Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Narrowing the Gap: Explaining the Increasing Competitiveness of the Venezuelan Opposition

Narrowing the Gap: Explaining the Increasing Competitiveness of the Venezuelan Opposition <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>This article seeks to explain why electoral support for the Venezuelan opposition has increased substantially, using Venezuelan public opinion survey data from LAPOP and an opt-in sample collected through the online vote advice application Brújula Presidencial Venezuela. It analyzes why Venezuelans who had either voted for Chávez or abstained in 2006 defected and started to support the opposition in subsequent elections. It proposes several reasons: negative voter evaluations of the economy, concern for public safety, and dissatisfaction with Venezuelan democracy. While the finding that negative policy evaluations boost support for the opposition aligns with theoretical expectations, this study finds a strong relationship between having different evaluations of the quality of democracy and supporting Chávez, which shows that the advocacy of two competing visions of democracy by the incumbent and the opposition also affects voting patterns in Venezuela.</jats:p> http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Latin American Politics and Society CrossRef

Narrowing the Gap: Explaining the Increasing Competitiveness of the Venezuelan Opposition

Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 56 (4): 71-97 – Jan 1, 2014

Narrowing the Gap: Explaining the Increasing Competitiveness of the Venezuelan Opposition


Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>This article seeks to explain why electoral support for the Venezuelan opposition has increased substantially, using Venezuelan public opinion survey data from LAPOP and an opt-in sample collected through the online vote advice application Brújula Presidencial Venezuela. It analyzes why Venezuelans who had either voted for Chávez or abstained in 2006 defected and started to support the opposition in subsequent elections. It proposes several reasons: negative voter evaluations of the economy, concern for public safety, and dissatisfaction with Venezuelan democracy. While the finding that negative policy evaluations boost support for the opposition aligns with theoretical expectations, this study finds a strong relationship between having different evaluations of the quality of democracy and supporting Chávez, which shows that the advocacy of two competing visions of democracy by the incumbent and the opposition also affects voting patterns in Venezuela.</jats:p>

Loading next page...
 
/lp/crossref/narrowing-the-gap-explaining-the-increasing-competitiveness-of-the-6gnGA0TKA1

References (104)

Publisher
CrossRef
ISSN
1531-426X
DOI
10.1111/j.1548-2456.2014.00249.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>This article seeks to explain why electoral support for the Venezuelan opposition has increased substantially, using Venezuelan public opinion survey data from LAPOP and an opt-in sample collected through the online vote advice application Brújula Presidencial Venezuela. It analyzes why Venezuelans who had either voted for Chávez or abstained in 2006 defected and started to support the opposition in subsequent elections. It proposes several reasons: negative voter evaluations of the economy, concern for public safety, and dissatisfaction with Venezuelan democracy. While the finding that negative policy evaluations boost support for the opposition aligns with theoretical expectations, this study finds a strong relationship between having different evaluations of the quality of democracy and supporting Chávez, which shows that the advocacy of two competing visions of democracy by the incumbent and the opposition also affects voting patterns in Venezuela.</jats:p>

Journal

Latin American Politics and SocietyCrossRef

Published: Jan 1, 2014

There are no references for this article.