Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Historically, there have been two approaches to the use of computers for the design of printed circuit boards: Computer Aided Design (CAD) wherein a designer carries out the design of the board and a computer, coupled with graphics hardware (usually a storage tube) and software is used to carry out graphic handling and bookkeeping tasks; and Design Automation (DA) wherein a sophisticated placement and routing program, usually installed on a large computer, is used in a batch process mode to carry out the design according to necessarily limited algorithms. When either of these approaches is used in conjunction with dense PCB designs, the results have been unsatisfactory: From CAD because of a feeling that "the computer should be able to help me more in solving this knotty problem"; and from DA because the results of the automated process are usually so poor as to approach being worthless: that is, the effort to complete the design approaches the level of difficulty of designing the card manually from the beginning. The use of a computer-based design system for the design of dense printed circuit boards (PCB's) has thus been an elusive goal.
ACM SIGDA Newsletter – Association for Computing Machinery
Published: Jun 1, 1978
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.