Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Does the expectation of finding deficiencies impact internal audit work?

Does the expectation of finding deficiencies impact internal audit work? Purpose – The main purpose of this paper is to examine whether the source of an expectation of finding deficiencies – the audit committee, the chief executive officer, or the internal auditor's own assessment – affects the time budgeted by internal auditors for that audit area. Design/methodology/approach – The approach used is a behavioral experiment where audit planning decisions are made by internal auditors for three hypothetical scenarios. Findings – The paper finds that the source of the expectation makes a difference in some cases. In particular, internal auditors allocate more time when the expectation of deficiencies results from a self‐assessment than when it comes via communication from an audit committee member. The paper also finds that internal auditors do not generally increase audit time budgets if initial audit procedures find no reportable deficiencies when deficiencies are expected to be found. Research limitations/implications – Internal auditors typically obtain more information about an audit scenario than is provided in the research questionnaire. As well, economic incentives such as being fired for making poor planning decisions are absent in the paper. Practical implications – The results imply that the reliability of an expectation about deficiencies is more influential than the authority of the source. Originality/value – No prior research study has addressed the issue of whether the source of an expectation of finding deficiencies affects the time budgeted by internal auditors for that audit area. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Applied Accounting Research Emerald Publishing

Does the expectation of finding deficiencies impact internal audit work?

Arnold Schneider
Journal of Applied Accounting Research , Volume 10 (2): 10 – Sep 11, 2009
Download PDF
10 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/does-the-expectation-of-finding-deficiencies-impact-internal-audit-pL4rjOJCSC
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
0967-5426
DOI
10.1108/09675420910984682
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – The main purpose of this paper is to examine whether the source of an expectation of finding deficiencies – the audit committee, the chief executive officer, or the internal auditor's own assessment – affects the time budgeted by internal auditors for that audit area. Design/methodology/approach – The approach used is a behavioral experiment where audit planning decisions are made by internal auditors for three hypothetical scenarios. Findings – The paper finds that the source of the expectation makes a difference in some cases. In particular, internal auditors allocate more time when the expectation of deficiencies results from a self‐assessment than when it comes via communication from an audit committee member. The paper also finds that internal auditors do not generally increase audit time budgets if initial audit procedures find no reportable deficiencies when deficiencies are expected to be found. Research limitations/implications – Internal auditors typically obtain more information about an audit scenario than is provided in the research questionnaire. As well, economic incentives such as being fired for making poor planning decisions are absent in the paper. Practical implications – The results imply that the reliability of an expectation about deficiencies is more influential than the authority of the source. Originality/value – No prior research study has addressed the issue of whether the source of an expectation of finding deficiencies affects the time budgeted by internal auditors for that audit area.

Journal

Journal of Applied Accounting Research – Emerald Publishing

Published: Sep 11, 2009

Keywords: Internal auditing; Expectation; Audit committees; Chief executives

References

  • Assurance and consulting services
    Anderson, U.
  • Internal auditors' evaluation of fraud factors in planning an audit: the importance of audit committee quality and management incentives
    Asare, S.K.; Davidson, R.A.; Gramling, A.A.
  • Expert judgment in the audit team: a source reliability approach
    Bamber, E.M.
  • The effects of judgments of new clients' integrity upon risk judgments, audit evidence, and fees
    Beaulieu, P.R.
  • Earnings manipulation risk, corporate governance risk, and auditor's planning and pricing decisions
    Bedard, J.C.; Johnstone, K.M.
  • Source credibility in social judgment: bias, expertise, and the judge's point of view
    Birnbaum, M.H.; Stegner, S.E.
  • The effects of fraud and going‐concern risk on auditors' assessments of the risk of material misstatement and resulting audit procedures
    Blay, A.D.; Sneathen, L.D.; Kizirian, T.
  • Escalation of commitment among internal auditors
    Brody, R.G.; Kaplan, S.E.
  • A Global Summary of the Common Body of Knowledge 2006
    Burnaby, P.A.; Abdolmohammadi, M.J.; Haas, S.
  • Internal auditor involvement in internal control systems design: is objectivity impaired?
    Church, B.K.; Schneider, A.
  • The impact of roles of the board on auditors' risk assessments and program planning decisions
    Cohen, J.R.; Krishnamurthy, G.; Wright, A.M.
  • Risk assessment and sample size decisions
    Elder, R.J.; Allen, R.D.
  • The contribution of internal audit as a determinant of external audit fees and factors influencing this contribution
    Felix, W.L. Jr; Gramling, A.A.; Maletta, M.J.
  • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) About the Internal Audit Profession
    IIA
  • International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing
    IIA
  • Engagement planning, bid pricing, and client response in the market for initial attest engagements
    Johnstone, K.M.; Bedard, J.C.
  • The impact of management integrity on audit planning and evidence
    Kizirian, T.G.; Mayhew, B.W.; Sneathen, L.D.
  • Auditor identification of fraud risk factors and their impact on audit programs
    Mock, T.J.; Turner, J.L.
  • An exploratory study of auditor evidential planning
    Mock, T.J.; Wright, A.M.
  • Are audit program plans risk‐adjusted?
    Mock, T.J.; Wright, A.M.
  • The influence of auditors' justification processes on their decisions: a cognitive model and experimental evidence
    Peecher, M.E.
  • 2007 State of the Internal Audit Profession Study: Pressures Build for Continual Focus on Risk
    PricewaterhouseCoopers
  • The other side of objectivity in operational auditing
    Schneider, A.
  • A Time Series Analysis of the Effect of Internal Audit Activities on External Audit Fees
    Wallace, W.