Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A Manager’s Interpretation of Cross Tabulation Survey Data

A Manager’s Interpretation of Cross Tabulation Survey Data This practitioner’s guide is based on examples which highlight the usefulness of cross tabulation as a tool for investigating cause‐effect relationships in the business environment. Although cross‐tabulations are common in statistical analysis, many managers need a better understanding of the data being presented. We consider a soft drinks application where a third factor helps uncover an association not readily apparent, in addition to different cases where a third factor causes refinement of initial conclusions based on two‐factor analysis. Because conclusions are always subject to modification with introduction of the “right” factors, we are always in the position of inferring only that an association exists. This is the rationale for why the accumulation of research studies, rather than a single result, supporting a single relationship is so important to understanding the forces driving a business. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png American Journal of Business Emerald Publishing

A Manager’s Interpretation of Cross Tabulation Survey Data

American Journal of Business , Volume 5 (2): 7 – Jan 1, 1990

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/a-manager-s-interpretation-of-cross-tabulation-survey-data-l9fbxpa4BI
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 MCB UP Ltd. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1935-5181
DOI
10.1108/19355181199000012
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This practitioner’s guide is based on examples which highlight the usefulness of cross tabulation as a tool for investigating cause‐effect relationships in the business environment. Although cross‐tabulations are common in statistical analysis, many managers need a better understanding of the data being presented. We consider a soft drinks application where a third factor helps uncover an association not readily apparent, in addition to different cases where a third factor causes refinement of initial conclusions based on two‐factor analysis. Because conclusions are always subject to modification with introduction of the “right” factors, we are always in the position of inferring only that an association exists. This is the rationale for why the accumulation of research studies, rather than a single result, supporting a single relationship is so important to understanding the forces driving a business.

Journal

American Journal of BusinessEmerald Publishing

Published: Jan 1, 1990

Keywords: Cross tabulation; Cause‐effect relationships; Business environment

There are no references for this article.