Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Evaluation in the Practice of Development

Evaluation in the Practice of Development Standard methods of impact evaluation often leave significant gaps between what we know about development effectiveness and what we want to knowgaps that stem from distortions in the market for knowledge. The author discusses how evaluations might better address these knowledge gaps and so be more relevant to the needs of practitioners. It is argued that more attention needs to be given to identifying policy-relevant questions (including the case for intervention), that a broader approach should be taken to the problems of internal validity (including heterogeneity and spillover effects), and that the problems of external validity (including scaling up) merit more attention by researchers. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The World Bank Research Observer Oxford University Press

Evaluation in the Practice of Development

The World Bank Research Observer , Volume 24 (1) – Feb 25, 2009

Loading next page...
 
/lp/oxford-university-press/evaluation-in-the-practice-of-development-gSJpG2s0uy

References (73)

Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
© Published by Oxford University Press.
Subject
Symposium on Evaluation
ISSN
0257-3032
eISSN
1564-6971
DOI
10.1093/wbro/lkp002
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Standard methods of impact evaluation often leave significant gaps between what we know about development effectiveness and what we want to knowgaps that stem from distortions in the market for knowledge. The author discusses how evaluations might better address these knowledge gaps and so be more relevant to the needs of practitioners. It is argued that more attention needs to be given to identifying policy-relevant questions (including the case for intervention), that a broader approach should be taken to the problems of internal validity (including heterogeneity and spillover effects), and that the problems of external validity (including scaling up) merit more attention by researchers.

Journal

The World Bank Research ObserverOxford University Press

Published: Feb 25, 2009

Keywords: JEL codes H43 O22

There are no references for this article.