Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
AbstractWe have performed experiments at 1.5 GPa and 1400 °C on 25 different bulk compositions to determine the effects of major element compositions on the Cl contents of silicate melts at known fugacities of Cl2 and O2. The experimental method involved mixing a “sliding” Cl buffer, a mixture of AgCl, AgI, and Ag with the silicate bulk composition and performing the experiment in a graphite capsule together with a source of CO2 (AgCO3). The graphite capsules were sealed inside welded Pt tubes to maintain a CO2-CO atmosphere with oxygen fugacity fixed at the C-CO-CO2 (CCO) buffer. During the experiment, the Cl buffer segregates leaving a Cl-bearing melt, which quenches to a glass. We used the results to define chloride capacity CCl for each melt at the pressure and temperature of the experiment:C C l = C l ( w t f C l 2 × f O 2 4 $$ \begin{equation} C_{\mathrm{Cl}}=\frac{\mathrm{Cl}(\mathrm{wt} \%)}{\sqrt{f\left(\mathrm{Cl}_{2}\right)}} \times \sqrt[4]{f_{\mathrm{O}_{2}}} \end{equation}$$Chloride capacity was found to correlate positively with optical basicity and NBO/T and negatively with ionic porosity and the Larsen index. We combined our new data with the results of Thomas and Wood (2021) to derive an equation describing the composition, pressure and temperature dependence of the chloride capacity:log C C l = 1.601 + 4470 X C a − 3430 X S i + 2592 X F e − 4092 X K − 894 P / T . $$ \begin{equation} \log \mathrm{C}_{\mathrm{Cl}}=1.601+\left(4470 \mathrm{X}_{\mathrm{Ca}}-3430 \mathrm{X}_{\mathrm{Si}}+2592 \mathrm{X}_{\mathrm{Fe}}-4092 \mathrm{X}_{\mathrm{K}}-894 P\right) / T. \end{equation}$$In this equation, XCa, XSi, and so on refer to the oxide mole fractions on a single-cation basis, P is in GPa and T in K. The equation reproduces 58 data points with an r2 of 0.96 and a standard error of 0.089. The addition of literature data on hydrous experiments indicates that the effects of <4.3 wt% H2O are small enough to be ignored. We also performed experiments aimed at determining the conditions of NaCl saturation in melts. When combined with literature data we obtained:log C l − = log a N a C l + 0.06 − 2431 X C a + 3430 X S i − 2592 X F e + 3484 X N a + 4092 X K − 2417 / T $$ \begin{equation} \log \left(\mathrm{Cl}^{-}\right)=\log \left(a_{\mathrm{NaCl}}\right)+0.06-\left(2431 \mathrm{X}_{\mathrm{Ca}}+3430 \mathrm{X}_{\mathrm{Si}}-2592 \mathrm{X}_{\mathrm{Fe}}+3484 \mathrm{X}_{\mathrm{Na}}+4092 \mathrm{X}_{\mathrm{K}}-2417\right) / T \end{equation}$$where (Cl–) is the Cl content of the melt in wt% aNaCl is the activity of NaCl (liquid) and the other symbols are the same as before. The results indicate that basalt dissolves ~8 times more Cl than rhyolite at a given NaCl activity i.e., Cl is ~8 times more soluble in basalt than in rhyolite.
American Mineralogist – de Gruyter
Published: May 1, 2023
Keywords: Basalt; rhyolite; Cl solubility in melts; compositional effects on Cl solubility; Cl degassing; chloride capacity; NaCl saturation in melts; Experimental Halogens in Honor of Jim Webster
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.