Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

National Monument Audit

National Monument Audit 628 The Journal of American History December 2022 There are also six pages of preliminary recommendations, however, only some ar -e re lated to Black reparations. In addition to pursuing the passage in Congress of H.R. 40 and the organizing of reparations town hall meetings across the countr naarc y, has em- phasized the distinction between reparations for past and present harms against African Americans, and what could be considered “good public policy.” To “prohibit for-profit prison companies from operating within the system (i.e., companies that control phone calls, email, and other communications)”; or to “compensate individuals forcibly r - e moved from their homes due to state action”; or to “provide funding for free tuition to California colleges and universities” would be positive developments for all California residents (ibid., pp. 19, 20). The same is true with “review and adopt policies that car-e givers in the child welfare system are allowed to meet the requirements and have access to resources to care for family members”; or “provide mental health support designed specifically to heal trauma and strengthen family ties, including both individual and fam - ily treatment” ( ibid., pp. 21, 22). All these recommendations, if implemented, would http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of American History Oxford University Press

National Monument Audit

Chambliss, Julian C
Journal of American History , Volume 109 (3): 4 – Dec 1, 2022
Download PDF
4 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/oxford-university-press/national-monument-audit-LNP3309wez
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
© The Author 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Organization of American Historians. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
ISSN
0021-8723
eISSN
1945-2314
DOI
10.1093/jahist/jaac348
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

628 The Journal of American History December 2022 There are also six pages of preliminary recommendations, however, only some ar -e re lated to Black reparations. In addition to pursuing the passage in Congress of H.R. 40 and the organizing of reparations town hall meetings across the countr naarc y, has em- phasized the distinction between reparations for past and present harms against African Americans, and what could be considered “good public policy.” To “prohibit for-profit prison companies from operating within the system (i.e., companies that control phone calls, email, and other communications)”; or to “compensate individuals forcibly r - e moved from their homes due to state action”; or to “provide funding for free tuition to California colleges and universities” would be positive developments for all California residents (ibid., pp. 19, 20). The same is true with “review and adopt policies that car-e givers in the child welfare system are allowed to meet the requirements and have access to resources to care for family members”; or “provide mental health support designed specifically to heal trauma and strengthen family ties, including both individual and fam - ily treatment” ( ibid., pp. 21, 22). All these recommendations, if implemented, would

Journal

Journal of American History – Oxford University Press

Published: Dec 1, 2022

There are no references for this article.