Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Health Equity in Public Health: Clarifying our Commitment

Health Equity in Public Health: Clarifying our Commitment Health equity is increasingly identified as a principal goal to be achieved through public health policies and activities. However, what is to be measured in the assessment of health equity and how inequities in health ought to be redressed are among the pressing questions that must be answered if health equity is to serve as a meaningful and consistent ethical guide for measurement and intervention in public health. In this article I argue that the concept of health equity, in the form it is predominantly found in public health, suffers from normative indeterminacy and is therefore unlikely to provide actionable normative guidance to public health policy-makers, practitioners and researchers. I argue that the concept of health equity, as it is commonly defined in public health, ultimately rests upon assumptions of a more fundamental, yet tacit, conception of justice to do its normative work. In this vein, I expand upon a critique of Margaret Whiteheads (1992) oft-cited definition of health equity made by James Wilson (2011) to raise additional reasons not explored by Wilson, or others, as to why Whiteheads definition remains inadequate in providing normative guidance to policy-makers, practitioners and researchers in public health. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Public Health Ethics Oxford University Press

Health Equity in Public Health: Clarifying our Commitment

Smith, Maxwell J.
Public Health Ethics , Volume 8 (2) – Jul 23, 2015
Download PDF
12 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/oxford-university-press/health-equity-in-public-health-clarifying-our-commitment-kDBq49B3Vj

References (31)

Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. Available online at www.phe.oxfordjournals.org
ISSN
1754-9973
eISSN
1754-9981
DOI
10.1093/phe/phu042
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Health equity is increasingly identified as a principal goal to be achieved through public health policies and activities. However, what is to be measured in the assessment of health equity and how inequities in health ought to be redressed are among the pressing questions that must be answered if health equity is to serve as a meaningful and consistent ethical guide for measurement and intervention in public health. In this article I argue that the concept of health equity, in the form it is predominantly found in public health, suffers from normative indeterminacy and is therefore unlikely to provide actionable normative guidance to public health policy-makers, practitioners and researchers. I argue that the concept of health equity, as it is commonly defined in public health, ultimately rests upon assumptions of a more fundamental, yet tacit, conception of justice to do its normative work. In this vein, I expand upon a critique of Margaret Whiteheads (1992) oft-cited definition of health equity made by James Wilson (2011) to raise additional reasons not explored by Wilson, or others, as to why Whiteheads definition remains inadequate in providing normative guidance to policy-makers, practitioners and researchers in public health.

Journal

Public Health Ethics – Oxford University Press

Published: Jul 23, 2015

There are no references for this article.