Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
W. Khan, M. Nahon (2013)
Toward an Accurate Physics-Based UAV Thruster ModelIEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 18
B. Mccormick (1979)
Aerodynamics, Aeronautics and Flight Mechanics
D. Pitt, D. Peters (1980)
Theoretical prediction of dynamic inflow derivatives, 5
J. Tangler (2004)
Insight into Wind Turbine Stall and Post-stall AerodynamicsWind Energy, 7
Hugh Freeman (1932)
The Effect of Small Angles of Yaw and Pitch on the Characteristics of Airplane Propellers
Robert Deters, G. Krishnan, M. Selig (2014)
Reynolds number effects on the performance of small-scale propellers
B. Theys, G. Dimitriadis, T. Andrianne, Patrick Hendrick, J. Schutter (2014)
Wind tunnel testing of a VTOL MAV propeller in tilted operating mode2014 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS)
Robert Chen (1990)
A survey of nonuniform inflow models for rotorcraft flight dynamics and control applications, 14
H. Amini, S. Steen (2011)
Experimental and Theoretical Analysis of Propeller Shaft Loads in Oblique InflowJournal of Ship Research, 55
S. Hoerner, H. Borst (1992)
Fluid-Dynamic Lift: Practical Information on Aerodynamic and Hydrodynamic Lift
R. Pendley (1945)
Effect of Propeller-Axis Angle of Attack on Thrust Distribution over the Propeller Disk in Relation to Wake-Survey Measurement of Thrust
R. Coleman, A. Feingold, C. Stempin (1945)
Evaluation of the Induced-Velocity Field of an Idealized Helicopter Rotor
M. Selig (2010)
Modeling propeller aerodynamics and slipstream effects on small UAVs in realtime
J. Crigler, J. Gilman (1952)
Calculation of aerodynamic forces on a propeller in pitch or yaw
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to develop a physics-based model for UAV propellers that is capable of predicting all aerodynamic forces and moments in any general forward flight condition such as no flow, pure axial flow and pure side flow etc. Design/methodology/approach – The methodology adopted in this paper is the widely used Blade Element Momentum Theory (BEMT) for propeller model development. The difficulty arising from the variation of induced flow with blade’s angular position is overcome by supplementing the BEMT with the inflow model developed by Pitt and Peters. More so, high angle of attack aerodynamics is embedded in the simulation as it is likely for the blades to stall in general forward flight, for example during extreme aerobatics/maneuvers. Findings – The validity of the model is demonstrated via comparison with experiments as well as with other existing models. It is found that one of the secondary forces is negligible while the other is one order of magnitude less than the primary static thrust, and as such may be neglected depending on the level of accuracy required. On the other hand, both secondary moments must be considered as they are of similar order of magnitude as the primary static torque. Research limitations/implications – The paper does not consider the swirl component of the induced flow under the assumption that it is negligible compared to the axial component. Originality/value – This paper fulfills the identified need of a propeller model for general forward flight conditions, and aims to fill this void in the existing literature pertaining to UAVs.
International Journal of Intelligent Unmanned Systems – Emerald Publishing
Published: May 11, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.