Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Lan, S. Keshmiri, R. Hale (2012)
Fuzzy-Logic Modeling of a Rolling Unmanned Vehicle in Antarctica Wind ShearJournal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, 35
G. Garcia, S. Keshmiri (2015)
Nonlinear H-infinity Control applied to a UAS in Trajectory Following
G. Balas (2002)
LINEAR, PARAMETER-VARYING CONTROL AND ITS APPLICATION TO AEROSPACE SYSTEMS
T. Glad, L. Ljung (2000)
Control theory : multivariable and nonlinear methods
H. Kwakernaak (1993)
Robust control and H∞-optimization - Tutorial paperAutom., 29
H. Kwakernaak (2002)
Mixed sensitivity designIFAC Proceedings Volumes, 35
A. Mills, A. Wills, B. Ninness (2009)
Nonlinear model predictive control of an inverted pendulum2009 American Control Conference
J. Cloutier (1997)
State-dependent Riccati equation techniques: an overviewProceedings of the 1997 American Control Conference (Cat. No.97CH36041), 2
David Mayne, J. Rawlings, C. Rao, P. Scokaert
Constrained Model Predictive Control: Stability and Optimality ଝ
F. Allgöwer, R. Findeisen, Z. Nagy (2004)
Nonlinear Model Predictive Control: From Theory to ApplicationJournal of The Chinese Institute of Chemical Engineers, 35
D. Ramírez, T. Alamo, E. Camacho, D. Peña (2006)
Min-Max MPC based on a computationally efficient upper bound of the worst case costJournal of Process Control, 16
H. Kwakernaak (2000)
H2-optimization - Theory and applications to robust control designAnnu. Rev. Control., 26
D. Raimondo, T. Alamo, D. Limón, E. Camacho (2007)
Towards the practical implementation of min-max nonlinear Model Predictive Control2007 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control
G. Garcia, S. Keshmiri (2013)
Online artificial neural network model‐based nonlinear model predictive controller for the meridian UASInternational Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 23
A. Casavola, E. Mosca, D. Angeli (2000)
Robust command governors for constrained linear systemsIEEE Trans. Autom. Control., 45
R. Nichols, R. Reichert, W. Rugh (1993)
Gain scheduling for H-infinity controllers: a flight control exampleIEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol., 1
Jia Luo, C. Lan (1993)
Control of Wing-Rock Motion of Slender Delta WingsJournal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, 16
B. Wilburn, M. Perhinschi, H. Moncayo, O. Karas, J. Wilburn (2013)
Unmanned aerial vehicle trajectory tracking algorithm comparison, 1
Jie Huang, Ching-Fang Lin (1995)
Numerical approach to computing nonlinear H-infinity control lawsJournal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, 18
Xiao Zhou, J. Doyle (1997)
Essentials of Robust Control
C. MacCluer (2012)
Calculus of Variations: Mechanics, Control and Other Applications
J. Nocedal, Stephen Wright (2018)
Numerical Optimization
Purpose – Nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) is emerging as a way to control unmanned aircraft with flight control constraints and nonlinear and unsteady aerodynamics. However, these predictive controllers do not perform robustly in the presence of physics-based model mismatches and uncertainties. Unmodeled dynamics and external disturbances are unpredictable and unsteady, which can dramatically degrade predictive controllers’ performance. To address this limitation, the purpose of this paper is to propose a new systematic approach using frequency-dependent weighting matrices. Design/methodology/approach – In this framework, frequency-dependent weighting matrices jointly minimize closed-loop sensitivity functions. This work presents the first practical implementation where the frequency content information of uncertainty and disturbances is used to provide a significant degree of robustness for a time-domain nonlinear predictive controller. The merit of the proposed method is successfully verified through the design, coding, and numerical implementation of a robust nonlinear model predictive controller. Findings – The proposed controller commanded and controlled a large unmanned aerial system (UAS) with unsteady and nonlinear dynamics in the presence of environmental disturbances, measurement bias or noise, and model uncertainties; the proposed controller robustly performed disturbance rejection and accurate trajectory tracking. Stability, performance, and robustness are attained in the NMPC framework for a complex system. Research limitations/implications – The theoretical results are supported by the numerical simulations that illustrate the success of the presented technique. It is expected to offer a feasible robust nonlinear control design technique for any type of systems, as long as computational power is available, allowing a much larger operational range while keeping a helpful level of robustness. Robust control design can be more easily expanded from the usual linear framework, allowing meaningful new experimentation with better control systems. Originality/value – Such algorithms allows unstable and unsteady UASs to perform reliably in the presence of disturbances and modeling mismatches.
International Journal of Intelligent Unmanned Systems – Emerald Publishing
Published: May 11, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.