Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Revising the Non-Financial Reporting Directive and the role of board of directors: a lost opportunity?

Revising the Non-Financial Reporting Directive and the role of board of directors: a lost... The purpose of this paper is to shed light an important limit of the Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD) in pursuit of its substantial purpose, which is to achieve sustainability and contribute to achieving the objectives of United Nation (UN) Agenda 2030; the paper also suggests how to overcome those limits.Design/methodology/approachThe study used a survey of board members of listed and un-listed Italian companies. Data were analysed using an ordered probit model.FindingsThe results show that a greater involvement of a board member in the non-financial reporting process is associated with a stronger commitment towards sustainable development. Specifically, the involvement in materiality assessment is positively associated with more proactive behaviours towards sustainability.Research limitations/implicationsThe use of self-reported assessments on beliefs and behaviours and the application of an online survey are methodology limitations of the study. Regarding theory, the study contributes to the literature on corporate governance and sustainability, integrating upper echelons theory, which focuses on how individual attributes influence a firm's strategies and governance, with research on how leadership practices can have a positive impact on corporate sustainability goals.Practical implicationsThe paper underscores the opportunity for policymakers to increase the effectiveness of the NFRD through deeper involvement of the board members in the process of non-financial reporting. The results could also be of interest to governance bodies in terms of defining a board's tasks and practices to encourage the adoption of behaviours oriented towards a stronger engagement in sustainable issues.Originality/valueThis is the first study to provide evidence of the relationship between individual directors' tasks and behaviours, non-financial reporting and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This study highlights some of the limits of the NFRD, even after the public consultation to revise it, and suggests how to overcome these limits. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Applied Accounting Research Emerald Publishing

Revising the Non-Financial Reporting Directive and the role of board of directors: a lost opportunity?

Download PDF
20 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/revising-the-non-financial-reporting-directive-and-the-role-of-board-ndT0361brY
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
0967-5426
DOI
10.1108/jaar-04-2021-0102
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to shed light an important limit of the Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD) in pursuit of its substantial purpose, which is to achieve sustainability and contribute to achieving the objectives of United Nation (UN) Agenda 2030; the paper also suggests how to overcome those limits.Design/methodology/approachThe study used a survey of board members of listed and un-listed Italian companies. Data were analysed using an ordered probit model.FindingsThe results show that a greater involvement of a board member in the non-financial reporting process is associated with a stronger commitment towards sustainable development. Specifically, the involvement in materiality assessment is positively associated with more proactive behaviours towards sustainability.Research limitations/implicationsThe use of self-reported assessments on beliefs and behaviours and the application of an online survey are methodology limitations of the study. Regarding theory, the study contributes to the literature on corporate governance and sustainability, integrating upper echelons theory, which focuses on how individual attributes influence a firm's strategies and governance, with research on how leadership practices can have a positive impact on corporate sustainability goals.Practical implicationsThe paper underscores the opportunity for policymakers to increase the effectiveness of the NFRD through deeper involvement of the board members in the process of non-financial reporting. The results could also be of interest to governance bodies in terms of defining a board's tasks and practices to encourage the adoption of behaviours oriented towards a stronger engagement in sustainable issues.Originality/valueThis is the first study to provide evidence of the relationship between individual directors' tasks and behaviours, non-financial reporting and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This study highlights some of the limits of the NFRD, even after the public consultation to revise it, and suggests how to overcome these limits.

Journal

Journal of Applied Accounting Research – Emerald Publishing

Published: Feb 1, 2022

Keywords: Revising the non-financial reporting directive; Non-financial information; Board member; Directors' engagement; Leadership practices; Sustainable development goals

References

  • Sustainable infrastructure development challenges through PPP procurement process: Indian perspective
    Agarchand, N.; Laishram, B.
  • What we know and don't know about corporate social responsibility: a review and research agenda
    Aguinis, H.; Glavas, A.
  • The theory of planned behavior
    Ajzen, I.
  • The theory of planned behaviour: reactions and reflections
    Ajzen, I.
  • University libraries-bridging digital gaps and accelerating the achievement of sustainable development goals through information and communication technologies
    Anasi, S.N.; Ukangwa, C.C.; Fagbe, A.
  • Individual environmental initiative: championing natural environmental issues in US business organizations
    Andersson, L.M.; Bateman, T.S.
  • Talking trash: legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment
    Bansal, P.; Clelland, I.
  • Factors influencing environmental attitudes and behaviors: a UK case study of household waste management
    Barr, S.
  • The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation
    Bear, S.; Rahman, N.; Post, C.
  • Leaders without ethics in global business: corporate psychopaths
    Boddy, C.R.; Ladyshewsky, R.; Galvin, P.
  • Hidden connections: the link between board gender diversity and corporate social performance
    Boulouta, I.
  • The formation of green strategies in Chinese firms: matching corporate environmental responses and individual principles
    Branzei, O.; Ursacki‐Bryant, T.J.; Vertinsky, I.; Zhang, W.
  • Is eco-friendly unmanly? The green-feminine stereotype and its effect on sustainable consumption
    Brough, A.R.; Wilkie, J.E.; Ma, J.; Isaac, M.S.; Gal, D.
  • Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility
    Campbell, J.L.
  • Sustainable or not sustainable? The role of the board of directors
    Chams, N.; García-Blandón, J.
  • Implementation of green chemistry principles in circular economy system towards sustainable development goals: challenges and perspectives
    Chen, T.L.; Kim, H.; Pan, S.Y.; Tseng, P.C.; Lin, Y.P.; Chiang, P.C.
  • Political ideologies of CEOs: the influence of executives' values on corporate social responsibility
    Chin, M.K.; Hambrick, D.C.; Treviño, L.K.
  • Non-financial information as a driver of transformation: evidence from Italy
  • Environmental attitude in the board. Who are the ‘green directors’? Evidences from Italy
    Cosma, S.; Schwizer, P.; Nobile, L.; Leopizzi, R.
  • The stakeholder engagement in the European banks: regulation versus governance. What changes after the NF directive?
    Cosma, S.; Leopizzi, R.; Pizzi, S.; Turco, M.
  • Diversity of board of directors and environmental social governance: evidence from Italian listed companies
    Cucari, N.; Esposito de Falco, S.; Orlando, B.
  • Investor activism, managerial responsiveness, and corporate social performance
    David, P.; Bloom, M.; Hillman, A.J.
  • The effect of board characteristics on firm environmental performance
    De Villiers, C.; Naiker, V.; Van Staden, C.J.
  • In search of legitimacy: a semiotic analysis of business model disclosure practices
    Di Tullio, P.; Valentinetti, D.; Nielsen, C.; Rea, M.A.
  • How managerial attitudes toward the natural environment affect market orientation and innovation
    Dibrell, C.; Craig, J.B.; Hansen, E.N.
  • The role of board environmental committees in corporate environmental performance
    Dixon-Fowler, H.R.; Ellstrand, A.E.; Johnson, J.L.
  • Voluntary versus mandatory non-financial disclosure: EU Directive 95/2014 and sustainability reporting practices based on empirical evidence from Italy
    Doni, F.; Martini, S.B.; Corvino, A.; Mazzoni, M.
  • Developing trust through stewardship
    Dumay, J.; La Torre, M.; Farneti, F.
  • Leadership in the North American environmental sector: values, leadership styles, and contexts of environmental leaders and their organizations
    Egri, C.P.; Herman, S.
  • Sustainable development goals
  • Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
    Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F.
  • The role of the board in the dissemination of integrated corporate social reporting
    Frias‐Aceituno, J.V.; Rodriguez‐Ariza, L.; Garcia‐Sanchez, I.M.
  • Are there gender-related influences on corporate sustainability? A study of women on boards of directors
    Galbreath, J.
  • Academic engagement in policy-making and social and environmental reporting
    Garcia-Torea, N.; Larrinaga, C.; Luque-Vílchez, M.
  • Bound by the past? Experience-based effects on commitment to the strategic status quo
    Geletkanycz, M.A.; Black, S.S.
  • Factors affecting corporate environmental disclosure in emerging markets: the role of corporate governance structures
    Gerged, A.M.
  • G4 to standards: transition complete
  • Business education and idealism as determinants of stakeholder orientation
    Godos-Díez, J.L.; Fernández-Gago, R.; Cabeza-García, L.
  • Boardroom diversity and its effect on social performance: conceptualization and empirical evidence
    Hafsi, T.; Turgut, G.
  • Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers
    Hambrick, D.C.; Mason, P.A.
  • Managers' personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility
    Hemingway, C.A.; Maclagan, P.W.
  • Corporate governance and sustainability performance: analysis of triple bottom line performance
    Hussain, N.; Rigoni, U.; Orij, R.P.
  • Strategy-process research: what have we learned and what is still to be explored
    Hutzschenreuter, T.; Kleindienst, I.
  • Board members in the service industry: an empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility orientation and directorial type
    Ibrahim, N.A.; Howard, D.P.; Angelidis, J.P.
  • Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure
    Jensen, M.C.; Meckling, W.H.
  • The influence of board composition on sustainable development disclosure
    Jizi, M.
  • Rebuilding trust: sustainability and non-financial reporting and the European Union regulation
    La Torre, M.; Sabelfeld, S.; Blomkvist, M.; Dumay, J.
  • Accounting for economic sustainability: environmental, social and governance perspectives
    Lehner, O.M.; Harrer, T.
  • Difference in degrees: CEO characteristics and firm environmental disclosure
    Lewis, B.W.; Walls, J.L.; Dowell, G.W.
  • Business statesman or shareholder advocate? CEO responsible leadership styles and the micro‐foundations of political CSR
    Maak, T.; Pless, N.M.; Voegtlin, C.
  • The CEO effect: a longitudinal, multilevel analysis of the relationship between executive orientation and corporate social strategy
    Mazutis, D.D.
  • Leadership and sustainability: a systematic assessment of the empirical evidence
    Mazutis, D.; Zintel, C.
  • Materiality in integrated and sustainability reporting: a paradigm shift?
    Mio, C.; Fasan, M.; Costantini, A.
  • Are women eco‐friendly? Board gender diversity and environmental innovation
    Nadeem, M.; Bahadar, S.; Gull, A.A.; Iqbal, U.
  • The influence of personality traits and demographic factors on social entrepreneurship start up intentions
    Nga, J.K.H.; Shamuganathan, G.
  • Corporate social responsibility or CEO narcissism? CSR motivations and organizational performance
    Petrenko, O.V.; Aime, F.; Ridge, J.; Hill, A.
  • Green governance: boards of directors' composition and environmental corporate social responsibility
    Post, C.; Rahman, N.; Rubow, E.
  • Leading for sustainability: implementing the tasks of leadership
    Quinn, L.; Dalton, M.
  • The roles of supervisory support behaviors and environmental policy in employee ‘Ecoinitiatives’ at leading-edge European companies
    Ramus, C.A.; Steger, U.
  • Greening organizations through leaders' influence on employees' pro‐environmental behaviors
    Robertson, J.L.; Barling, J.
  • Addressing the SDGs in sustainability reports: the relationship with institutional factors
    Rosati, F.; Faria, L.G.
  • Beyond corporate governance reporting: the usefulness of information on board member profiles
    Rossignoli, F.; Lionzo, A.; Buchetti, B.
  • Institutional environment, managerial attitudes and environmental sustainability orientation of small firms
    Roxas, B.; Coetzer, A.
  • A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design
    Salancik, G.R.; Pfeffer, J.
  • The relationship between corporate governance and corporate social behavior: a structural equation model analysis
    Sánchez, J.L.F.; Sotorrío, L.L.; Díez, E.B.
  • Human capital and innovation: mixing apples and oranges on the board of high-tech firms
    Sarto, F.; Saggese, S.; Viganò, R.; Mauro, M.
  • New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior
    Stern, P.C.
  • Board diversity and corporate social performance: does the family firm status matter?
    Veltri, S.; Mazzotta, R.; Rubino, F.E.
  • Stakeholder engagement: an evaluation of European banks
    Venturelli, A.; Cosma, S.; Leopizzi, R.
  • The revision of nonfinancial reporting directive: a critical lens on comparability principle
    Venturelli, A.; Pizzi, S.; Caputo, F.; Principale, S.
  • Do female board directors promote corporate social responsibility? An empirical study based on the critical mass theory
    Yang, W.; Yang, J.; Gao, Z.
  • Corporate social responsibility and gender diversity: insights from Asia Pacific
    Yasser, Q.R.; Al Mamun, A.; Ahmed, I.
  • Board demographic diversity, independence, and corporate social performance
    Zhang, L.
  • Enhancing corporate sustainable development: stakeholder pressures, organizational learning, and green innovation
    Zhang, F.; Zhu, L.
  • Board composition and corporate social responsibility: an empirical investigation in the post Sarbanes-Oxley era
    Zhang, J.Q.; Zhu, H.; Ding, H.