Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/cambridge-university-press/the-ethical-bases-of-public-policies-a-conceptual-framework-uxHM00IE59
References (60)
-
G. Cohen (1989)
On the Currency of Egalitarian JusticeEthics, 99
-
A. Sen, B. Williams (1982)
Utilitarianism and beyond: Preface -
The EE is a utilitarian if and only if the EE's evaluations are exclusively focused on utility and, for all ℎ ∈ and for all = ( -
P. Anand, P. Dolan (2005)
Equity, capabilities and health.Social science & medicine, 60 2
-
P. Pattanaik (2005)
Little and Bergson on Arrow's concept of social welfareSocial Choice and Welfare, 25
-
W. Gaertner, E. Schokkaert (2011)
Empirical Social Choice -
(1982)
Evaluating choice -
K. Suzumura, Yongsheng Xu (2000)
Characterizations of Consequentialism and NonconsequentialismJ. Econ. Theory, 101
-
Andrea Brandolini (2009)
Against Injustice: Part III -
Geoffrey Hawthorn, Amartya Sen (1988)
Standard of Living -
A. Wailoo, P. Anand (2005)
The nature of procedural preferences for health-care rationing decisions.Social science & medicine, 60 2
-
Bernard Hodgson (2000)
Economics as Moral Science -
J. Broome (2008)
Why economics needs ethical theory -
P. Anand, A. Wailoo (2000)
Utilities versus Rights to Publicly Provided Goods: Arguments and Evidence from Health Care RationingEconomica, 67
-
H. Steiner (1983)
How Free: Computing Personal LibertyRoyal Institute of Philosophy Lecture Series, 15
-
M. Nussbaum (1988)
Nature, Function and Capability: Aristotle on Political Distribution -
Abram Burk (1938)
A Reformulation of Certain Aspects of Welfare EconomicsQuarterly Journal of Economics, 52
-
T. Scanlon (2008)
Rights and Interests -
Gary Bolton, J. Brandts, Axel Ockenfels (2000)
Fair Procedures: Evidence from Games Involving LotteriesWiley-Blackwell: Economic Journal
-
M. Nussbaum (2000)
Women and Human Development -
A. Bergson (1954)
On the Concept of Social WelfareQuarterly Journal of Economics, 68
-
G. Sher (1979)
Reverse Discrimination, the Future, and the PastEthics, 90
-
M. Fleurbaey (2008)
Fairness, responsibility, and welfare -
L. Hurwicz (1996)
Institutions As Families Of Game FormsThe Japanese Economic Review, 47
-
P. Pattanaik, K. Suzumura (1996)
INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND SOCIAL EVALUATION: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK, 48
-
J. Roemer (1992)
A pragmatic theory of responsibility for the egalitarian plannerPhilosophy & Public Affairs, 22
-
S. Cahn (2013)
Preferential Hiring: A Reply to Judith Jarvis Thomson -
M. Rabin (1993)
Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and EconomicsThe American Economic Review, 83
-
C. John, Harsányi (1982)
Utilitarianism and beyond: Morality and the theory of rational behaviour -
M. Fleurbaey, François Maniquet (2011)
Compensation and responsibilityHandbook of Social Choice and Welfare, 2
-
A. Sen (1991)
Welfare, preference and freedomJournal of Econometrics, 50
-
A. Sen, J. Kornai, Siddiq Osmani
Freedom of Choice: Concept and Content Freedom of Choice: Concept and Content -
K. Suzumura, Yongsheng Xu (2003)
Consequences, opportunities, and generalized consequentialism and non-consequentialismJ. Econ. Theory, 111
-
Andrew Cohen (2009)
Compensation for Historic Injustices: Completing the Boxill and Sher ArgumentPhilosophy & Public Affairs, 37
-
G. Stigler, P. Samuelson (1948)
Foundations of Economic Analysis.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 43
-
P. Pattanaik, Yongsheng Xu (1990)
On Ranking Opportunity Sets in Terms of Freedom of ChoiceRecherches économiques de Louvain
-
A. Sen (1970)
The Impossibility of a Paretian LiberalJournal of Political Economy, 78
-
Richard Arneson (1990)
Liberalism, distributive subjectivism, and equal opportunity for welfarePhilosophy & Public Affairs
-
P. Dolan, R. Edlin, A. Tsuchiya, A. Wailoo (2007)
It ain?t what you do, it's the way that you do it: Characteristics of procedural justice and their importance in social decision-makingJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 64
-
W. Sunman (1999)
Affirmative actionThe Lancet, 353
-
A. Sen (1977)
Social Choice Theory: A Re-ExaminationEconometrica, 45
-
S. Yoon (2003)
Women and Human Development.American Anthropologist, 105
-
M. Hees (2001)
Legal Reductionism and Freedom -
(2000)
Utilities vs -
í µí± denote the set of all conceivable physically specified outcomes (physical outcomes for short) for -
Robert Sudgen (1998)
The Metric of OpportunityEconomics and Philosophy, 14
-
R. Sugden (1985)
Liberty, Preference, and ChoiceEconomics and Philosophy, 1
-
identical with respect to outcomes (O-identical); different with respect to outcomes (O-different); and identical with respect to well-being levels -
G. Sher (2013)
Justifying Reverse Discrimination in Employment -
J. Graaff (1957)
Theoretical welfare economicsThe Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 24
-
鈴村 興太郎, 徐 永勝 (1999)
Characterizations of consequentialism and non-consequentialism -
M. Hees (1995)
Rights and Decisions -
P. Pattanaik, Yongsheng Xu (2007)
Conceptions of Individual Rights and Freedom in Welfare Economics: A Re-ExaminationMicroeconomic Theory eJournal
-
J. Jenkins (2012)
On the Currency of Egalitarian JusticeThe Philosophical Quarterly, 62
-
A. Sen (2017)
Collective Choice and Social Welfare -
W. Gaertner, P. Pattanaik, K. Suzumura (1992)
Individual Rights RevisitedEconomica, 59
-
R. Sugden (1986)
Commodities and CapabilitiesThe Economic Journal, 96
-
I. Little (1952)
Social Choice and Individual ValuesJournal of Political Economy, 60
-
K. Arrow (1951)
Social Choice and Individual Values -
Bruno Frey, A. Stutzer (2002)
Beyond Outcomes: Measuring Procedural UtilityMicroeconomic Theory eJournal
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014
- ISSN
- 1474-0028
- eISSN
- 0266-2671
- DOI
- 10.1017/S0266267114000157
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
This paper develops a conceptual framework, which can accommodate a wide range of value judgements used in ethical evaluations of extended social states and which can be used to differentiate different categories of value judgements by referring to the type of information on which they may be based. The notions of consequentialism, non-consequentialism, exclusive focus on personal well-being, exclusive focus on utility, etc. are conceptualized in operational ways in the framework. The framework and the discussion of different types of ethical criteria that may be used in evaluating extended social states contribute to conceptual clarity about the ethical bases of public policies.
Journal
Economics & Philosophy – Cambridge University Press
Published: Jun 2, 2014