Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
sdoi:10.1017/S0959270913000592, Published by Cambridge University Press, 10 March 2014.sIn the above paper (Rivers et al. s2014), all estimates of monthly home range in the manuscript should have been reported as geometric means.sThe following figure legends should read:sFigure 2. Geometric mean (± 95% CI) monthly home range size of immature (filled circles) and adult California Condors (open circles) across the annual cycle.sFigure 3. Geometric mean (± 95% CI) monthly home range size of adult female and male California Condors relative to breeding status.sFigure 4. Geometric mean (± 95% CI) monthly home range size of California Condors that were raised in the wild by their genetic parents or reared in captivity.sFigure 5. Geometric mean (± 95% CI) monthly home range size of California Condors from the three release sites in southern and central California (i.e., FWS = Hopper Mountain National Wildlife Refuge Complex) and central California (i.e., PNM = Pinnacles National Monument, VWS = Ventana Wildlife Society).s
Bird Conservation International – Cambridge University Press
Published: Feb 9, 2015
You can share this free article with as many people as you like with the url below! We hope you enjoy this feature!
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.