Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A national example of open source digital healthcare is critiqued. The code for implementing numeric patient identifiers is surprisingly naïve and bug-ridden, despite patient identifiers being computationally trivial and a critical component of reliable healthcare. The issues raised are shown to be widespread, long term, and apparently unrecognized. Problems are traced back to inadequacies in the relevant standards, and, at every stage, regulation through to development, inadequate Software Engineering input. An important finding is that the relevant healthcare standards are inconsistent and written without sufficient rigor to be at all constructive for implementing digital systems. The widely recognized problems of interoperability may be traced back to diverse (and buggy) interpretations of vague standards.
ACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare (HEALTH) – Association for Computing Machinery
Published: Nov 3, 2022
Keywords: Open source
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.