Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

An Analysis of Interpersonal Manipulation

An Analysis of Interpersonal Manipulation Abstract The term ‘manipulation’ is frequently employed but rarely discussed or defined in psychiatric circles. This paper reviews previous conceptual analyses of the term by philosophers and psychiatrists, and examines its use in ordinary discourse. A series of characteristics which comprise the conceptual core of the term when it is unambiguously applied in interpersonal settings are proposed. Manipulation is contrasted with other behavior control methods such as rational persuasion and coercion, with emphasis on the role played by deception and the communicative context in which the manipulative transaction occurs. It is argued that manipulative behavior is fundamentally intentional, and the usefulness of the concept of ‘unconscious manipulation’ is questioned. Though the proposal that Manipulative Personality Disorder be formally recognized as a new diagnostic category is rejected, it is urged that the concept of manipulation receive wider attention and discussion within the mental health community diagnosis, disease, manipulation, philosophy, psychiatry This content is only available as a PDF. © 1992 by The Society for Health and Human Values http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy Oxford University Press

An Analysis of Interpersonal Manipulation

Loading next page...
 
/lp/oxford-university-press/an-analysis-of-interpersonal-manipulation-L7fjatm8Wg

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
© 1992 by The Society for Health and Human Values
ISSN
0360-5310
eISSN
1744-5019
DOI
10.1093/jmp/17.2.173
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract The term ‘manipulation’ is frequently employed but rarely discussed or defined in psychiatric circles. This paper reviews previous conceptual analyses of the term by philosophers and psychiatrists, and examines its use in ordinary discourse. A series of characteristics which comprise the conceptual core of the term when it is unambiguously applied in interpersonal settings are proposed. Manipulation is contrasted with other behavior control methods such as rational persuasion and coercion, with emphasis on the role played by deception and the communicative context in which the manipulative transaction occurs. It is argued that manipulative behavior is fundamentally intentional, and the usefulness of the concept of ‘unconscious manipulation’ is questioned. Though the proposal that Manipulative Personality Disorder be formally recognized as a new diagnostic category is rejected, it is urged that the concept of manipulation receive wider attention and discussion within the mental health community diagnosis, disease, manipulation, philosophy, psychiatry This content is only available as a PDF. © 1992 by The Society for Health and Human Values

Journal

The Journal of Medicine and PhilosophyOxford University Press

Published: Apr 1, 1992

There are no references for this article.