Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Book Review: Hofdamen: Amtsträgerinnen im Wiener Hofstaat des 17. Jahrhunderts

Book Review: Hofdamen: Amtsträgerinnen im Wiener Hofstaat des 17. Jahrhunderts AUSTRIAN HISTORY YEARBOOK 38 2007 highlights the major diff erences for Godsey. Th e German context represented the change to modernity, the new conceptualization of nobility within the German cultural nation, whereas the Habsburg context is the other side of the coin. Th is part of his argument is less convincing. Th e caesura that dissolves the knights as a corporate group, the changes in society and intellectual life, aff ected the Habsburg nobility as well. What kind of caesura does the revolution really mean for status and estate? How do they relate to other classes? Th ere is a tendency here to overemphasize the uniformity in identity among the Habsburg aristocracy. Th ose who attended court were certainly bound by the standards of pedigree that access to the center of power implied. On the other hand, the upper crust of Viennese elite included families from across the Habsburg territories and not all were equally part of and enamored of the corporate identity that Godsey describes. Moreover, I would question his argument that “modern cultural nations had not come about by the early nineteenth century in the Habsburg Monarchy” (253). In addition, there are terms that require more explanation. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Austrian History Yearbook Cambridge University Press

Book Review: Hofdamen: Amtsträgerinnen im Wiener Hofstaat des 17. Jahrhunderts

Austrian History Yearbook , Volume 38: 2 – Jan 18, 2010

Loading next page...
 
/lp/cambridge-university-press/book-review-hofdamen-amtstr-gerinnen-im-wiener-hofstaat-des-17-JJPLbjgTly

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Copyright
Copyright © Center for Austrian Studies, University of Minnesota 2007
ISSN
0067-2378
eISSN
1558-5255
DOI
10.1017/S0067237800021627
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

AUSTRIAN HISTORY YEARBOOK 38 2007 highlights the major diff erences for Godsey. Th e German context represented the change to modernity, the new conceptualization of nobility within the German cultural nation, whereas the Habsburg context is the other side of the coin. Th is part of his argument is less convincing. Th e caesura that dissolves the knights as a corporate group, the changes in society and intellectual life, aff ected the Habsburg nobility as well. What kind of caesura does the revolution really mean for status and estate? How do they relate to other classes? Th ere is a tendency here to overemphasize the uniformity in identity among the Habsburg aristocracy. Th ose who attended court were certainly bound by the standards of pedigree that access to the center of power implied. On the other hand, the upper crust of Viennese elite included families from across the Habsburg territories and not all were equally part of and enamored of the corporate identity that Godsey describes. Moreover, I would question his argument that “modern cultural nations had not come about by the early nineteenth century in the Habsburg Monarchy” (253). In addition, there are terms that require more explanation.

Journal

Austrian History YearbookCambridge University Press

Published: Jan 18, 2010

There are no references for this article.