Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Wakui, HI S.TAKEUC, J. Isioka, K. Iwabuchi, S. Morimoto (2000)
Metallic stents for malignant and benign ureteric obstructionBJU International, 85
Ravi Kulkarni, Elizabeth Bellamy (2001)
Nickel-titanium shape memory alloy Memokath 051 ureteral stent for managing long-term ureteral obstruction: 4-year experience.The Journal of urology, 166 5
H. Joshi, A. Stainthorpe, R. MacDonagh, F. Keeley, A. Timoney, M. Barry (2003)
Indwelling ureteral stents: evaluation of symptoms, quality of life and utility.The Journal of urology, 169 3
Pankaj Maheshwari, M. Andankar, Rakesh Khera, R. Stone (2000)
The indwelling ureteric stent: a ’friendly’ procedure with unfriendly high morbidityBJU International, 86
E. Liatsikos, G. Kagadis, G. Barbalias, D. Siablis (2005)
Ureteral metal stents: a tale or a tool?Journal of endourology, 19 8
Kulkarni, Bellamy (1999)
A new thermo‐expandable shape‐memory nickel‐titanium alloy stent for the management of ureteric stricturesBJU International, 83
W. Pauer, H. Lugmayr (1996)
[Self-expanding permanent endoluminal stents in the ureter. 5 years results and critical evaluation].Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 35 6
G. Daskalopoulos, A. Hatzidakis, T. Triantafyllou, D. Delakas, P. Anezinis, M. Metaxari, A. Cranidis (2001)
Intraureteral metallic endoprosthesis in the treatment of ureteral strictures.European journal of radiology, 39 3
J. Candela, G. Bellman (1997)
Ureteral stents: impact of diameter and composition on patient symptoms.Journal of endourology, 11 1
Z. Pidsudko (2004)
Distribution and chemical coding of neurons in intramural ganglia of the porcine urinary bladder trigone.Folia histochemica et cytobiologica, 42 1
N. Lawrentschuk, J. Russell (2004)
Ureteric stenting 25 years on: routine or risky?ANZ Journal of Surgery, 74
N. Shore, K. Bregg, R. Sosa (1987)
Indwelling ureteral stents.Seminars in urology, 5 3
P. Klarskov, J. Nordling, J. Nielsen (2005)
Experience with Memokath 051 ureteral stentScandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, 39
E. Erturk, A. Sessions, J. Joseph (2003)
Impact of ureteral stent diameter on symptoms and tolerability.Journal of endourology, 17 2
S. Chung, R. Stein, D. Landsittel, B. Davies, D. Cuellar, R. Hrebinko, T. Tarin, T. Averch (2004)
15-year experience with the management of extrinsic ureteral obstruction with indwelling ureteral stents.The Journal of urology, 172 2
D. Leibovici, A. Cooper, A. Lindner, Regina Ostrowsky, J. Kleinmann, S. Velikanov, H. Cipele, Eliahu Goren, Y. Siegel (2005)
Ureteral stents: morbidity and impact on quality of life.The Israel Medical Association journal : IMAJ, 7 8
H. Joshi, A. Okeke, N. Newns, F. Keeley, A. Timoney (2002)
Characterization of urinary symptoms in patients with ureteral stents.Urology, 59 4
Dimitrios Staios, Iqbal Shergill, Ali Thwaini, Islam Junaid, N. Buchholz (2007)
The Memokath™ stentExpert Review of Medical Devices, 4
G. Barbalias, D. Siablis, E. Liatsikos, Dimitrios Karnabatidis, Spiridon Yarmenitis, Konstantinos Bouropoulos, John Dimopoulos (1997)
Metal stents: a new treatment of malignant ureteral obstruction.The Journal of urology, 158 1
A. Ganatra, K. Loughlin (2005)
The management of malignant ureteral obstruction treated with ureteral stents.The Journal of urology, 174 6
W. Pauer, G. Eckerstorfer (1999)
Use of self-expanding permanent endoluminal stents for benign ureteral strictures: mid-term results.The Journal of urology, 162 2
B. Saltzman (1989)
Ureteral Stents: Indications, Variation and ComplicationsThe Journal of Urology, 141
S. Agrawal, Christian Brown, E. Bellamy, R. Kulkarni (2009)
The thermo‐expandable metallic ureteric stent: an 11‐year follow‐upBJU International, 103
Background: We use the Memokath 051TM, a segmental nickel-titanium alloy ureteric stent in patients with strictures and aim to characterize symptoms following stent insertion and evaluate its tolerability using a validated questionnaire. Methods: We mailed the validated ureteral stent symptom questionnaire to all patients who had undergone insertion of a ureteric Memokath 051TM stent over a one-year period. Responses were analyzed to evaluate the frequency and severity of symptoms in all 6 domains tested by the questionnaire. Results: Eighteen out of 23 patients completed the ureteral stent symptom questionnaire. In patients with unilateral stents; dysuria, severe frequency, nocturia, severe urgency and urge incontinence were seen in 28.6, 43, 72, 43 and 43% respectively. Severe frequency, urgency and dysuria in patients with bilateral stents were reported by 66, 25, and 50% respectively. Frank hematuria was reported by 29% of patients with unilateral stents. Lethargy was experienced by 23 and 25% of patients with unilateral and bilateral stents respectively with 75% of patients enjoying their social life. Conclusion: Although the study population is small, our results indicate that Memokath 051TM stents are well tolerated by patients in terms of quality of life. This study provides important information about stent related symptoms in patients undergoing this procedure.
Current Urology – Karger
Published: Jan 1, 2011
Keywords: Characterisation; Memokath; Stent symptoms; Metallic stents; Ureter
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.