Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

EQUALITY VERSUS PRIORITY: A USEFUL DISTINCTION

EQUALITY VERSUS PRIORITY: A USEFUL DISTINCTION Abstract:Both egalitarianism and prioritarianism give value to equality. Prioritarianism has an additively separable value function whereas egalitarianism does not. I show that in some cases prioritarianism and egalitarianism necessarily have different implications: I describe two alternatives G and H such that egalitarianism necessarily implies G is better than H whereas prioritarianism necessarily implies G and H are equally good. I also raise a doubt about the intelligibility of prioritarianism. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Economics & Philosophy Cambridge University Press

EQUALITY VERSUS PRIORITY: A USEFUL DISTINCTION

Economics & Philosophy , Volume 31 (2): 10 – May 18, 2015

Loading next page...
 
/lp/cambridge-university-press/equality-versus-priority-a-useful-distinction-8X0WlT30Cc

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 
ISSN
1474-0028
eISSN
0266-2671
DOI
10.1017/S0266267115000097
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract:Both egalitarianism and prioritarianism give value to equality. Prioritarianism has an additively separable value function whereas egalitarianism does not. I show that in some cases prioritarianism and egalitarianism necessarily have different implications: I describe two alternatives G and H such that egalitarianism necessarily implies G is better than H whereas prioritarianism necessarily implies G and H are equally good. I also raise a doubt about the intelligibility of prioritarianism.

Journal

Economics & PhilosophyCambridge University Press

Published: May 18, 2015

Keywords: Egalitarianism; Prioritarianism; Utilitarianism; Fairness

References