Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Resano-Mayor, A. Fernández-Martín, S. Hernández-Gómez, Ignasi Toranzo, A. España, J. Gil, M. Gabriel, Isabel Roa-Álvarez, Eliseo Strinella, K. Hobson, G. Heckel, R. Arlettaz (2017)
Integrating genetic and stable isotope analyses to infer the population structure of the White-winged Snowfinch Montifringilla nivalis in Western EuropeJournal of Ornithology, 158
(2018)
2018a) Landscape-associated differences in fine-scale habitat selection
Robert Muscarella, Peter Galante, Mariano Soley‐Guardia, Robert Boria, J. Kass, M. Uriarte, R. Anderson (2014)
ENMeval: An R package for conducting spatially independent evaluations and estimating optimal model complexity for Maxent ecological niche modelsMethods in Ecology and Evolution, 5
(2017)
European birds of conservation concern: populations, trends and national responsibilities
(2015)
European Red List of Birds
(2009)
2009)Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R, Statistics for Biology and Health
(2018)
Bird species distribution maps of the world. Version
Norman Bourg, W. McShea, D. Gill (2005)
PUTTING A CART BEFORE THE SEARCH: SUCCESSFUL HABITAT PREDICTION FOR A RARE FOREST HERBEcology, 86
J. Engler, D. Stiels, Kathrin Schidelko, D. Strubbe, P. Quillfeldt, M. Brambilla (2017)
Avian SDMs : current state, challenges, and opportunitiesJournal of Avian Biology, 48
J. Engler, D. Rödder, D. Stiels, M. Förschler (2014)
Suitable, reachable but not colonised: seasonal niche duality in an endemic mountainous songbirdJournal of Ornithology, 155
(2011)
The Fauna of Bulgaria
A. Zuur, E. Ieno, N. Walker, A. Saveliev, Graham Smith (2009)
Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R
M. Brambilla, F. Casale, Valentina Bergero, G. Crovetto, Riccardo Falco, Irene Negri, P. Siccardi, G. Bogliani (2009)
GIS-models work well, but are not enough: Habitat preferences of Lanius collurio at multiple levels and conservation implicationsBiological Conservation, 142
M. Brambilla, P. Pedrini, A. Rolando, D. Chamberlain (2016)
Climate change will increase the potential conflict between skiing and high‐elevation bird species in the AlpsJournal of Biogeography, 43
Canran Liu, P. Berry, T. Dawson, R. Pearson (2005)
Selecting thresholds of occurrence in the prediction of species distributionsEcography, 28
Canran Liu, M. White, G. Newell (2013)
Selecting thresholds for the prediction of species occurrence with presence‐only dataJournal of Biogeography, 40
M. Brambilla, E. Caprio, G. Assandri, D. Scridel, E. Bassi, R. Bionda, C. Celada, Riccardo Falco, G. Bogliani, P. Pedrini, A. Rolando, D. Chamberlain (2017)
A spatially explicit definition of conservation priorities according to population resistance and resilience, species importance and level of threat in a changing climateDiversity and Distributions, 23
D. Karger, O. Conrad, J. Böhner, Tobias Kawohl, H. Kreft, Rodrigo Soria-Auza, N. Zimmermann, Peter Linder, M. Kessler (2016)
Climatologies at high resolution for the earth’s land surface areasScientific Data, 4
R. Team (2014)
R: A language and environment for statistical computing.MSOR connections, 1
PiEra VianalE (2007)
USO DELL'HABITAT NEL FRINGUELLO ALPINO Montifringilla nivalis IN PERIODO RIPRODUTTIVO IN UN'AREA SUB-ANTROPIZZATA: CAMPO IMPERATORE (GRAN SASSO - ABRUZZO)
D. Scridel, G. Bogliani, P. Pedrini, A. Iemma, A. Hardenberg, M. Brambilla (2017)
Thermal niche predicts recent changes in range size for bird speciesClimate Research, 73
M. Brambilla, Matteo Cortesi, Federico Capelli, D. Chamberlain, P. Pedrini, D. Rubolini (2016)
Foraging habitat selection by Alpine White-winged Snowfinches Montifringilla nivalis during the nestling rearing periodJournal of Ornithology, 158
J. Resano-Mayor, F. Korner‐Nievergelt, Sergio Vignali, Nathan Horrenberger, Arnaud Barras, Veronika Braunisch, C. Pernollet, R. Arlettaz (2019)
Snow cover phenology is the main driver of foraging habitat selection for a high-alpine passerine during breeding: implications for species persistence in the face of climate changeBiodiversity and Conservation
M. Neteler, M. Bowman, M. Landa, M. Metz (2012)
GRASS GIS: A multi-purpose open source GISEnviron. Model. Softw., 31
M. Brambilla, Federico Capelli, M. Anderle, A. Forti, Marica Bazzanella, Giulia Masiero, G. Bogliani, P. Partel, P. Pedrini, L. Pedrotti, D. Scridel (2018)
Landscape-associated differences in fine-scale habitat selection modulate the potential impact of climate change on White-winged Snowfinch Montifringilla nivalisBird Study, 65
M. Brambilla, J. Resano-Mayor, D. Scridel, M. Anderle, G. Bogliani, Veronika Braunisch, Federico Capelli, Matteo Cortesi, Nathan Horrenberger, P. Pedrini, B. Sangalli, D. Chamberlain, R. Arlettaz, D. Rubolini (2018)
Past and future impact of climate change on foraging habitat suitability in a high-alpine bird species: Management options to buffer against global warming effectsBiological Conservation, 221
(2016)
2016) Climate change
(2017)
2017b) Foraging habitat selection by Alpine White-winged Snowfinches Montifringilla nivalis during the nestling rearing
(2019)
Snow cover phenology is themain driver of foraging habitat selection
Summary The White-winged Snowfinch Montifringilla nivalis nivalis is assumed to be highly threatened by climate change, but this high elevation species has been little studied and the current breeding distribution is accurately known only for a minor portion of its range. Here, we provide a detailed and spatially explicit identification of the potentially suitable breeding areas for the Snowfinch. We modelled suitable areas in Europe and compared them with the currently known distribution. We built a distribution model using 14,574 records obtained during the breeding period that integrated climatic, topographic and land-cover variables, working at a 2-km spatial resolution with MaxEnt. The model performed well and was very robust; average annual temperature was the most important occurrence predictor (optimum between c.-3°C and 0°; unsuitable conditions below -10° and above 5°). The current European breeding range estimated by BirdLife International was almost three times greater than that classified as potentially suitable by our model. Discrepancies between our model and the distribution estimated by BirdLife International were particularly evident in eastern Europe, where the species is poorly monitored. Southern populations are likely more isolated and at major risk because of global warming. These differences have important implications for the supposed national responsibility for conservation of the species and highlight the need for new investigations on the species in the eastern part of its European range.
Bird Conservation International – Cambridge University Press
Published: Dec 1, 2020
Keywords: species distribution model; climate change; mountains
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.