Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/brill/arctic-climate-interventions-Q0Z0Jk73C7
References (11)
-
)(d) (judicial decisions are a 'subsidiary means for the determination of rules of law -
(2018)
Certain activities carried out by Nicaragua in the border area (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua) and Construction of a road in Costa Rica along the San Juan River (Nicaragua v. Costa Rica) Judgment of 16 December 2015Summaries of Judgments, Advisory Opinions and Orders of the Permanent Court of International Justice
-
Art. 3, comments 7 and 8. In contrast, in Pulp Mills, the International Court of Justice used the formulation, 'all means at its disposal -
(1905)
Trail Smelter case (United States v. Canada), (1941) 3 UN Rep. Int'l Arbitral Awards -
)(b)(iii) -
para 204; see also Responsibilities and Obligations of States with Respect to Activities in the Area, Advisory Opinion -
Rosalyn Qc (2009)
Dissenting Opinion of Judge Higgins Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion -
However, Russia might also have an interest in working through the Arctic Council to ensure that refreezing activities by other Arctic States are done in such -
UN Doc A/CONF.151/26, Annex I: Rio Declaration on Environment and Development -
P. Rao (2002)
Prevention of Transboundary Harm from Hazardous ActivitiesEnvironmental Policy and Law, 32
-
(2007)
Transboundary impacts
- Publisher
- Brill
- Copyright
- Copyright © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
- ISSN
- 0927-3522
- eISSN
- 1571-8085
- DOI
- 10.1163/15718085-BJA10035
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Journal
The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law – Brill
Published: Aug 3, 2020