Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Board control, performance and CEO compensation in Taiwan

Board control, performance and CEO compensation in Taiwan Agency theory starts with the assumption that people act in their own selfinterest, and holds that under normal conditions, the goals, interests, and risks of two actors principal and agent are not identical. This means that the agent will not necessarily act according to the interests of the principal. CEO compensation is the type of control mechanism that companies employ to reduce the agency problem. This paper took 201 manufacturing companies in the year 1998 in Taiwan, and used the LISTREL 8 model to analyze the influence of company performance, scale, and board of director control over CEO compensation. The results indicate is that company performance, scale, and control by the board of directors all influence CEO compensation, with company scale the main factor, followed by company performance, and control by the board of directors. I also find that CEO compensation is higher when the board of directors' does not have effective control. Moreover, the board of directors control of a company is diminished when the CTO and chairman of the board are one person, and also when the number of internal directors is great. Conversely, the board of directors' control is increased when their ratio of stock ownership is higher. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Asian Review of Accounting Emerald Publishing

Board control, performance and CEO compensation in Taiwan

Asian Review of Accounting , Volume 12 (1): 14 – Jan 1, 2004

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/board-control-performance-and-ceo-compensation-in-taiwan-1CkEdDj8Km
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © Emerald Group Publishing Limited
ISSN
1321-7348
DOI
10.1108/eb060772
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Agency theory starts with the assumption that people act in their own selfinterest, and holds that under normal conditions, the goals, interests, and risks of two actors principal and agent are not identical. This means that the agent will not necessarily act according to the interests of the principal. CEO compensation is the type of control mechanism that companies employ to reduce the agency problem. This paper took 201 manufacturing companies in the year 1998 in Taiwan, and used the LISTREL 8 model to analyze the influence of company performance, scale, and board of director control over CEO compensation. The results indicate is that company performance, scale, and control by the board of directors all influence CEO compensation, with company scale the main factor, followed by company performance, and control by the board of directors. I also find that CEO compensation is higher when the board of directors' does not have effective control. Moreover, the board of directors control of a company is diminished when the CTO and chairman of the board are one person, and also when the number of internal directors is great. Conversely, the board of directors' control is increased when their ratio of stock ownership is higher.

Journal

Asian Review of AccountingEmerald Publishing

Published: Jan 1, 2004

There are no references for this article.