Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
This exploratory study examines how promotional effectiveness is determined in small firms and examines decision‐makers attitudes toward promotional performance and measurement. Although it is commonly believed that small business managers rely upon intuitive methods, this study suggests that most small business managers apply some objective measure of effectiveness to their promotional strategies, typically using multiple methods. Evaluation techniques usually center on measures of financial performance and consumer behavior, with some firms relying on employee input for the assessment of promotional performance. The size of the firm and the gender of the decision‐maker account for significant differences in the frequency and type of evaluation methods applied. The majority of small business managers are somewhat satisfied with how well their promotional efforts perform, however, many experience difficulty in determining the impact of their promotions and could benefit from the development of models and techniques designed specifically for use in small firms.
American Journal of Business – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jan 1, 1997
Keywords: Promotional effectiveness; Promotional performance; Promotional measurement; Small buisnesses; Decision making
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.