Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

How relative performance information affects employee behavior: a systematic review of empirical research

How relative performance information affects employee behavior: a systematic review of empirical... This paper provides an overview of the empirical findings on how relative performance information (RPI) affects employee behavior. Additionally, the review identifies future research opportunities based on a systematic analysis of the literature that incorporates findings across several disciplines and provides replicable, extensive coverage.Design/methodology/approachThis paper addresses a research gap via synthesis, drawing on the empirical literature identified and analyzed systematically. A conceptual framework is developed to integrate the studies.FindingsThe effect of RPI on performance through enhanced effort is positive; moreover, publicity and performance-dependent compensation strengthen the effect. However, RPI has also been found to increase sabotage among employees, and it can lead to less honest reporting. Future research could examine critical mediators and moderators of the RPI-performance relationship and thus complement the findings. Additionally, the effects of group-based RPI remain underrepresented. Future work could help to assess in greater detail how RPI interacts with culture and norms and whether RPI is due to personal expectations. There is also room for further research regarding the effects of RPI on cooperation, its consequences for learning, how it affects budgeting decisions and its implications for risk taking.Originality/valueThis paper presents the first literature review in the field of RPI. It provides synthesized knowledge about whether RPI is beneficial or detrimental to organizational performance. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Accounting Literature Emerald Publishing

How relative performance information affects employee behavior: a systematic review of empirical research

Schnieder, Christian
Journal of Accounting Literature , Volume 44 (1): 36 – Apr 12, 2022
Download PDF
36 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/how-relative-performance-information-affects-employee-behavior-a-8C0IadkgV0
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
0737-4607
eISSN
2452-1469
DOI
10.1108/jal-11-2021-0006
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This paper provides an overview of the empirical findings on how relative performance information (RPI) affects employee behavior. Additionally, the review identifies future research opportunities based on a systematic analysis of the literature that incorporates findings across several disciplines and provides replicable, extensive coverage.Design/methodology/approachThis paper addresses a research gap via synthesis, drawing on the empirical literature identified and analyzed systematically. A conceptual framework is developed to integrate the studies.FindingsThe effect of RPI on performance through enhanced effort is positive; moreover, publicity and performance-dependent compensation strengthen the effect. However, RPI has also been found to increase sabotage among employees, and it can lead to less honest reporting. Future research could examine critical mediators and moderators of the RPI-performance relationship and thus complement the findings. Additionally, the effects of group-based RPI remain underrepresented. Future work could help to assess in greater detail how RPI interacts with culture and norms and whether RPI is due to personal expectations. There is also room for further research regarding the effects of RPI on cooperation, its consequences for learning, how it affects budgeting decisions and its implications for risk taking.Originality/valueThis paper presents the first literature review in the field of RPI. It provides synthesized knowledge about whether RPI is beneficial or detrimental to organizational performance.

Journal

Journal of Accounting Literature – Emerald Publishing

Published: Apr 12, 2022

Keywords: Relative performance information; Feedback; Performance management; Literature review; M410

References

  • The role of goals and feedback in incentivizing performance
    Akın, Z.; Karagözoğlu, E.
  • Behavior management in the public accommodations industry
    Anderson, D.C.; Crowell, C.R.; Sponsel, S.S.; Clarke, M.; Brence, J.
  • Do performance ranks increase productivity? Evidence from a field experiment
    Ashraf, A.
  • Awards unbundled: evidence from a natural field experiment
    Ashraf, N.; Bandiera, O.; Lee, S.S.
  • The importance of relative performance feedback information: evidence from a natural experiment using high school students
    Azmat, G.; Iriberri, N.
  • The provision of relative performance feedback: an analysis of performance and satisfaction
    Azmat, G.; Iriberri, N.
  • What you don't know… can't hurt you? A field experiment on relative performance feedback in higher education
    Azmat, G.; Bagues, M.; Cabrales, A.; Iriberri, N.
  • Peer effects and risk sharing in experimental asset markets
    Baghestanian, S.; Gortner, P.J.; van der Weele, J.J.
  • Team incentives: evidence from a firm level experiment
    Bandiera, O.; Barankay, I.; Rasul, I.
  • Rank incentives: evidence from a randomized workplace experiment
    Barankay, I.
  • The Effects of making performance information public: evidence from Los Angeles teachers and a regression discontinuity design
    Bergman, P.; Hill, M.
  • Rank and response: a field experiment on peer information and water use behavior
    Bhanot, S.P.
  • The Contingent effect of management practices
    Blader, S.; Gartenberg, C.M.; Prat, A.
  • Tournaments without prizes: evidence from personnel records
    Blanes i Vidal, J.; Nossol, M.
  • Status motives and agent-to-agent information sharing: how evolutionary psychology shapes agents' responses to control system design
    Bol, J.C.; Leiby, J.
  • The effects of monetary incentives on effort and task performance: theories, evidence, and a framework for research
    Bonner, S.E.; Sprinkle, G.B.
  • Employee recognition and performance: a field experiment
    Bradler, C.; Dur, R.; Neckermann, S.; Non, A.
  • The current state of performance appraisal research and practice: concerns, directions, and implications
    Bretz, R.D.; Milkovich, G.T.; Read, W.
  • Peer information and risk-taking under competitive and non-competitive pay schemes
    Brookins, P.; Brown, J.; Ryvkin, D.
  • The effect of rankings on honesty in budget reporting
    Brown, J.L.; Fisher, J.G.; Sooy, M.; Sprinkle, G.B.
  • Biased self-assessments, feedback, and employees' compensation plan choices
    Brown, J.L.; Farrington, S.; Sprinkle, G.B.
  • How does peer pressure affect educational investments?
    Bursztyn, L.; Jensen, R.
  • Gender differences to relative performance feedback: a field experiment in education
    Cabrera, J.M.; Cid, A.
  • Promotion, relative performance information, and the peter principle
    Chan, E.W.
  • The Dark side of competition for status
    Charness, G.; Masclet, D.; Villeval, M.C.
  • Social comparisons and contributions to online communities: a field experiment on MovieLens
    Chen, Y.; Harper, F.M.; Konstan, J.; Li, S.X.
  • The promise and peril of integrated cost systems
    Cooper, R.; Kaplan, R.S.
  • Budgeting research: three theoretical perspectives and criteria for selective integration
    Covaleski, M.A.; Evans, J.H.; Luft, J.L.; Shields, M.D.
  • A survey of experimental research on contests, all-pay auctions and tournaments
    Dechenaux, E.; Kovenock, D.; Sheremeta, R.M.
  • Tournament incentives in the field: gender differences in the workplace
    Delfgaauw, J.; Dur, R.; Sol, J.; Verbeke, W.
  • A theory of co-operation and competition
    Deutsch, M.
  • Rank matters–The impact of social competition on portfolio choice
    Dijk, O.; Holmen, M.; Kirchler, M.
  • Peer Pressure in multi-dimensional work tasks
    Ebeling, F.; Fellner, G.; Wahlig, J.
  • Relative performance information and financial incentives in multidimensional task settings – a conceptual and experimental analysis of effects on performance and attention towards task dimensions
    Eichhorn, N.
  • Feedback and incentives: experimental evidence
    Eriksson, T.; Poulsen, A.; Villeval, M.C.
  • Saving face and group identity
    Eriksson, T.; Mao, L.; Villeval, M.C.
  • The effect of relative performance information and other employee behavior on noncompliance
    Ewelt-Knauer, C.; Knauer, T.; Sharp, D.J.
  • Performance effects of setting a high reference point for peer-performance comparison
    Eyring, H.; Narayanan, V.G.
  • Clean evidence on peer effects
    Falk, A.; Ichino, A.
  • A theory of social comparison processes
    Festinger, L.
  • Relative performance information: the effects of common uncertainty and contract type on agent effort
    Frederickson, J.R.
  • Peer pressure and productivity: the role of observing and being observed
    Georganas, S.; Tonin, M.; Vlassopoulos, M.
  • The impact of private and public feedback on worker performance: evidence from the lab
    Gerhards, L.; Siemer, N.
  • First-place loving and last-place loathing: how rank in the distribution of performance affects effort provision
    Gill, D.; Kissová, Z.; Lee, J.; Prowse, V.
  • Driven by social comparisons: how feedback about Coworkers' effort influences individual productivity
    Gino, F.; Staats, B.R.
  • Self-efficacy: a theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability
    Gist, M.E.; Mitchell, T.R.
  • The effects of disseminating relative performance feedback in tournament and individual performance compensation plans
    Hannan, R.L.; Krishnan, R.; Newman, A.H.
  • The effect of relative performance information on performance and effort allocation in a multi-task environment
    Hannan, R.L.; McPhee, G.P.; Newman, A.H.; Tafkov, I.D.
  • The informativeness of relative performance information and its effect on effort allocation in a multitask environment
    Hannan, R.L.; McPhee, G.P.; Newman, A.H.; Tafkov, I.D.V.; Kachelmeier, S.J.
  • Social loafing and group evaluation
    Harkins, S.G.; Szymanski, K.
  • Rankings, performance, and sabotage: the moderating effects of target setting
    Hartmann, F.; Schreck, P.
  • Forced ranking: a review
    Hazels, B.; Sasse, C.M.
  • Moral hazard in teams
    Holmstrom, B.
  • Performance evaluation and compensation research: an agency perspective
    Indjejikian, R.J.
  • Grades and rank: impacts of non-financial incentives on test performance
    Jalava, N.; Joensen, J.S.; Pellas, E.
  • How do non-monetary performance incentives for physicians affect the quality of medical care? - A laboratory experiment
    Kairies, N.; Krieger, M.
  • Social comparisons in real time: a field experiment of residential electricity and water use
    Kažukauskas, A.; Broberg, T.; Jaraite, J.
  • The effects of tangible rewards versus cash rewards in consecutive sales tournaments: a field experiment
    Kelly, K.; Presslee, A.; Webb, R.A.
  • Rankings and risk-taking in the finance industry
    Kirchler, M.; Weitzel, U.
  • The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory
    Kluger, A.N.; DeNisi, A.
  • Getting more work for nothing? Symbolic awards and worker performance
    Kosfeld, M.; Neckermann, S.
  • Relative performance information, rank ordering and employee performance: a research note
    Kramer, S.; Maas, V.S.; van Rinsum, M.
  • Feedback, self-esteem, and performance in organizations
    Kuhnen, C.M.; Tymula, A.
  • Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts
    Lazear, E.P.; Rosen, S.
  • How do performance feedback characteristics influence recipients' reactions? A state-of-the-art review on feedback source, timing, and valence effects
    Lechermeier, J.; Fassnacht, M.
  • The social context of performance appraisal: a review and framework for the future
    Levy, P.E.; Williams, J.R.
  • Determinants of judgment performance in accounting settings: ability, knowledge, motivation, and environment
    Libby, R.; Luft, J.
  • The effect of group identity on sabotage induced by relative performance information
    Liu, W.
  • Working harder with the out-group: the impact of social category diversity on motivation gains
    Lount, R.B.; Phillips, K.W.
  • Working harder or hardly working? Posting performance eliminates social loafing and promotes social laboring in workgroups
    Lount, R.B.; Wilk, S.L.
  • Cooperation and competition among employees: experimental evidence on the role of management control systems
    Luft, J.
  • Mapping management accounting: graphics and guidelines for theory-consistent empirical research
    Luft, J.; Shields, M.D.
  • How control system design influences performance misreporting
    Maas, V.S.; van Rinsum, M.
  • Relational effects of relative performance information: the role of professional identity
    Mahlendorf, M.D.; Kleinschmit, F.; Perego, P.
  • The effects of relative performance information on individualss satisfaction with the work itself
    Marley, R.; Kersting, L.
  • The effects of group-level relative performance information on group task performance
    Marley, R.; Murthy, U.S.
  • Peers at work
    Mas, A.; Moretti, E.
  • Transparency, inequity aversion, and the dynamics of peer pressure in teams: theory and evidence
    Mohnen, A.; Pokorny, K.; Sliwka, D.
  • The effects of relative performance information and framed information systems feedback on performance in a production task
    Murthy, U.S.; Schafer, B.A.
  • Prizes and incentives: towards a general theory of compensation and competition
    Nalebuff, B.J.; Stiglitz, J.E.
  • Understanding the (unexpected) consequences of unexpected recognition
    Neckermann, S.; Yang, X.
  • Relative performance information in tournaments with different prize structures
    Newman, A.H.; Tafkov, I.D.
  • A review of public posting of performance feedback in work settings
    Nordstrom, R.; Lorenzi, P.; Hall, R.V.
  • Retailers reprogram workers in efficiency push
    O'Connell, V.O.
  • The effect of teacher ratings on teacher performance
    Pope, A.
  • The effects of reward type and relative performance information on budget slack and performance
    Presslee, C.A.
  • The transsituational influence of social norms
    Reno, R.R.; Cialdini, R.B.; Kallgren, C.A.
  • Quitting and peer effects at work
    Rosaz, J.; Slonim, R.; Villeval, M.C.
  • Risk-taking in tournaments: an experimental analysis
    Schedlinsky, I.; Sommer, F.; Wöhrmann, A.
  • Relative performance information in asset markets: an experimental approach
    Schoenberg, E.J.; Haruvy, E.
  • Honesty in managerial reporting: how competition affects the benefits and costs of lying
    Schreck, P.
  • Maximizing versus satisficing: happiness is a matter of choice
    Schwartz, B.; Ward, A.; Monterosso, J.; Lyubomirsky, S.; White, K.; Lehman, D.R.
  • Transforming decision-making processes: a research agenda for understanding the impact of business analytics on organisations
    Sharma, R.; Mithas, S.; Kankanhalli, A.
  • Latest game theory: mixing work and play
    Silverman, R.E.
  • Tailored feedback and worker green behavior: field evidence from bus drivers
    Soetevent, A.; Romensen, G.-J.
  • Closing the productivity gap: improving worker productivity through public relative performance feedback and validation of best practices
    Song, H.; Tucker, A.L.; Murrell, K.L.; Vinson, D.R.
  • Perspectives on experimental research in managerial accounting
    Sprinkle, G.B.
  • Private and public relative performance information under different compensation contracts
    Tafkov, I.D.
  • Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior
    Tesser, A.
  • Peer effects under different relative performance feedback and grouping procedures
    Thiemann, K.; Wallmeier, N.
  • Me vs We: the effect of incomplete team member feedback on cooperation of self-regarding individuals
    Thomas, T.F.; Thornock, T.A.
  • Cooperation theory and organizations
    Tjosvold, D.
  • Rank as an inherent incentive: evidence from a field experiment
    Tran, A.; Zeckhauser, R.
  • Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review
    Tranfield, D.; Denyer, D.; Smart, P.
  • Recognizing the best: the productive and counterproductive effects of relative performance recognition
    Wang, L.W.
  • Behavior management in a factory setting
    Wikoff, M.B.; Anderson, D.C.; Crowell, C.R.
  • Gender differences in the demand and effects of relative performance feedback for competitions
    Wozniak, D.; Harbaugh, W.T.; Mayr, U.