Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Polynomial-Time Random Oracles and Separating Complexity Classes

Polynomial-Time Random Oracles and Separating Complexity Classes Bennett and Gill [1981] showed that PA NPA coNPA for a random oracle A, with probability 1. We investigate whether this result extends to individual polynomial-time random oracles. We consider two notions of random oracles: p-random oracles in the sense of martingales and resource-bounded measure [Lutz 1992; Ambos-Spies et al. 1997], and p-betting-game random oracles using the betting games generalization of resource-bounded measure [Buhrman et al. 2000]. Every p-betting-game random oracle is also p-random; whether the two notions are equivalent is an open problem. (1) We first show that PA NPA for every oracle A that is p-betting-game random. Ideally, we would extend (1) to p-random oracles. We show that answering this either way would imply an unrelativized complexity class separation: (2) If PA NPA relative to every p-random oracle A, then BPP EXP. (3) If PA NPA relative to some p-random oracle A, then P PSPACE. Rossman, Servedio, and Tan [2015] showed that the polynomial-time hierarchy is infinite relative to a random oracle, solving a longstanding open problem. We consider whether we can extend (1) to show that PHA is infinite relative to oracles A that are p-betting-game random. Showing that PHA separates at even its first level would also imply an unrelativized complexity class separation: (4) If NPA coNPA for a p-betting-game measure 1 class of oracles A, then NP EXP. (5) If PHA is infinite relative to every p-random oracle A, then PH EXP. We also consider random oracles for time versus space, for example: (6) LA PA relative to every oracle A that is p-betting-game random. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png ACM Transactions on Computation Theory (TOCT) Association for Computing Machinery

Polynomial-Time Random Oracles and Separating Complexity Classes

Loading next page...
 
/lp/association-for-computing-machinery/polynomial-time-random-oracles-and-separating-complexity-classes-TypO405A5L
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
Copyright
Copyright © 2021 ACM
ISSN
1942-3454
eISSN
1942-3462
DOI
10.1145/3434389
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Bennett and Gill [1981] showed that PA NPA coNPA for a random oracle A, with probability 1. We investigate whether this result extends to individual polynomial-time random oracles. We consider two notions of random oracles: p-random oracles in the sense of martingales and resource-bounded measure [Lutz 1992; Ambos-Spies et al. 1997], and p-betting-game random oracles using the betting games generalization of resource-bounded measure [Buhrman et al. 2000]. Every p-betting-game random oracle is also p-random; whether the two notions are equivalent is an open problem. (1) We first show that PA NPA for every oracle A that is p-betting-game random. Ideally, we would extend (1) to p-random oracles. We show that answering this either way would imply an unrelativized complexity class separation: (2) If PA NPA relative to every p-random oracle A, then BPP EXP. (3) If PA NPA relative to some p-random oracle A, then P PSPACE. Rossman, Servedio, and Tan [2015] showed that the polynomial-time hierarchy is infinite relative to a random oracle, solving a longstanding open problem. We consider whether we can extend (1) to show that PHA is infinite relative to oracles A that are p-betting-game random. Showing that PHA separates at even its first level would also imply an unrelativized complexity class separation: (4) If NPA coNPA for a p-betting-game measure 1 class of oracles A, then NP EXP. (5) If PHA is infinite relative to every p-random oracle A, then PH EXP. We also consider random oracles for time versus space, for example: (6) LA PA relative to every oracle A that is p-betting-game random.

Journal

ACM Transactions on Computation Theory (TOCT)Association for Computing Machinery

Published: Jan 21, 2021

Keywords: Random oracles

References