Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Yue Cao, Zhili Sun (2013)
Routing in Delay/Disruption Tolerant Networks: A Taxonomy, Survey and ChallengesIEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 15
Amin Vahdat (2009)
Epidemic Routing for Partially-Connected Ad Hoc Networks
Yongtao Wei, Junwei Wang (2015)
A delay/disruption tolerant routing algorithm based on traffic predictionThe 27th Chinese Control and Decision Conference (2015 CCDC)
Mirco Musolesi, C. Mascolo (2009)
CAR: Context-Aware Adaptive Routing for Delay-Tolerant Mobile NetworksIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 8
A. Balasubramanian, B. Levine, A. Venkataramani (2007)
DTN routing as a resource allocation problem
Survey and Challenges IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials
(2007)
RFC 4838, delay tolerant networking architecture
T. Spyropoulos, K. Psounis, C. Raghavendra (2008)
Efficient Routing in Intermittently Connected Mobile Networks: The Single-Copy CaseIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 16
Cong Liu, Jie Wu, I. Cardei (2009)
Message forwarding in Cyclic MobiSpace: the multi-copy case2009 IEEE 6th International Conference on Mobile Adhoc and Sensor Systems
Radu Handorean, C. Gill, G. Roman (2004)
Accommodating Transient Connectivity in Ad Hoc and Mobile Settings
Wu Jiagao, Ye Ke, Zhu Yiji, Liu Linfeng (2015)
New spray and wait protocol with node activity in heterogeneous delay tolerant networksThe Journal of China Universities of Posts and Telecommunications, 22
(2012)
Evaluated and optimized of routing model on delay tolerant networ (DTN) for data transmission to remote area
A. Keränen (2008)
Opportunistic Network Environment simulator
S. Burleigh (2008)
Dynamic Routing for Delay-Tolerant Networking in Space Flight Operations
Ioannis Komnios, Sotirios Diamantopoulos, V. Tsaoussidis (2009)
Evaluation of dynamic DTN routing protocols in space environment2009 International Workshop on Satellite and Space Communications
Naviya Dayanand, A. Vidhate (2016)
Routing in Delay Tolerant Network
T. Spyropoulos, K. Psounis, C. Raghavendra (2005)
Spray and wait: an efficient routing scheme for intermittently connected mobile networks
Science Direct, 22
E. Bulut, Zijian Wang, B. Szymanski (2010)
Cost-Effective Multiperiod Spraying for Routing in Delay-Tolerant NetworksIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 18
Anders Lindgren, A. Doria, O. Schelén (2003)
Probabilistic routing in intermittently connected networks
A. Keränen, J. Ott (2007)
Increasing Reality for DTN Protocol Simulations
Xiangfa Guo, M. Chan (2013)
Plankton: An efficient DTN routing algorithm2013 IEEE International Conference on Sensing, Communications and Networking (SECON)
V. Cerf, S. Burleigh, A. Hooke, L. Torgerson, R. Durst, K. Scott, K. Fall, H. Weiss (2007)
Delay-Tolerant Networking ArchitectureRFC, 4838
(2008)
Project page of the ONE simulator
In this study, we discuss three DTN routing protocols, these are epidemic, PRoPHET and spray and wait routing protocols. A special simulator will be used; that is opportunistic network environment (ONE) to create a network environment. Spray and wait has highest delivery rate and low latency in most of the cases. Hence, spray and wait have better performance than others. This analysis of the performance of DTN protocols helps the researcher to learn better of these protocols in the different environment.Design/methodology/approachDelay-Tolerant Network (DTN) is a network designed to operate effectively over extreme distances, such as those encountered in space communications or on an interplanetary scale. In such an environment, nodes are occasional communication and are available among hubs, and determinations of the next node communications are not confirmed. In such network environment, the packet can be transferred by searching current efficient route available for a particular node. Due to the uncertainty of packet transfer route, DTN is affected by a variety of factors such as packet size, communication cost, node activity, etc.FindingsSpray and wait have highest delivery rate and low latency in most of the cases. Hence, spray and wait have better performance than others.Originality/valueThe primary goal of the paper is to extend these works in an attempt to offer a better understanding of the behavior of different DTN routing protocols with delivery probability, latency and overhead ratio that depend on various amounts of network parameters such as buffer size, number of nodes, movement ratio, time to live, movement range, transmission range and message generation rate. In this study, we discuss three DTN routing protocols: these are epidemic, PRoPHET and spray and wait routing protocols. A special simulator will be used; that is opportunistic network environment (ONE) to create a network environment. Spray and wait have highest delivery rate and low latency in most of the cases. Hence, spray and wait have better performance than others. This analysis of the performance of DTN protocols helps the researcher to learn better of these protocols in the different environment.
International Journal of Intelligent Unmanned Systems – Emerald Publishing
Published: Oct 12, 2021
Keywords: Performance; Delay tolerant network; Evatuation; Routing protocols
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.