Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Do analysts understand accruals’ persistence? Evidence revisited

Do analysts understand accruals’ persistence? Evidence revisited The purpose of this paper is to revisit the question of whether analysts anticipate accruals’ predicted reversals (or persistence) of future earnings. Prior evidence documents that analysts who provide information to investors are over optimistic about firms with high working capital (WC) accruals. The authors propose that empirical models using WC accruals alone may be incomplete and hence not entirely appropriate to assess the level of analysts’ understanding of accruals. The authors argue that analysts’ optimism about WC accruals might not be due to their lack of sophistication, but rather driven by incomplete accrual information embedded in forecast accuracy tests.Design/methodology/approachThe authors use non-financial US firms for the period between 1976 and 2013. The authors define earnings forecast errors as the analysts’ consensus earnings forecasts minus the actual earnings provided by IBES deflated by share price from CRSP. The authors carry out forecast error regressions on individual accrual components by decomposing total accruals into categories. The authors perform the tests across 12 months starting from the initial analysts’ forecasts, which are generally issued in the first month after the prior period earnings announcement date. The final sample contains 48,142 firm–year observations per month.FindingsThe empirical tests show no correlation between analysts’ forecast errors and revised total accruals. The findings are robust to different samples, periods, model specifications, decile ranked accruals, high accruals, absolute forecast errors, controlling for cash flows (CF) and high accounting conservatism. The findings imply that if analysts are to achieve more accurate forecasts, they should be considering all rather than some accrual components. The authors interpret this evidence as an indication of analysts’ relative sophistication with respect to accruals.Research limitations/implicationsThe authors recognise that analysts’ correct anticipation of accruals’ persistence does not mean that their earnings forecasts are entirely free of bias. Analysts can make forecast errors for various reasons including strategic biases. For instance, the tests show pessimistic forecast errors with respect to CF, which is in line with similar findings in prior research (Drake and Myers, 2011). Hence, the authors suggest that future research examine this correlation in greater depth as CF components are with the highest level of persistence, and hence should be predicted most accurately.Practical implicationsThe results imply that the argument about analysts’ lack of sophistication with respect to accruals’ persistence is not warranted. The results imply that forecasts appear to contribute to market efficiency. Another implication is that analysts seem to utilise all relevant accrual information in their forecasts, hence traditional accrual definition should be revised in future studies. Key inferences of the paper imply that the growing use of analysts’ reports by institutional investors and money managers in their decision-making processes is justified despite the debate in the prior literature on the role and the reputation of analysts as surrogates of market expectations.Originality/valueThe research sheds a new light on the question whether sell-side security analysts are able to anticipate the persistence of accruals in future earnings. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Applied Accounting Research Emerald Publishing

Do analysts understand accruals’ persistence? Evidence revisited

Raonic, Ivana; Sahin, Ali
Journal of Applied Accounting Research , Volume 21 (1): 22 – Feb 5, 2020
Download PDF
22 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/do-analysts-understand-accruals-persistence-evidence-revisited-Wqev1GQBNi
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
0967-5426
DOI
10.1108/jaar-07-2018-0103
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to revisit the question of whether analysts anticipate accruals’ predicted reversals (or persistence) of future earnings. Prior evidence documents that analysts who provide information to investors are over optimistic about firms with high working capital (WC) accruals. The authors propose that empirical models using WC accruals alone may be incomplete and hence not entirely appropriate to assess the level of analysts’ understanding of accruals. The authors argue that analysts’ optimism about WC accruals might not be due to their lack of sophistication, but rather driven by incomplete accrual information embedded in forecast accuracy tests.Design/methodology/approachThe authors use non-financial US firms for the period between 1976 and 2013. The authors define earnings forecast errors as the analysts’ consensus earnings forecasts minus the actual earnings provided by IBES deflated by share price from CRSP. The authors carry out forecast error regressions on individual accrual components by decomposing total accruals into categories. The authors perform the tests across 12 months starting from the initial analysts’ forecasts, which are generally issued in the first month after the prior period earnings announcement date. The final sample contains 48,142 firm–year observations per month.FindingsThe empirical tests show no correlation between analysts’ forecast errors and revised total accruals. The findings are robust to different samples, periods, model specifications, decile ranked accruals, high accruals, absolute forecast errors, controlling for cash flows (CF) and high accounting conservatism. The findings imply that if analysts are to achieve more accurate forecasts, they should be considering all rather than some accrual components. The authors interpret this evidence as an indication of analysts’ relative sophistication with respect to accruals.Research limitations/implicationsThe authors recognise that analysts’ correct anticipation of accruals’ persistence does not mean that their earnings forecasts are entirely free of bias. Analysts can make forecast errors for various reasons including strategic biases. For instance, the tests show pessimistic forecast errors with respect to CF, which is in line with similar findings in prior research (Drake and Myers, 2011). Hence, the authors suggest that future research examine this correlation in greater depth as CF components are with the highest level of persistence, and hence should be predicted most accurately.Practical implicationsThe results imply that the argument about analysts’ lack of sophistication with respect to accruals’ persistence is not warranted. The results imply that forecasts appear to contribute to market efficiency. Another implication is that analysts seem to utilise all relevant accrual information in their forecasts, hence traditional accrual definition should be revised in future studies. Key inferences of the paper imply that the growing use of analysts’ reports by institutional investors and money managers in their decision-making processes is justified despite the debate in the prior literature on the role and the reputation of analysts as surrogates of market expectations.Originality/valueThe research sheds a new light on the question whether sell-side security analysts are able to anticipate the persistence of accruals in future earnings.

Journal

Journal of Applied Accounting Research – Emerald Publishing

Published: Feb 5, 2020

Keywords: Efficiency; Earnings; Earnings persistence; Accruals; Analysts; M41; G10

References

  • What do accrualstell us about future cash flows?
    Barth, M.E.; Clinch, G.; Israeli, D.
  • The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings
    Basu, S.
  • Loss function assumptions in rational expectations tests on financial analysts’ earnings forecasts
    Basu, S.; Markov, S.
  • Do analysts disclose cash flow forecasts with earnings estimates when earnings quality is low?
    Bilinski, P.
  • The interactive role of difficulty and incentives in explaining the annual earnings forecast walkdown
    Bradshaw, M.; Lee, L.F.; Peterson, K.
  • Do analysts and auditors use information in accruals?
    Bradshaw, M.; Richardson, S.; Sloan, R.G.
  • The superiority of analysts forecasts as measures of expectation: evidence from earnings
    Brown, L.; Rozeff, M.
  • An information interpretation of financial analyst superiority in forecasting earnings
    Brown, L.D.; Richardson, G.D.; Schwager, S.J.
  • Security analyst superiority relative to univariate time-series models in forecasting quarterly earnings
    Brown, L.D.; Griffin, P.A.; Hagerman, R.I.; Zmijewski, M.E.
  • The Sarbanes-Oxley Act, earnings management, and post-buyback performance of open-market repurchasing firms
    Chen, S.-S.; Huang, C.-W.
  • Real and accrual-based earnings management in the pre-and post-Sarbanes-Oxley periods
    Cohen, D.A.; Dey, A.; Lys, T.Z.
  • Investor sophistication and the mispricing of accruals
    Collins, D.W.; Gong, G.; Hribar, S.P.
  • Which types of analyst firms are more optimistic?
    Cowen, A.; Groysberg, B.; Healy, P.
  • Earnings predictability and bias in analysts’ earnings forecasts
    Das, S.; Levine, C.B.; Sivaramakrishnan, K.
  • The predictive value of expenses excluded from pro forma earnings
    Doyle, J.T.; Lundholm, R.J.; Soliman, M.T.
  • Analysts’ accrual-related over-optimism: do analyst characteristics play a role?
    Drake, M.; Myers, L.
  • The relative and complementary performance of analysts and security price-based measures of expected earnings
    Elgers, P.; Murray, D.
  • The accrual anomaly: accrual originations, accrual reversals and resolution of uncertainty
    Fedyk, T.; Singer, Z.; Sougiannis, T.
  • Analysts’ decisions as products of a multi-task environment
    Francis, J.; Philbrick, D.
  • Financial analysts’ forecasts of earnings: a better surrogate for market expectations
    Fried, D.; Givoly, D.
  • Earnings skewness and analyst forecast bias
    Gu, Z.; Wu, J.
  • The persistence and pricing of earnings, accruals, and cash flows when firms have large book-tax differences
    Hanlon, M.
  • The effect of issuing biased earnings forecasts on analysts’ access to management and survival
    Ke, B.; Yu, Y.
  • Estimation and empirical properties of a firm-year measure of accounting conservatism
    Khan, M.; Watts, R.L.
  • An analysis of the theories and explanations offered for the mispricing of accruals and accrual components
    Kraft, A.; Leone, A.J.; Wasley, C.E.
  • Underwriting relationships, analysts’ earnings forecasts and investment recommendations
    Lin, H.W.; McNichols, M.F.
  • Self-selection and analyst coverage
    McNichols, M.; O’Brien, R.
  • Why is the accrual anomaly not arbitraged away? The role of idiosyncratic risk and transactions costs
    Mashruwala, C.; Rajgopal, S.; Shevlin, T.
  • Evidence on the possible underweighting of earnings related information
    Mendenhall, R.
  • Conflict of interest and the credibility of underwriter analyst recommendations
    Michaely, R.; Womack, K.
  • Accounting conservatism, the quality of earnings, and stock returns
    Penman, S.; Zhang, X.
  • Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: comparing approaches
    Petersen, M.
  • Horizon-dependent underreaction in financial analysts’ earnings forecasts
    Raedy, J.; Shane, P.; Yang, Y.
  • The financial analyst forecasting literature: taxonomy with suggestions for future research
    Ramnath, S.; Rock, S.; Shane, P.
  • Accrual reliability earnings persistence and stock prices
    Richardson, S.; Soliman, M.; Sloan, R.; Tuna, I.
  • The walk-down to beatable analyst forecasts: the role of equity issuance and insider trading incentives
    Richardson, S.; Teoh, S.H.; Wysocki, P.D.
  • Do stock prices fully reflect information in accruals and cash flows about future earnings?
    Sloan, R.
  • Inventory changes and future returns
    Thomas, J.; Zhang, H.
  • The mispricing of abnormal accruals
    Xie, H.
  • Conditional and unconditional conservatism: concepts and modelling
    Beaver, W.H.; Ryan, S.
  • GAAP versus the street: an empirical assessment of two alternative definitions of earnings
    Bradshaw, M.; Sloan, R.G.
  • Delayed security price adjustments to financial analysts forecasts of annual earnings
    Elgers, P.; Lo, M.; Pfeiffer, R.
  • Analysts’ vs investors’ weightings of accruals in forecasting annual earnings
    Elgers, P.; Lo, M.; Pfeiffer, R.
  • Risk, return, and equilibrium: empirical tests
    Fama, E.F.; MacBeth, J.D.
  • Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds
    Fama, E.F.; French, K.
  • What drives sell-side analyst compensation at high-status investment banks?
    Groysberg, B.; Healy, P.; Maber, D.
  • On the nature and rationality of analysts’ forecasts under earnings conservatism
    Helbok, G.; Walker, M.
  • Analyzing the analysts: career concerns and biased earnings forecasts
    Hong, H.; Kubik, J.
  • Asymmetric persistence and the pricing of accruals and cash flows
    Konstantinidi, S.; Kraft, A.; Pope, P.F.
  • Capitalization versus expensing: evidence on the uncertainty of future earnings from capital expenditures versus R&D outlays
    Kothari, S.P.; Laguerre, T.E.; Leone, A.J.
  • The persistence of the accruals anomaly
    Lev, B.; Nissim, D.
  • Ex-ante and ex-post accounting conservatism, asset recognition and asymmetric earnings timeliness
    Pope, P.F.; Walker, M.
  • The use of earnings forecasts in stock recommendations: are accurate analysts more consistent?
    Simon, A.; Curtis, A.
  • Earnings management and the underperformance of seasoned equity offerings
    Teoh, S.H.; Welch, I.; Wong, T.J.