Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Christie-David, Mukesh Chaudhry (2001)
Coskewness and cokurtosis in futures marketsJournal of Empirical Finance, 8
T. Mills (1995)
Modelling Skewness and Kurtosis in the London Stock Exchange Ft‐Se Index Return DistributionsThe Statistician, 44
(1994)
Kendall's Advance Theory of Statistics, Distribution
Calyampudi Rao (1948)
Large sample tests of statistical hypotheses concerning several parameters with applications to problems of estimationMathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 44
Ronald Horswell, S. Looney (1993)
Diagnostic limitations of skewness coefficients in assessing departures from univariate and multivariate normalityCommunications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 22
Richard Bookstaber, James McDonald (1987)
A General Distribution for Describing Security Price ReturnsThe Journal of Business, 60
Mukhtar Ali, Carmelo Giaccotto (1982)
The Identical Distribution Hypothesis for Stock Market Prices—Location- and Scale-Shift AlternativesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 77
M. Richardson, Thomas Smith (1993)
A Test for Multivariate Normality in Stock ReturnsThe Journal of Business, 66
Anil Bera (1982)
Aspects of econometric modelling
W. Sharpe (1964)
CAPITAL ASSET PRICES: A THEORY OF MARKET EQUILIBRIUM UNDER CONDITIONS OF RISK*Journal of Finance, 19
(1993)
On secant approximation to cumulative distribution function, Biometrika
S. Badrinath, Sangit Chatterjee (1988)
On Measuring Skewness and Elongation in Common Stock Return Distributions: The Case of the Market IndexThe Journal of Business, 61
F. Black, Myron Scholes (1973)
The Pricing of Options and Corporate LiabilitiesJournal of Political Economy, 81
J. Rayner, D. Best, K. Mathews (1995)
Interpreting the skewness coefficientCommunications in Statistics-theory and Methods, 24
Ching-Chuong Lin, Govtnd Mudholkar (1980)
A simple test for normality against asymmetric alternativesBiometrika, 67
S. Badrinath, Sangit Chatterjee (1991)
A Data-Analytic Look at Skewness and Elongation in Common-Stock-Return DistributionsJournal of Business & Economic Statistics, 9
E. Pearson (1967)
Biometrika tables for statisticians
Amado Peiró (1999)
Skewness in financial returnsJournal of Banking and Finance, 23
B. Mandlebrot (1963)
The Variation of Certain Speculative Prices
Yi-Ting Chen, R. Chou, Chung-Ming Kuan (2000)
Testing time reversibility without moment restrictionsJournal of Econometrics, 95
Campbell Harvey, Akhtar Siddique (1999)
Conditional Skewness in Asset Pricing TestsPension Risk Management eJournal
(1974)
A comparison of Students' t and Stable distributions as statistical models of stock prices
D. Pierce (1982)
The Asymptotic Effect of Substituting Estimators for Parameters in Certain Types of StatisticsAnnals of Statistics, 10
G. Premaratne, Anil Bera (2000)
Modeling Asymmetry and Excess Kurtosis in Stock Return DataCapital Markets: Asset Pricing & Valuation eJournal
Jeong-Ryeol Kim, S. Mittnik, S. Rachev (1996)
Detecting Asymmetries in Observed Linear Time Series and Unobserved DisturbancesStudies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, 1
J. Affleck-Graves, B. Mcdonald (1989)
Nonnormalities and Tests of Asset Pricing TheoriesJournal of Finance, 44
Stanley Kon (1984)
Models of Stock Returns—A ComparisonJournal of Finance, 39
Andrew Patton (2002)
(IAM Series No 001) On the Out-Of-Sample Importance of Skewness and Asymetric Dependence for Asset AllocationResearch Papers in Economics
J. Lintner (1965)
THE VALUATION OF RISK ASSETS AND THE SELECTION OF RISKY INVESTMENTS IN STOCK PORTFOLIOS AND CAPITAL BUDGETSThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 47
Most of the tests for symmetry are developed under the (implicit or explicit) null hypothesis of normal distribution. As is well known, many financial data exhibit fat tails, and therefore commonly used tests for symmetry (such as the standard \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(\sqrt{b_{1}}\) \end{document} test based on sample skewness) are not valid for testing the symmetry of leptokurtic financial data. In particular, the \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(\sqrt{b_{1}}\) \end{document} test uses third moment, which may not be robust in presence of gross outliers. In this article we propose a simple test for symmetry based on the Pearson type IV family of distributions, which take account of leptokurtosis explicitly. Our test is based on a function that is bounded over the real line, and we expect it to be more well behaved than the test based on sample skewness (third moment). Results from our Monte Carlo study reveal that the suggested test performs very well in finite samples both in terms of size and power. Simulation results also support our conjecture of the tests to be well behaved and robust to excess kurtosis. We apply the test to some selected individual stock return data to illustrate its usefulness.
Journal of Financial Econometrics – Oxford University Press
Published: Jan 1, 2005
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.