Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Public HealtH etHics VOluMe 16 • issue 1 • 2023 • 112 112 c orrection to: Moral intuitions About s tigmatizing Practices and Feeding s tigmatizing Practices: How Haidt’s Moral Foundations t heory Relates to infectious Disease s tigma This is a correction to: Carlijn, Koen, Moral Intuitions In the originally published version of this man- About Stigmatizing Practices and Feeding Stigmatizing uscript, ‘Box 1’ was inadvertently omitted from the Practices: How Haidt’s Moral Foundations Theory Introduction section. Relates to Infectious Disease Stigma, Public Health This error has been corrected. Ethics, 2023;, phad002, https://doi.org/10.1093/phe/ phad002 box 1 – Harmless taboo violations In one of his most famous investigations, Haidt asked people for responses to short stories (Haidt, 2001). These stories, which were called harmless taboo violations, describe actions that many people find oen ff sive but that do not harm anyone. An example of such a story is about Julie and Mark (see below). Aer h ft earing this story, most people immediately say that it was wrong for Julie and Mark to make love. Then, aer g ft iving their judgement, they start searching for reasons (Haidt, 2001). Haidt calls this post hoc reasoning. This happened for the story of Julie and Mark, but also for many other harmless taboo violations stories integrating with Haidt’s proposed moral foundations. From Haidt (2001), this is the story of Julie and Mark: “Julie and Mark are brother and sister. They are traveling together in France on summer vacation from college. One night they are staying alone in a cabin near the beach. They decide that it would be interesting and fun if they tried making love. At the very least it would be a new experience for each of them. Julie was already taking birth control pills, but Mark uses a condom too, just to be safe. e Th y both enjoy making love, but they decide not to do it again. They keep that night as a special secret, which makes them feel even closer to each other. What do you think about that? Was it OK for them to make love?” (p. 814) https://doi.org/10.1093/phe/phad009 Online publication date: 8 April 2023 © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Public Health Ethics – Oxford University Press
Published: Apr 8, 2023
You can share this free article with as many people as you like with the url below! We hope you enjoy this feature!
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.