Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Bacala (2020)
Linac photon beam fine-tuning in PRIMO using the gamma-index analysis toolkitRadiation Oncology (London, England), 15
Mageshraja Kannan, Jefy Ninan, Prasobh Chandrasenan, S. Pande, Aditya Gupta, H. Kaur, Ajay Khatri (2018)
Commissioning of two different algorithms for stereotactic Radiosurgery M6 FI+ CyberKnife systemInternational Journal of Medical Research and Review
S. Dieterich, I. Gibbs (2011)
The CyberKnife in clinical use: current roles, future expectations.Frontiers of radiation therapy and oncology, 43
P. Almond, P. Biggs, B. Coursey, W. Hanson, M. Huq, R. Nath, D. Rogers (1999)
AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.Medical physics, 26 9
P. Francescon, W. Kilby, J. Noll, Laura Masi, N. Satariano, S. Russo (2017)
Monte Carlo simulated corrections for beam commissioning measurements with circular and MLC shaped fields on the CyberKnife M6 System: a study including diode, microchamber, point scintillator, and synthetic microdiamond detectorsPhysics in Medicine & Biology, 62
(2013)
IAEA TRS 483-Dosimetry of Small Static Fields used in External Beam Radiation Therapy
S. Dieterich, T. Pawlicki (2008)
Cyberknife image-guided delivery and quality assurance.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 71 1 Suppl
S. Sharma, Joseph Ott, Jamone Williams, Danny Dickow (2007)
Commissioning and acceptance testing of a CyberKnife linear acceleratorJournal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 8
P. Francescon, W. Kilby, J. Noll, L. Masi, N. Satariano, S. Russo (2017)
Corrigendum: Monte Carlo simulated corrections for beam commissioning measurements with circular and MLC shaped fields on the CyberKnife M6 system: a study including diode, microchamber, point scintillator, and synthetic microdiamond detectors (2017 Phys. Med. Biol. 62 1076)Physics in Medicine & Biology, 62
(2017)
Monte Carlo simulation of siements primus plus Linac for 6 and 18 MV photon bemas
J. Vale, G. Campos, F. Ponte (2016)
SAD vs SSD methods for cyberknife ocr measurementsPhysica Medica, 32
Stanley Benedict, K. Yenice, D. Followill, James Galvin, William Hinson, Brian Kavanagh, P. Keall, Michael Lovelock, Sanford Meeks, L. Papiez, Thomas Purdie, Ramaswamy Sadagopan, Michael Schell, Bill Salter, David Schlesinger, A. Shiu, Timothy Solberg, Danny Song, Volker Stieber, Robert Timmerman, Wolfgang Tomé, Dirk Verellen, Lu Wang, Fang-Fang Yin (2010)
Stereotactic body radiation therapy: the report of AAPM Task Group 101.Medical physics, 37 8
Abstract Introduction: Measurement of off-centre ratios (OCRs) is a requirement for the commissioning of cyberknife. The fixed source to axis distance (SAD) technique is required for the measurement of OCRs which is time-consuming and tedious. The fixed source to surface distance (SSD) technique, on the other hand, is easy to set up and requires less time. The OCRs have been measured with SAD and SSD setup and compared to assess the difference between each other. Material and Methods: The research is carried out on an Accuracy cyberknife M6, installed at NORI Cancer Hospital Islamabad. The OCRs are measured with Sun Nuclear ‘EDGE’ diode detector on a Sun Nuclear SNC 3D dosimetry system. The OCRs were measured for 12 cones and at three depths. Each OCR measured with the SAD setup is compared with the corresponding OCR measured with SSD setup using % dose distance and distance to agreement (2%/0·2mm). Results: For the within-the-beam and out-of-the beam regions, both OCRs are matching with each other. The percentage difference is in the order of less than 1% while the distance-to-agreement results in 100% matching for all cones and all depths. For the penumbra region, the percentage difference is higher than the other two regions. The maximum percentage difference is 2·96%. Generally, the percentage difference is higher for small cones and for OCRs measured at larger depths. Conclusion: The OCRs on a cyberknife system measured with a fixed SSD setup and fixed SAD setup coincide within an acceptable limit and can be measured with both setups with similar accuracy.
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice – Cambridge University Press
Published: May 22, 2023
Keywords: Cyberknife commissioning; OCRs; SSD Setup
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.