Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Selgelid, Eline Sepers (2006)
Patents, profits, and the price of pills: implications for access and availability
Joseph Lyon (1999)
Nuclear weapons testing and research efforts to evaluate health effects on exposed populations in the United States.Epidemiology, 10 5
J. Murray, A. López (1996)
The Global Burden of Disease
Christopher Murray, Alan Lopez (2000)
Progress and directions in refining the global burden of disease approach: a response to Williams.Health economics, 9 1
Christopher Murray, A. Acharya (1997)
Understanding DALYs (disability-adjusted life years).Journal of health economics, 16 6
A. Williams (2000)
Comments on the response by Murray and Lopez.Health economics, 9 1
Alan Lopez, C. Mathers, M. Ezzati, D. Jamison, Murray Cjl (2006)
Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analyses for Burden of Disease and Risk Factor Estimates -- Global Burden of Disease and Risk Factors
C. Mathers, Joshua Salomon, M. Ezzati, Stephen Begg, S. Hoorn, Alan Lopez (2006)
Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analyses for Burden of Disease and Risk Factor Estimates
J. Kaplan, J. Kaplan (2000)
The Limits and Lies of Human Genetic Research
Mason Jb, P. Musgrove, Habicht Jp (2003)
At least one-third of poor countries disease burden is due to malnutrition.
A. Attaran (2004)
How do patents and economic policies affect access to essential medicines in developing countries?Health affairs, 23 3
.. Murray (1997)
Global burden of diseaseThe Lancet, 350
D. Brock (2004)
Ethical Issues in the Use of Cost Effectiveness Analysis for the Prioritization of Health Resources
Christopher Murray, A. Lopez (1999)
On the comparable quantification of health risks: lessons from the Global Burden of Disease Study.Epidemiology, 10 5
Thomas Pogge (2005)
World Poverty and Human RightsEthics & International Affairs, 19
S. Anand, K. Hanson (1997)
Disability-adjusted life years: a critical review.Journal of health economics, 16 6
Alan Williams (1999)
Calculating the global burden of disease: time for a strategic reappraisal?Health economics, 8 1
Thomas Pogge has proposed a supplement to the standard patent regime whereby innovating companies would be rewarded in proportion to the extent to which their innovations lead to reduction of the global burden of disease (GBD). This paper argues that an expansion of this proposalwhereby provision of already existing medicines are incentivised in a similar waywould provide a more comprehensive solution to the healthcare situation in developing countries. It then considers the practical challenges that the implementation of such a proposal (expanded or otherwise) would entail. Though these include difficulties associated with disease burden metric, I argue that the most serious difficulties are associated with the problem of causal attribution. A basic idea underlying Pogge's proposal is that the disease burden reduction attributable to particular interventions can be determined. Theoretically speaking, in cases involving multiple interacting causal factors, there may be no fact of the matter regarding the extent to which disease burden reduction should be attributed to one intervention as opposed to another; and (even if workable practical solutions to this theoretical challenge can be met) the data requirements for implementation would be daunting.
Public Health Ethics – Oxford University Press
Published: Jul 27, 2008
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.