Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Ruthenium Complexes, an Emerging Class of Leishmanicidal Drug Candidates

Ruthenium Complexes, an Emerging Class of Leishmanicidal Drug Candidates Review Ruthenium Complexes, an Emerging Class of Leishmanicidal Drug Candidates Susana Santos Braga LAQV/REQUIMTE, Department of Chemistry, Campus of Santiago, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal; sbraga@ua.pt Abstract: This review addresses the search for activity enhancement of leishmanicidal organic com- pounds through their coordination chemistry with ruthenium. In an introduction to leishmaniasis, its clinical manifestations, geographical distribution, available forms of treatment, and challenges to disease management are presented. Ruthenium complexes, owing to their physico-chemical and biological properties, are introduced as a suitable molecular library from which to find alternatives to current medicines. The main sections of the review describe complexes reported in the literature, organised into two main groups: organometallics and inorganic complexes. The activity of the ru- thenium complexes is presented compared with that of the ligands for a critical assessment of their utility in future clinical application. Keywords: ruthenium; p-cymene; polypyridyl; phenylphosphines; azole drugs; natural products; anti-inflammatory agents 1. Introduction 1.1. Leishmaniasis, a Growing Concern Citation: Braga, S.S. Ruthenium Human leishmaniasis is an infectious disease caused by over 20 different species of Complexes, an Emerging Class of the Leishmania genus. Reported in 98 countries and affecting, in 2017, a number of people Leishmanicidal Drug Candidates. estimated between 50,000 and 90,000, leishmaniasis is considered as a major public health 2022, 1, 9. https://doi.org/ issue [1,2]. Its transmission to humans originates from dogs or small mammal reservoirs, 10.3390/applbiosci1020009 such as rats, mice, and other rodents. Human to human transmission is also known. The parasite is inoculated into the patient during the hematophagy of female sandflies of the Academic Editor: Alfonso Zambon Phlebotomus (Old World) and Lutzomyia (New World) genera [3]. Since these insects grow Received: 13 April 2022 preferentially in warm climates, human leishmaniasis has a higher incidence in tropical Accepted: 4 July 2022 and warm climates [4]. Published: 5 July 2022 Typically called a tropical disease, leishmaniasis is now growing beyond the tropics, as climate changes are expanding the habitat of its vectors northwards to the USA and Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neu- Europe [5]. Two studies published in the early 2010s decade used mathematical models tral with regard to jurisdictional to postulate that the global warming effect would expand the habitat of sand flies north- claims in published maps and institu- wards to reach Canada [6], Germany, and Poland [7] in thirty to forty years. The expan- tional affiliations. sion, however, is already happening. A study conducted in Germany in 2020 revealed the presence of sand flies in areas where they had not been detected before, with fifteen new sites in Southwest Germany having been identified as positive. Once more, global warm- Copyright: © 2022 by the author. Li- ing was proposed as a leading cause for expanding the distribution area of sand flies, with censee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. consequent increase in the risk for sand fly-borne infections in Southwest Germany [8]. This article is an open access article Other factors contributing to expansion of the disease are globalisation and geopoli- distributed under the terms and con- tics. In the last two decades, the number of global travellers, by airplane travel alone, has ditions of the Creative Commons At- more than doubled, and travelling strongly contributes to the spread of infectious diseases tribution (CC BY) license (https://cre- (as recently demonstrated by the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic). Geopolitical factors re- ativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). fer to the various armed conflicts in sensitive areas that have caused numbers to almost Appl. Biosci. 2022, 1, 129–142. https://doi.org/10.3390/applbiosci1020009 www.mdpi.com/journal/applbiosci Appl. Biosci. 2022, 1, 9 130 double in countries like Syria, Libya, and Yemen [9]. In association with armed conflicts, the low socio-economic conditions in African and Middle Eastern countries that have caused a large number of refugees and unprecedented migration waves. The agglomera- tion of these people in refugee camps, along with the poor nutritional and sanitary re- sources therein, resulted in several leishmaniasis outbreaks [10]. Adding to these con- cerns, challenges to leishmaniasis management include the growing number of drug-re- sistant strains and the lack of drugs with a good tolerability profile, adequate storage time and, more importantly, the possibility of oral administration, which allows for ambula- tory treatment in areas with limited hospital capacity (or where hospitals are completely absent). 1.2. Clinical Forms and Treatment Human leishmaniasis has various clinical forms: cutaneous (CL), a polymorphic skin disease with a single or multiple ulcerating lesions; mucocutaneous (MCL), producing destructive lesions in the skin, mucosa, and cartilage, typically around the nose and mouth and eventually leading to necrosis of the nose; and visceral (VL), characterised by an evolution towards chronic disease with systemic spreading and infection of visceral organs that appear dark and necrotised, resulting, when untreated, in a 90% fatality rate, that is, roughly 70,000 deaths every year [4]. The available medication is limited to aggres- sive drugs as Sb(V) salts (e.g., meglumine antimoniate), amphotericin B (AmB), miltefo- sine, pentamidine and some azole compounds for CL (e.g., ketoconazole), as described in the following paragraphs. These drugs frequently cause severe adverse effects, sometimes even death, and their efficacy is reduced by frequent resistance development [11,12]. Pentavalent antimony salts, sodium stibogluconate and meglumine antimoniate, are first-line medicines for the treatment of leishmaniasis. Developed in the 1920s, these salts remain in use mainly due to their broad span of action, affordability, and lack of alterna- tive drugs with equivalent activity and potency. They inhibit ADP phosphorylation, low- ering intracellular ATP levels and thus limiting the ability of the parasite to produce the energy needed for its survival. Pentavalent antimony salts also bind to the ribose moiety of DNA to form stable complexes with adenine nucleosides that inhibit parasitic purine transporter proteins [13]. Nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, abdominal cramps, weakness, hepatotoxicity, and cardiotoxicity are the main adverse effects of these drugs [14]. Amphotericin B acts by binding to sterols in the cell membrane of the parasite’s cells (note that the parasite’s membrane contains higher amounts of ergosterol, unlike the host cell membrane, which has cholesterol), resulting in the formation of pores that leak water, potassium, and small molecules. Amphotericyn B is also an ergosterol disruptor, i.e., it is able to block the sterol biosynthesis pathway and to cause ergosterol depletion in parasitic cells. Low ergosterol production results in further membrane disfunction, reducing the parasite’s viability [12]. The most common adverse effects are nephrotoxicity, hypocalce- mia, anemia, fever, and malaise; anaphylasis may also occur, albeit it is less frequent [15]. Miltefosine is the only leishmanicidal drug approved for oral intake. It is a phospho- lipid analogue that accumulates inside cells by interacting first with the outer membrane, and then folding inwards; once in the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane, miltefosine can detach and balance with the membranes of the organelles [16]. The biological activity of miltefosine involves interaction with membrane lipids and the inhibition of cytochrome c oxidase, leading to apoptosis [17]. Limitations to its use include teratogenicity, gastroin- testinal disturbances such as nausea, vomiting, or diarrhoea, and a moderate risk (2–3%) of severe kidney and liver toxicity. Pentamidine isothionate is an orphan drug approved in the USA for the treatment of Pneumocistus carinii pneumonia that is also active against trypanosomatids, being recom- mended by the World Health Organization (WHO) for the treatment of leishmaniasis and being part of this organisation’s list of essential drugs [18]. While its mode of action is not fully known, some targets of action are already identified: pentamidine has been shown to hamper nucleobase synthesis [19] and to inhibit the transmembranar protein Appl. Biosci. 2022, 1, 9 131 aguaglyceroporin-2, interfering with the parasite’s osmoregulation [20]. It is used as a first-line treatment for Leishmania aethiopica infections and as a second-line medicine in the treatment of VL and CL with other sensitive species. It has been reported to cause irre- versible toxicity in some patients, which poses limitations to its use. Azole drugs approved for the treatment of CL comprise ketoconazole, an imidazol derivative, and two trizoles, itraconazol and fluconazole. Their common mechanism of action is the inhibition of the enzyme lanosterol 14-α-demetylase, which is involved in the biosynthesis of ergosterol, the main cell membrane sterol in both yeasts and leishmania parasites. They are usually given per orum, but for some of these drugs there are also in- jectable forms. Itraconazole has no major adverse effects [21], posing as a good alternative for patients who do not respond to first-line drugs [22]. Ketoconazole and fluconazole can cause a few reversible adverse effects, such as elevated liver enzymes, but they offer the advantage of a CL healing rate comparable to that of first-line drugs [23]. Paromomycin, a repurposed aminoglycoside antibiotic, is employed in the treatment of VL by intravenous administration [24] being also used for treating CL, typically in the form of an ointment and in association with other anti-infectious drugs [2]. The discovery of a novel universal therapy that causes less adverse effects and is less prone to resistance is much needed. It is, however, a very challenging matter due to the complex pathophysiology of the parasite and of the varied strategies it possesses for adapting to its host. Parasites infect immunocompetent cells, such as macrophages, neu- trophils, and monocytes, and hamper their normal behaviour in order to escape the body’s defences. In turn, exaggerated inflammatory responses are often observed in MCL and some disseminated forms of CL. In these forms, the parasites migrate to secondary sites and there is the formation of metastatic lesions that have very low parasite numbers but suffer, in contrast, from a concomitant hyper-inflammatory state. This is what ultimately causes the destruction of the tissues and the typical lesions observed in MCL [25]. This way, novel therapeutic agents should ideally combine leishmanicidal and anti-inflamma- tory properties, helping to mitigate infection as well as the exacerbated immune response of the host. Various strategies have been adopted in the search for new lead compounds, from natural product screening to the development of new libraries of compounds based on known molecular targets of the parasite. Another approach is to use combined therapy, associating immunotherapeutics with classic drugs to improve patient outcomes [26,27]. A few clinical trials, conducted in the last three decades, have shown positive results, with combined immunotherapy reducing the healing time for patients, but more studies are needed before these combinations re- ceive market approval [27]. 1.3. Why Ruthenium-Based Leishmanicidal Drugs? Metals contribute strongly towards the activity of a compound. In biocidal activity, the role of the metal is particularly important, its relevance demonstrated by the use of metal compounds in disinfection since the dawn of Medicine. In Leishmania parasites, iron is known to be vital for the metabolism and the reproductive cycle, because infected pa- tients often have iron deficiency or even anaemia [28]. The parasite’s dependency on iron led it to develop privileged uptake pathways to satisfy the demand for this metal, with a heme uptake path having already been observed in L. infantum [29]. Ruthenium, a transi- tion metal belonging to group 8 of the periodic table, same as iron, has the ability to inter- fere with some of the biological processes developed for handling iron in vivo, including transport, cell uptake, and metabolism. Ruthenium complexes are an emerging class of metallopharmaceuticals for the treatment of parasitic infections [30,31]. Indeed, they gather a quite unique set of properties that makes them the best drug candidates for the treatment of leishmaniasis (Figure 1): 1. The redox properties of the Ru centre [32] are postulated to interfere with the para- site’s defence mechanisms against oxidation; Appl. Biosci. 2022, 1, 9 132 2. Ru is less toxic than Sb(V); 3. Ruthenium complexes can bind to transferrin [33,34] and be transported through the organism in this way; 4. In human cells, some ruthenium complexes are taken up and metabolised through iron-related pathways [34]; thus, they are likely to enter parasitic cells by the afore- mentioned heme pathway. Figure 1. Overview of the advantages of ruthenium complexes as anti-leishmania medicines. Novel ruthenium complexes developed as drug candidates for parasitic infections often aim at achieving the paradigm of ‘metal-to-ligand synergy’ [35]: a ligand is carefully selected according to its intrinsic anti-parasitic activity, and binding of the active ligand to ruthenium is expected to generate a complex with increased activity. This principle has been employed to design both organometallic and inorganic ruthenium complexes. These two main classes of leishmanicidal ruthenium complexes are described in detail in the two following sections. 2. Organometallic Ruthenium Complexes Leishmanicidal organometallic ruthenium complexes typically have a geometry re- sembling a piano stool, in which the stool seat is the organometallic fragment, usually benzene or p-cymene, and the legs are the active ligand as well as spectator ligands such as chloride, ethylenediamine (en), acetylacetonate (acac), 2,2′-bipyridine (bpy); the organ- ometallic part conveys some degree of lipophilicity to these molecules, which allows them to cross cell membranes. Lipophilicity may be further increased by adding apolar ligands such as bpy or phenylphosphines. 2.1. Ruthenium Azole Complexes The azole drugs that have a well-known leishmanicidal activity can be used as lig- ands for organometallic ruthenium complexes, in what comprises one of the most suc- cessful approaches to achieve metal-to-ligand synergy. The effect, is not, however, uni- versal, and the medicinal effect of each drug is better potentiated by a particular scaffold of the ruthenium complex, as well as the overall charge of the complex formed, as illus- trated by the literature reports described below. II In a family of four p-cymene complexes with ketoconazole (KTZ), [Ru (p-cy- II 2+ II 2+ mene)(KTZ)Cl2] (1), [Ru (p-cymene)(en)(KTZ)] (2), [Ru (p-cymene)(bpy)(KTZ)] (3), Appl. Biosci. 2022, 1, 9 133 II + and [Ru (p-cymene)(acac)(KTZ)] (4), the first three complexes showed increased anti-pro- mastigote activity regarding pure ketoconazole, at rates of >240%, 160%, and 120%, re- spectively; complex 4, having one acac ligand, was less active (only 20% of the potency of KTZ) [35]. The complexes were quite safe, with 2 and 3 having no cytotoxicity against human fibroblast cells (Hs27 cell line) at 120 M, the highest tested concentration, and 1 causing 47% inhibition at the same concentration. Given that the LD50 values against pro- mastigotes of complexes 1–3 are quite low (0.8 ± 1.32, 1.16 ± 0.52, and 1.53 ± 0.84 M, re- spectively), the corresponding selectivity indexes are quite high, within 78–150 folds. Complexes 1–3 were also tested against intracellular parasites in macrophage cells, with some inhibitory activity observed at concentrations around 0.25–1.0 M; however, IC50 values were not determined as a dose-dependent action could not be observed. In a follow-up study, complexes 1 and 3 were evaluated in vivo against L. major meta- cyclic promastigotes that were injected into the paw of BALB/c mice and allowed to incu- bate for two weeks [36]. The mice were then treated for another two weeks with an intra- peritoneal injection of the test compounds at a daily dose of 4 mg/kg. Compared to nega- tive control, the skin lesion reducing action was 26% for complex 1 and 68% for complex 3 (compared to negative control). Moreover, 3 was slightly more effective than pure clot- rimazole in reducing CL skin lesions. The authors concluded that 3 has moderate in vivo activity against L. major mice infection, with a parasite load reduction of 50% or more and no significant toxicity. A similar family of organometallic ruthenium azole complexes was reported, differ- ing only by having clotrimazole (CTZ) as the active ligand [37]. Complexes, depicted in II II 2+ II Figure 2, are [Ru (p-cymene)(CTZ)Cl2] (5), [Ru (p-cymene)(bpy)(CTZ)] (6), [Ru (p-cy- 2+ II + mene)(en)(CTZ)] (7), and [Ru (p-cymene)(acac)(CTZ)] (8), and they were tested against Leishmania major promastigotes. Similarly to the results obtained with the first family, the neutral complex, [RuII(p-cymene)(CTZ)Cl2] (5), was the most active, with an IC50 of 15 ± 8 nM, already within the nanomolar range; it was almost one hundred times more potent than pure clotrimazole (IC50 = 1.6 ± 0.5 M). The second most active complex was the mon- II + ocationic one, [Ru (p-cymene)(acac)(CTZ)] (8), with an IC50 of 0.45 ± 0.15 M. The dica- tionic complexes 6 and 7 have IC50 values of 1.4 ± 0.6 and 1.32 ± 0.69 M, respectively, being thus fairly within the same potency as pure clotrimazole. Tests against intra-macro- phage amastigotes, conducted with complexes 5 and 8, showed the high potency of com- plex 5, with an IC70 value of 29 nM, while complex 8 was able to inhibit 40% of the intra- cellular parasites at the highest concentration tested, 1 μM; note that at the same concen- tration, pure clotrimazole displayed no significant activity. In another study, the two abovementioned families of ruthenium p-cymene com- plexes with KTZ and CTZ were expanded to include complexes bearing triphenil- phosphine (PPh3) as ligands, [Ru(p-cymene)(KTZ)(PPh3)Cl] (9) and [Ru(p-cy- mene)(CTZ)(PPh3)Cl] (10) [38]. The complexes exhibited ligand-to-metal synergy when tested against Leishmania amazonensis promastigotes: IC50 values at 24h of incubation were 0.08 ± 2.62 μM for complex 9 and 0.24 ± 1.65 μM for complex 10 while the pure drugs ketoconazole and clotrimazole had IC50 > 3.0 μM and 0.82 ± 1.12 μM, respectively (at the same incubation time). The complexes were also very potent against intramacrophage amastigotes, with IC50 values in the nanomolar range: 15.53 ± 1.30 nM for complex 9 and 25.80 ± 1.09 nM for complex 10. Moreover, they presented a good safety profile on healthy macrophages, with no cytotoxicity observed at 24 h of incubation and only some growth inhibition occurring with complex 10 after 48 h of incubation at the highest tested concen- tration, 1 M. Appl. Biosci. 2022, 1, 9 134 Figure 2. Structural representation of ruthenium p-cymene complexes with azole ligands (1-8) hav- ing ‘piano-stool’ geometry. 2.2. Ruthenium Complexes with Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Agents The exacerbated inflammation response of the patient during infection with leish- maniasis often is the cause of the disfiguring lesions observed in MCL [25], as described previously in Section 1.2. It may thus be useful to convey anti-inflammatory drugs to the patient during the treatment, in order to mitigate the inflammatory response and prevent widespread tissue damage. A family of ruthenium p-cymene complexes with NSAIDs (non-steroid anti-inflam- II + matory drugs having the general formulae [Ru (p-cymene)(NSAID)Cl] , where NSAID = naproxen (11), diclofenac (12) and ibuprofen (13), was recently reported (Figure 3) [39]. Activity screening on promastigote forms of Leishmania infantum (MCER/BR/79/M6445 strain) and L. amazonensis (IFLA/BR/67/PH8 strain) showed that binding naproxen and diclofenac to the ruthenium scaffold to form complexes 11 and 12 was able to imbue them with leishmanicidal action, even though these drugs do not have such effect in their pure form. Complex 11 displayed IC50 values of 42.3 ± 16.5 M against L. infantum and 23.6 ± 1.0 M against L. amazonensis, while for complex 12 values were 8.6 ± 0.4 M and 7.4 ± 2.7 M, respectively; the pure drugs and complex 13 did not display any activity at the high- est concentration tested (200 M). The partition coefficient was calculated for the com- plexes, showing values of 7.1, 7.3, and 7.7 (for 11, 12, and 13, respectively). This indicates an increase in lipophilicity in regard to the pure drugs, naproxen (log P = 3.2), diclofenac (log P = 4.5), and ibuprofen (log P = 4.0). Appl. Biosci. 2022, 1, 9 135 Figure 3. Structural representation of ruthenium p-cymene complexes with NSAIDs (11–13). 3. Inorganic Ruthenium Complexes Inorganic ruthenium complexes feature an overall broader structural diversity than their organometallic counterparts. Besides the various active ligands, the coordination sphere in most complexes is comprised of kinetically inert ligands, usually of the polypyridyl or of the phenylphosphine kind. A few complexes, present, in alternative, labile ligands (e.g., Cl or DMSO), which render them more reactive but also less stable. 3.1. Ruthenium Complexes with Plant Alkaloids Plant alkaloids are a vast class of metabolites that typically serve as defence mecha- nisms against sources of biotic stress, such as environmental factors, parasites, or even to protect against extensive culling by herbivores. Alkaloids are, thus, a vast and excellent natural source of cytotoxic agents. Epiisopiloturine (EPI) is an imidazole alkaloid abun- dant in the leaves of Pilocarpus microphyllus, a plant popularly known as ‘jaborandi do maranhão’. Having already demonstrated pharmacologic activity as an anti-inflamma- tory [40,41], anti-nociceptive [41] and anti-schisostomiasis [42,43] agent, EPI is a very promising ligand to combine with a ruthenium scaffold to form a new molecule targeting CL and MCL, because besides inhibiting the parasite it may also contribute to reduce the inflammation typically associated with these lesions. The complex [Ru(bpy)2(EPI)NO2] (14), represented in Figure 4, was recently re- ported to inhibit L. major promastigotes (MHOM/IL/80/Friedlin strain) with an IC50 of 1.07 M [44]. Figure 4. Structural representation of the ruthenium epiisopiloturine complex (14). Molecular docking studies were conducted on complex 14 and target proteins of leishmania. Figure 5 shows the results for pteridine reductase (1e7w) and UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (5nzg), two of the proteins that formed hydrogen bonds with the com- plex. Appl. Biosci. 2022, 1, 9 136 Figure 5. Molecular docking between complex 14 and the target proteins 1e7w (a) and 5nzg (b); the bottom images show the three-dimensional details of the molecular interaction between complex 20 and the proteins 1e7w (c) and 5nzg (d). Reproduced from Ref. [44]. The strongest binding affinity was calculated to occur with protein 1e7w (inhibition constant of 14.8 nM), indicating that complex 14 may act though interruption of the growth of the parasite (for which 1e7w is essential). Complex 14 also showed excellent molecular affinity towards the target protein 5nzg of L. major (inhibition constant of 19.74 nM), through the formation of three hydrogen bonds. This protein is vital for the produc- tion of cell surface glycans, and is also involved in other processes that generate parasite pathogenicity [44]. 3.2. Ruthenium Lapachol Complexes Lapachol is a natural biocidal compound isolated from the bark of Handroanthus im- petiginosus, the lapacho tree. Traditionally used to treat a variety of bacterial and parasitic infections, lapachol also possesses leishmanicidal activity. Combining lapachol with an inorganic ruthenium scaffold is a paradigmatic example in metal-to-ligand synergy [45]. The complexes are depicted in Figure 6, and they can be described by the general formula II + [Ru (N,N’-lig)(lapachol)(PPh3)2] , where the N,N’-lig is 1,10-phenanthroline (phen), bpy or its derivatives, 4,4′-dimethylbypiridine and 4,4′-dimethoxybypiridine. Besides the ac- tive ligand, lapachol, the remaining ligands were chosen due to their high inertia towards ligand substitution, that is, because they are very little labile. Appl. Biosci. 2022, 1, 9 137 Figure 6. Structural representation of the ruthenium lapachol complexes (15–18). The molecular design strategy allowed obtaining complexes that surpass the potency of pure lapachol, both against the promastigote form and the macrophage-internalised amastigote form of L. amazonensis. However, the complexes were also toxic to non-infected mouse macrophages (J744 line), as indicated by the relatively low IC50 values obtained against these cells (Table 1) [45]. Table 1. Leishmanicidal activities at 72 h of incubation of lapachol and its corresponding ruthenium (II) complexes, 15–18 [45]. L. amazonensis IC50 (M) Healthy Mouse J774 Compound Macrophagues IC50 (M) Promastigotes Amastigotes 15 >10 0.07 ± 0.002 0.33 ± 0.08 16 0.18 ± 0.04 0.17 ± 0.01 1.0 ± 0.46 17 0.42 ± 0.03 >10 6.7 ± 1.3 18 1.60 ± 0.44 n.d. 1.9 ± 1.3 Lapachol 12.4 ± 0.69 >10 >10 Note: IC50 values are expressed as mean ± s.d.; n.d. indicates “not determined”. 3.3. Ruthenium Alkylbenzoate Complexes Alkylbenzoates are skin bleaching compounds acting by inhibition of tyrosinase [46], an enzyme that, besides being involved in the production of melanin in healthy humans, features strongly increased expression in leishmaniasis patients [47]. Complexes 19–21, having three distinct alkylbenzoate derivatives as active ligands and a bridged phenylphosphine inert ligand (Figure 7), had good leishmanicidal activity against promastigote forms of L. brasiliensis, L. amazonensis, and L. infantum, with IC50 val- ues in the low micromolar or, for a few of them, in the nanomolar range (Table 2) [48]. However, the complexes also exhibited some toxicity against non-infected mouse macro- phages (RAW 264 line), thus evidencing that complexation was unable to ensure selectiv- ity of action towards infected immune cells. Appl. Biosci. 2022, 1, 9 138 Figure 7. Structural representation of the ruthenium complexes with alkylbenzoate ligands (19– 21). Table 2. Leishmanicidal activities at 24 h of incubation with promastigote forms of Leishmania spp. of alkylbenzoate complexes 19–21, in comparison with that of their precursor, [Ru(Ph2P-CH2- PPh2)2Cl2] [47]. L. Amazonensis L. Braziliensis L. Infantum Healthy Mouse RAW 264 Compound IC50 (M) IC50 (M) IC50 (M) Macrophagues IC50 (M) 19 7.52 9.09 12.59 8.73 20 0.70 3.28 3.17 1.85 21 0.52 0.86 1.75 2.14 Ru precursor 15.48 3.93 19.46 62.24 In a follow-up study, complex 21 was investigated regarding the ability to generate reactive oxygen species (ROS), DNA fragmentation, and alterations to the cell cycle of L. amazonensis promastigotes [49]. The anti-proliferative effect of the complex was shown to involve cell cycle arrest in the sub-G1 phase and death by apoptosis associated with DNA fragmentation. Moreover, the complex was shown to increase the intracellular levels of ROS, with possible repercussions on the mitochondria, because depolarisation of the mi- tochondrial membrane was observed concomitantly. 3.4. Ruthenium Purine Complexes Ruthenium complexes with a purine derivative as the active ligand and the remain- ing coordination sphere composed of labile ligands, such as DMSO and chloride, pre- sented metal-to-ligand synergy, translated as a higher activity against promastigote forms of L. infantum, L. brasiliensis, and L. Donovani [50]. Importantly, the two most potent com- plexes, 22 and 23 (Figure 8) have different oxidation states: Ru(II) for complex 22 and Ru(III) for complex 23. Complex 23 hydrolysed rapidly in pure water. Regarding complex 22, rapid hydrolysis was achieved by adding sodium chloride to the aqueous medium. This implies that both complexes can be expected to have similar hydrolytical profiles in vivo. Complex 22 was the most potent, with IC50 values ranging from 9.2 ± 0.7 to 41.8 ± 3.3 M (according to the Leishmania species tested), while IC50 values for 23 laid between 46.1 ± 3.7 and 62.0 ± 4.9 M. A strong advantage of these complexes is their in vitro safe profile on macrophages and kidney epithelial cells (IC50 > 300 M). Nevertheless, the presence of labile ligands with foreseeably fast in vivo hydrolysis may cause undesired interactions with a vast number of host targets, leading to partial loss of activity and eventual un- wanted toxic effects. Future studies should include the evaluation, in animal models, of the effective dose and safety of these complexes, to better understand their viability as new therapeutic agents. Appl. Biosci. 2022, 1, 9 139 Figure 8. Structural representation of ruthenium chloride dimethylsolfoxide (DMSO) complexes with the active ligand 5,6,7-trimethyl-1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-a]-pyrimidine (22 and 23). 3.5. Ruthenium Nitrosyl Complexes Nitric oxide is a small biosignalling molecule that in humans helps regulate vasodi- lation, inflammation, and even neuronal responses. It is also the main molecule mediating macrophage anti-leishmania activity during the course an infection. For this reason, NO is considered as an active ligand by some researchers, who have developed NO-releasing complexes as potential new drugs. While most of the complexes were designed for anti- tumour action [51], their role as leishmanicidal agents has also been investigated. An ex- ample is complex 24 (Figure 9), shown to generate NO with a dissociation constant of 2.0 –3 –1 × 10 s and to resist hydroxide disruption up to pH 9 [52]. Follow-up biological activity studies with complex 24 showed growth inhibition of L. braziliensis parasites that were internalised in dermal fibroblasts (IC50 < 10 M) and no toxicity towards the non-infected dermal fibroblasts; in vivo studies on hamsters showed that a dose of 0.3 mg/kg/day of 24 produced 99.9% reduction of parasitic load in the lesion, a feat that for glucantime re- quired a dose of 60 mg/kg/day to be matched [53]. Figure 9. Structural representation of a ruthenium bipyridine complex with a nitrosyl ligand (24). 4. Conclusions and Outlook The last two decades have witnessed a growth in research targeted at finding novel therapeutic agents for neglected tropical diseases. A good part of these research efforts have focused on leishmaniasis, a pathology with a large range of clinical manifestations and with tendency to expand beyond its traditional endemic tropical areas as a result of global warming and widespread global travel. In the wide range of possible new treat- ments, ruthenium metal complexes have gained interest owing to their unique set of prop- erties and biocompatibility. As demonstrated throughout this article, ruthenium com- plexes offer a broad panorama of structures from which it is possible to identify promising leishmanicidal agents with increased activity regarding the corresponding organic lig- ands that can pose as new leads for leishmanicidal activity. Highlight should be given to the complexes 9, 14, and 15 in particular, for their activity in the low micromolar or even nanomolar range in tandem with the good safety profile observed in vitro. The phenan- throline lapachol complex, 15, was one of the most striking examples of metal-to-ligand synergy, being more than 140 times more potent than pure lapachol. The main limitation of the presently available literature studies is the lack of in vivo studies to verify both the activity of the complexes and their safety profile. Future Appl. Biosci. 2022, 1, 9 140 perspectives can rely on the optimisation of the lead structures herein identified, as well as the investigation of their activity in animal models of the disease. Funding: Thanks are due to University of Aveiro and FCT/MCTES (Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Ministério da Ciência, da Tecnologia e do Ensino Superior) for financial support to LAQV-REQUIMTE (Ref. UIDB/50006/2020) through national founds (PIDDAC) and, where appli- cable, co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER), within the PT2020 Part- nership Agreement. Conflicts of Interest: The author declares no conflict of interest. References 1. Leishmaniasis: Situation and Trends. Available online: http://www.who.int/gho/neglected_diseases/leishmaniasis/en/ (13 April 2022). 2. Burza, S.; Croft, S.L.; Boelaert, M. Leishmaniasis. Lancet 2018, 392, 951–970. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31204-2. 3. Rodrigues, I.A.; Mazotto, A.M.; Cardoso, V.; Alves, R.L.; Amaral, A.C.F.; Silva, J.R.A.; Pinheiro, A.S.; Vermelho, A.B. Natural products: Insights into leishmaniasis inflammatory response. Mediat. Inflam. 2015, 2015, 835910. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/835910. 4. Torres-Guerrero, E.; Quintanilla-Cedillo, M.R.; Ruiz-Esmenjaud, J.; Arenas, R. Leishmaniasis: A review. F1000 Research 2017, 6, 750. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11120.1. 5. Available online: https://ecdc.europa.eu/en/disease-vectors/facts/phlebotomine-sand-flies (13 April 2022). 6. González, C.; Wang, O.; Strutz, S.E.; González-Salazar, C.; Sánchez-Cordero, V.; Sarkar, S. Climate change and risk of leishman- iasis in North America: Predictions from ecological niche models of vector and reservoir species. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2010, 4, e585. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0000585. 7. Trájer, A.J.; Bede-Fazekas, Á.; Hufnagel, L.; Horváth, L.; Bobvos, J. The effect of climate change on the potential distribution of the European Phlebotomus species. Appl. Ecol. Envir. Res. 2013, 11, 189–208. https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1102_189208. 8. Oerther, S.; Jöst, H.; Heitmann, A.; Lühken, R.; Krüger, A.; Steinhausen, I.; Brinker, C.; Lorentz, S.; Marx, M.; Schmidt-Chanasit, J.; et al. Phlebotomine sand flies in Southwest Germany: An update with records in new locations. Parasit. Vectors 2020, 13, 173. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04058-6. 9. Steverding, D. The history of leishmaniasis. Parasit. Vectors 2017, 10, 82. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-017-2028-5. 10. Du, R.; Hotez, P.J.; Al-Salem, W.S.; Costa-Serrano, A.A. Old world cutaneous leishmaniasis and refugee crises in the Middle East and North Africa. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2016, 10, e0004545. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0004545. 11. Ponte-Sucre, A.; Gamarro, F.; Dujardin, J.C.; Barrett, M.P.; López-Vélez, R.; García-Hernández, R.; Pountain, A.W.; Mwenechanya, R.; Papadopoulou, B. Drug resistance and treatment failure in leishmaniasis: A 21st century challenge. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2017, 11, e0006052. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006052. 12. Braga, S.S. Multi-target drugs active against leishmaniasis: A paradigm of drug repurposing. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 183, 13. Mishra, J.; Saxena, A.; Singh, S. Chemotherapy of leishmaniasis: Past, present and future. Curr. Med. Chem. 2007, 14, 1153–1169. https://doi.org/10.2174/092986707780362862. 14. Frézard, F.; Demicheli, C.; Ribeiro, R.R. Pentavalent antimonials: New perspectives for old drugs. Molecules 2009, 14, 2317–2336. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules14072317. 15. Laniado-Laborín, R.; Cabrales-Vargas, M.N. Amphotericin B: Side effects and toxicity. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 2009, 26, 223–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riam.2009.06.003. 16. Javier, F.P.; Seifert, K.; Croft, S.L.; Sundar,S.; Castanys, S.; Gamarro, F. Mechanisms of experimental resistance of Leishmania to miltefosine: Implications for clinical use. Drug Resist. Updat. 2006, 9, 26–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drup.2006.04.001. 17. Berman, J.J. Treatment of leishmaniasis with miltefosine: 2008 status. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 2008, 4, 1209–1216. https://doi.org/10.1517/17425255.4.9.1209. 18. World Health Organization. Model List of Essential Medicines: 21st List 2019. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/han- dle/10665/325771 (accessed on 31 March 2020). 19. Bornstein, R.S.; Yarbro, J.W. An evaluation of the mechanism of action of pentamidine isethionate. J. Surg. Oncol. 1970, 2, 393– 398. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.2930020412. 20. Song, J.; Baker, N.; Rothert, M.; Henke, B.; Jeacock, L.; Horn, D.; Beitz, E. Pentamidine is not a permeant but a nanomolar inhib- itor of the Trypanosoma brucei aquaglyceroporin-2. PLoS Pathog. 2016, 12, e1005436. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005436. 21. Dogra, J.; Saxena, V.N. Itraconazole and leishmaniasis: A randomised double-blind trial in cutaneous disease. Int. J. Parasitol. 1996, 26, 1413–1415. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(96)00128-2. 22. Consigli, J.; Danielo, C.; Gallerano, V.; Papa, M.; Guidi, A. Cutaneous leishmaniasis: Successful treatment with itraconazole. Int. J. Dermatol. 2006, 45, 46–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-4632.2004.02429.x. 23. Alrajhi, A.A.; Ibrahim, E.A.; De Vol, E.B.; Khairat, M.; Faris, R.M.; Maguire, J.H. Fluconazole for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania major. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002, 346, 891–895. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa011882. Appl. Biosci. 2022, 1, 9 141 24. Pokharel, P.; Ghimire, R.; Lamichhane, P. Efficacy and safety of paromomycin for visceral leishmaniasis: A systematic review. J. Trop. Med. 2021, 2021, 8629039. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8629039. 25. Rossi, M.; Fasel, N. How to master the host immune system? Leishmania parasites have the solutions! Int. Immunol. 2017, 30, 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1093/intimm/dxx075. 26. Akbari, M.; Orian, A.; Hatam, G. Immunotherapy in treatment of leishmaniasis. Immunol. Lett. 2021, 233, 80–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imlet.2021.03.011. 27. Mota, C.M.; Oyama, J.; Monich, M.S.T.; Brustolin, A.A.; de Souza, J.V.P.; Murase, L.S.; Lopes, L.D.G.; Santos, T.S.; Teixeira, J.J.V.; Silveira, T.G.V. Three decades of clinical trials on immunotherapy for human leishmaniases: A systematic review and meta- analysis. Immunotherapy 2021, 13, 693–721. https://doi.org/10.2217/imt-2020-0184. 28. Goto, Y.; Cheng, J.; Omachi, S.; Morimoto, A. Prevalence, severity, and pathogeneses of anemia in visceral leishmaniasis. Para- sitol. Res. 2017, 116, 457–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-016-5313-x. 29. Carvalho, S.; Crus, T.; Santarém, N.; Castro, H.; Costa, V.; Tomás, A.M. Heme as a source of iron to Leishmania infantum amastigotes. Acta Trop. 2009, 109, 131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2008.10.007. 30. Braga, S.S.; Lysenko, K.; Santos, N.E. Ruthenophenanthroline complexes active against tripanosomids. In A Closer Look at Phe- nanthroline, 1st ed.; Amies, W., Ed.; NovaScience Publishing: Hauppage, NY, USA, 2020; Chapter 3, pp. 101–123. 31. Britten, N.S.; Butler, J.A. Ruthenium metallotherapeutics: Novel approaches to combating parasitic infections. Curr. Med. Chem. 2022, 29, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867329666220401105444. 32. Pongratz, M.; Schluga, P.; Jakupec, M.A.; Arion, V.A.; Hartinger, C.G.; Allmaierb, G.; Keppler, B.K. Transferrin binding and transferrin-mediated cellular uptake of the ruthenium coordination compound KP1019, studied by means of AAS, ESI-MS and CD spectroscopy. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2004, 19, 46. https://doi.org/10.1039/B309160K. 33. Alessio, E. Thirty years of the drug candidate NAMI-A and the myths in the field of ruthenium anticancer compounds: A personal perspective. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 12, 1549–1560. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejic.201600986. 34. Aitken, J.B.; Antony, S.; Weekley, C.M.; Lai, B.; Spiccia, L.; Harris, H.H. Distinct cellular fates for KP1019 and NAMI-A deter- mined by X-ray fluorescence imaging of single cells. Metallomics 2012, 4, 1051–1056. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2mt20072d. 35. Inigues, E.; Sánchez, A.; Vasquez, M.A.; Martínez, A.; Olivas, J.; Sattler, A.; Sánchez-Delgado, R.A.; Maldonado, R.A. Metal– drug synergy: New ruthenium(II) complexes of ketoconazole are highly active against Leishmania major and Trypanosoma cruzi and nontoxic to human or murine normal cells. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 18, 779–790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00775-013-1024-2. 36. Iniguez, E., Varela-Ramirez, A.; Martínez, A.; Torres, C.L.; Sánchez-Delgado, R.A.; Maldonado, R.A. Ruthenium-Clotrimazole complex has significant efficacy in the murine model of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Acta Trop. 2016, 164, 402–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.09.029. 37. Martínez, A.; Carreon, T.; Iniguez, E., Anzellotti, A.; Sánchez, A.; Tyan, M.; Sattler, A.; Herrera, L.; Maldonado, R.A.; Sánchez- Delgado, R.A. Searching for new chemotherapies for tropical diseases: Ruthenium–clotrimazole complexes display high in vitro activity against Leishmania major and Trypanosoma cruzi and low toxicity toward normal mammalian cells. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 3867−3877. h ps://doi.org/10.1021/jm300070h. 38. Colina-Vegas, L.; Godinho, J.L.P.; Coutinho, T.; Correa, R.S.; de Souza, W.; Rodrigues, J.C.F.; Batista, A.A.; Navarro, M. Antipar- asitic activity and ultrastructural alterations provoked by organoruthenium complexes against Leishmania amazonensis. New J. Chem. 2019, 43, 1431–1439. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8nj04657c. 39. Miranda, V.M.; Costa, M.S.; Guilardi, S.; Machado, A.E.H.; Ellena, J.A.; Tudini, K.A.G.; Von Poelhsitz, G. In vitro leishmanicidal activity and theoretical insights into biological action of ruthenium(II) organometallic complexes containing anti-inflammato- ries. Biometals 2018, 31, 1003–1017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10534-018-0145-z. 40. de Carvalho, L.C.; de Brito, T.V.; da C. Júnior, J.S.; Dias Júnior, G.J.; Magalhães, D.A.; Sousa, S.G.; Silva, R.O.; da Silva, F.R.P.; Vasconcelos, D.F.P.; Véras, L.M.C.; et al. Epiisopiloturine, an imidazole alkaloid, reverses inflammation and lipid peroxidation parameters in the Crohn disease model induced by trinitrobenzenosulfonic acid in Wistar rats. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 102, 278–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2018.03.090. 41. Silva, V.G.; Silva, R.O.; Damasceno, S.R.B.; Carvalho, N.S.; Prudêncio, R.S.; Aragão, K.S.; Guimarães, M.A.; Campos, S.A.; Véras, L.M.C.; Godejohann, M.; et al. Anti-inflammatory and antinociceptive activity of epiisopiloturine, an imidazole alkaloid isolated from Pilocarpus microphyllus. J. Nat. Prod. 2013, 76, 1071–1077. https://doi.org/10.1021/np400099m. 42. Véras, L.M.; Guimarães, M.A.; Campelo, Y.D.; Vieira, M.M.; Nascimento, C.; Lima, D.F.; Vasconcelos, L.; Nakano, E.; Ku- ckelhaus, S.S.; Batista, M.C.; et al. Activity of epiisopiloturine against Schistosoma mansoni. Curr. Med. Chem. 2012, 19, 2051–2058. https://doi.org/10.2174/092986712800167347. 43. Véras, L.M.; Cunha, V.R.; Lima, F.C.; Guimarães, M.A.; Vieira, M.M.; Campelo, Y.D.; Sakai, V.Y.; Lima, D.F.; Carvalho, P.S., Jr.; Ellena, J.A.; et al. Industrial scale isolation, structural and spectroscopic characterization of epiisopiloturine from Pilocarpus microphyllus Stapf leaves: A promising alkaloid against schistosomiasis. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e66702. https://doi.org/10.1371/jour- nal.pone.0066702. 44. Araújo, J.; Bastos, R.; Santos, G.; de Moraes Alves, M.; Figueiredo, K.; de Sousa, L.; Passos, I.; de Amorim Carvalho, F.; das Chagas Alves Lima, F.; Rocha, J. Molecular docking and evaluation of antileishmania activity of a ruthenium complex with epiisopiloturine and nitric oxide. J. Biosci. Med. 2020, 8, 42–53. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbm.2020.85005. 45. Barbosa, M.I.F.; Corrêa, R.S.; De Oliveira, K.M.; Rodrigues, C.; Ellena, J.; Nascimento, O.R.; Rocha, V.P.C.; Nonato, F.R.; Macedo, T.S.; Barbosa-Filho, J.M.; et al. Antiparasitic activities of novel ruthenium/lapachol complexes J. Inorg. Biochem. 2014, 136, 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2014.03.009. Appl. Biosci. 2022, 1, 9 142 46. Huang, X.H.; Chen, Q.X.; Wang, Q.; Song, K.K.; Wang, J.; Sha, L.; Guan, X. Inhibition of the activity of mushroom tyrosinase by alkylbenzoic acids. Food Chem. 2006, 94, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.09.008. 47. Dogra, N.; Warburton, C.; McMaster, W.R. Leishmania major abrogates gamma interferon-induced gene expression in human macrophages from a global perspective. Infect. Immun. 2007, 75, 3506–3515. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00277-07. 48. Costa, M.S.; Gonçalves, Y.G.; Nunes, D.C.O.; Napolitano, D.R.; Maia, P.I.S.; Rodrigues, R.S.; Rodrigues, V.M.; Von Poelhsitz, G.; Yoneyama, K.A.G. Anti-leishmania activity of new ruthenium(II) complexes: Effect on parasite-host interaction. J. Inorg. Bio- chem. 2017, 175, 225–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2017.07.023. 49. Costa, M.S.; Gonçalves, Y.G.; Teixeira, S.C.; Nunes, D.C.O.; Lopes, D.S.; da Silva, C.V.; Borges, B.C.; Silva, M.J.B.; Rodrigues, R.S.; Rodrigues, V.M.; et al. Increased ROS generation causes apoptosis-like death: Mechanistic insights into the anti-Leishmania activity of a potent ruthenium(II) complex. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2019, 195, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2019.03.005. 50. Fandzloch, M.; Arriaga, J.M.M.; Sánchez-Moreno, M.; Wojtczak, A.; Jezierska, J.; Sitkowski, J.; Wiśniewska, J.; Salas, J.M.; Łakomska, I. Strategies for overcoming tropical disease by ruthenium complexes with purine analog: Application against Leish- mania spp. and Trypanosoma cruzi. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2017, 176, 144–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2017.08.018. 51. Negri, L.B.; Martins, T.J.; Ramos, L.C.B.; da Silva, R.S. Nitric oxide derivative ruthenium compounds as NO-based chemother- apeutic and phototherapeutic agents. In: Nitric Oxide Donors. Novel Biomedical Applications and Perspectives, 1st ed.; Seabra, A.B., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2017; Chapter 1, pp. 1–24. 52. da Silva, F.O.N.; Araújo, S.X.B.; Holanda, A.K.M.; Meyer, E.; Sales, F.A.M.; Diógenes, I.C.N.; Carvalho, I.M.M.; Moreira, I.S.; Lopes, L.G.F. Synthesis, characterization, and NO release study of the cis- and trans-[Ru(Bpy)2(SO3)(NO)] complexes. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 2006, 2020–2026. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejic.200500871. 53. do Nascimento, N.R.F.; Aguiar, F.L.N.; Santos, C.F.; Costa, A.M.L.; Hardoim, D.J.; Calabrese, K.S.; Almeida-Souza, F.; de Sousa, E.H.S.; Lopes, L.G.F.; Teixeira, M.J.; et al. In vitro and in vivo leishmanicidal activity of a ruthenium nitrosyl complex against Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis. Acta Trop. 2019, 192, 61–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2019.01.021. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Applied Biosciences Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute

Ruthenium Complexes, an Emerging Class of Leishmanicidal Drug Candidates

Braga, Susana Santos
Applied Biosciences , Volume 1 (2) – Jul 5, 2022
Download PDF
14 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/multidisciplinary-digital-publishing-institute/ruthenium-complexes-an-emerging-class-of-leishmanicidal-drug-6oz1d4MZC3
Publisher
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Copyright
© 1996-2022 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated Disclaimer The statements, opinions and data contained in the journals are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy
ISSN
2813-0464
DOI
10.3390/applbiosci1020009
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Review Ruthenium Complexes, an Emerging Class of Leishmanicidal Drug Candidates Susana Santos Braga LAQV/REQUIMTE, Department of Chemistry, Campus of Santiago, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal; sbraga@ua.pt Abstract: This review addresses the search for activity enhancement of leishmanicidal organic com- pounds through their coordination chemistry with ruthenium. In an introduction to leishmaniasis, its clinical manifestations, geographical distribution, available forms of treatment, and challenges to disease management are presented. Ruthenium complexes, owing to their physico-chemical and biological properties, are introduced as a suitable molecular library from which to find alternatives to current medicines. The main sections of the review describe complexes reported in the literature, organised into two main groups: organometallics and inorganic complexes. The activity of the ru- thenium complexes is presented compared with that of the ligands for a critical assessment of their utility in future clinical application. Keywords: ruthenium; p-cymene; polypyridyl; phenylphosphines; azole drugs; natural products; anti-inflammatory agents 1. Introduction 1.1. Leishmaniasis, a Growing Concern Citation: Braga, S.S. Ruthenium Human leishmaniasis is an infectious disease caused by over 20 different species of Complexes, an Emerging Class of the Leishmania genus. Reported in 98 countries and affecting, in 2017, a number of people Leishmanicidal Drug Candidates. estimated between 50,000 and 90,000, leishmaniasis is considered as a major public health 2022, 1, 9. https://doi.org/ issue [1,2]. Its transmission to humans originates from dogs or small mammal reservoirs, 10.3390/applbiosci1020009 such as rats, mice, and other rodents. Human to human transmission is also known. The parasite is inoculated into the patient during the hematophagy of female sandflies of the Academic Editor: Alfonso Zambon Phlebotomus (Old World) and Lutzomyia (New World) genera [3]. Since these insects grow Received: 13 April 2022 preferentially in warm climates, human leishmaniasis has a higher incidence in tropical Accepted: 4 July 2022 and warm climates [4]. Published: 5 July 2022 Typically called a tropical disease, leishmaniasis is now growing beyond the tropics, as climate changes are expanding the habitat of its vectors northwards to the USA and Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neu- Europe [5]. Two studies published in the early 2010s decade used mathematical models tral with regard to jurisdictional to postulate that the global warming effect would expand the habitat of sand flies north- claims in published maps and institu- wards to reach Canada [6], Germany, and Poland [7] in thirty to forty years. The expan- tional affiliations. sion, however, is already happening. A study conducted in Germany in 2020 revealed the presence of sand flies in areas where they had not been detected before, with fifteen new sites in Southwest Germany having been identified as positive. Once more, global warm- Copyright: © 2022 by the author. Li- ing was proposed as a leading cause for expanding the distribution area of sand flies, with censee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. consequent increase in the risk for sand fly-borne infections in Southwest Germany [8]. This article is an open access article Other factors contributing to expansion of the disease are globalisation and geopoli- distributed under the terms and con- tics. In the last two decades, the number of global travellers, by airplane travel alone, has ditions of the Creative Commons At- more than doubled, and travelling strongly contributes to the spread of infectious diseases tribution (CC BY) license (https://cre- (as recently demonstrated by the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic). Geopolitical factors re- ativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). fer to the various armed conflicts in sensitive areas that have caused numbers to almost Appl. Biosci. 2022, 1, 129–142. https://doi.org/10.3390/applbiosci1020009 www.mdpi.com/journal/applbiosci Appl. Biosci. 2022, 1, 9 130 double in countries like Syria, Libya, and Yemen [9]. In association with armed conflicts, the low socio-economic conditions in African and Middle Eastern countries that have caused a large number of refugees and unprecedented migration waves. The agglomera- tion of these people in refugee camps, along with the poor nutritional and sanitary re- sources therein, resulted in several leishmaniasis outbreaks [10]. Adding to these con- cerns, challenges to leishmaniasis management include the growing number of drug-re- sistant strains and the lack of drugs with a good tolerability profile, adequate storage time and, more importantly, the possibility of oral administration, which allows for ambula- tory treatment in areas with limited hospital capacity (or where hospitals are completely absent). 1.2. Clinical Forms and Treatment Human leishmaniasis has various clinical forms: cutaneous (CL), a polymorphic skin disease with a single or multiple ulcerating lesions; mucocutaneous (MCL), producing destructive lesions in the skin, mucosa, and cartilage, typically around the nose and mouth and eventually leading to necrosis of the nose; and visceral (VL), characterised by an evolution towards chronic disease with systemic spreading and infection of visceral organs that appear dark and necrotised, resulting, when untreated, in a 90% fatality rate, that is, roughly 70,000 deaths every year [4]. The available medication is limited to aggres- sive drugs as Sb(V) salts (e.g., meglumine antimoniate), amphotericin B (AmB), miltefo- sine, pentamidine and some azole compounds for CL (e.g., ketoconazole), as described in the following paragraphs. These drugs frequently cause severe adverse effects, sometimes even death, and their efficacy is reduced by frequent resistance development [11,12]. Pentavalent antimony salts, sodium stibogluconate and meglumine antimoniate, are first-line medicines for the treatment of leishmaniasis. Developed in the 1920s, these salts remain in use mainly due to their broad span of action, affordability, and lack of alterna- tive drugs with equivalent activity and potency. They inhibit ADP phosphorylation, low- ering intracellular ATP levels and thus limiting the ability of the parasite to produce the energy needed for its survival. Pentavalent antimony salts also bind to the ribose moiety of DNA to form stable complexes with adenine nucleosides that inhibit parasitic purine transporter proteins [13]. Nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, abdominal cramps, weakness, hepatotoxicity, and cardiotoxicity are the main adverse effects of these drugs [14]. Amphotericin B acts by binding to sterols in the cell membrane of the parasite’s cells (note that the parasite’s membrane contains higher amounts of ergosterol, unlike the host cell membrane, which has cholesterol), resulting in the formation of pores that leak water, potassium, and small molecules. Amphotericyn B is also an ergosterol disruptor, i.e., it is able to block the sterol biosynthesis pathway and to cause ergosterol depletion in parasitic cells. Low ergosterol production results in further membrane disfunction, reducing the parasite’s viability [12]. The most common adverse effects are nephrotoxicity, hypocalce- mia, anemia, fever, and malaise; anaphylasis may also occur, albeit it is less frequent [15]. Miltefosine is the only leishmanicidal drug approved for oral intake. It is a phospho- lipid analogue that accumulates inside cells by interacting first with the outer membrane, and then folding inwards; once in the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane, miltefosine can detach and balance with the membranes of the organelles [16]. The biological activity of miltefosine involves interaction with membrane lipids and the inhibition of cytochrome c oxidase, leading to apoptosis [17]. Limitations to its use include teratogenicity, gastroin- testinal disturbances such as nausea, vomiting, or diarrhoea, and a moderate risk (2–3%) of severe kidney and liver toxicity. Pentamidine isothionate is an orphan drug approved in the USA for the treatment of Pneumocistus carinii pneumonia that is also active against trypanosomatids, being recom- mended by the World Health Organization (WHO) for the treatment of leishmaniasis and being part of this organisation’s list of essential drugs [18]. While its mode of action is not fully known, some targets of action are already identified: pentamidine has been shown to hamper nucleobase synthesis [19] and to inhibit the transmembranar protein Appl. Biosci. 2022, 1, 9 131 aguaglyceroporin-2, interfering with the parasite’s osmoregulation [20]. It is used as a first-line treatment for Leishmania aethiopica infections and as a second-line medicine in the treatment of VL and CL with other sensitive species. It has been reported to cause irre- versible toxicity in some patients, which poses limitations to its use. Azole drugs approved for the treatment of CL comprise ketoconazole, an imidazol derivative, and two trizoles, itraconazol and fluconazole. Their common mechanism of action is the inhibition of the enzyme lanosterol 14-α-demetylase, which is involved in the biosynthesis of ergosterol, the main cell membrane sterol in both yeasts and leishmania parasites. They are usually given per orum, but for some of these drugs there are also in- jectable forms. Itraconazole has no major adverse effects [21], posing as a good alternative for patients who do not respond to first-line drugs [22]. Ketoconazole and fluconazole can cause a few reversible adverse effects, such as elevated liver enzymes, but they offer the advantage of a CL healing rate comparable to that of first-line drugs [23]. Paromomycin, a repurposed aminoglycoside antibiotic, is employed in the treatment of VL by intravenous administration [24] being also used for treating CL, typically in the form of an ointment and in association with other anti-infectious drugs [2]. The discovery of a novel universal therapy that causes less adverse effects and is less prone to resistance is much needed. It is, however, a very challenging matter due to the complex pathophysiology of the parasite and of the varied strategies it possesses for adapting to its host. Parasites infect immunocompetent cells, such as macrophages, neu- trophils, and monocytes, and hamper their normal behaviour in order to escape the body’s defences. In turn, exaggerated inflammatory responses are often observed in MCL and some disseminated forms of CL. In these forms, the parasites migrate to secondary sites and there is the formation of metastatic lesions that have very low parasite numbers but suffer, in contrast, from a concomitant hyper-inflammatory state. This is what ultimately causes the destruction of the tissues and the typical lesions observed in MCL [25]. This way, novel therapeutic agents should ideally combine leishmanicidal and anti-inflamma- tory properties, helping to mitigate infection as well as the exacerbated immune response of the host. Various strategies have been adopted in the search for new lead compounds, from natural product screening to the development of new libraries of compounds based on known molecular targets of the parasite. Another approach is to use combined therapy, associating immunotherapeutics with classic drugs to improve patient outcomes [26,27]. A few clinical trials, conducted in the last three decades, have shown positive results, with combined immunotherapy reducing the healing time for patients, but more studies are needed before these combinations re- ceive market approval [27]. 1.3. Why Ruthenium-Based Leishmanicidal Drugs? Metals contribute strongly towards the activity of a compound. In biocidal activity, the role of the metal is particularly important, its relevance demonstrated by the use of metal compounds in disinfection since the dawn of Medicine. In Leishmania parasites, iron is known to be vital for the metabolism and the reproductive cycle, because infected pa- tients often have iron deficiency or even anaemia [28]. The parasite’s dependency on iron led it to develop privileged uptake pathways to satisfy the demand for this metal, with a heme uptake path having already been observed in L. infantum [29]. Ruthenium, a transi- tion metal belonging to group 8 of the periodic table, same as iron, has the ability to inter- fere with some of the biological processes developed for handling iron in vivo, including transport, cell uptake, and metabolism. Ruthenium complexes are an emerging class of metallopharmaceuticals for the treatment of parasitic infections [30,31]. Indeed, they gather a quite unique set of properties that makes them the best drug candidates for the treatment of leishmaniasis (Figure 1): 1. The redox properties of the Ru centre [32] are postulated to interfere with the para- site’s defence mechanisms against oxidation; Appl. Biosci. 2022, 1, 9 132 2. Ru is less toxic than Sb(V); 3. Ruthenium complexes can bind to transferrin [33,34] and be transported through the organism in this way; 4. In human cells, some ruthenium complexes are taken up and metabolised through iron-related pathways [34]; thus, they are likely to enter parasitic cells by the afore- mentioned heme pathway. Figure 1. Overview of the advantages of ruthenium complexes as anti-leishmania medicines. Novel ruthenium complexes developed as drug candidates for parasitic infections often aim at achieving the paradigm of ‘metal-to-ligand synergy’ [35]: a ligand is carefully selected according to its intrinsic anti-parasitic activity, and binding of the active ligand to ruthenium is expected to generate a complex with increased activity. This principle has been employed to design both organometallic and inorganic ruthenium complexes. These two main classes of leishmanicidal ruthenium complexes are described in detail in the two following sections. 2. Organometallic Ruthenium Complexes Leishmanicidal organometallic ruthenium complexes typically have a geometry re- sembling a piano stool, in which the stool seat is the organometallic fragment, usually benzene or p-cymene, and the legs are the active ligand as well as spectator ligands such as chloride, ethylenediamine (en), acetylacetonate (acac), 2,2′-bipyridine (bpy); the organ- ometallic part conveys some degree of lipophilicity to these molecules, which allows them to cross cell membranes. Lipophilicity may be further increased by adding apolar ligands such as bpy or phenylphosphines. 2.1. Ruthenium Azole Complexes The azole drugs that have a well-known leishmanicidal activity can be used as lig- ands for organometallic ruthenium complexes, in what comprises one of the most suc- cessful approaches to achieve metal-to-ligand synergy. The effect, is not, however, uni- versal, and the medicinal effect of each drug is better potentiated by a particular scaffold of the ruthenium complex, as well as the overall charge of the complex formed, as illus- trated by the literature reports described below. II In a family of four p-cymene complexes with ketoconazole (KTZ), [Ru (p-cy- II 2+ II 2+ mene)(KTZ)Cl2] (1), [Ru (p-cymene)(en)(KTZ)] (2), [Ru (p-cymene)(bpy)(KTZ)] (3), Appl. Biosci. 2022, 1, 9 133 II + and [Ru (p-cymene)(acac)(KTZ)] (4), the first three complexes showed increased anti-pro- mastigote activity regarding pure ketoconazole, at rates of >240%, 160%, and 120%, re- spectively; complex 4, having one acac ligand, was less active (only 20% of the potency of KTZ) [35]. The complexes were quite safe, with 2 and 3 having no cytotoxicity against human fibroblast cells (Hs27 cell line) at 120 M, the highest tested concentration, and 1 causing 47% inhibition at the same concentration. Given that the LD50 values against pro- mastigotes of complexes 1–3 are quite low (0.8 ± 1.32, 1.16 ± 0.52, and 1.53 ± 0.84 M, re- spectively), the corresponding selectivity indexes are quite high, within 78–150 folds. Complexes 1–3 were also tested against intracellular parasites in macrophage cells, with some inhibitory activity observed at concentrations around 0.25–1.0 M; however, IC50 values were not determined as a dose-dependent action could not be observed. In a follow-up study, complexes 1 and 3 were evaluated in vivo against L. major meta- cyclic promastigotes that were injected into the paw of BALB/c mice and allowed to incu- bate for two weeks [36]. The mice were then treated for another two weeks with an intra- peritoneal injection of the test compounds at a daily dose of 4 mg/kg. Compared to nega- tive control, the skin lesion reducing action was 26% for complex 1 and 68% for complex 3 (compared to negative control). Moreover, 3 was slightly more effective than pure clot- rimazole in reducing CL skin lesions. The authors concluded that 3 has moderate in vivo activity against L. major mice infection, with a parasite load reduction of 50% or more and no significant toxicity. A similar family of organometallic ruthenium azole complexes was reported, differ- ing only by having clotrimazole (CTZ) as the active ligand [37]. Complexes, depicted in II II 2+ II Figure 2, are [Ru (p-cymene)(CTZ)Cl2] (5), [Ru (p-cymene)(bpy)(CTZ)] (6), [Ru (p-cy- 2+ II + mene)(en)(CTZ)] (7), and [Ru (p-cymene)(acac)(CTZ)] (8), and they were tested against Leishmania major promastigotes. Similarly to the results obtained with the first family, the neutral complex, [RuII(p-cymene)(CTZ)Cl2] (5), was the most active, with an IC50 of 15 ± 8 nM, already within the nanomolar range; it was almost one hundred times more potent than pure clotrimazole (IC50 = 1.6 ± 0.5 M). The second most active complex was the mon- II + ocationic one, [Ru (p-cymene)(acac)(CTZ)] (8), with an IC50 of 0.45 ± 0.15 M. The dica- tionic complexes 6 and 7 have IC50 values of 1.4 ± 0.6 and 1.32 ± 0.69 M, respectively, being thus fairly within the same potency as pure clotrimazole. Tests against intra-macro- phage amastigotes, conducted with complexes 5 and 8, showed the high potency of com- plex 5, with an IC70 value of 29 nM, while complex 8 was able to inhibit 40% of the intra- cellular parasites at the highest concentration tested, 1 μM; note that at the same concen- tration, pure clotrimazole displayed no significant activity. In another study, the two abovementioned families of ruthenium p-cymene com- plexes with KTZ and CTZ were expanded to include complexes bearing triphenil- phosphine (PPh3) as ligands, [Ru(p-cymene)(KTZ)(PPh3)Cl] (9) and [Ru(p-cy- mene)(CTZ)(PPh3)Cl] (10) [38]. The complexes exhibited ligand-to-metal synergy when tested against Leishmania amazonensis promastigotes: IC50 values at 24h of incubation were 0.08 ± 2.62 μM for complex 9 and 0.24 ± 1.65 μM for complex 10 while the pure drugs ketoconazole and clotrimazole had IC50 > 3.0 μM and 0.82 ± 1.12 μM, respectively (at the same incubation time). The complexes were also very potent against intramacrophage amastigotes, with IC50 values in the nanomolar range: 15.53 ± 1.30 nM for complex 9 and 25.80 ± 1.09 nM for complex 10. Moreover, they presented a good safety profile on healthy macrophages, with no cytotoxicity observed at 24 h of incubation and only some growth inhibition occurring with complex 10 after 48 h of incubation at the highest tested concen- tration, 1 M. Appl. Biosci. 2022, 1, 9 134 Figure 2. Structural representation of ruthenium p-cymene complexes with azole ligands (1-8) hav- ing ‘piano-stool’ geometry. 2.2. Ruthenium Complexes with Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Agents The exacerbated inflammation response of the patient during infection with leish- maniasis often is the cause of the disfiguring lesions observed in MCL [25], as described previously in Section 1.2. It may thus be useful to convey anti-inflammatory drugs to the patient during the treatment, in order to mitigate the inflammatory response and prevent widespread tissue damage. A family of ruthenium p-cymene complexes with NSAIDs (non-steroid anti-inflam- II + matory drugs having the general formulae [Ru (p-cymene)(NSAID)Cl] , where NSAID = naproxen (11), diclofenac (12) and ibuprofen (13), was recently reported (Figure 3) [39]. Activity screening on promastigote forms of Leishmania infantum (MCER/BR/79/M6445 strain) and L. amazonensis (IFLA/BR/67/PH8 strain) showed that binding naproxen and diclofenac to the ruthenium scaffold to form complexes 11 and 12 was able to imbue them with leishmanicidal action, even though these drugs do not have such effect in their pure form. Complex 11 displayed IC50 values of 42.3 ± 16.5 M against L. infantum and 23.6 ± 1.0 M against L. amazonensis, while for complex 12 values were 8.6 ± 0.4 M and 7.4 ± 2.7 M, respectively; the pure drugs and complex 13 did not display any activity at the high- est concentration tested (200 M). The partition coefficient was calculated for the com- plexes, showing values of 7.1, 7.3, and 7.7 (for 11, 12, and 13, respectively). This indicates an increase in lipophilicity in regard to the pure drugs, naproxen (log P = 3.2), diclofenac (log P = 4.5), and ibuprofen (log P = 4.0). Appl. Biosci. 2022, 1, 9 135 Figure 3. Structural representation of ruthenium p-cymene complexes with NSAIDs (11–13). 3. Inorganic Ruthenium Complexes Inorganic ruthenium complexes feature an overall broader structural diversity than their organometallic counterparts. Besides the various active ligands, the coordination sphere in most complexes is comprised of kinetically inert ligands, usually of the polypyridyl or of the phenylphosphine kind. A few complexes, present, in alternative, labile ligands (e.g., Cl or DMSO), which render them more reactive but also less stable. 3.1. Ruthenium Complexes with Plant Alkaloids Plant alkaloids are a vast class of metabolites that typically serve as defence mecha- nisms against sources of biotic stress, such as environmental factors, parasites, or even to protect against extensive culling by herbivores. Alkaloids are, thus, a vast and excellent natural source of cytotoxic agents. Epiisopiloturine (EPI) is an imidazole alkaloid abun- dant in the leaves of Pilocarpus microphyllus, a plant popularly known as ‘jaborandi do maranhão’. Having already demonstrated pharmacologic activity as an anti-inflamma- tory [40,41], anti-nociceptive [41] and anti-schisostomiasis [42,43] agent, EPI is a very promising ligand to combine with a ruthenium scaffold to form a new molecule targeting CL and MCL, because besides inhibiting the parasite it may also contribute to reduce the inflammation typically associated with these lesions. The complex [Ru(bpy)2(EPI)NO2] (14), represented in Figure 4, was recently re- ported to inhibit L. major promastigotes (MHOM/IL/80/Friedlin strain) with an IC50 of 1.07 M [44]. Figure 4. Structural representation of the ruthenium epiisopiloturine complex (14). Molecular docking studies were conducted on complex 14 and target proteins of leishmania. Figure 5 shows the results for pteridine reductase (1e7w) and UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (5nzg), two of the proteins that formed hydrogen bonds with the com- plex. Appl. Biosci. 2022, 1, 9 136 Figure 5. Molecular docking between complex 14 and the target proteins 1e7w (a) and 5nzg (b); the bottom images show the three-dimensional details of the molecular interaction between complex 20 and the proteins 1e7w (c) and 5nzg (d). Reproduced from Ref. [44]. The strongest binding affinity was calculated to occur with protein 1e7w (inhibition constant of 14.8 nM), indicating that complex 14 may act though interruption of the growth of the parasite (for which 1e7w is essential). Complex 14 also showed excellent molecular affinity towards the target protein 5nzg of L. major (inhibition constant of 19.74 nM), through the formation of three hydrogen bonds. This protein is vital for the produc- tion of cell surface glycans, and is also involved in other processes that generate parasite pathogenicity [44]. 3.2. Ruthenium Lapachol Complexes Lapachol is a natural biocidal compound isolated from the bark of Handroanthus im- petiginosus, the lapacho tree. Traditionally used to treat a variety of bacterial and parasitic infections, lapachol also possesses leishmanicidal activity. Combining lapachol with an inorganic ruthenium scaffold is a paradigmatic example in metal-to-ligand synergy [45]. The complexes are depicted in Figure 6, and they can be described by the general formula II + [Ru (N,N’-lig)(lapachol)(PPh3)2] , where the N,N’-lig is 1,10-phenanthroline (phen), bpy or its derivatives, 4,4′-dimethylbypiridine and 4,4′-dimethoxybypiridine. Besides the ac- tive ligand, lapachol, the remaining ligands were chosen due to their high inertia towards ligand substitution, that is, because they are very little labile. Appl. Biosci. 2022, 1, 9 137 Figure 6. Structural representation of the ruthenium lapachol complexes (15–18). The molecular design strategy allowed obtaining complexes that surpass the potency of pure lapachol, both against the promastigote form and the macrophage-internalised amastigote form of L. amazonensis. However, the complexes were also toxic to non-infected mouse macrophages (J744 line), as indicated by the relatively low IC50 values obtained against these cells (Table 1) [45]. Table 1. Leishmanicidal activities at 72 h of incubation of lapachol and its corresponding ruthenium (II) complexes, 15–18 [45]. L. amazonensis IC50 (M) Healthy Mouse J774 Compound Macrophagues IC50 (M) Promastigotes Amastigotes 15 >10 0.07 ± 0.002 0.33 ± 0.08 16 0.18 ± 0.04 0.17 ± 0.01 1.0 ± 0.46 17 0.42 ± 0.03 >10 6.7 ± 1.3 18 1.60 ± 0.44 n.d. 1.9 ± 1.3 Lapachol 12.4 ± 0.69 >10 >10 Note: IC50 values are expressed as mean ± s.d.; n.d. indicates “not determined”. 3.3. Ruthenium Alkylbenzoate Complexes Alkylbenzoates are skin bleaching compounds acting by inhibition of tyrosinase [46], an enzyme that, besides being involved in the production of melanin in healthy humans, features strongly increased expression in leishmaniasis patients [47]. Complexes 19–21, having three distinct alkylbenzoate derivatives as active ligands and a bridged phenylphosphine inert ligand (Figure 7), had good leishmanicidal activity against promastigote forms of L. brasiliensis, L. amazonensis, and L. infantum, with IC50 val- ues in the low micromolar or, for a few of them, in the nanomolar range (Table 2) [48]. However, the complexes also exhibited some toxicity against non-infected mouse macro- phages (RAW 264 line), thus evidencing that complexation was unable to ensure selectiv- ity of action towards infected immune cells. Appl. Biosci. 2022, 1, 9 138 Figure 7. Structural representation of the ruthenium complexes with alkylbenzoate ligands (19– 21). Table 2. Leishmanicidal activities at 24 h of incubation with promastigote forms of Leishmania spp. of alkylbenzoate complexes 19–21, in comparison with that of their precursor, [Ru(Ph2P-CH2- PPh2)2Cl2] [47]. L. Amazonensis L. Braziliensis L. Infantum Healthy Mouse RAW 264 Compound IC50 (M) IC50 (M) IC50 (M) Macrophagues IC50 (M) 19 7.52 9.09 12.59 8.73 20 0.70 3.28 3.17 1.85 21 0.52 0.86 1.75 2.14 Ru precursor 15.48 3.93 19.46 62.24 In a follow-up study, complex 21 was investigated regarding the ability to generate reactive oxygen species (ROS), DNA fragmentation, and alterations to the cell cycle of L. amazonensis promastigotes [49]. The anti-proliferative effect of the complex was shown to involve cell cycle arrest in the sub-G1 phase and death by apoptosis associated with DNA fragmentation. Moreover, the complex was shown to increase the intracellular levels of ROS, with possible repercussions on the mitochondria, because depolarisation of the mi- tochondrial membrane was observed concomitantly. 3.4. Ruthenium Purine Complexes Ruthenium complexes with a purine derivative as the active ligand and the remain- ing coordination sphere composed of labile ligands, such as DMSO and chloride, pre- sented metal-to-ligand synergy, translated as a higher activity against promastigote forms of L. infantum, L. brasiliensis, and L. Donovani [50]. Importantly, the two most potent com- plexes, 22 and 23 (Figure 8) have different oxidation states: Ru(II) for complex 22 and Ru(III) for complex 23. Complex 23 hydrolysed rapidly in pure water. Regarding complex 22, rapid hydrolysis was achieved by adding sodium chloride to the aqueous medium. This implies that both complexes can be expected to have similar hydrolytical profiles in vivo. Complex 22 was the most potent, with IC50 values ranging from 9.2 ± 0.7 to 41.8 ± 3.3 M (according to the Leishmania species tested), while IC50 values for 23 laid between 46.1 ± 3.7 and 62.0 ± 4.9 M. A strong advantage of these complexes is their in vitro safe profile on macrophages and kidney epithelial cells (IC50 > 300 M). Nevertheless, the presence of labile ligands with foreseeably fast in vivo hydrolysis may cause undesired interactions with a vast number of host targets, leading to partial loss of activity and eventual un- wanted toxic effects. Future studies should include the evaluation, in animal models, of the effective dose and safety of these complexes, to better understand their viability as new therapeutic agents. Appl. Biosci. 2022, 1, 9 139 Figure 8. Structural representation of ruthenium chloride dimethylsolfoxide (DMSO) complexes with the active ligand 5,6,7-trimethyl-1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-a]-pyrimidine (22 and 23). 3.5. Ruthenium Nitrosyl Complexes Nitric oxide is a small biosignalling molecule that in humans helps regulate vasodi- lation, inflammation, and even neuronal responses. It is also the main molecule mediating macrophage anti-leishmania activity during the course an infection. For this reason, NO is considered as an active ligand by some researchers, who have developed NO-releasing complexes as potential new drugs. While most of the complexes were designed for anti- tumour action [51], their role as leishmanicidal agents has also been investigated. An ex- ample is complex 24 (Figure 9), shown to generate NO with a dissociation constant of 2.0 –3 –1 × 10 s and to resist hydroxide disruption up to pH 9 [52]. Follow-up biological activity studies with complex 24 showed growth inhibition of L. braziliensis parasites that were internalised in dermal fibroblasts (IC50 < 10 M) and no toxicity towards the non-infected dermal fibroblasts; in vivo studies on hamsters showed that a dose of 0.3 mg/kg/day of 24 produced 99.9% reduction of parasitic load in the lesion, a feat that for glucantime re- quired a dose of 60 mg/kg/day to be matched [53]. Figure 9. Structural representation of a ruthenium bipyridine complex with a nitrosyl ligand (24). 4. Conclusions and Outlook The last two decades have witnessed a growth in research targeted at finding novel therapeutic agents for neglected tropical diseases. A good part of these research efforts have focused on leishmaniasis, a pathology with a large range of clinical manifestations and with tendency to expand beyond its traditional endemic tropical areas as a result of global warming and widespread global travel. In the wide range of possible new treat- ments, ruthenium metal complexes have gained interest owing to their unique set of prop- erties and biocompatibility. As demonstrated throughout this article, ruthenium com- plexes offer a broad panorama of structures from which it is possible to identify promising leishmanicidal agents with increased activity regarding the corresponding organic lig- ands that can pose as new leads for leishmanicidal activity. Highlight should be given to the complexes 9, 14, and 15 in particular, for their activity in the low micromolar or even nanomolar range in tandem with the good safety profile observed in vitro. The phenan- throline lapachol complex, 15, was one of the most striking examples of metal-to-ligand synergy, being more than 140 times more potent than pure lapachol. The main limitation of the presently available literature studies is the lack of in vivo studies to verify both the activity of the complexes and their safety profile. Future Appl. Biosci. 2022, 1, 9 140 perspectives can rely on the optimisation of the lead structures herein identified, as well as the investigation of their activity in animal models of the disease. Funding: Thanks are due to University of Aveiro and FCT/MCTES (Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Ministério da Ciência, da Tecnologia e do Ensino Superior) for financial support to LAQV-REQUIMTE (Ref. UIDB/50006/2020) through national founds (PIDDAC) and, where appli- cable, co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER), within the PT2020 Part- nership Agreement. Conflicts of Interest: The author declares no conflict of interest. References 1. Leishmaniasis: Situation and Trends. Available online: http://www.who.int/gho/neglected_diseases/leishmaniasis/en/ (13 April 2022). 2. Burza, S.; Croft, S.L.; Boelaert, M. Leishmaniasis. Lancet 2018, 392, 951–970. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31204-2. 3. Rodrigues, I.A.; Mazotto, A.M.; Cardoso, V.; Alves, R.L.; Amaral, A.C.F.; Silva, J.R.A.; Pinheiro, A.S.; Vermelho, A.B. Natural products: Insights into leishmaniasis inflammatory response. Mediat. Inflam. 2015, 2015, 835910. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/835910. 4. Torres-Guerrero, E.; Quintanilla-Cedillo, M.R.; Ruiz-Esmenjaud, J.; Arenas, R. Leishmaniasis: A review. F1000 Research 2017, 6, 750. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11120.1. 5. Available online: https://ecdc.europa.eu/en/disease-vectors/facts/phlebotomine-sand-flies (13 April 2022). 6. González, C.; Wang, O.; Strutz, S.E.; González-Salazar, C.; Sánchez-Cordero, V.; Sarkar, S. Climate change and risk of leishman- iasis in North America: Predictions from ecological niche models of vector and reservoir species. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2010, 4, e585. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0000585. 7. Trájer, A.J.; Bede-Fazekas, Á.; Hufnagel, L.; Horváth, L.; Bobvos, J. The effect of climate change on the potential distribution of the European Phlebotomus species. Appl. Ecol. Envir. Res. 2013, 11, 189–208. https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1102_189208. 8. Oerther, S.; Jöst, H.; Heitmann, A.; Lühken, R.; Krüger, A.; Steinhausen, I.; Brinker, C.; Lorentz, S.; Marx, M.; Schmidt-Chanasit, J.; et al. Phlebotomine sand flies in Southwest Germany: An update with records in new locations. Parasit. Vectors 2020, 13, 173. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04058-6. 9. Steverding, D. The history of leishmaniasis. Parasit. Vectors 2017, 10, 82. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-017-2028-5. 10. Du, R.; Hotez, P.J.; Al-Salem, W.S.; Costa-Serrano, A.A. Old world cutaneous leishmaniasis and refugee crises in the Middle East and North Africa. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2016, 10, e0004545. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0004545. 11. Ponte-Sucre, A.; Gamarro, F.; Dujardin, J.C.; Barrett, M.P.; López-Vélez, R.; García-Hernández, R.; Pountain, A.W.; Mwenechanya, R.; Papadopoulou, B. Drug resistance and treatment failure in leishmaniasis: A 21st century challenge. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2017, 11, e0006052. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006052. 12. Braga, S.S. Multi-target drugs active against leishmaniasis: A paradigm of drug repurposing. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 183, 13. Mishra, J.; Saxena, A.; Singh, S. Chemotherapy of leishmaniasis: Past, present and future. Curr. Med. Chem. 2007, 14, 1153–1169. https://doi.org/10.2174/092986707780362862. 14. Frézard, F.; Demicheli, C.; Ribeiro, R.R. Pentavalent antimonials: New perspectives for old drugs. Molecules 2009, 14, 2317–2336. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules14072317. 15. Laniado-Laborín, R.; Cabrales-Vargas, M.N. Amphotericin B: Side effects and toxicity. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 2009, 26, 223–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riam.2009.06.003. 16. Javier, F.P.; Seifert, K.; Croft, S.L.; Sundar,S.; Castanys, S.; Gamarro, F. Mechanisms of experimental resistance of Leishmania to miltefosine: Implications for clinical use. Drug Resist. Updat. 2006, 9, 26–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drup.2006.04.001. 17. Berman, J.J. Treatment of leishmaniasis with miltefosine: 2008 status. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 2008, 4, 1209–1216. https://doi.org/10.1517/17425255.4.9.1209. 18. World Health Organization. Model List of Essential Medicines: 21st List 2019. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/han- dle/10665/325771 (accessed on 31 March 2020). 19. Bornstein, R.S.; Yarbro, J.W. An evaluation of the mechanism of action of pentamidine isethionate. J. Surg. Oncol. 1970, 2, 393– 398. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.2930020412. 20. Song, J.; Baker, N.; Rothert, M.; Henke, B.; Jeacock, L.; Horn, D.; Beitz, E. Pentamidine is not a permeant but a nanomolar inhib- itor of the Trypanosoma brucei aquaglyceroporin-2. PLoS Pathog. 2016, 12, e1005436. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005436. 21. Dogra, J.; Saxena, V.N. Itraconazole and leishmaniasis: A randomised double-blind trial in cutaneous disease. Int. J. Parasitol. 1996, 26, 1413–1415. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(96)00128-2. 22. Consigli, J.; Danielo, C.; Gallerano, V.; Papa, M.; Guidi, A. Cutaneous leishmaniasis: Successful treatment with itraconazole. Int. J. Dermatol. 2006, 45, 46–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-4632.2004.02429.x. 23. Alrajhi, A.A.; Ibrahim, E.A.; De Vol, E.B.; Khairat, M.; Faris, R.M.; Maguire, J.H. Fluconazole for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania major. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002, 346, 891–895. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa011882. Appl. Biosci. 2022, 1, 9 141 24. Pokharel, P.; Ghimire, R.; Lamichhane, P. Efficacy and safety of paromomycin for visceral leishmaniasis: A systematic review. J. Trop. Med. 2021, 2021, 8629039. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8629039. 25. Rossi, M.; Fasel, N. How to master the host immune system? Leishmania parasites have the solutions! Int. Immunol. 2017, 30, 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1093/intimm/dxx075. 26. Akbari, M.; Orian, A.; Hatam, G. Immunotherapy in treatment of leishmaniasis. Immunol. Lett. 2021, 233, 80–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imlet.2021.03.011. 27. Mota, C.M.; Oyama, J.; Monich, M.S.T.; Brustolin, A.A.; de Souza, J.V.P.; Murase, L.S.; Lopes, L.D.G.; Santos, T.S.; Teixeira, J.J.V.; Silveira, T.G.V. Three decades of clinical trials on immunotherapy for human leishmaniases: A systematic review and meta- analysis. Immunotherapy 2021, 13, 693–721. https://doi.org/10.2217/imt-2020-0184. 28. Goto, Y.; Cheng, J.; Omachi, S.; Morimoto, A. Prevalence, severity, and pathogeneses of anemia in visceral leishmaniasis. Para- sitol. Res. 2017, 116, 457–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-016-5313-x. 29. Carvalho, S.; Crus, T.; Santarém, N.; Castro, H.; Costa, V.; Tomás, A.M. Heme as a source of iron to Leishmania infantum amastigotes. Acta Trop. 2009, 109, 131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2008.10.007. 30. Braga, S.S.; Lysenko, K.; Santos, N.E. Ruthenophenanthroline complexes active against tripanosomids. In A Closer Look at Phe- nanthroline, 1st ed.; Amies, W., Ed.; NovaScience Publishing: Hauppage, NY, USA, 2020; Chapter 3, pp. 101–123. 31. Britten, N.S.; Butler, J.A. Ruthenium metallotherapeutics: Novel approaches to combating parasitic infections. Curr. Med. Chem. 2022, 29, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867329666220401105444. 32. Pongratz, M.; Schluga, P.; Jakupec, M.A.; Arion, V.A.; Hartinger, C.G.; Allmaierb, G.; Keppler, B.K. Transferrin binding and transferrin-mediated cellular uptake of the ruthenium coordination compound KP1019, studied by means of AAS, ESI-MS and CD spectroscopy. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2004, 19, 46. https://doi.org/10.1039/B309160K. 33. Alessio, E. Thirty years of the drug candidate NAMI-A and the myths in the field of ruthenium anticancer compounds: A personal perspective. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 12, 1549–1560. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejic.201600986. 34. Aitken, J.B.; Antony, S.; Weekley, C.M.; Lai, B.; Spiccia, L.; Harris, H.H. Distinct cellular fates for KP1019 and NAMI-A deter- mined by X-ray fluorescence imaging of single cells. Metallomics 2012, 4, 1051–1056. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2mt20072d. 35. Inigues, E.; Sánchez, A.; Vasquez, M.A.; Martínez, A.; Olivas, J.; Sattler, A.; Sánchez-Delgado, R.A.; Maldonado, R.A. Metal– drug synergy: New ruthenium(II) complexes of ketoconazole are highly active against Leishmania major and Trypanosoma cruzi and nontoxic to human or murine normal cells. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 18, 779–790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00775-013-1024-2. 36. Iniguez, E., Varela-Ramirez, A.; Martínez, A.; Torres, C.L.; Sánchez-Delgado, R.A.; Maldonado, R.A. Ruthenium-Clotrimazole complex has significant efficacy in the murine model of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Acta Trop. 2016, 164, 402–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.09.029. 37. Martínez, A.; Carreon, T.; Iniguez, E., Anzellotti, A.; Sánchez, A.; Tyan, M.; Sattler, A.; Herrera, L.; Maldonado, R.A.; Sánchez- Delgado, R.A. Searching for new chemotherapies for tropical diseases: Ruthenium–clotrimazole complexes display high in vitro activity against Leishmania major and Trypanosoma cruzi and low toxicity toward normal mammalian cells. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 3867−3877. h ps://doi.org/10.1021/jm300070h. 38. Colina-Vegas, L.; Godinho, J.L.P.; Coutinho, T.; Correa, R.S.; de Souza, W.; Rodrigues, J.C.F.; Batista, A.A.; Navarro, M. Antipar- asitic activity and ultrastructural alterations provoked by organoruthenium complexes against Leishmania amazonensis. New J. Chem. 2019, 43, 1431–1439. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8nj04657c. 39. Miranda, V.M.; Costa, M.S.; Guilardi, S.; Machado, A.E.H.; Ellena, J.A.; Tudini, K.A.G.; Von Poelhsitz, G. In vitro leishmanicidal activity and theoretical insights into biological action of ruthenium(II) organometallic complexes containing anti-inflammato- ries. Biometals 2018, 31, 1003–1017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10534-018-0145-z. 40. de Carvalho, L.C.; de Brito, T.V.; da C. Júnior, J.S.; Dias Júnior, G.J.; Magalhães, D.A.; Sousa, S.G.; Silva, R.O.; da Silva, F.R.P.; Vasconcelos, D.F.P.; Véras, L.M.C.; et al. Epiisopiloturine, an imidazole alkaloid, reverses inflammation and lipid peroxidation parameters in the Crohn disease model induced by trinitrobenzenosulfonic acid in Wistar rats. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 102, 278–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2018.03.090. 41. Silva, V.G.; Silva, R.O.; Damasceno, S.R.B.; Carvalho, N.S.; Prudêncio, R.S.; Aragão, K.S.; Guimarães, M.A.; Campos, S.A.; Véras, L.M.C.; Godejohann, M.; et al. Anti-inflammatory and antinociceptive activity of epiisopiloturine, an imidazole alkaloid isolated from Pilocarpus microphyllus. J. Nat. Prod. 2013, 76, 1071–1077. https://doi.org/10.1021/np400099m. 42. Véras, L.M.; Guimarães, M.A.; Campelo, Y.D.; Vieira, M.M.; Nascimento, C.; Lima, D.F.; Vasconcelos, L.; Nakano, E.; Ku- ckelhaus, S.S.; Batista, M.C.; et al. Activity of epiisopiloturine against Schistosoma mansoni. Curr. Med. Chem. 2012, 19, 2051–2058. https://doi.org/10.2174/092986712800167347. 43. Véras, L.M.; Cunha, V.R.; Lima, F.C.; Guimarães, M.A.; Vieira, M.M.; Campelo, Y.D.; Sakai, V.Y.; Lima, D.F.; Carvalho, P.S., Jr.; Ellena, J.A.; et al. Industrial scale isolation, structural and spectroscopic characterization of epiisopiloturine from Pilocarpus microphyllus Stapf leaves: A promising alkaloid against schistosomiasis. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e66702. https://doi.org/10.1371/jour- nal.pone.0066702. 44. Araújo, J.; Bastos, R.; Santos, G.; de Moraes Alves, M.; Figueiredo, K.; de Sousa, L.; Passos, I.; de Amorim Carvalho, F.; das Chagas Alves Lima, F.; Rocha, J. Molecular docking and evaluation of antileishmania activity of a ruthenium complex with epiisopiloturine and nitric oxide. J. Biosci. Med. 2020, 8, 42–53. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbm.2020.85005. 45. Barbosa, M.I.F.; Corrêa, R.S.; De Oliveira, K.M.; Rodrigues, C.; Ellena, J.; Nascimento, O.R.; Rocha, V.P.C.; Nonato, F.R.; Macedo, T.S.; Barbosa-Filho, J.M.; et al. Antiparasitic activities of novel ruthenium/lapachol complexes J. Inorg. Biochem. 2014, 136, 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2014.03.009. Appl. Biosci. 2022, 1, 9 142 46. Huang, X.H.; Chen, Q.X.; Wang, Q.; Song, K.K.; Wang, J.; Sha, L.; Guan, X. Inhibition of the activity of mushroom tyrosinase by alkylbenzoic acids. Food Chem. 2006, 94, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.09.008. 47. Dogra, N.; Warburton, C.; McMaster, W.R. Leishmania major abrogates gamma interferon-induced gene expression in human macrophages from a global perspective. Infect. Immun. 2007, 75, 3506–3515. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00277-07. 48. Costa, M.S.; Gonçalves, Y.G.; Nunes, D.C.O.; Napolitano, D.R.; Maia, P.I.S.; Rodrigues, R.S.; Rodrigues, V.M.; Von Poelhsitz, G.; Yoneyama, K.A.G. Anti-leishmania activity of new ruthenium(II) complexes: Effect on parasite-host interaction. J. Inorg. Bio- chem. 2017, 175, 225–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2017.07.023. 49. Costa, M.S.; Gonçalves, Y.G.; Teixeira, S.C.; Nunes, D.C.O.; Lopes, D.S.; da Silva, C.V.; Borges, B.C.; Silva, M.J.B.; Rodrigues, R.S.; Rodrigues, V.M.; et al. Increased ROS generation causes apoptosis-like death: Mechanistic insights into the anti-Leishmania activity of a potent ruthenium(II) complex. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2019, 195, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2019.03.005. 50. Fandzloch, M.; Arriaga, J.M.M.; Sánchez-Moreno, M.; Wojtczak, A.; Jezierska, J.; Sitkowski, J.; Wiśniewska, J.; Salas, J.M.; Łakomska, I. Strategies for overcoming tropical disease by ruthenium complexes with purine analog: Application against Leish- mania spp. and Trypanosoma cruzi. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2017, 176, 144–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2017.08.018. 51. Negri, L.B.; Martins, T.J.; Ramos, L.C.B.; da Silva, R.S. Nitric oxide derivative ruthenium compounds as NO-based chemother- apeutic and phototherapeutic agents. In: Nitric Oxide Donors. Novel Biomedical Applications and Perspectives, 1st ed.; Seabra, A.B., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2017; Chapter 1, pp. 1–24. 52. da Silva, F.O.N.; Araújo, S.X.B.; Holanda, A.K.M.; Meyer, E.; Sales, F.A.M.; Diógenes, I.C.N.; Carvalho, I.M.M.; Moreira, I.S.; Lopes, L.G.F. Synthesis, characterization, and NO release study of the cis- and trans-[Ru(Bpy)2(SO3)(NO)] complexes. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 2006, 2020–2026. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejic.200500871. 53. do Nascimento, N.R.F.; Aguiar, F.L.N.; Santos, C.F.; Costa, A.M.L.; Hardoim, D.J.; Calabrese, K.S.; Almeida-Souza, F.; de Sousa, E.H.S.; Lopes, L.G.F.; Teixeira, M.J.; et al. In vitro and in vivo leishmanicidal activity of a ruthenium nitrosyl complex against Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis. Acta Trop. 2019, 192, 61–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2019.01.021.

Journal

Applied Biosciences – Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute

Published: Jul 5, 2022

Keywords: ruthenium; p-cymene; polypyridyl; phenylphosphines; azole drugs; natural products; anti-inflammatory agents

There are no references for this article.