Access the full text.

Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.

Annals of the Alexandru Ioan Cuza University - Mathematics
, Volume 61 (1) – Jan 1, 2015

/lp/de-gruyter/a-tauberian-theorem-for-a-general-summability-method-xIfF8znXWN

- Publisher
- de Gruyter
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2015 by the
- ISSN
- 1221-8421
- eISSN
- 1221-8421
- DOI
- 10.2478/aicu-2013-0047
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site

We investigate conditions under which M summability implies Abel summability and give the generalized Littlewood Tauberian theorem for M summability method. Mathematics Subject Classification 2010: 40E05, 40G10. Key words: Tauberian theorems, power series methods, slow oscillation, Abel summability method, M summability method. 1. Introduction Let A denote the space of analytic functions in 0 < x < 1. To each f (a) = f (a, x) = an xn in A we associate a series an of Taylor n=0 n=0 an is said to be Abel summable to s if coefficients of f . A series n=0 n - x converges for 0 < x < 1 and tends to s as x 1 . Abel's con tinuity theorem (see [1]) for power series states that if converges, then lim f (a, x) = an . It is known that the converse of this imn=0 plication is not true in general. However, we have a conditional converse of Abel's continuity theorem known as the generalized Littlewood Tauberian theorem (see [10]) for the Abel summability method asserting that if is Abel summable to s and slowly oscillating, then = s. We remind the reader that a series an is said to be slowly oscillating n=0 (see [7]) if ak = o(1), n > m , n/m 1. k=m+1 For a different proof of the generalized Littlewood Tauberian theorem (see [10]), we refer the reader to Landau [6], Schmidt [7], and Canak [2]. ¸ Denote the class of kernels of the integral transforms of functions in A by . We now need the following properties of functions in : 1. There exists a number 0 = 0 () (0, 1) such that every is analytical in [0 , 1). 2. For every , (x) , x 1- . 3. Each is zero-free in [0 , 1). 4. For each m 1, m (x) = o(1), x 1- where 0 = and m (x) = m-1 (x) x m-1 (t)dt. 0 For every f in A and we define M (f, ) = M (f, , x) = if x = 0 and limx0 M (f, , x) = f (0 ) if x = 0 . A series an is said to be M summable to s if n=0 (1.1) x 0 f (t)(t)dt 1 (x) lim M (f, , x) = s. Example 1.1. The series an whose general term is the Taylor n=0 coefficient of the function g defined by g(x) = f (1 (x)), where f is bounded in A is M summable. It is plain that every Abel summable series is M summable, but the converse statement is not always true. The M summability method is regular with respect to the Abel summability method. Indeed, since 1 (x) = (x), it easily follows that Abel summability of an implies M summability n=0 of an . However, if a function f satisfies the condition n=0 x 0 = o(1), x 1- , then the converse statement is also true. This follows from the identity (1.2) f (x) = M (f, , x) + x 0 An important subclass of is the class of following functions m (x) = 1 m = 1, 2, ... and 0 = 0. The function m (x) = (1-x)m defines a summability method (A, m) which is regular with respect to Abel summability method. For the more information about the M and (A, m) summability methods, we refer to [8]. Recently, a number of authors including 1 (1-x)m , A TAUBERIAN THEOREM FOR A GENERAL SUMMABILITY METHOD 125 Canak et al. [3, 5], Canak [4], and Totur [9] have given Tauberian ¸ ¸ theorems for the (A, m) summability method. The (A, 1) summability method as a special case of M summability method is of considerable interest. A series an is said to be (A, 1) n=0 summable to s if (1.3) lim (1 - x) x x 0 f (t) dt = s. (1 - t)2 It is clear that Abel summability of an implies (A, 1) summability n=0 an . That the converse is not true in general follows from the of n=0 series an whose general term is the Taylor coefficient of the function n=0 f defined by f (x) = sin((1 - x)-1 ) on 0 < x < 1. The identity (1.2) becomes f (x) = (1 - x) x x 0 f (t) (1 - x) dt + 2 (1 - t) x x 0 f (t) dt 1-t 1 for (x) = (1-x)2 . Since a series which is Abel summable to s is (A,1) summable to s, we have (1.4) (1 - x) x x 0 f (t) dt = o(1), x 1- . 1-t In the case where the condition (1.4) holds, every (A,1) summable series is Abel summable. An example of an (A, 1) summable series can be obtained by applying x f (t) integration by parts to (1-x) o (1-t)2 dt. x 1 Example 1.2. If n=0 n+1 is (A, 1) summable to 0. n k=0 ak is Abel summable to s, then It is natural to ask under which conditions M summability implies Abel summability of an . In this paper we both answer this question d give the generalized Littlewood Tauberian theorem for M summability method. 2. A Tauberian theorem By the following theorem, we prove that every M summable series is Abel summable under certain conditions. Theorem 2.1. Let (2.1) x 0 be M summable to s. If = o(1), x 1- f (0 ) 2 (0 ) f (t)2 (t)dt 1 (x) and f has a zero of order three at 0 such that limit f limx0 2(x) , (x) is defined to be the then is Abel summable to s. Proof. Applying integration by parts to M (f, , x), we have (2.2) where T (f, , x) = T (f, , x), we have (2.3) M (f, , x) = f (x) - T (f, , x), x 0 . Applying again integration by parts to x 0 2 (x) T (f, , x) = f (x) - 1 (x) f (t)2 (t) dt 1 (x) Combining (2.2) with (2.3), we obtain (2.4) M (f, , x) = g(x) + x 0 f (t)2 (t) dt 1 (x) where g(x) = f (x) - 2 (x) f (x). Since 1 (x) have by (2.1) and (2.4) that (2.5) is M summable to s, we lim g(x) = lim M (f, , x) = s. Multiplying g(x) by 1 (x) and dividing by 2 (x), we arrive at 2 (2.6) 2 (x) g(x) = - 2 1 (x) f (x) 2 (x) f (x) 2 (x) f Since 2(00)) is defined to be the limit limx0 ( zero of order three, we obtain x at 0 where f has a (2.7) f (x) = -2 (x) g(t) 1 (t) dt. 2 (t) 2 A TAUBERIAN THEOREM FOR A GENERAL SUMMABILITY METHOD 127 Since lim g(x) = s, we have by L'Hospital's rule that (2.8) lim f (x) = s. This completes the proof. 1 Taking (x) = (1-x)2 in Theorem 2.1, we have the following Tauberian theorem for the (A, 1) summability method. Corollary 2.2. Let (2.9) (1 - x) 0 x be (A, 1) summable to s. If ln(1 - t)f (t)dt = o(1), x 1- f (x) -x-ln(1-x)) and f has a zero of order three at 0 such that be the limit f (x) limx0 -x-ln(1-x) , at 0 is defined to then is Abel summable to s. We note that Theorem 2.1 can be given for the composition of M and M defined by (2.10) (M M )(f (a), x) = M (M (f (a)), , x) = x 0 M (f, , t)(t)dt 1 (x) where , . The following theorem is a consequence of the generalized Littlewood Tauberian theorem for Abel summability method. Theorem 2.3. Let an be M summable to s, (2.1) be satisfied and n=0 f f have a zero of order three at 0 such that 2(00)) is defined to be the limit ( limx0 to s. f (x) 2 (x) . If is slowly oscillating, then converges Proof. We have by Theorem 2.1 that an is Abel summable to s. n=0 Since an is slowly oscillating, we have from the generalized Littlewood n=0 Tauberian theorem that an converges to s. n=0 If the condition (2.1) is replaced by a stronger condition, we have the following result. Theorem 2.4. Let (2.11) and be M summable to s. If (x) 2 (x) , x 1- f (x) = o is slowly oscillating, then converges to s. Proof. We easily see that the condition (2.11) implies (2.1). It follows by Theorem 2.1 that an is Abel summable to s. Since an n=0 n=0 is slowly oscillating, we have from the generalized Littlewood Tauberian theorem that an converges to s. n=0

Annals of the Alexandru Ioan Cuza University - Mathematics – de Gruyter

**Published: ** Jan 1, 2015

Loading...

You can share this free article with as many people as you like with the url below! We hope you enjoy this feature!

Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.

System error. Please try again!

Already have an account? Log in

Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.

To save an article, **log in** first, or **sign up** for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.

Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote

Access the full text.

Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.

All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.