -76.417 450 7.8 874 AM mineral NA NA NA NA 172.9 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.11 f fixing boradlea non-N- Phillips & Fahey 2006 42.45 -76.417 450 7.8 874 AM mineral NA NA NA NA 58.8 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.67 f fixing boradlea non-N- Phillips & Fahey 2006 42.45 -76.417 450 7.8 874 AM mineral NA NA NA NA 45.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.95 f fixing boradlea non-N- Phillips & Fahey 2006 42.45 -76.417 450 7.8 874 AM mineral NA NA NA NA 80.6 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.16 f fixing boradlea non-N- Phillips & Fahey 2006 42.45 -76.417 450 7.8 874 AM mineral NA NA NA NA 45.9 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.56 f fixing non-N- Phillips & Fahey 2006 42.45 -76.417 450 7.8 874 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA NA 292.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.81 fixing boradlea non-N- Phillips & Fahey 2006 42.45 -76.417 450 7.8 874 ECM mineral NA NA NA NA 278.8 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.21 f fixing non-N- Phillips & Fahey 2006 42.45 -76.417 450 7.8 874 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA NA 237.1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.06 fixing boradlea non-N- Phillips & Fahey 2006 42.45 -76.417 450 7.8 874 ECM mineral NA NA NA NA 59.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.93 f fixing boradlea non-N- Phillips & Fahey 2006 42.45 -76.417 450 7.8 874 ECM mineral NA NA NA NA 58.2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.83 f fixing non-N- Phillips & Fahey 2006 42.45 -76.417 450 7.8 874 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA NA 134.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.94 fixing non-N- Saha et al. 2007 25.683 91.917 961 19.5 2208 conifer ECM mineral 6.215 11.04 NA NA 3.54 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing boradlea non-N- Saha et al. 2007 25.683 91.917 961 19.5 2208 AM mineral 4.7375 10.53 NA NA 3.22 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea Saha et al. 2007 25.683 91.917 961 19.5 2208 AM N-fixing mineral 3.4175 8.52 NA NA 2.31 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA boradlea non-N- Saha et al. 2007 25.683 91.917 961 19.5 2208 AM mineral 5.1225 10.58 NA NA 3.36 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Singh et al. 2000 26.75 80.883 126 25.7 920 ECM mineral NA 40.95 2.47 16.6 7.8 0.47 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 8.95 f fixing boradlea non-N- Singh et al. 2000 26.75 80.883 126 25.7 920 AM mineral NA 31.99 2.12 15.1 6.2 0.41 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 8.71 f fixing boradlea non-N- Russell et al. 2007 10.433 -83.983 43 25.8 3960 AM mineral NA 51.03 3.79 13.5 49.3 3.66 NA NA 3.3 NA NA NA NA 4.31 f fixing boradlea Russell et al. 2007 10.433 -83.983 43 25.8 3960 AM N-fixing mineral NA 40.05 3.16 12.7 44.5 3.51 NA NA 4.2 NA NA NA NA 4.15 non-N- Russell et al. 2007 10.433 -83.983 43 25.8 3960 conifer ECM mineral NA 52.07 3.93 13.2 44.5 3.36 NA NA 4.2 NA NA NA NA 4.36 fixing boradlea non-N- Russell et al. 2007 10.433 -83.983 43 25.8 3960 AM mineral NA 49.1 3.78 13 46.1 3.55 NA NA 4.7 NA NA NA NA 4.3 f fixing boradlea non-N- Russell et al. 2007 10.433 -83.983 43 25.8 3960 AM mineral NA 42.15 3.23 13.1 55.1 4.22 NA NA 4.2 NA NA NA NA 4.47 f fixing boradlea non-N- Russell et al. 2007 10.433 -83.983 43 25.8 3960 AM mineral NA 46.3 3.67 12.6 50.6 4.01 NA NA 3.2 NA NA NA NA 4.48 f fixing non-N- Mellor et al. 2013 41.867 -100.333 870 8.4 561 conifer AM mineral NA 6.43 0.65 9.9 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 7.12 fixing non-N- Mellor et al. 2013 41.867 -100.333 870 8.4 561 conifer AM mineral NA 3.7 0.61 6.1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.37 fixing non-N- Mellor et al. 2013 41.867 -100.333 870 8.4 561 conifer ECM mineral NA 4.06 0.34 11.9 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.98 fixing non-N- Wang et al. 2010 22.167 106.833 373 21 1400 conifer ECM mineral 2.318 46.9 2.58 18.2 NA NA 4.9 1.85 NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing boradlea non-N- Wang et al. 2010 22.167 106.833 373 21 1400 ECM mineral 2.719 49.61 3.28 15.2 NA NA 5.16 2.35 NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Wang et al. 2010 22.167 106.833 373 21 1400 AM mineral 2.423 54.51 3.29 16.7 NA NA 5.39 2.35 NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Wang et al. 2010 22.167 106.833 373 21 1400 AM mineral 3.123 51.46 3.32 15.5 NA NA 3.75 3.24 NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing non-N- Wang et al. 2010 22.167 106.833 373 21 1400 conifer ECM mineral NA 29.2 NA NA 26.8 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing boradlea non-N- Wang et al. 2010 22.167 106.833 373 21 1400 ECM mineral NA 32.6 NA NA 29.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Wang et al. 2010 22.167 106.833 373 21 1400 AM mineral NA 34.9 NA NA 31.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Wang et al. 2010 22.167 106.833 373 21 1400 AM mineral NA 34.4 NA NA 31.8 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea Zhang et al. 2012 22.567 112.833 373 22.5 1534 ECM N-fixing mineral NA NA NA 13.8 22.1 1.6 16 17.8 1.8 254 41.4 NA NA 3.83 boradlea non-N- Zhang et al. 2012 22.567 112.833 373 22.5 1534 ECM mineral NA NA NA 10.3 15.5 1.5 13.4 13.6 1.6 288 43.9 NA NA 3.91 f fixing non-N- forest Ushio et al. 2008 6.08333 116.55 1560 18 3080 conifer AM NA NA NA 21.8 350 15.8 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.84 fixing floor non-N- forest Ushio et al. 2008 6.08333 116.55 1560 18 3080 conifer AM NA NA NA 25.4 456 18.1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.83 fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Ushio et al. 2008 6.08333 116.55 1560 18 3080 ECM NA NA NA 23.4 358 15.2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.08 f fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Ushio et al. 2008 6.08333 116.55 1560 18 3080 AM NA NA NA 21.8 379 17.2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.02 f fixing floor boradlea non-N- forest Ushio et al. 2008 6.08333 116.55 1560 18 3080 ECM NA NA NA 24.1 370 15.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.13 f fixing floor 26.3166 boradlea non-N- Wu et al. 2014 117.6 455 20.1 1670 ECM mineral 5.91 NA NA 15.1 29.84 1.97 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.4 7 f fixing 26.3166 non-N- Wu et al. 2014 117.6 455 20.1 1670 conifer AM mineral 3.4 NA NA 15.2 22.91 1.51 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.87 7 fixing non-N- Song et al. 2013 27.5 114.5 617 16.5 1591 conifer AM mineral NA NA NA 14.68 21.433 1.46 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.69 fixing boradlea non-N- Song et al. 2013 27.5 114.5 617 16.5 1591 AM mineral NA NA NA 12.28 21.981 1.79 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.92 f fixing - boradlea non-N- Pereira et al. 2011 41.57 750 12 555 AM mineral NA NA NA 12.56 12.15 0.96 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.56 6.501944 f fixing - boradlea Pereira et al. 2011 41.57 750 12 555 ECM N-fixing mineral NA NA NA 11.18 11.23 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.62 6.501944 f 26.1916 boradlea non-N- Chen et al. 2015 117.4333 201 19.1 1749 ECM mineral 4.51 21.45 NA NA 19.597 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 7 f fixing 26.1916 boradlea Chen et al. 2015 117.4333 201 19.1 1749 AM N-fixing mineral 2.57 23.06 NA NA 20.536 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 7 f 26.1916 non-N- Chen et al. 2015 117.4333 201 19.1 1749 conifer AM mineral 3.19 19.74 NA NA 17.816 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 7 fixing 26.1916 non-N- Chen et al. 2015 117.4333 201 19.1 1749 conifer AM mineral 2.15 20.61 NA NA 18.383 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 7 fixing boradlea non-N- Forrester et al. 2013 -37.5833 149.1667 158 17.8 1009 AM mineral 3.29 36.11 1.15 31.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Forrester et al. 2013 -37.5833 149.1667 158 17.8 1009 AM mineral NA 81.07 1.987 40.8 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Forrester et al. 2013 -37.5833 149.1667 158 17.8 1009 ECM mineral 2.43 30.05 0.712 42.2 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Forrester et al. 2013 -37.5833 149.1667 158 17.8 1009 ECM mineral NA 67.04 1.493 44.9 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing 44.6666 - non-N- Boyle et al. 1990 300 10.5 1300 conifer ECM mineral NA 22.28 1.14 19.5 30.8 1.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 7 123.3333 fixing 44.6666 - boradlea non-N- Boyle et al. 1990 300 10.5 1300 AM mineral NA 28.14 1.59 17.5 44.5 2.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 7 123.3333 f fixing 44.6666 - non-N- Boyle et al. 1990 300 10.5 1300 conifer ECM mineral NA 31 1.52 20.2 39.3 1.9 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 7 123.3333 fixing 44.6666 - boradlea non-N- Boyle et al. 1990 300 10.5 1300 AM mineral NA 30.34 1.56 19.5 45.6 2.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 7 123.3333 f fixing 44.6666 - non-N- Boyle et al. 1990 300 10.5 1300 conifer ECM mineral NA 29.64 1.49 19.7 42.6 2.1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 7 123.3333 fixing 44.6666 - boradlea non-N- Boyle et al. 1990 300 10.5 1300 AM mineral NA 35.97 1.71 21.2 53 2.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 7 123.3333 f fixing 44.6666 - non-N- Boyle et al. 1990 300 10.5 1300 conifer ECM mineral NA 37.22 1.79 20.7 49.1 2.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 7 123.3333 fixing 44.6666 - boradlea non-N- Boyle et al. 1990 300 10.5 1300 AM mineral NA 56.22 1.97 28.5 82.3 2.8 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 7 123.3333 f fixing 44.6666 - non-N- Boyle et al. 1990 300 10.5 1300 conifer ECM mineral NA 25.04 1.28 19.5 28.9 1.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 7 123.3333 fixing 44.6666 - boradlea non-N- Boyle et al. 1990 300 10.5 1300 AM mineral NA 29.37 1.76 17 35.8 2.1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 7 123.3333 f fixing non-N- Jiang et al. 2012 26.7333 115.0667 121 18.6 1726 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 16 8.5 0.55 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing non-N- Jiang et al. 2012 26.7333 115.0667 121 18.6 1726 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 15 12.3 0.79 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA fixing boradlea non-N- Jiang et al. 2012 26.7333 115.0667 121 18.6 1726 AM mineral NA NA NA 14 13.5 0.94 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing boradlea non-N- Jiang et al. 2012 26.7333 115.0667 121 18.6 1726 AM mineral NA NA NA 14 21.9 1.55 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA f fixing Perez-Bejarano et al. 38.3833 non-N- -0.98333 851 15.8 260 conifer AM mineral NA NA NA NA 75.58 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 2010 3 fixing Perez-Bejarano et al. 38.3833 boradlea non-N- -0.98333 851 15.8 260 AM mineral NA NA NA NA 64.42 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 2010 3 f fixing Perez-Bejarano et al. 38.3833 boradlea non-N- -0.98333 851 15.8 260 ECM mineral NA NA NA NA 87.524 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 2010 3 f fixing Perez-Bejarano et al. 38.3833 non-N- -0.98333 851 15.8 260 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA NA 91.441 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 2010 3 fixing 25.6891 boradlea non-N- Ramesh et al. 2013 91.92361 980 18.7 2208.5 AM mineral 5.1245 NA NA NA 22.125 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.6 7 f fixing 25.6891 boradlea Ramesh et al. 2013 91.92361 980 18.7 2208.5 AM N-fixing mineral 3.5392 NA NA NA 23.336 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.59 7 f 25.6891 boradlea non-N- Ramesh et al. 2013 91.92361 980 18.7 2208.5 AM mineral 4.7675 NA NA NA 31.242 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.38 7 f fixing 25.6891 non-N- Ramesh et al. 2013 91.92361 980 18.7 2208.5 conifer ECM mineral 6.253 NA NA NA 22.706 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.36 7 fixing - non-N- Turner et al. 1993 44.3333 349 11.5 1210 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 17 217 12.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.8 123.9167 fixing - non-N- Turner et al. 1993 44.3333 349 11.5 1210 conifer AM mineral NA NA NA 19 217 11.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.8 123.9167 fixing - non-N- Turner et al. 1993 44.3333 349 11.5 1210 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 20 316 15.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.6 123.9167 fixing boradlea non-N- Wang et al. 2013 22.1 106.7667 350 19.6 1400 AM mineral NA NA NA 12.28 35.11 2.86 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.93 f fixing boradlea non-N- Wang et al. 2013 22.1 106.7667 350 19.6 1400 ECM mineral NA NA NA 15.63 32.55 2.11 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.26 f fixing non-N- Wang et al. 2013 22.1 106.7667 350 19.6 1400 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 16.69 26.46 1.59 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5.18 fixing boradlea non-N- Wang et al. 2013 22.1 106.7667 350 19.6 1400 AM mineral NA NA NA 12.07 30.25 2.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 3.86 f fixing boradlea non-N- Wang et al. 2013 22.1 106.7667 350 19.6 1400 ECM mineral NA NA NA 14.33 28.58 2.03 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.15 f fixing non-N- Wang et al. 2013 22.1 106.7667 350 19.6 1400 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 14.88 23.94 1.6 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.96 fixing non-N- Li et al. 2012 31.65 119.2833 300 17.5 1149 conifer AM mineral NA NA NA 13.36 24.71 1.87 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.4 fixing boradlea non-N- Li et al. 2012 31.65 119.2833 300 17.5 1149 ECM mineral NA NA NA 13.21 36.84 2.8 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.36 f fixing non-N- Li et al. 2012 31.65 119.2833 300 17.5 1149 conifer ECM mineral NA NA NA 13.52 16.2 1.21 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 4.5 fixing Litter: annual litter production (); Cs: C stock; CN: C :N ratio; Ns: forest floor N stock; Nc: mineral soil N concentration; PAP: plant available phosphorus; MBC: microbial biomass C; MBN: microbial biomass nitrogen; MBP: microbial biomass phosphorus; respiration: soil base respiration. Table S2 Estimates of the linear mixed models assessing the effects of tree species type, mycorrhizal association, and N-fixing ability on mineral soil chemical and biotic properties. Values in bold indicate statistically significant difference between broadleaf and conifer, AM and ECM, or N-fixing and non-N-fixing. The corresponding statistical results are shown in Table 1. Soil properties Tree species effect on soil properties Species type Mycorrhizal association N-fixing ability Broadleaf Conifer AM ECM N-fixing non-N-fixing + -1 NH4 (mg kg ) 214.8 575.9 309.1 411.2 327.5 377.5 - -1 NO (mg kg ) 14.7 13.2 17.2 11.9 17.2 14.0 -1 PAP (mg kg ) 312.1 463.8 293.9 447.8 246.3 391.4 -1 MBC (mg kg ) 599.8 577.7 684.8 535.9 560.7 594.8 -1 MBN (mg kg ) 85.7 57.2 76.4 73.5 70.8 75.2 -1 MBP (mg kg ) 26.4 15.4 19.8 24.9 23.3 23.4 -1 -1 Basal respiration (mg CO g day ) 27.6 29.4 24.2 29.7 27.1 28.8 Appendix 1: List of the 143 primary articles from which the data were extracted for this study 1. Son, Y., & Gower, S. T. (1992). Nitrogen and phosphorus distribution for five plantation species in southwestern Wisconsin. Forest Ecology and Management, 53(1-4), 175-193. 2. Kooch, Y., Tavakoli, M., & Akbarinia, M. (2018). Microbial/biochemical indicators showing perceptible deterioration in the topsoil due to deforestation. Ecological Indicators, 91, 84-91. 3. Rachid, C. T. C. C., Balieiro, F. C., Peixoto, R. S., Pinheiro, Y. A. S., Piccolo, M. C., Chaer, G. M., & Rosado, A. S. (2013). Mixed plantations can promote microbial integration and soil nitrate increases with changes in the N cycling genes. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 66, 146-153. 4. Xu, X., Inubushi, K., & Sakamoto, K. (2006). Effect of vegetations and temperature on microbial biomass carbon and metabolic quotients of temperate volcanic forest soils. Geoderma, 136(1-2), 310-319. 5. Chodak, M., Klimek, B., Azarbad, H., & Jaźwa, M. (2015). Functional diversity of soil microbial communities under Scots pine, Norway spruce, silver birch and mixed boreal forests. Pedobiologia, 58(2-3), 81-88. 6. Vesterdal, L., Schmidt, I. K., Callesen, I., Nilsson, L. O., & Gundersen, P. (2008). Carbon and nitrogen in forest floor and mineral soil under six common European tree species. Forest Ecology and Management, 255(1), 35-48. 7. Baum, C., Fienemann, M., Glatzel, S., & Gleixner, G. (2009). Overstory-specific effects of litter fall on the microbial carbon turnover in a mature deciduous forest. Forest ecology and management, 258(2), 109-114. 8. Olsson, B. A., Hansson, K., Persson, T., Beuker, E., & Helmisaari, H. S. (2012). Heterotrophic respiration and nitrogen mineralisation in soils of Norway spruce, Scots pine and silver birch stands in contrasting climates. Forest Ecology and Management, 269, 197- 9. Smolander, A., & Kitunen, V. (2002). Soil microbial activities and characteristics of dissolved organic C and N in relation to tree species. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 34(5), 651-660. 10. Selmants, P. C., Hart, S. C., Boyle, S. I., & Stark, J. M. (2005). Red alder (Alnus rubra) alters community-level soil microbial function in conifer forests of the Pacific Northwest, USA. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 37(10), 1860-1868. 11. Chatterjee, A., Vance, G. F., Pendall, E., & Stahl, P. D. (2008). Timber harvesting alters soil carbon mineralization and microbial community structure in coniferous forests. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 40(7), 1901-1907. 12. Malchair, S., & Carnol, M. (2009). Microbial biomass and C and N transformations in forest floors under European beech, sessile oak, Norway spruce and Douglas-fir at four temperate forest sites. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 41(4), 831-839. 13. Huang, Z., Davis, M. R., Condron, L. M., & Clinton, P. W. (2011). Soil carbon pools, plant biomarkers and mean carbon residence time after afforestation of grassland with three tree species. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 43(6), 1341-1349. 14. Huang, Z., Wan, X., He, Z., Yu, Z., Wang, M., Hu, Z., & Yang, Y. (2013). Soil microbial biomass, community composition and soil nitrogen cycling in relation to tree species in subtropical China. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 62, 68-75. 15. Huang, X., Liu, S., Wang, H., Hu, Z., Li, Z., & You, Y. (2014). Changes of soil microbial biomass carbon and community composition through mixing nitrogen-fixing species with Eucalyptus urophylla in subtropical China. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 73, 42-48. 16. Fu, X., Yang, F., Wang, J., Di, Y., Dai, X., Zhang, X., & Wang, H. (2015). Understory vegetation leads to changes in soil acidity and in microbial communities 27 years after reforestation. Science of the Total Environment, 502, 280-286. 17. Kang, H., Gao, H., Yu, W., Yi, Y., Wang, Y., & Ning, M. (2018). Changes in soil microbial community structure and function after afforestation depend on species and age: case study in a subtropical alluvial island. Science of The Total Environment, 625, 1423- 18. Józefowska, A., Pietrzykowski, M., Woś, B., Cajthaml, T., & Frouz, J. (2017). Relationships between respiration, chemical and microbial properties of afforested mine soils with different soil texture and tree species: Does the time of incubation matter. European Journal of Soil Biology, 80, 102-109. 19. Hagen-Thorn, A., Callesen, I., Armolaitis, K., & Nihlgård, B. (2004). The impact of six European tree species on the chemistry of mineral topsoil in forest plantations on former agricultural land. Forest Ecology and Management, 195(3), 373-384. 20. Schulp, C. J., Nabuurs, G. J., Verburg, P. H., & de Waal, R. W. (2008). Effect of tree species on carbon stocks in forest floor and mineral soil and implications for soil carbon inventories. Forest Ecology and Management, 256(3), 482-490. 21. Díaz-Pinés, E., Rubio, A., Van Miegroet, H., Montes, F., & Benito, M. (2011). Does tree species composition control soil organic carbon pools in Mediterranean mountain forests?. Forest Ecology and Management, 262(10), 1895-1904. 22. Hansson, K., Olsson, B. A., Olsson, M., Johansson, U., & Kleja, D. B. (2011). Differences in soil properties in adjacent stands of Scots pine, Norway spruce and silver birch in SW Sweden. Forest Ecology and Management, 262(3), 522-530. 23. Wang, H., Liu, S., Wang, J., Shi, Z., Lu, L., Zeng, J., ... & Yu, H. (2013). Effects of tree species mixture on soil organic carbon stocks and greenhouse gas fluxes in subtropical plantations in China. Forest Ecology and Management, 300, 4-13. 24. He, Y., Qin, L., Li, Z., Liang, X., Shao, M., & Tan, L. (2013). Carbon storage capacity of monoculture and mixed-species plantations in subtropical China. Forest ecology and management, 295, 193-198. 25. Frouz, J., Livečková, M., Albrechtová, J., Chroňáková, A., Cajthaml, T., Pižl, V., ... & Šimáčková, H. (2013). Is the effect of trees on soil properties mediated by soil fauna? A case study from post-mining sites. Forest Ecology and Management, 309, 87-95. 26. Wen, L., Lei, P., Xiang, W., Yan, W., & Liu, S. (2014). Soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen in pure and mixed stands of Pinus massoniana and Cinnamomum camphora differing in stand age. Forest Ecology and Management, 328, 150-158. 27. Song, W., Liu, Y., & Tong, X. (2017). Newly sequestrated soil organic carbon varies with soil depth and tree species in three forest plantations from northeastern China. Forest Ecology and Management, 400, 384-395. 28. Wang, W., Lu, J., Du, H., Wei, C., Wang, H., Fu, Y., & He, X. (2017). Ranking thirteen tree species based on their impact on soil physiochemical properties, soil fertility, and carbon sequestration in Northeastern China. Forest Ecology and Management, 404, 214- 29. Alriksson, A., & Eriksson, H. M. (1998). Variations in mineral nutrient and C distribution in the soil and vegetation compartments of five temperate tree species in NE Sweden. Forest Ecology and Management, 108(3), 261-273. 30. Neirynck, J., Mirtcheva, S., Sioen, G., & Lust, N. (2000). Impact of Tilia platyphyllos Scop., Fraxinus excelsior L., Acer pseudoplatanus L., Quercus robur L. and Fagus sylvatica L. on earthworm biomass and physico-chemical properties of a loamy topsoil. Forest Ecology and Management, 133(3), 275-286. 31. Chodak, M., Pietrzykowski, M., & Sroka, K. (2015). Physiological profiles of microbial communities in mine soils afforested with different tree species. Ecological engineering, 81, 462-470. 32. Kaur, B., Gupta, S. R., & Singh, G. (2000). Soil carbon, microbial activity and nitrogen availability in agroforestry systems on moderately alkaline soils in northern India. Applied soil ecology, 15(3), 283-294. 33. Galicia, L., & Garcıa-Oliva, F. (2004). The effects of C, N and P additions on soil microbial activity under two remnant tree species in a tropical seasonal pasture. Applied Soil Ecology, 26(1), 31-39. 34. Gartzia-Bengoetxea, N., Kandeler, E., de Arano, I. M., & Arias-González, A. (2016). Soil microbial functional activity is governed by a combination of tree species composition and soil properties in temperate forests. Applied soil ecology, 100, 57-64. 35. Zhan-Yuan, Y. U., Fu-Sheng, C. H. E. N., De-Hui, Z. E. N. G., Qiong, Z. H. A. O., & Guang-Sheng, C. H. E. N. (2008). Soil inorganic nitrogen and microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen under pine plantations in Zhanggutai sandy soil. Pedosphere, 18(6), 775-784. 36. Yang, N., Ji, L., Yang, Y., & Yang, L. (2018). The influence of tree species on soil properties and microbial communities following afforestation of abandoned land in northeast China. European journal of soil biology, 85, 73-78. 37. Wang, S., Wang, H., & Li, J. (2016). Does tree species composition affect soil CO 2 emission and soil organic carbon storage in plantations?. Trees, 30(6), 2071-2080. 38. Wotherspoon, A., Thevathasan, N. V., Gordon, A. M., & Voroney, R. P. (2014). Carbon sequestration potential of five tree species in a 25-year-old temperate tree-based intercropping system in southern Ontario, Canada. Agroforestry systems, 88(4), 631-643. 39. Frouz, J., Pižl, V., Cienciala, E., & Kalčík, J. (2009). Carbon storage in post-mining forest soil, the role of tree biomass and soil bioturbation. Biogeochemistry, 94(2), 111-121. 40. Mueller, K. E., Eissenstat, D. M., Hobbie, S. E., Oleksyn, J., Jagodzinski, A. M., Reich, P. B., ... & Chorover, J. (2012). Tree species effects on coupled cycles of carbon, nitrogen, and acidity in mineral soils at a common garden experiment. Biogeochemistry, 111(1-3), 601-614. 41. Wei, X., Shao, M., Fu, X., & Horton, R. (2010). Changes in soil organic carbon and total nitrogen after 28 years grassland afforestation: effects of tree species, slope position, and soil order. Plant and Soil, 331(1-2), 165-179. 42. Langenbruch, C., Helfrich, M., & Flessa, H. (2012). Effects of beech (Fagus sylvatica), ash (Fraxinus excelsior) and lime (Tilia spec.) on soil chemical properties in a mixed deciduous forest. Plant and Soil, 352(1-2), 389-403. 43. Wang, Q., & Zhong, M. (2016). Composition and mineralization of soil organic carbon pools in four single-tree species forest soils. Journal of forestry research, 27(6), 1277-1285. 44. Andivia, E., Rolo, V., Jonard, M., Formánek, P., & Ponette, Q. (2016). Tree species identity mediates mechanisms of top soil carbon sequestration in a Norway spruce and European beech mixed forest. Annals of Forest Science, 73(2), 437-447. 45. Wang, X., Wang, C., & Han, Y. (2015). Effects of tree species on soil organic carbon density: a common garden experiment of five temperate tree species. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 39(11): 1033-1043. (in Chinese with English abstract) 46. Finzi, A. C., Van Breemen, N., & Canham, C. D. (1998). Canopy tree–soil interactions within temperate forests: species effects on soil carbon and nitrogen. Ecological applications, 8(2), 440-446. 47. Lu, S., Zhang, Y., Chen, C., Xu, Z., & Guo, X. (2017). Plant–soil interaction affects the mineralization of soil organic carbon: evidence from 73-year-old plantations with three coniferous tree species in subtropical Australia. Journal of soils and sediments, 17(4), 985- 48. Ndlovu, E., Ngamau, K., Muthuri, C. W., & Muriuki, J. K. Alteration of soil carbon and pH by selected common tree species on farms in Eastern Highlands of Kenya. 49. Aponte, C., Matías, L., González-Rodríguez, V., Castro, J., García, L. V., Villar, R., & Marañón, T. (2014). Soil nutrients and microbial biomass in three contrasting Mediterranean forests. Plant and soil, 380(1-2), 57-72. 50. Zhou, X., Guo, Z., Chen, C., & Jia, Z. (2017). Soil microbial community structure and diversity are largely influenced by soil pH and nutrient quality in 78-year-old tree plantations. Biogeosciences, 14(8): 2101-2111. 51. Chaiyasen, A., Douds, D. D., Gavinlertvatana, P., & Lumyong, S. (2017). Diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in Tectona grandis Linn. f. plantations and their effects on growth of micropropagated plantlets. New forests, 48(4), 547-562. 52. Chodak, M., & Niklińska, M. (2010). The effect of different tree species on the chemical and microbial properties of reclaimed mine soils. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 46(6), 555- 53. Liang, C., Fujinuma, R., Wei, L., & Balser, T. C. (2007). Tree species-specific effects on soil microbial residues in an upper Michigan old-growth forest system. Forestry, 80(1), 65- 54. Wang, Q., Xiao, F., Zhang, F., & Wang, S. (2013). Labile soil organic carbon and microbial activity in three subtropical plantations. Forestry, 86(5), 569-574. 55. Deng, H., Zhang, B., Yin, R., Wang, H. L., Mitchell, S. M., Griffiths, B. S., & Daniell, T. J. (2010). Long-term effect of re-vegetation on the microbial community of a severely eroded soil in sub-tropical China. Plant and soil, 328(1-2), 447-458. 56. Kara, O., Babur, E., Altun, L., & Seyis, M. (2016). Effects of afforestation on microbial biomass C and respiration in eroded soils of Turkey. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 35(6), 385-396. 57. Vesterdal, L., & Raulund-Rasmussen, K. (1998). Forest floor chemistry under seven tree species along a soil fertility gradient. Canadian journal of forest research, 28(11), 1636- 58. Bell, G., Sena, K. L., Barton, C. D., & French, M. (2017). Establishing pine monocultures and mixed pine-hardwood stands on reclaimed surface mined land in eastern Kentucky: Implications for forest resilience in a changing climate. Forests, 8(10), 375. 59. Bolat, I., Kara, Ö., Sensoy, H., & Yüksel, K. (2015). Influences of Black Locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) afforestation on soil microbial biomass and activity. iForest- Biogeosciences and Forestry, 9(1), 171. 60. Sariyildiz, T., Savaci, G., & Kravkaz, I. S. (2015). Effects of tree species, stand age and land-use change on soil carbon and nitrogen stock rates in northwestern Turkey. iForest- Biogeosciences and Forestry, 9(1), 165. 61. Oostra, S., Majdi, H., & Olsson, M. (2006). Impact of tree species on soil carbon stocks and soil acidity in southern Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 21(5), 364- 62. Cheng, F., Peng, X., Zhao, P., Yuan, J., Zhong, C., Cheng, Y., ... & Zhang, S. (2013). Soil microbial biomass, basal respiration and enzyme activity of main forest types in the Qinling Mountains. PLoS One, 8(6). 63. Yu, X., Liu, X., Zhao, Z., Liu, J., & Zhang, S. (2015). Effect of monospecific and mixed sea-buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides) plantations on the structure and activity of soil microbial communities. PloS one, 10(2). 64. Kooch, Y., Sanji, R., & Tabari, M. (2018). Increasing tree diversity enhances microbial and enzyme activities in temperate Iranian forests. Trees, 32(3), 809-822. 65. Lejon, D. P., Chaussod, R., Ranger, J., & Ranjard, L. (2005). Microbial community structure and density under different tree species in an acid forest soil (Morvan, France). Microbial Ecology, 50(4), 614-625. 66. Li, C., Shi, L. L., Ostermann, A., Xu, J., Li, Y., & Mortimer, P. E. (2015). Indigenous trees restore soil microbial biomass at faster rates than exotic species. Plant and soil, 396(1- 2), 151-161. 67. Galicia, L., & Garcia-Oliva, F. (2011). Litter quality of two remnant tree species affects soil microbial activity in tropical seasonal pastures in Western Mexico. Arid land research and Management, 25(1), 75-86. 68. Lucas-Borja, M. E., Candel, D., Jindo, K., Moreno, J. L., Andrés, M., & Bastida, F. (2012). Soil microbial community structure and activity in monospecific and mixed forest stands, under Mediterranean humid conditions. Plant and soil, 354(1-2), 359-370. 69. Luo, D., Cheng, R., Shi, Z., Wang, W., Xu, G., & Liu, S. (2016). Impacts of nitrogen- fixing and non-nitrogen-fixing tree species on soil respiration and microbial community composition during forest management in subtropical China. Ecological Research, 31(5), 683-693. 70. Mareschal, L., Bonnaud, P., Turpault, M. P., & Ranger, J. (2010). Impact of common European tree species on the chemical and physicochemical properties of fine earth: an unusual pattern. European Journal of Soil Science, 61(1), 14-23. 71. Melvin, A. M., & Goodale, C. L. (2013). Tree species and earthworm effects on soil nutrient distribution and turnover in a northeastern United States common garden. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 43(2), 180-187. 72. Thomas, K. D., & Prescott, C. E. (2000). Nitrogen availability in forest floors of three tree species on the same site: the role of litter quality. Canadian journal of forest research, 30(11), 1698-1706. 73. Laik, R., Kumar, K., & Das, D. K. (2009). Organic carbon and nutrient build-up in a calciorthent soil under six forest tree species. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods, 19(1), 81-92. 74. Giardina, C. P., Ryan, M. G., Hubbard, R. M., & Binkley, D. (2001). Tree species and soil textural controls on carbon and nitrogen mineralization rates. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 65(4), 1272-1279. 75. Sevgi, O., Makineci, E., & Karaoz, O. (2011). The forest floor and mineral soil carbon pools of six different forest tree species. Ekoloji, 20(81), 8-14. 76. Laganière, J., Angers, D. A., Paré, D., Bergeron, Y., & Chen, H. Y. (2011). Black spruce soils accumulate more uncomplexed organic matter than aspen soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 75(3), 1125-1132. 77. Taylor, M. K., Lankau, R. A., & Wurzburger, N. (2016). Mycorrhizal associations of trees have different indirect effects on organic matter decomposition. Journal of Ecology, 104(6), 1576-1584. 78. Wan, X., Huang, Z., He, Z., Yu, Z., Wang, M., Davis, M. R., & Yang, Y. (2015). Soil C: N ratio is the major determinant of soil microbial community structure in subtropical coniferous and broadleaf forest plantations. Plant and Soil, 387(1-2), 103-116. 79. Ulery, A. L., Graham, R. C., Chadwick, O. A., & Wood, H. B. (1995). Decade-scale changes of soil carbon, nitrogen and exchangeable cations under chaparral and pine. Geoderma, 65(1-2), 121-134. 80. Michelsen, A., Lisanework, N., & Friis, I. (1993). Impacts of tree plantations in the Ethiopian highland on soil fertility, shoot and root growth, nutrient utilisation and mycorrhizal colonisation. Forest Ecology and Management, 61(3-4), 299-324. 81. Lemma, B., Kleja, D. B., Nilsson, I., & Olsson, M. (2006). Soil carbon sequestration under different exotic tree species in the southwestern highlands of Ethiopia. Geoderma, 136(3-4), 886-898. 82. Kasel, S., Singh, S., Sanders, G. J., & Bennett, L. T. (2011). Species-specific effects of native trees on soil organic carbon in biodiverse plantings across north-central Victoria, Australia. Geoderma, 161(1-2), 95-106. 83. Lu, S., Chen, C., Zhou, X., Xu, Z., Bacon, G., Rui, Y., & Guo, X. (2012). Responses of soil dissolved organic matter to long-term plantations of three coniferous tree species. Geoderma, 170, 136-143. 84. Quideau, S. A., Graham, R. C., Chadwick, O. A., & Wood, H. B. (1998). Organic carbon sequestration under chaparral and pine after four decades of soil development. Geoderma, 83(3-4), 227-242. 85. Templer, P., Findlay, S., & Lovett, G. (2003). Soil microbial biomass and nitrogen transformations among five tree species of the Catskill Mountains, New York, USA. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 35(4), 607-613. 86. Grayston, S. J., & Prescott, C. E. (2005). Microbial communities in forest floors under four tree species in coastal British Columbia. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 37(6), 1157- 87. Nsabimana, D., Klemedtson, L., Kaplin, B. A., & Wallin, G. (2009). Soil CO2 flux in six monospecific forest plantations in Southern Rwanda. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 41(2), 396-402. 88. Hoogmoed, M., Cunningham, S. C., Baker, P., Beringer, J., & Cavagnaro, T. R. (2014). N-fixing trees in restoration plantings: effects on nitrogen supply and soil microbial communities. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 77, 203-212. 89. Mertens, J., Van Nevel, L., De Schrijver, A., Piesschaert, F., Oosterbaan, A., Tack, F. M., & Verheyen, K. (2007). Tree species effect on the redistribution of soil metals. Environmental Pollution, 149(2), 173-181. 90. Yin, R., Deng, H., Wang, H. L., & Zhang, B. (2014). Vegetation type affects soil enzyme activities and microbial functional diversity following re-vegetation of a severely eroded red soil in sub-tropical China. Catena, 115, 96-103. 91. Smith, C. K., de Assis Oliveira, F., Gholz, H. L., & Baima, A. (2002). Soil carbon stocks after forest conversion to tree plantations in lowland Amazonia, Brazil. Forest Ecology and Management, 164(1-3), 257-263. 92. Lemenih, M., Olsson, M., & Karltun, E. (2004). Comparison of soil attributes under Cupressus lusitanica and Eucalyptus saligna established on abandoned farmlands with continuously cropped farmlands and natural forest in Ethiopia. Forest ecology and Management, 195(1-2), 57-67. 93. Zheng, H., Ouyang, Z. Y., Wang, X. K., Fang, Z. G., Zhao, T. Q., & Miao, H. (2005). Effects of regenerating forest cover on soil microbial communities: a case study in hilly red soil region, Southern China. Forest Ecology and Management, 217(2-3), 244-254. 94. Raich, J. W., Russell, A. E., & Bedoya-Arrieta, R. (2007). Lignin and enhanced litter turnover in tree plantations of lowland Costa Rica. Forest Ecology and Management, 239(1-3), 128-135. 95. Zheng, H., Ouyang, Z., Xu, W., Wang, X., Miao, H., Li, X., & Tian, Y. (2008). Variation of carbon storage by different reforestation types in the hilly red soil region of southern China. Forest Ecology and Management, 255(3-4), 1113-1121. 96. Johnsen, K. H., Samuelson, L. J., Sanchez, F. G., & Eaton, R. J. (2013). Soil carbon and nitrogen content and stabilization in mid-rotation, intensively managed sweetgum and loblolly pine stands. Forest ecology and management, 302, 144-153. 97. Tang, G., & Li, K. (2014). Soil amelioration through afforestation and self-repair in a degraded valley-type savanna. Forest Ecology and Management, 320, 13-20. 98. Zhao, Q., Zeng, D. H., & Fan, Z. P. (2010). Nitrogen and phosphorus transformations in the rhizospheres of three tree species in a nutrient-poor sandy soil. Applied Soil Ecology, 46(3), 341-346. 99. Jiang, P. K., & Qiu-Fang, X. U. (2006). Abundance and dynamics of soil labile carbon pools under different types of forest vegetation. Pedosphere, 16(4), 505-511. 100. Yan, W. D., Xu, W. M., Chen, X. Y., Tian, D. L., Peng, Y. Y., Zhen, W., ... & Xu, J. (2014). Soil CO2 flux in different types of forests under a subtropical microclimatic environment. Pedosphere, 24(2), 243-250. 101. Devi, B., Bhardwaj, D. R., Panwar, P., Pal, S., Gupta, N. K., & Thakur, C. L. (2012). Carbon allocation, sequestration and carbon dioxide mitigation under plantation forests of north western Himalaya, India. Annals of Forest Research, 56(1), 123-135. 102. JAHED, R. R., & HOSSEINI, S. M. (2014). The effect of natural and planted forest stands on soil fertility in the Hyrcanian region, Iran. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity, 15(2), 206-214. 103. Riestra, D., Noellemeyer, E., & Quiroga, A. (2012). Soil texture and forest species condition the effect of afforestation on soil quality parameters. Soil science, 177(4), 279- 104. Ovington, J. D. (1953). Studies of the development of woodland conditions under different trees: II the forest floor. Journal of Ecology, 41(1), 71-80. 105. Ovington, J. D. (1956). Studies of the development of woodland conditions under different trees: IV. The ignition loss, water, carbon and nitrogen content of the mineral soil. The Journal of Ecology, 41(1), 171-179. 106. Defrieri, R. L., Sarti, G., Tortarolo, M. F., Escobar-Ortega, J., García de Salamone, I., D'Auria, F., & Effron, D. (2011). Biochemical and microbiological properties of Argentinean Patagonia soil with implanted forest species. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 11(3), 111-124. 107. Asadiyan, M., Hojjati, S. M., Pourmajidian, M. R., & Fallah, A. (2013). Impact of land- use management on nitrogen transformation in a mountain forest ecosystem in the north of Iran. Journal of forestry Research, 24(1), 115-119. 108. Kooch, Y., Hosseini, S. M., Zaccone, C., Jalilvand, H., & Hojjati, S. M. (2012). Soil organic carbon sequestration as affected by afforestation: the Darab Kola forest (North of Iran) case study. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 14(9), 2438-2446. 109. Christiansen, J. R., Vesterdal, L., Callesen, I., Elberling, B., Schmidt, I. K., & Gundersen, P. (2010). Role of six European tree species and land‐use legacy for nitrogen and water budgets in forests. Global Change Biology, 16(8), 2224-2240. 110. Wang, F., Li, Z., Xia, H., Zou, B., Li, N., Liu, J., & Zhu, W. (2010). Effects of nitrogen- fixing and non-nitrogen-fixing tree species on soil properties and nitrogen transformation during forest restoration in southern China. Soil Science & Plant Nutrition, 56(2), 297- 111. Peng, S., Chen, A., Fang, H., Wu, J., & Liu, G. (2013). Effects of vegetation restoration types on soil quality in Yuanmou dry-hot valley, China. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 59(3), 347-360. 112. Wei, Y. C., Ouyang, Z. Y., Miao, H., & Zheng, H. (2009). Exotic Pinus carbaea causes soil quality to deteriorate on former abandoned land compared to an indigenous Podocarpus plantation in the tropical forest area of southern China. Journal of Forest Research, 14(4), 221-228. 113. Yang, Y. S., Guo, J. F., Chen, G. S., Xie, J. S., Cai, L. P., & Lin, P. (2004). Litterfall, nutrient return, and leaf-litter decomposition in four plantations compared with a natural forest in subtropical China. Annals of Forest Science, 61(5), 465-476. 114. Garcia-Montiel, D. C., & Binkley, D. (1998). Effect of Eucalyptus saligna and Albizia falcataria on soil processes and nitrogen supply in Hawaii. Oecologia, 113(4), 547-556. 115. Jiang, Y. M., Chen, C. R., Liu, Y. Q., & Xu, Z. H. (2010). Soil soluble organic carbon and nitrogen pools under mono-and mixed species forest ecosystems in subtropical China. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 10(6), 1071-1081. 116. Kulakova, N. (2012). Impact of plant species on the formation of carbon and nitrogen stock in soils under semi-desert conditions. European Journal of Forest Research, 131(6), 1717-1726. 117. Laudicina, V. A., De Pasquale, C., Conte, P., Badalucco, L., Alonzo, G., & Palazzolo, E. (2012). Effects of afforestation with four unmixed plant species on the soil–water interactions in a semiarid Mediterranean region (Sicily, Italy). Journal of Soils and Sediments, 12(8), 1222-1230. 118. Demessie, A., Singh, B. R., Lal, R., & Strand, L. T. (2012). Leaf litter fall and litter decomposition under Eucalyptus and coniferous plantations in Gambo District, southern Ethiopia. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B-Soil & Plant Science, 62(5), 467- 119. Lemma, B. (2012). Soil chemical properties and nutritional status of trees in pure and mixed-species stands in south Ethiopia. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 175(5), 769-774. 120. Li, Y. C., Liu, B. R., Li, S. H., Qin, H., Fu, W. J., & Xu, Q. F. (2014). Shift in abundance and structure of soil ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and archaea communities associated with four typical forest vegetations in subtropical region. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 14(9), 1577-1586. 121. Lugo, A. E., Cuevas, E., & Sanchez, M. J. (1990). Nutrients and mass in litter and top soil of ten tropical tree plantations. Plant and Soil, 125(2), 263-280. 123. Phillips, R. P., & Fahey, T. J. (2006). Tree species and mycorrhizal associations influence the magnitude of rhizosphere effects. Ecology, 87(5), 1302-1313. 124. Saha, R., Tomar, J. M. S., & Ghosh, P. K. (2007). Evaluation and selection of multipurpose tree for improving soil hydro-physical behaviour under hilly eco-system of north east India. Agroforestry Systems, 69(3), 239-247. 125. Singh, B., Tripathi, K. P., Jain, R. K., & Behl, H. M. (2000). Fine root biomass and tree species effects on potential N mineralization in afforested sodic soils. Plant and soil, 219(1-2), 81-89. 126. Russell, A. E., Raich, J. W., Valverde-Barrantes, O. J., & Fisher, R. F. (2007). Tree species effects on soil properties in experimental plantations in tropical moist forest. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 71(4), 1389-1397. 127. Mellor, N. J., Hellerich, J., Drijber, R., Morris, S. J., Stromberger, M. E., & Paul, E. A. (2013). Changes in ecosystem carbon following afforestation of native sand prairie. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 77(5), 1613-1624. 128. Wang, H., Liu, S., Mo, J., & Zhang, T. (2010). Soil-atmosphere exchange of greenhouse gases in subtropical plantations of indigenous tree species. Plant and soil, 335(1-2), 213- 129. Wang, H., Liu, S. R., Mo, J. M., Wang, J. X., Makeschin, F., & Wolff, M. (2010). Soil organic carbon stock and chemical composition in four plantations of indigenous tree species in subtropical China. Ecological Research, 25(6), 1071-1079. 130. Zhang, W., Zhu, X., Liu, L., Fu, S., Chen, H., Huang, J., ... & Mo, J. (2012). Large difference of inhibitive effect of nitrogen deposition on soil methane oxidation between plantations with N‐fixing tree species and non‐N‐fixing tree species. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 117(G4). 131. Ushio, M., Wagai, R., Balser, T. C., & Kitayama, K. (2008). Variations in the soil microbial community composition of a tropical montane forest ecosystem: does tree species matter? Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 40(10), 2699-2702. 132. Wu, J., Yang, Z., Liu, X., Xiong, D., Lin, W., Chen, C., Wang, X. (2014). Analysis of soil respiration and components in Castanopsis carlesii and Cunninghamia lanceolata plantations. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 38(1), 45-53. (in Chinese with English abstract) 133. Song, Q., Yang, Q., Yu, D., Fan,g K., Zhao, G., Yu, S. (2013). The effects of forest conversion on soil N mineralization and its availability in central jiangxi subtropical region. Acta Ecologica Sinica. 33(22): 7309-7318. (in Chinese with English abstract) 134. Pereira, E. L., Santos, S. A., Arrobas, M., & Patrício, M. D. S. (2011). Microbial biomass and N mineralization in mixed plantations of broadleaves and nitrogen-fixing species. Forest systems, 20(3), 516-524. 135. Chen, G. S., Yang, Y. S., Xie, J. S., Guo, J. F., Gao, R., & Qian, W. (2005). Conversion of a natural broad-leafed evergreen forest into pure plantation forests in a subtropical area: effects on carbon storage. Annals of Forest Science, 62(7), 659-668. 136. Forrester, D. I., Pares, A., O’hara, C., Khanna, P. K., & Bauhus, J. (2013). Soil organic carbon is increased in mixed-species plantations of Eucalyptus and nitrogen-fixing Acacia. Ecosystems, 16(1), 123-132. 137. Fried, J. S., Boyle, J. R., Tappeiner II, J. C., & Cromack Jr, K. (1990). Effects of bigleaf maple on soils in Douglas-fir forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 20(3), 259- 138. Jiang, Y., Chen, C., Xu, Z., & Liu, Y. (2012). Effects of single and mixed species forest ecosystems on diversity and function of soil microbial community in subtropical China. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 12(2), 228-240. 139. Pérez-Bejarano, A., Mataix-Solera, J., Zornoza, R., Guerrero, C., Arcenegui, V., Mataix- Beneyto, J., & Cano-Amat, S. (2010). Influence of plant species on physical, chemical and biological soil properties in a Mediterranean forest soil. European Journal of Forest Research, 129(1), 15-24. 140. Ramesh, T., Manjaiah, K. M., Tomar, J. M. S., & Ngachan, S. V. (2013). Effect of multipurpose tree species on soil fertility and CO efflux under hilly ecosystems of Northeast India. Agroforestry Systems, 87(6), 1377-1388. 141. Turner, D. P., Sollins, P., Leuking, M., & Rudd, N. (1993). Availability and uptake of inorganic nitrogen in a mixed old-growth coniferous forest. Plant and soil, 148(2), 163- 142. Wang, W., Shi, Z., Luo, D., Liu, S., & Lu, L. (2013). Characteristics of soil microbial biomass and community composition in three types of plantations in southern subtropical area of China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 24(7), 1784-1792. (in Chinese with English abstract) 143. Li, P., Wang, G., Zheng, A., Shen, Y., Zhao, Q., Wang, L., Jiang, R., Li, L., & Ruan, H. (2012). The variations of soil labile organic carbon in four plantations in south of Jiangsu Province. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 36(4), 79-83.
Journal
Quantitative Biology – arXiv (Cornell University)
Published: Nov 7, 2020