Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/inderscience-publishers/reproducibility-of-a-reaming-test-o0QR0Lum0g
References (23)
-
L. Dechiffre, Z. Zeng (2001)
An investigation of reaming test parameters used for cutting fluid evaluationsLubrication Engineering, 57
-
(2005)
Metal Cutting Principles , 2nd ed. -
P. Müller, G. Genta, G. Barbato, L. Chiffre, R. Levi (2012)
Reaming process improvement and control: An application of statistical engineeringCirp Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 5
-
M. Kaladhar, K. Subbaiah, C. Rao (2012)
Machining of austenitic stainless steels – a reviewInternational Journal of Machining and Machinability of Materials, 12
-
L. Chiffre, W. Belluco (2000)
Comparison of Methods for Cutting Fluid Performance TestingCIRP Annals, 49
-
W. Belluco (2001)
Performance Testing of Cutting Fluids -
Geometrical product specifications (GPS). Surface texture: Profile -
E. Iso (1993)
Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement -
Y. Zedan, V. Songmene, J. Kouam, J. Masounave (2013)
Effects of lubrication modes on part quality during drilling 6061-T6 aluminium alloyInternational Journal of Machining and Machinability of Materials, 13
-
M. Huerta, M. Carrilero, M. Álvarez, J. Salguero, M. Marcos, P. Arroyo (2010)
Surface finish based analysis of turned titanium alloys workpiecesInternational Journal of Mechatronics and Manufacturing Systems, 3
-
L. Chiffre, S. Lassen, K. Pedersen, S. Skade (1994)
A reaming test for cutting fluid evaluationJournal of Synthetic Lubrication, 11
-
D. Haan, S. Batzer, W. Olson, J. Sutherland (1997)
An experimental study of cutting fluid effects in drillingJournal of Materials Processing Technology, 71
-
M. Xavior, M. Adithan (2010)
Evaluating the performance of cutting fluids in machining of AISI 304 austenitic stainless steelInternational Journal of Machining and Machinability of Materials, 7
-
D. Axinte, M. Axinte, J. Tannock (2003)
A multicriteria model for cutting fluid evaluationProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 217
-
L. Chiffre, G. Tosello, M. Píška, P. Müller (2008)
Investigation on capability of the reaming process using minimal quantity lubricationCirp Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 2
-
P. Müller, L. Chiffre (2011)
Reproducibility of surface roughness in reaming -
L. Chiffre (1977)
Mechanics of metal cutting and cutting fluid actionInternational Journal of Machine Tool Design and Research, 17
-
G. Lorenz (1985)
Reliable Cutting Fluid RatingCIRP Annals, 34
-
L. Chiffre (1988)
Function of cutting fluids in machiningLubrication Engineering, 44
-
(2011)
ISO 14253-2:2011 – Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) – Inspection by Measurement of Workpieces and Measuring Equipment – Part 2: Guidance for the Estimation of Uncertainty in GPS Measurement -
(1975)
Instruments for the Measurement of Surface Roughness by the Profile Method -Contact (stylus) Instruments of consecutive Profile Transformation -Contact Profile Meters -
(1998)
ISO 3274:1998: Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) – Surface Texture: Profile Method – Nominal Characteristics of Contact (Stylus) Instruments , ISO, Geneva -
Sachindra Doshi, P. Jain, N. Mehta (2013)
Prospective applications of nano fluid during machining processInternational Journal of Machining and Machinability of Materials, 14
- Publisher
- Inderscience Publishers
- Copyright
- Copyright © Inderscience Enterprises Ltd. All rights reserved
- ISSN
- 1750-0591
- eISSN
- 1750-0605
- DOI
- 10.1504/IJMR.2014.062441
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
The reproducibility of a reaming test was analysed to document its applicability as a performance test for cutting fluids. Reaming tests were carried out on a drilling machine using HSS reamers. Workpiece material was an austenitic stainless steel, machined using 4.75 m∙min –1 cutting speed and 0.3 mm∙rev –1 feed. A mineral straight oil and a water-based lubricant at two different oil concentrations were compared with respect to hole quality, evaluated in terms of surface finish (conventional arithmetic mean roughness Ra and roughness profiles), and hole geometry (hole diameter and roundness). Process reproducibility was assessed as the ability of different operators to ensure a consistent rating of individual lubricants. Absolute average values as well as experimental standard deviations of the evaluation parameters were calculated, and uncertainty budgeting was performed. Results document a built-up edge occurrence hindering a robust evaluation of cutting fluid performance, if the data evaluation is based on surface finish only. Measurements of hole geometry provide documentation to recognise systematic error distorting the performance test.
Journal
International Journal of Manufacturing Research – Inderscience Publishers
Published: Jan 1, 2014