Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Book Review: Nobles and Nation in Central Europe: Free Imperial Knights in the Age of the Revolution, 1750–1850

Book Review: Nobles and Nation in Central Europe: Free Imperial Knights in the Age of the... AUSTRIAN HISTORY YEARBOOK 38 2007 almost every chapter of his book. He argues that the Utraquist consistory never submitted itself to the Prague archbishop and always considered itself the true Catholic Church, and that its doctrines of faith did not diff er much from those propagated by Rome. For the author, therefore, the sub utraque town estate, aft er joining the sub utraque nobles in 1575 to obtain from Maximilian II the toleration of the Bohemian Confession, was not necessarily close to Lutheranism. In turn, in 1609, when the non-Catholic estates forced Rudolf II to grant confessional liberties, the Utraquist consistory could unite with the Lutherans against the Catholic Church and yet stay faithful to its traditional doctrine. David develops three principal theses in this very impressive book, which off ers important insights into sixteenth-century Czech history. First, he persistently rejects the traditional (or, according to him, the “conventional”) division between Old and New Utraquism and states that there was only one kind of Utraquism, which always stood by the same doctrinal lines as the moderated Hussites such as Přibram and Rokycana in the fi ft eenth century, while those labeled New Utraquists were simply Lutherans. Sec- ondly, he http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Austrian History Yearbook Cambridge University Press

Book Review: Nobles and Nation in Central Europe: Free Imperial Knights in the Age of the Revolution, 1750–1850

Austrian History Yearbook , Volume 38: 3 – Jan 18, 2010

Loading next page...
 
/lp/cambridge-university-press/book-review-nobles-and-nation-in-central-europe-free-imperial-knights-L0FgsgqRVz

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Copyright
Copyright © Center for Austrian Studies, University of Minnesota 2007
ISSN
0067-2378
eISSN
1558-5255
DOI
10.1017/S0067237800021615
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

AUSTRIAN HISTORY YEARBOOK 38 2007 almost every chapter of his book. He argues that the Utraquist consistory never submitted itself to the Prague archbishop and always considered itself the true Catholic Church, and that its doctrines of faith did not diff er much from those propagated by Rome. For the author, therefore, the sub utraque town estate, aft er joining the sub utraque nobles in 1575 to obtain from Maximilian II the toleration of the Bohemian Confession, was not necessarily close to Lutheranism. In turn, in 1609, when the non-Catholic estates forced Rudolf II to grant confessional liberties, the Utraquist consistory could unite with the Lutherans against the Catholic Church and yet stay faithful to its traditional doctrine. David develops three principal theses in this very impressive book, which off ers important insights into sixteenth-century Czech history. First, he persistently rejects the traditional (or, according to him, the “conventional”) division between Old and New Utraquism and states that there was only one kind of Utraquism, which always stood by the same doctrinal lines as the moderated Hussites such as Přibram and Rokycana in the fi ft eenth century, while those labeled New Utraquists were simply Lutherans. Sec- ondly, he

Journal

Austrian History YearbookCambridge University Press

Published: Jan 18, 2010

There are no references for this article.