Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

SETH-based Lower Bounds for Subset Sum and Bicriteria Path

SETH-based Lower Bounds for Subset Sum and Bicriteria Path Subset Sumand k-SAT are two of the most extensively studied problems in computer science, and conjectures about their hardness are among the cornerstones of fine-grained complexity. An important open problem in this area is to base the hardness of one of these problems on the other.Our main result is a tight reduction from k-SAT to Subset Sum on dense instances, proving that Bellman’s 1962 pseudo-polynomial O*(T)-time algorithm for Subset Sum on n numbers and target T cannot be improved to time T1-ε · 2o(n) for any ε > 0, unless the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH) fails.As a corollary, we prove a “Direct-OR” theorem for Subset Sum under SETH, offering a new tool for proving conditional lower bounds: It is now possible to assume that deciding whether one out of N given instances of Subset Sum is a YES instance requires time (N T)1-o(1). As an application of this corollary, we prove a tight SETH-based lower bound for the classical Bicriteria s,t-Path problem, which is extensively studied in Operations Research. We separate its complexity from that of Subset Sum: On graphs with m edges and edge lengths bounded by L, we show that the O(Lm) pseudo-polynomial time algorithm by Joksch from 1966 cannot be improved to Õ(L + m), in contrast to a recent improvement for Subset Sum (Bringmann, SODA 2017). http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png ACM Transactions on Algorithms (TALG) Association for Computing Machinery

SETH-based Lower Bounds for Subset Sum and Bicriteria Path

Loading next page...
 
/lp/association-for-computing-machinery/seth-based-lower-bounds-for-subset-sum-and-bicriteria-path-zd89nd962b
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
Copyright
Copyright © 2022 Copyright held by the owner/author(s). Publication rights licensed to ACM.
ISSN
1549-6325
eISSN
1549-6333
DOI
10.1145/3450524
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Subset Sumand k-SAT are two of the most extensively studied problems in computer science, and conjectures about their hardness are among the cornerstones of fine-grained complexity. An important open problem in this area is to base the hardness of one of these problems on the other.Our main result is a tight reduction from k-SAT to Subset Sum on dense instances, proving that Bellman’s 1962 pseudo-polynomial O*(T)-time algorithm for Subset Sum on n numbers and target T cannot be improved to time T1-ε · 2o(n) for any ε > 0, unless the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH) fails.As a corollary, we prove a “Direct-OR” theorem for Subset Sum under SETH, offering a new tool for proving conditional lower bounds: It is now possible to assume that deciding whether one out of N given instances of Subset Sum is a YES instance requires time (N T)1-o(1). As an application of this corollary, we prove a tight SETH-based lower bound for the classical Bicriteria s,t-Path problem, which is extensively studied in Operations Research. We separate its complexity from that of Subset Sum: On graphs with m edges and edge lengths bounded by L, we show that the O(Lm) pseudo-polynomial time algorithm by Joksch from 1966 cannot be improved to Õ(L + m), in contrast to a recent improvement for Subset Sum (Bringmann, SODA 2017).

Journal

ACM Transactions on Algorithms (TALG)Association for Computing Machinery

Published: Jan 22, 2022

Keywords: Subset sum

References