Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Subscribe now for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Public Body’ or Not: Chinese State-Owned Enterprise

Public Body’ or Not: Chinese State-Owned Enterprise <jats:p><jats:italic>Chinese state-owned enterprises (SOEs) pose an increasing number of challenges to the international trade regime. One of the issues is how to regulate state-owned enterprises under the World Trade Organization's rules on subsidies. This paper tackles the issue of what criteria decide whether an SOE can be a 'public body' that provides subsidies to other enterprises under the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures. Appellate Body's jurisprudence on this issue is not clear, and the debate regarding the proper line between 'public body' and 'private body' continues. This paper is the first attempt to provide a systematic and objective analysis of three different approaches in interpreting the term 'public body', providing a framework for further discussions on the proper legal status of Chinese SOEs under the World Trade Organization (WTO) legal regime. By examining the negotiation history and varying approaches to the issue, this paper identifies the problems of current Appellate Body's approach and provides proposals for future clarification. Taking Chinese SOEs as examples, this paper also analyzes potential impact of different approaches on SOEs.</jats:italic></jats:p> http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of World Trade CrossRef

Public Body’ or Not: Chinese State-Owned Enterprise

Journal of World Trade , Volume 48 (Issue 1): 167-189 – Feb 1, 2014

Public Body’ or Not: Chinese State-Owned Enterprise


Abstract

<jats:p><jats:italic>Chinese state-owned enterprises (SOEs) pose an increasing number of challenges to the international trade regime. One of the issues is how to regulate state-owned enterprises under the World Trade Organization's rules on subsidies. This paper tackles the issue of what criteria decide whether an SOE can be a 'public body' that provides subsidies to other enterprises under the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures. Appellate Body's jurisprudence on this issue is not clear, and the debate regarding the proper line between 'public body' and 'private body' continues. This paper is the first attempt to provide a systematic and objective analysis of three different approaches in interpreting the term 'public body', providing a framework for further discussions on the proper legal status of Chinese SOEs under the World Trade Organization (WTO) legal regime. By examining the negotiation history and varying approaches to the issue, this paper identifies the problems of current Appellate Body's approach and provides proposals for future clarification. Taking Chinese SOEs as examples, this paper also analyzes potential impact of different approaches on SOEs.</jats:italic></jats:p>

Loading next page...
 
/lp/crossref/public-body-or-not-chinese-state-owned-enterprise-0AW0yUeQVB

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
CrossRef
ISSN
1011-6702
DOI
10.54648/trad2014007
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

<jats:p><jats:italic>Chinese state-owned enterprises (SOEs) pose an increasing number of challenges to the international trade regime. One of the issues is how to regulate state-owned enterprises under the World Trade Organization's rules on subsidies. This paper tackles the issue of what criteria decide whether an SOE can be a 'public body' that provides subsidies to other enterprises under the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures. Appellate Body's jurisprudence on this issue is not clear, and the debate regarding the proper line between 'public body' and 'private body' continues. This paper is the first attempt to provide a systematic and objective analysis of three different approaches in interpreting the term 'public body', providing a framework for further discussions on the proper legal status of Chinese SOEs under the World Trade Organization (WTO) legal regime. By examining the negotiation history and varying approaches to the issue, this paper identifies the problems of current Appellate Body's approach and provides proposals for future clarification. Taking Chinese SOEs as examples, this paper also analyzes potential impact of different approaches on SOEs.</jats:italic></jats:p>

Journal

Journal of World TradeCrossRef

Published: Feb 1, 2014

There are no references for this article.