Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The accession of Latin American countries to the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: lessons from Brazil and Chile

The accession of Latin American countries to the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: lessons... The purpose of this paper is to discuss the motivations behind the accession of Latin American countries to the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) with a focus on the cases of Brazil and Chile.Design/methodology/approachThe author collected data using a case study methodology, primarily through semi-structured interviews with decision-makers and through official government documentation.FindingsThe findings identified that, overall, the Brazilian politicians who made the decision to join the bank had an unclear perception of its economic benefit and believed that the clearest benefit from accession is political (to support China's initiative). After years of domestic political turmoil and economic crisis, Brazil experienced delayed incorporation into the bank, slow ratification processes in the domestic arena and a reduction in its capital commitment. Chilean decision-makers, on the other hand, seemed to have a clearer idea of the benefits from accessing the bank, which explains that their ratification process has been faster and smoother. Yet, a surprising socio-political crisis delayed incorporation into the bank. Both countries have delayed their accession to the bank due to domestic crises.Practical implicationsThree policy implications can be drawn from this study. First, the entry of Latin American countries into the bank reflects the persuasiveness of Chinese diplomacy in this region. Second, the author finds that interviewees are not always able to differentiate the AIIB from the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and hold the misguided idea that the AIIB is subordinated to the BRI rather than complementary to it. This might set overly high expectations of the benefits of entering the AIIB. Third, the author foresees that the largest potential of the AIIB in Latin America lies in the possibility of participating in co-financed projects, in particular with the Inter-American Development Bank and the Development Bank of Latin America.Originality/valueResearch on the AIIB has boomed in recent years, yet there are few in-depth studies about Latin American prospective members. The value of this study lies in offering in-depth data for two of the eight prospective members from this region. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Asian Education and Development Studies Emerald Publishing

The accession of Latin American countries to the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: lessons from Brazil and Chile

Urdinez, Francisco
Asian Education and Development Studies , Volume 10 (3): 12 – Jun 18, 2021
Download PDF
12 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/the-accession-of-latin-american-countries-to-the-asian-infrastructure-3HRgqdzoBt
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
2046-3162
DOI
10.1108/aeds-08-2019-0128
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to discuss the motivations behind the accession of Latin American countries to the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) with a focus on the cases of Brazil and Chile.Design/methodology/approachThe author collected data using a case study methodology, primarily through semi-structured interviews with decision-makers and through official government documentation.FindingsThe findings identified that, overall, the Brazilian politicians who made the decision to join the bank had an unclear perception of its economic benefit and believed that the clearest benefit from accession is political (to support China's initiative). After years of domestic political turmoil and economic crisis, Brazil experienced delayed incorporation into the bank, slow ratification processes in the domestic arena and a reduction in its capital commitment. Chilean decision-makers, on the other hand, seemed to have a clearer idea of the benefits from accessing the bank, which explains that their ratification process has been faster and smoother. Yet, a surprising socio-political crisis delayed incorporation into the bank. Both countries have delayed their accession to the bank due to domestic crises.Practical implicationsThree policy implications can be drawn from this study. First, the entry of Latin American countries into the bank reflects the persuasiveness of Chinese diplomacy in this region. Second, the author finds that interviewees are not always able to differentiate the AIIB from the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and hold the misguided idea that the AIIB is subordinated to the BRI rather than complementary to it. This might set overly high expectations of the benefits of entering the AIIB. Third, the author foresees that the largest potential of the AIIB in Latin America lies in the possibility of participating in co-financed projects, in particular with the Inter-American Development Bank and the Development Bank of Latin America.Originality/valueResearch on the AIIB has boomed in recent years, yet there are few in-depth studies about Latin American prospective members. The value of this study lies in offering in-depth data for two of the eight prospective members from this region.

Journal

Asian Education and Development Studies – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jun 18, 2021

Keywords: Latin America; Financing; Belt and road initiative; AIIB; Multilateral development banks

References

  • Empty promises and nonincorporation in Mercosur
    Arnold, C.
  • El Banco Asiático de Inversión en Infraestructura apuntando al camino del medio: uniéndose a las filas de los Bancos Multilaterales de Desarrollo, pero con características chinas
    Borquéz, A.
  • The one belt one road and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: beijing's new strategy of geoeconomics and geopolitics
    Cai, K.G.
  • Strategic reassurance in institutional contests: explaining China's creation of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank
    Chen, Z.; Liu, Y.
  • China as creditor: a rising financial power?
    Chin, G.; Helleiner, E.
  • Perspectives on the emerging role of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank
    De Jonge, A.
  • Bad debts: assessing China's financial influence in great power politics
    Drezner, D.W.
  • Does one belt one road initiative promote Chinese overseas direct investment?
    Du, J.; Zhang, Y.
  • Sobreviviendo a reformas, impopularidad y casos de corrupción: el presidencialismo de coalición del Brasil de Temer %J Revista de ciencia política (Santiago)
    Feliú, P.
  • Chinese multilateralism in the AIIB
    Gu, B.
  • China challenges global governance? Chinese international development finance and the AIIB
    Hameiri, S.; Jones, L.
  • Leadership transition and global governance: role conception, institutional balancing, and the AIIB
    He, K.; Feng, H.
  • Of words and deeds: Latin American declaratory regionalism, 1994–2014
    Jenne, N.; Schenoni, L.L.; Urdinez, F.
  • Contesting contested multilateralism: why the west joined the rest in founding the Asian infrastructure investment bank
    Knoerich, J.; Urdinez, F.
  • AIIB set to extend reach to Latin America and Africa
    Kynge, J.
  • Latin America and the AIIB: interests and viewpoints
    Mendez, A.
  • Memoria Anual
    Puerto San Antonio, P.
  • China as an institution-builder: the case of the AIIB
    Ren, X.
  • Measuring international engagement: systemic and domestic factors in Brazilian foreign policy from 1998 to 2014
    Rodrigues, P.; Urdinez, F.; de Oliveira, A.
  • The new architects: Brazil, China, and innovation in multilateral development lending
    Serrano Oswald, O.R.
  • Domestic actors and agendas in Chinese aid policy
    Varrall, M.
  • The evolution of China's Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: from a revisionist to status-seeking agenda
    Wilson, J.D.